I'm in the midst of creating a SASS mixin that will let me take a spritesheet of social media icons and display them, but I'm having an issue with the background-position when it's hovered over, here's the SASS code:
#mixin social-button($imgurl,$xpos,$ypos,$height,$width) {
background-image: url($imgurl);
background-position: $xpos $ypos;
display: block;
float: left;
height: $height;
width: $width;
&:hover {
background-position: 0px -$height;
}
& span {
position: absolute;
top: -999em;
}
}
And my include:
a.facebook {
#include social-button("../img/social-buttons.png",0px,0px,26px,26px);
}
If you'd like to see/use the spritesheet in action, I've uploaded it here: http://i49.tinypic.com/2evtbwp.png
Here's the HTML as well:
<a class="facebook" href="#"><span>Facebook</span></a>
Essentially the CSS output for the hover is displaying as this:
a.facebook:hover {
background-position: -26px;
}
And in Firebug it displays as this:
a.facebook:hover {
background-position: -26px center;
}
Any help is greatly appreciated, I'm pretty stumped on what I'm doing wrong at this point.. thanks!
PS. I'm going to be creating 5 of these, so I wouldn't mind creating a loop that could auto generate that for me, but at the present time it's not a huge deal, just need to get the hovers working first!
You have to add parentheses around variables when you change them to negatives otherwise it just does the math (0px - $height):
background-position: 0px (-$height);
You probably want to fix the 0px, too.
Related
I created a mixin to manipulate easily images and replace, now my app it is growing and I don't know how to improve this code.
basically I have a include: #include img-replace("logo.png", 104px, 47px, inline-block); where I simple change the name of the image and define the pixels width and height.
I would like change it because now, some developers want just change that image name and not worry about the size anymore understand?
in that case the image has: width: 104px and height:47px, so they would like not to worry about it anymore since the next image can be bigger or smaller.
so guys any solution for this? thank you.
$path--rel : "../images";
#mixin img-replace($img, $w, $h, $disp: block) {
background-image: url('#{$path--rel}/#{$img}');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: $w;
height: $h;
display: $disp;
}
.site-logo {
#include img-replace("logo.png", 104px, 47px, inline-block);
margin-top: 8px;
margin-left: 6px;
}
Using SASS, you are able to set default values against parameters in a mixin; in your example for instance, I have specified the width to be 104px by default and the height to be 47px by default:
$path--rel: "../images";
#mixin img-replace($img, $w:104px, $h:47px, $disp:null) {
background-image: url('#{$path--rel}/#{$img}');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
width: $w;
height: $h;
#if ($disp) {display: $disp;}
}
.site-logo {
#include img-replace(
$img: "logo.png",
$disp: "inline-block"
);
margin-top: 8px;
margin-left: 6px;
}
If $w,$h or $disp are left off the default values get rendered. This essentially makes them optional.
The problem is that if you make the sizes optional, the element will have no width or height. This means the dev will still have to determine the elements' size or else it will just be 0x0 and the picture won't show!
If the problem is that the dev is too lazy to find and write the size of the images, you could always use a map to store all images and their sizes, so the function would insert the correct sizing depending on the image value. Read more here
So if i understand correctly, you want to use this mixin, by just passing the image path. But each image has a different size.
This cannot be done with SASS.
Instead, you should add your image inline, eg:
<img src="images/logo.png" alt="">
or
<img src="images/logo.png" alt="" width="104" height="74">
Otherwise the answer by #chris-spittles above is correct, meaning that you should pass the default width and height to your mixin.
And if you want to continue using the mixin you will need to pass the width and height for the images that have different dimensions.
As suggested before if you change your mixin to this -
#mixin img-replace($img, $w: null, $h: null, $disp: block) {
background-image: url('#{$path--rel}/#{$img}');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: $disp;
width: $w;
height: $h;
}
You can use your code flexibly without having any need to assign width and height arguments. So, now, if you write this -
.site-logo {
#include img-replace("logo.png");
margin-top: 8px;
margin-left: 6px;
}
it will get compiled to -
.site-logo {
background-image: url("../images/logo.png");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: block;
margin-top: 8px;
margin-left: 6px;
}
It will also preserve your previously written codes, without any changes.
Now, if you have any specific requirements, like providing default values to different types of images which a developer can assign, you can add maps in your code -
$small-img: ( w: 100px, h: 100px );
$medium-img: ( w: 200px, h: 200px );
Now you can call img-replace like this -
.site-logo {
#include img-replace("logo.png", $small-img...);
}
.site-medium-image {
#include img-replace("logo.png", $medium-img...);
}
This will get compiled to -
.site-logo {
background-image: url("../images/logo.png");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
.site-medium-image {
background-image: url("../images/logo.png");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: block;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
This ... makes arguments variable arguments
Sass supports "variable arguments," which are arguments at the end of
a mixin or function declaration that take all leftover arguments and
package them up as a list. These arguments look just like normal
arguments, but are followed by ...
