I'm creating an iPhone app using PhoneGap and jQuery mobile. I'm using a simple image tag and set the width to 100% and height to auto, but the image is not scaling properly and gets cut off. I have also tried using max-width with the same outcome. Any idea how I can solve this?
<div data-role="page">
<img class="banner" src="..." style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>
I have even tried this:
$('img.banner').each(function(){
$(this).width($(window).width());
});
Previously i have gone through same problem. I tried min-height. And why both maximum-scale=1, minimum-scale=1? Try minimum-scale=1. Just give a try
I'm assuming that your image is actually nested in a div with a data-role="content" and your problem is that class ui-content by default has a 15px padding.
The simplest way to correct that would be to simply override the CSS for that page to get rid of that padding, if you need it for other elements then just wrap them in a div and add padding to those divs.
For example
CSS
.imgContPage { padding:0px; }
Markup
<div data-role="page">
<div data-role="content" class="imgContPage">
<img class="banner" src="http://dummyimage.com/600x400/000/fff.png&text=PlaceHolder" style="width: 100%; height: auto;">
</div>
</div>
Link to JSBin
Alternatively you can set a negative margin on your img to compensate for the padding, but then you will need to calculate the width so that it fills up to the right side.
Ok, I feel very stupid right now. I was getting that image from a JSON response that was coming from a Wordpress website. When I was parsing my JSON to get to the image, I was using the thumbnail version of the image (which in my surprise, it's not really a scaled thumbnail, it's just a cropped 150x150 square of the main image).
So I changed my reference from:
json.page.thumbnail
to
json.page.attachments[0].images.full.url
And now the image scales just fine (width: 100%, height: auto).
Thanks everyone for your helps
Related
How do i go about setting up a full height side bar using a responsive grid system, that is similar to bootstrap?
The issues I am running it to is the .main wrapper div collapses to the height of the .primarycol div.
I 'm using pull and push classes to adjust the visual layout so the .secondarycol div looks like its on the left hand side, even though it is after the .primarycol div in the code.
<div id="main" class="main content">
<div class="row">
<div id="primarycolumn" class="primarycol col12 col9-768 col3-768-push" role="main"></div>
<div id="secondary" class="secondarycol col12 col3-768 col9-768-pull col7-1024-pull" role="complementary"></div>
</div>
</div>
Normally the without the .secondarycol` class, the div would and look like this.
I have tried adding min-height:100% to the .main div and height:100% to the body tag, but that makes the main div height only ever be the height of the browser window and not the content.
Any suggestions on how I can remedy this would be really welcome.
This is the codepen of my base structure.
http://codepen.io/onebitrocket/pen/ZYQLMm/
I've added in the third column as well as some pages require one.
The column system is based on bootstraps, but i think it's an improved version:
The column classes are declared from smallest size to largest size.
I've also changed the class names to indicate the breakpoint size rather then xs,sm,md,lr etc..
Thanks
At least on chrome you need to set the height on the html tag too. Try it - http://jsfiddle.net/27kze60s/
html, body { height: 100%; }
Fixed, thanks to everyone for the suggestions
I've added the following to the css
height:100% to body
min-height:100% to .main
overflow:-y: auto to .secondarycol
I've updated the codepen - http://codepen.io/onebitrocket/pen/ZYQLMm/
Hoping someone can help me out as I'm still pretty new to the whole web design thing. I'm using CSS to create a container wrapper. As you can see from the code I have a bottom, top and center image. When I was using JPEG images everything lined up correctly, however I needed to switch to PNG image files (to take advantage of transparency) and now the top and bottom sections of the wrapper are offset.
**Here is a live link: storrepictures.weebly.com/projects.html
-Please find an image of the resulting problem here: http://i.imgur.com/YnTS8.png
-This is how it looks when I use JPEGs instead of PNGs: http://i.imgur.com/2WMFN.png
Here is my CSS code:
#wrapper {
background: url(containerbg.png) center repeat-y;
}
#wrappertop{
background: url(containertop.png) top center no-repeat;
}
#wrappertbtm{
background: url(containerbtm.png) bottom center no-repeat;
padding-bottom: 65px;
}
And here is the body portion of the HTML file:
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrappertop">
<div id="wrappertbtm">
<div id="container">
<div id="header">
<div id="headerleft">{logo max-height="60"}</div>
<div id="navigation">{menu}</div>
</div>
<div id="content">{content}
<div id="footer">{footer}
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
check height add width of jpeg and png..
may be both are different.
I am not sure but i think you can solve your problem by giving them same height and width..
I think your PNG images are not sliced properly check it the exact width & height of that.
Whereas they are PNG or JPEG they will come at their exact position if they sliced properly so the problem in not transparency the problem can be improper slicing of image....
And if you will give us the live demo than we would be able to see deeply the exact bugs..
I'm working on a layout using the 960 CSS grid layout and having some trouble getting my content div to stretch all the way to the bottom, no matter how much content there is.
