I'm developing an ASP.NET website. Sometimes some modules contain so few content that I present them inside a jQUeryUI dialog and communicate with the server via AJAX. I keep those contents inside a separate file and load them to a jQueryUI dialog according to the appropriate module.I was wondering if it's a good idea to have that content as a plain HTML elements instead of asp ones. Somehow I thought maybe this would reduce the overhead the conversion from asp elements to html elements can cause.
I'd allways go with the aspx Page, because a dynamic Page is more work at the beginning but in the end it almost ever saves time.
Specially when your not sure of the content that will be shown there, it is better.
And for the one reason i do it, is to have everything the same.
One style one way to code.
I'd say this is probably premature optimization. The overhead of an aspx page is in almost all cases negligible. I believe it's more likely that you will some day need to put dynamic things in that page, in which case you would have to convert the html file to an aspx, and change the url for your ajax dialog - which will cost time/money.
If you have aspx pages, or ascs user controls that you do not actually use/run any code, you can set the AutoEventWireup the EnableViewState, and maybe the EnableSessionState to false and stop the calling of the PageLoad and the rest functions and reduce the overhead. So on top of the controls you declare:
<%# Control AutoEventWireup="false" EnableViewState="false" ...
or for page:
<%# Page AutoEventWireup="false" EnableViewState="false" EnableSessionState="false" ...
The disable of the session is let the pages loads in parallel, the disable of the EnableViewState is reduce the size, the AutoEventWireup is reduce the callback hooks and calls.
In general you can use what ever you wish - if your pages can work, but if you like to keep it robust and easy to change or update, or add new functionality in the future, then use dynamic aspx pages.
Similar question: Master page and performance
Related
I want to put a ASTreeView web control in a custom web control, ASTreeView sample code is like:
<ct:ASTreeView ID="astvMyTree"
runat="server"
...
LoadNodesProvider="~/ASTreeViewDemo5.aspx"
.../>
LoadNodesProvider is the page ajax called when loading a node...however if I changed the provider to my .ascx file, it does not work:
LoadNodesProvider="~/ASTreeViewDemo5.ascx"
it did not even go through the Page_Load part of the .ascx file
Though this might be related with astreeview itself, I'm wondering what the problem could be? anything I can do to fix it?
Thanks!
It is because ascx must have a container ie Page. You can't use it same way as Page.
ASPX is a page and ASCX is a usercontrol. You cannot ajax call a control, so you probably want it to be a page with the control on it.
While it isnt entirely clear to me what LoadNodesProvider is supposed to do, if you want to encapsulate some code or run a process via AJAX you have a couple of options. One would be to create a web service (you could use WCF for this) that the AJAX method could call. Another option would be to create an http handler (ASHX extension typically denotes this). Using an ASPX or ASCX for this doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Proco and Tomas are correct regarding the ASCX file, these are Usercontrols and are not stand-alone objects.
If you really, really want to use an ASPX page/ASCX control, then I suppose it would be best to create a blank ASPX page that has one placeholder, and then attach your user control (based on query string parameters or something I guess) to the placeholder to render out the content for your AJAX control
I could use late events such as EndRequest and put inside Response.Write but this way whatever I'm adding would come after the /html tag and the HTML won't be well formed.
Very bad practice to use the HttpModule for page footer. This can lead to possible errors with UpdatePanels, and possible with other controls on randomly pages - especial if you try to add controls.
Also its probably delay the load of all pages and eat a lot of memory reading the page and append at the end strings on every single request.
Use a master page !. Its very simple and the correct way.
More to read: Creating a Layout Using Master Pages
my web site structure is like this :
1- master page with stylesheet and scripts
2- aspx which render (number 3)
3- web user control and scripts inside them
in the number 3 I have some javascript that are call some ajax method they are about 20 lines code and I can not move them to js file in order to using <%= myAspControl.ClientID %> for some purpose
my default.aspx is so heavily now I checked it by google chrome developer tools it is equal to 2.7MB for document only document not images or style sheet.
I have about ten controls but I think it is effect on viewstate and encoding them it creates all in default.aspx dynamicly and make it so heavy.
Have you read these SO-suggestions to minimize ViewState?
That seems like poor ViewState use. I saw it in a project with some Telerik controls, which had a feature that stored the whole data source in the ViewState / which included more than was being displayed.
Keep the ViewState to what's absolutely necessary. Don't try any clever workaround, you should never store large amount of info in the view state.
I've got an ASP.NET 3.5 Web Forms application in which a large chunk of code needs to be duplicated between a few different pages. Sounds like the ideal candidate for a user-control right? Problem is, this cannot be contained within a <form runat="server"> because it contains a client-side form of it's own.
There are no runat=server controls or postbacks or anything that really need that webform - think of it just as a chunk of HTML with a few basic <% %> tags. I'd just want to set a property on the control when it's loaded, so that it knows what to output. This is purely an exercise to make the code easier to maintain.
Before I resort to using an oldskool <!--#include-->, is there some better way of doing this?
You can still use a normal user control. Just don't rely on viewstate and postbacks and you shouldn't have any problems.
<%=Response.Write(File.ReadAllText(Server.MapPath("~/includes/filename.ext")))%>
Something along those lines, anyway.
Edit: Same functionality as a server side include, but if I'm not mistaken, enabling the SSI syntax requires an IIS change, where as this wouldn't.
Edit 2: I didn't see the note that your include contains asp.net code. This would obviously only work for client side code only. My mistake.
You can have as many form controls as you want but only one can have runat="server".
Some other techniques:
http://webproject.scottgu.com/CSharp/UserControls/UserControls.aspx
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2005/08/28/423888.aspx
I'd still make it a control. The <% %> stuff could be labels/literals for more flexibility, and as soon as you get done saying there are no postbacks needed, you'll need them. Best to set up the other pages to include it as a control now for easier changes later. Heck - you could even take advantage control-level caching!
I am looking to make a web control where I can register client startup scripts inline with my aspx because I hate registering in the codebehind!
An example of what I have so far:
<Ben:StartupScript runat="server">
var form = document.getElementById("<% =form1.ClientID %>");
</Ben:StartupScript>
Currently, I am overriding the OnPreRender method of the control, rendering the contents of the control to a string and then manually registering that string as a startup script using ClientScript.RegisterStartupScript on the Page. I also override the Render method in order not to render the control. I should also note that I have the ParseChildren attribute set to false and the PersistChildren attribute set to true.
All seems to be working well, but my control allows other web controls inside it (such as Button). Apart from being unintuitive, this can result in runtime errors. I would love to be able to clear the controls but this is impossible given the <% ... %> code block.
So, is it possible to prevent developers from embedding child controls whilst still allowing code blocks?
Also, is this idea any good or is it fundamentally flawed? Lol.
Thanks a bunch,
Ben
it sounds like a good idea, but if you spend too much time fighting the inherited/default behaviors then it may be more trouble than it's worth
if this is a one-shot issue, a cheap-hack solution is to just directly embed your scripts in the header of a master page ;-)
on the other hand, allowing developers to embed their own scripts as children of your web control might be useful
If you are using master pages, add another control in your section. That way you can easily add css/js to your headers in your child pages.
ClientScript.RegisterScript is mostly for user/server controls,