I am building a website with WordPress. On my homepage I want a picture grid (10 x 3) of different products, and when you hover over each picture, a caption with the product name will pop up.
I have managed to do 3/4 of it but there's this massive white space below each row. :(
I am using the SiteOrigin editor widget to insert the image, and using HTML and CSS to code the hover effects. See below for the current coding.
HTML:
<div id="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Hassaku.png" />
<p class="text">Summer Mikan</p>
</div>
CSS:
.text {
color: #000000;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
}
#pic .text {
position:relative;
bottom:80px;
left:0px;
visibility:hidden;
}
#pic:hover .text {
visibility:visible;
}
Here's the website so you can see what I've done: http://peacefruit.net
The top row has the captions, but also, the pesky gap. The bottom three rows are examples of how I want it to look (no borders or gaps between pics). All rows and individual widgets have no padding, margins or gutters and I've already adjusted the theme padding to 0 with CSS.
I'm sure it's a simple line of code I'm missing, but it's driving me crazy!
Please send help.
Try adding to your inline css for siteorigin-panels-stretch
overflow:hidden;
height:164.89px;
Hope this works.
Thanks!
In your case
the id should be unique.
So, it is better to change #pic to a class
Also, the <p> tag in your style contain padding-bottom and it will case the white space problem.
Change each pic to the following
HTML:
<div class="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp- content/uploads/2016/11/Hassaku.png">
<div class="text">Summer Mikan</div>
</div>
CSS:
.pic{
position: relative;
}
.pic .text{
position: absolute;
top: 80px;
width: 100%;
visibility: hidden;
}
then it should be work.
Stylesheets for WordPress themes can have a lot of CSS bloat, so you're on the right track creating a custom stylesheet, to tackle the styling nuances you desire.
Since this is a responsive theme, it's best to begin solving this from a mobile-first perspective.
The first thing to prune is the bottom-margin: 30px; for .panel-grid-cell, like this:
.home #main .panel-grid-cell {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
The next thing is to correct your HTML mark-up. The value of pic is given to multiple id attributes. An id attribute is used to denote a unique element. The class attribute denotes a non-unique element. pic should be assigned to class attributes instead, since many elements in your layout utilize this hook value. Like this:
<div class="pic">
I'm noticing that img.hover and p.text are getting wrapped in an unnecessary <p> tag. Make sure that this does not happen in the SiteOrigin editor.
You should then prune the bottom-margin: 1.5em for paragraphs inside of the .pic divs (note the designation of pic as a class hook .pic, rather than an id hook, which would have been #pic):
.pic p {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
To get even closer, relative positioning should be used on the .pic div to ensure that the subsequent styling suggestion (position: absolute;) will take effect:
.pic {
position: relative;
}
And then, for the text that appears when hovering an image:
p.text {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
}
The styles above will work for mobile, but your theme is responsive, and you might need to account for some styling variations with different screen sizes.
For tablets, you'd need a media query like this:
#media (min-width: 600px) {
.some-class {
some-property: some-value;
}
etc...
}
And finally, for desktop:
#media (min-width: 1000px) {
.some-class {
some-property: some-value;
}
etc....
}
Thanks everyone for your help :) After some fiddling around with the suggestions and a software update, there is no gap now!
I thought I'd post my final code in case anyone has a similar problem and it might be of some help. (Note: there are some minor style changes which differ from the original post but have no effect on how it works).
HTML:
<div class="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Summer-Mikan.png"/>
<div class="text">Summer Mikan</div>
</div>
WIDGET CLASS:
fade
CSS:
.fade {
-webkit-opacity: 0.6;
-moz-opacity: 0.6;
opacity: 0.6;
}
.fade:hover {
-webkit-opacity: 1;
-moz-opacity: 1;
opacity: 1;
}
.pic {
position: relative;
}
.text {
color: #FFFFFF;
font-size: 22px;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(214, 187, 14, 0.85);
}
.pic .text {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
width: 100%;
visibility:hidden;
}
.pic:hover .text {
visibility:visible;
}
.pic p {
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
So glad it finally works, much appreciation to everyone!
I admit I am fairly new to less. While playing with it to make my site as dynamic as possible I was trying to use less variables so if I had to change something I could just do it in one file.
I have run across an issue though when trying to position elements. For example I have a button that is currently sitting on the left side, but in the future I may want to move it to the right. Normally how you call that is either left:0; or right:0;
Is there a way to make that left, or right a variable?