I have height: 100% on both html and body tags. Usually a min-height: 100% on the content div would work but that does not seem to be the case with the 960 grid.
Any ideas?
Not sure if this answer is still needing to be answered, but I ran into the same problem today working on a wordpress template and solved the problem.
What you have to do is make a wrapper before the container_12 or container_16 that is provided by the grid. You don't need html or body equaling height: 100% at all. You don't even need a min-height on the wrapper.
Make sure that your wrapper doesn't have a height or width set, and put the clearfix on container_12 or container_16 and it should expand all the way down.
I have this working on my wordpress template.
<div id="yourwrapper">
<div class="container_12 clearfix">
<div class="grid_12">
<!-- YOUR CONTENT SHOULD BE COMPLETELY WRAPPED BY THE WRAPPER -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
I'm trying to get an image to be scaled to the size of a table (unfortunately I need to keep the table) where the table is the same size as the div. Looking at the link below, the picture on the way right is what I expect. However, in the bottom picture, the image is not staying in its 100% sized table. Why doesn't the height get shrunk?
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/139980/image%20size%20experiment/index.html
Thanks.
Apply height and width directly since you know the tables size.
<img src="imageName.png" width="20" height="20">
try overflow hidden to div
overflow:hidden
Well, I have to say I never noticed this behavior before. I have figured out a solution to your problem using Javascript. The only way I was able to do it with CSS is if I specified the same Height and Width to the image as the DIV.
Therefore, the javascript sets the same Height and Width as the parenting DIV of the image element. Hopefully this will be a viable solution for you:
<html>
<head>
<script>
function autoSize(i)
{
i.style.height = i.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.style.height;
i.style.width = i.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.style.width;
};
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div style="position: absolute; width: 400; height: 100;top: 200; left: 10;background-color: #CCCCCC">
<table width=100% height=100%><tr><td align=center valign=middle>
<img src="ImagePlaceholder.png" onload="autoSize(this)">
</td></tr></table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
There is probably a better way of getting the parentNode, but I'll let you figure it out :)
How to put an image over another bigger image, like on youtube, a play button is displayed on top of video thumbnail?
Make a semi-transparent PNG graphic with a "Play" symbol and the size you want (e.g. 240x320).
Let's say you named it "overlay.png", and let's say the YouTube-generated thumbnail is at http://img.ytimg.com/abcdefg/0.jpg
Now all you need in your code is this:
<a href="destination_of_your_link">
<img src="overlay.png" width="320" height="240" border="0"
style="background: url(http://img.ytimg.com/abcdefg/0.jpg) center center black;" />
</a>
As long as your target audience is not still using IE6, you should be safe.
I'm not sure that YouTube uses images for this effect, isn't it still the Flash player?
Anyhow, exactly how this is done depends very much on the design you want to achieve. Lets assume that you want to achieve the YouTube style, where you have a thumbnail image and want to overlay a play button image on top. If you want the thumbnail to be an actual <img> tag you will need some extra markup, like this:
<div class="thumb-wrapper">
<img src="mythumbnail.gif" alt="my awesome video" /><span></span>
</div>
The wrapper <div> is required so you can target the img and span correctly, and have dimensions to contain them in. The span is where the overlay image will go.
.thumb-wrapper {
position:relative;
}
.thumbwrapper span {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 100;
background: transparent url(overlay.png) no-repeat;
}
(I haven't actually tested this, if its blatently wrong let me know I'll revise it!)
This assumes a couple of things:
Your thumbnails will always be a fixed size and your overlay image matches that
Your overlay image is a semi-transparent PNG
You could also use the opacity: style to achieve #2. Of course, IE6 will rear it's ugly head and you'll need to use a PNG fix for it if going the transparent image route, or a separate opacity filter if using that method. Both of these are undoubtadly answered elsewhere on Stack Overflow or easily google-able.
If you have other requirements it might be possible to do this without the extra markup, as I said it all depends on what you need exactly. Some requirements may not be possible without JavaScript (which would of course mean you could inject any extra markup with that!).
You will find the solution in the following thread on StackOverflow:
How to draw a graphic over another graphic
Shortly (quoting after Ipsquiggle) :
<div style="position:relative">
<div>
<img url="backgroundimg.png">
</div>
<div style="position:absolute; left:0; top:0;">
<img url="smallgraphic.png">
</div>
</div>
More details why and how it works in the original thread.
If you have good control over image size, we have used the background to various elements - for example, set the background of a table cell to one image and put an img tab inside the cell.
Taking your example of youtube, you could very easily do this with 2 images and 1 img tag and a little bit of CSS of course ;)
<style>
img.youtube {
width:500px; height:500px;
margin:0; padding:0;
background:transparent url(/point/to/your/larger/image.jpg) no-repeat center
}
</style>
<img src="/point/to/youtube/play/image.png" alt="Gotta have alt text ;)" border="0" class="youtube" />
How it works is simple, you have the small youtube image as transparent PNG or GIF and then set the background image as the larger image, this will then give the effect of the smaller image being in the center with no extra markup.