I had done a fair share of research before asking this here.
Firstly, i would like to create a drop-down filter #accessVar with the ability to select multiple values. It would be easy if not due to my special requirement. My dataset statement is:
SELECT PASS_M, ENTRY_DT, EXIT_DT, WORKED_HRS, ACCESS_LOCATION_X, IC_N, COMPANY_M, CONSECUTIVE_D
FROM TEMP_TARGET
WHERE (CONSECUTIVE_D >= #consecDays) AND (ENTRY_DT BETWEEN #startDate AND #endDate) AND
(ACCESS_LOCATION_X LIKE #accessVar) AND
(IC_N LIKE #icVAr)
However i need to make use the %wildcard for #accessVar(e.g 'BT%') hence i am unable to use the operator IN. What can i do? I am using SSRS2005. Please advice me.
You can do this using Filter at the Data Set properties. Before that you need to remove the (ACCESS_LOCATION_X LIKE #accessVar) from your data set query.
set the expression as follows[Modify your parameter name].
=ACCESS_LOCATION_X Like "*"+Parameters!param.Value+"*"
Then configure the Dataset properties Filter tab as follows.
After that you can run your report. Following screenshot searches for "en" word in the report data set and returns the result set.
Hope this helps!
Related
I am trying to utilize a single tabular form to handle a couple minor tables since I cannot have multiple updateable reports on a single page. The easiest way I could figure to adjust what table I was modifying was to use a select list to choose which table I am viewing/editing.
The select list contains a display of "Supervisor" and "School"
resulting in SUPERVISOR and SCHOOL respectively
the items name is P8_TABLE
Region Source:
select *
from #OWNER#."G06_" || :P8_TABLE
The tables are named G06_SUPERVISOR and G06_SCHOOL
However the query returns:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
I'm afraid that this won't work. As far as I can tell, tabular form is to be based on one table only (i.e. you can't have a JOIN in there; even if you're displaying values from some other table, you'd rather create functions which would return those values).
That being said, principle you'd like to use means that tabular form underlying table is unknown (as it can vary, depending on what you select in P8_TABLE select list item), which - in turn - means that column names also differ (unless all of those tables share the same column list).
If we presume that above is correct, then I'd suggest you to abandon that approach and maintain every "minor table" on its own tabular form page. It will be just a little bit more typing & clicking, but I wouldn't worry about it.
Hopefully, someone else knows how to do it the way you'd want it to.
You cant make a tabular form query source dynamic. And since the two tables you want to be displayed and be updatable doesnt have common number and usage of their columns, the only way I can think of is separating the two tables and diplaying one tabular form for each table. Though, Apex 4.1 or even the latest Apex 5 doesnt allow multiple tabular form, you can make this possible by using javascript's iframe. You'll need to use javascript since you want to modify the interface of the report/page.
I want to know the query for kibana, i tried terms and agg, but didnt get right output, so need to filter the data based on distinct query in kibana.
I want to apply query in following input data in elasticsearch
Rows and columns
CELLID|MCC|MNC|
1222|405|861|
1222|405|861|
1222|405|122|
1233|406|861|
1233|406|861|
1224|407|777|
1224|407|777|
need to apply query such a way, it will remove the same CELL ID with different MNC, so expecting output like this
CELLID|MCC|MNC|
1233|406|861|
1233|406|861|
1224|407|777|
1224|407|777|
As you know, it's impossible to have such row vs column infrastructure within Kibana graphs as of now. Cos this feature is yet be made to the new versions as an enhancement.
But then if you're simply trying to print out the count|sum or let it be whatever the aggregation you need, you can have a Data Table visualization with a metric of count and then within your buckets you could define multiple terms-aggregation. In your case, you should have CELLID|MCC|MNC being split by terms-aggregation which should do the job for you. Hope this helps!
I have a problem that I've been going round and round with in Access 2010. Imagine a table with these columns:
Name Date Time
Now, I have a query that asks the user to input a begin date and an end date and returns all records that are between those two dates. This works fine. However, as soon as I add a sort to the Date column things go awry. Once you put a sort on a column with a parameter the user gets asked to enter the parameter twice. From what I've been able to find out this is normal (although annoying) behavior in Access.