My css looks like this
.previous{
position:fixed;
left:0; //The left is what I want to declare somewhere else
top:#header-padding;
height:#side-height;
font-size: #button-side-font !important;
}
I have tried something like
#{prevPos}: left;
and then calling
#prevPos: 0;
but it just stopped loading my application altogether.
Mixins (update)
Have you tried using a mixin?
It could look something like this:
.previous {
.previous-position();
font-size: #button-side-font !important;
height: #side-height;
position: fixed;
top: #header-padding;
}
.previous-position() {
left: 0;
// right: 0;
}
To swap the left and right, change the comment in the mixin.
Multiple classes approach (original answer)
I'd actually approach this differently. Instead of having the button styles and positioning in the same CSS rule, I'd have the positioning in a sub-class.
.previous {
font-size: #button-side-font !important;
height: #side-height;
}
.previous-left,
.previous-right {
position: fixed;
top: #header-padding;
}
.previous-left {
left: 0;
}
.previous-right {
right: 0;
}
Then your buttons look like this:
I am on the left
I am on the right
I am not fixed
This way you can update your page pretty quickly without having to tear apart your LESS files and it makes your styles more re-usable.
And yet another answer for how to get it to work in a "variable way" using old-fashioned method (intentionally using the most conservative syntax so it could work even with ancient compilers):
#previous-position: right;
.previous {
position: fixed;
margin: 1em;
font-size: 400%;
.-(left) {left: 0}
.-(right) {right: 0}
.-(#previous-position);
}
I am using compass to generate sprite images. And I have MANY sprite icons, and it is generating too much CSS code (too many class selectors for the background image). So lets analyze the compass sprite code:
as you can see here http://compass-style.org/help/tutorials/spriting/
#import "my-icons/*.png";
#include all-my-icons-sprites;
Will generate:
.my-icons-sprite,
.my-icons-delete,
.my-icons-edit,
.my-icons-new,
.my-icons-save { background: url('/images/my-icons-s34fe0604ab.png') no-repeat; }
.my-icons-delete { background-position: 0 0; }
.my-icons-edit { background-position: 0 -32px; }
.my-icons-new { background-position: 0 -64px; }
.my-icons-save { background-position: 0 -96px; }
If you see I use this way: <div class="my-icons-sprite my-icons-delete"></div>
I want Compass to generate this code:
.my-icons-sprite { background: url('/images/my-icons-s34fe0604ab.png') no-repeat; }
.my-icons-delete { background-position: 0 0; }
.my-icons-edit { background-position: 0 -32px; }
.my-icons-new { background-position: 0 -64px; }
.my-icons-save { background-position: 0 -96px; }
Else each new image, it'll add for background and background position. Causing too many selectors.
Is there a configuration for that?
Thanks
Have you tried this snippet for Compass?
$icons: sprite-map("icons/*.png");
i{
background: $icons;
display: inline-block; // or block
}
#each $i in sprite_names($icons){
.icn-#{$i}{
background-position: sprite-position($icons, $i);
#include sprite-dimensions($icons, $i);
}
}
This example uses the <i></i>-tag with a class containing the prefix icn- combined with the filename of the separate .png-files in your icons-folder. Like this:
<i class="icn-delete"></i>
The generated CSS looks like this:
i {
background: url('/path/to/generated/spritemap/my-icons-xxxxxxxxxxx.png');
display: inline-block;
}
.icn-delete {
background-position: 0 0;
height: 32px; // assuming the width is 32px
width: 32px; // assuming the height is 32px
}
.icn-edit{
background-position: 0 -32px;
height: 32px; // assuming the width is 32px
width: 32px; // assuming the height is 32px
}
.icn-new {
background-position: 0 -64px;
height: 32px; // assuming the width is 32px
width: 32px; // assuming the height is 32px
}
...
..
.
Still, I haven't quite figured out how to use this in combination with Compass' Magic Selectors.
Magic Selectors works very nice when you need different states (:hover, :active, :target). All you have to do is name your files like this: filename_state.png (delete_hover.png, delete_active.png etc). Compass' Magic Selectors then automatically generates css for :hover, :active and :target (delete:hover, delete_hover and delete-hover). This way you are quite free to choose how you would represent a state-change.
If you, in my first example, has filenames with the postfix for hover/ active states, the snippet only writes CSS like this:
.icn-edit_hover {
background-position: -32px -32px;
height: 32px;
width: 32px;
}
I'd really like to have it print this:
.icn-edit:hover, .icn-edit_hover, .icn-edit-hover{
background-position: 0 -32px;
height: 32px;
width: 32px;
}
like the traditional Compass' Magic Selectors does. Any idea?
In my opinion, it seems like the best of both worlds (less HTML and CSS) would be to have this code (using an attribute selector for the image):
HTML
<div class="my-icons-delete"></div>
CSS
[class^="my-icons-"] { background: url('/images/my-icons-s34fe0604ab.png') no-repeat; }
.my-icons-delete { background-position: 0 0; }
.my-icons-edit { background-position: 0 -32px; }
.my-icons-new { background-position: 0 -64px; }
.my-icons-save { background-position: 0 -96px; }
Unfortunately, I do not know how to get Compass to export like that. However, unless you are using Compass dynamically rather than just to build your back end static css, you could just change it once generated.
For anyone looking to the answer to ScottS question.
How can I use a css selector for anything starting with a baseclass
Try this:
http://codepen.io/Acts7/pen/nwsEb
I'm pasting the code below.
the spriteGen mixin requires two parameters
1) the baseclass you want to use (in ScottS case --- "myicons"
2) the second parameter is the folder location
Also DONT forget the "." before #{$mySpriteBaseClass}.
Otherwise you get >> myicons-home_icon{background-position:...}
(notice no . for class name selector)
// _custom.scss
// ---------------------------------------------------------
// Sprite Generation
--------------------- */
#include spriteGen('sprites','sprites');
// _mixins.scss
// ---------------------------------------------------------
// Sprite Generation Mixin with options
#mixin spriteGen($mySpriteBaseClass:'.spritebc',$mySpriteFolder:'sprites'){
$mySprites:$mySpriteFolder + "/*.png";
$spritefoldername-map: sprite-map($mySprites,
$spacing: 10px,
$layout: vertical
);
// if using base class as starter for sprite name class
[class^="#{$mySpriteBaseClass}"]{
/*// if using a separate base class
.#{$mySpriteBaseClass}{*/
// TODO:
// Add if/else to set width globally
// or let spriting assign it per each
//width: 48px;
//height: 48px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
background: $spritefoldername-map no-repeat;
}
#each $sprite in sprite_names($spritefoldername-map) {
// if using sprite base class as prefix to full sprite class name
.#{$mySpriteBaseClass}-#{$sprite} {
/*// if using separate base class and sprite name class
.#{$sprite} {*/
background-position: sprite-position($spritefoldername-map, $sprite);
#include sprite-dimensions($spritefoldername-map, $sprite);
}
}
}
What's wrong with the current output?
You can already assign my-icons-delete/edit/new/save only, this is semantic enough - it already says it's an icon and it's a delete icon.
This is what I'm currently doing, it requires Sass 3.3 though:
$icons: sprite-map('icons/*.png');
.icon {
background: $icons;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
#each $i in sprite_names($icons) {
$underscore: str-index($i, _);
#if ($underscore < 1) {
.icon--#{$i} {
background-position: sprite-position($icons, $i);
#include sprite-dimensions($icons, $i);
}
} #else {
$prefix: str-slice($i, 0, $underscore - 1);
$postfix: str-slice($i, $underscore + 1);
.icon--#{$prefix}:#{$postfix} {
background-position: sprite-position($icons, $i);
}
}
}
I'm using BEM here so it assumes you'll use this like <i class="icon icon--star></i>, so if if you have a "star.png" and "star_hover.png" images it'll generate .icon--star and .icon--star:hover class names.
This question already has answers here:
Closed 11 years ago.
Possible Duplicate:
Best Way to Sprite Images?
I have the following image that I want to use for users to log into site.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7468116/facebook_signin.png
However I am not able to make css work properly.
.sprite {
background-image: url("pathto/facebook_signin.png");
background-position: 0 0;
}
.sprite:hover {
background-position: 0 16px /*or whatever the y position of the 2nd button is*/
}
.sprite:active {
background-position: 0 32px /*or whatever the y position of the 3rd button is*/
}
Something like this should work:
a.fb {
display: block;
background: ("/path/to/sprite.png") 0 0 no-repeat; /* start with normal state */
width: 150px;
height: 18px;
text-indent: -9999px; /* for image replacement */
}
a.fb:hover,
a.fb:focus {
/* hover and focus state */
background-position: 0 -20px;
}
a.fb:active {
/* click state */
background-position: 0 -40px;
}
If you are on mac, you can use some tools for writing your CSS file automatically. These tools are ordering your sprites in an effective way and also writes CSS files for you. You don't need to fight with ordering and calculating pixel coordinates, etc. I
suggest Sprite Master.
What exactly's not working in your CSS? Spriting is involves changing the background position of the image on hover (or other states).
So it's really just
#element {
background-position-y: 10px;
}
#element:hover {
background-position-y: 0px;
}
Would be helpful to see your CSS.