If I add the Date column in a second time and show the column with the sort and don't show the column with the parameter it works fine. The query would look something like:
Name Date (shown & sorted) Date (not shown & parameters) Time
Now when I run the query it all works well and comes out the way I want it to. This would obviously be a great solution then. However, there's another problem. When I save the query, leave, and reopen the query the two columns are merged back into each other. Thus, the change is lost and the user again sees two inputs.
My question is this: what can I do differently to achieve the desired results?
Some possible things I've thought about but don't know the answer to are:
Is there a way to make it so the columns don't merge? Do I have to use a form with the input boxes and take the data from that (I'd prefer not to do that as it will require a lot of additional work to handle the various things I am doing in the database). Is there some obvious thing I'm missing?
Thanks for any suggestions.
FYI: Here is the SQL from the query
SELECT Intentions.Intention, Intentions.MassDate, Intentions.[Time Requested], Intentions.[Place Requested], Intentions.[Offered By], Intentions.Completed
FROM Intentions
WHERE (((Intentions.MassDate) Between [Enter start date] And [Enter end date]))
ORDER BY Intentions.MassDate, Intentions.[Time Requested];
It is true that sometimes the Query Designer in Access will "reorganize" a query when you save it. However, I don't recall an instance where such a reorganization actually broke anything.
For what it's worth, the following query seems to do what you desire. After saving and re-opening it looks and behaves just the same:
For reference, the SQL behind it is
PARAMETERS startDate DateTime, endDate DateTime;
SELECT NameDateTime.Name, NameDateTime.Date, NameDateTime.Time
FROM NameDateTime
WHERE (((NameDateTime.Date) Between [startDate] And [endDate]))
ORDER BY NameDateTime.Date DESC , NameDateTime.Time DESC;
I have had the same problem and I have discovered the reason:
If, after you have run your query, sort a collumn in the result grid and the say yes to save changes to the query the sort action will be stored with the query. This will actually cause the query to run twice. First to create the result and then one more time to sort. You'll therefore be asked twice for the parameters.
SOLUTION: Run the query (entering your parameters twice ;-) ). Then remove the Sorting by clicking on the AZ-eraser symbol in the task bar above (in the sorting compartment).
Then open your query in design-mode and add the sorting order to the appropriate collumn.
Your are then good to go.
Regards
Jan
I am using custom SPgridview with Filtering, and Sorting. In Filtering for the Query I have used has a condition as follows.
" AND SupplierActiveStatus LIKE '%{0}%'"
This has two values in DB. "Active" or "Inactive". This filter applies perfectly when you filter by Inactive. Due to "like" condition for the Active users it shows both types of uses without Filtering.
Please help me to find the correct filter expression to equal two strings.
Thanks in Advance.
Why not get rid of the LIKE and just say:
AND SupplierActiveStatus = '{0}'
Since you have only two statuses, there's no reason to match on a wildcard with LIKE
I'm using Drupal's Views 2, and need to retrieve min values from fields in a custom table. The query for this is easy if I were writing it by hand--something like, "SELECT foo, min(bar) FROM table GROUP BY foo." But how would I do this using Views? I've already defined the table in a views.info file, so there's no trouble getting views to see the table. It's the Min() part of the query I just don't understand. My next stop will be the Views API documentation, but if someone can just provide the outline for how to do this quickly, I would greatly appreciate it.
New answer to an old question, but something like this will work. You need to create a custom field handler and then wrap the field as follows:
class views_handler_custom_field extends views_handler_field {
function query() {
$this->ensure_my_table();
$this->field_alias = $this->query->add_field("MAX({$this->table_alias}", "{$this->real_field})",$this->table_alias . "_" . $this->real_field);
}
}
Use aggregation from advanced configuration of views. After this is set
yes you can select max, min or any other selector to fields.
Test your results but it should work well
Alternatively in some cases you can sort your data ascending or
descending and then just pick one to be shown on the view. Can be
problematic when displaying multiple fields or so.
After testing first one seems to be faster at least on small scale.
One could consider the modules groupby and views_calc, but I assume they are not acceptable for you.
Additionally, you can accomplish this with a custom module.