Roxygen documentation [duplicate] - r

I am writing a package that defines a new class, surveyor, and a print method for this, i.e. print.surveyor. My code works fine and I use roxygen for inline documentation. But R CMD check issues a warning:
Functions/methods with usage in
documentation object 'print.surveyor'
but not in code: print
I have used the following two pages, written by Hadley, as inspiration:
Namespaces and Documenting functions, both of which states that the correct syntax is #method function-name class
So my question is: What is the correct way of documenting the print method for my new class using Roxygen? And more specifically, how do I get rid of the warning?
Here is my code: (The commented documentation indicated attempts at fixing this, none of which worked.)
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' Prints surveyor object
#'
## #' #usage print(x, ...)
## #' #aliases print print.surveyor
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #S3method print surveyor
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
And the roxygenized output, i.e. print.surveyor.Rd:
\name{print.surveyor}
\title{Prints surveyor object.}
\usage{print(x, ...)
#'}
\description{Prints surveyor object.}
\details{Prints surveyor object
#'}
\alias{print}
\alias{print.surveyor}
\arguments{\item{x}{surveyor object}
\item{...}{ignored}}

Update
As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0 the package has gotten a lot smarter at figuring all this out for you. You now just need the #export tag and roxygen will work out what kind of thing you are documenting and do the appropriate thing when writing the NAMESPACE etc during conversion.
There are exceptions where you may need to help out roxygen. An example that Hadley Wickham uses in his R Packages book is all.equal.data.frame. There is ambiguity in that function name as to what is the class and what is the generic function (all, all.equal, or all.equal.data)?
In such cases, you can help roxygen out by explicitly informing it of the generic and class/method, e.g.
#method all.equal data.frame
The original answer below explains more about the older behaviour if you need to explicitly use #method.
Original
The function should be documented with the #method tag:
#' #method print surveyor
On initial reading, #hadley's document was a little confusing for me as I am not familiar with roxygen, but after several readings of the section, I think I understand the reason why you need #method.
You are writing full documentation for the print method. #S3method is related to the NAMESPACE and arranges for the method to be exported. #S3method is not meant for documenting a method.
Your Rd file should have the following in the usage section:
\method{print}{surveyor}(x, ...)
if this works correctly, as that is the correct way to document S3 methods in Rd files.

As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0., you only need #export because roxygen can figure out that print.surveyor is an S3 method. This means that you now only need
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
However, in this case since the documentation isn't very useful, it'd probably better to just do:
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}

#export only works if the generic is loaded. If the generic is in another package you need to import the generic. With current roxygen this is solved with a block like
#' #importFrom tibble data_frame
#' #export
tibble::data_frame
taken from dplyr/R/reexport-tibble.r . In this example, the data_frame method is imported from the tibble package, and tibble::data_frame is exported. Such re-exported objects are then documented in a reexports.Rd file that - needless to say - satisfies R CMD check.

Related

S3 generic method not appearing in package manual

In my R package, a few functions are omitted from the package manual .pdf file - and they are all S3 methods where several functions are documented together. All other "normal" functions appear correctly, so I suspect I'm not documenting the S3 methods correctly.
I want an entry for myfun to appear in the manual. Right now, the function is missing from the .pdf manual entirely, though it can still be called correctly and its help page referenced with ?myfun. Are my Roxygen2 keywords wrong?
#' #export
myfun <- function(...) UseMethod("myfun")
#' #inheritParams myfun
#' #describeIn myfun Create a frequency table from a vector.
#' #export
#' #keywords internal
myfun.default <- function(vec, sort = FALSE, show_na = TRUE, ...) {
...
}
#' #inheritParams myfun.default
#' #describeIn myfun Create a frequency table from a data.frame,
#' supplying the unquoted name of the column to tabulate.
#' #export
#' #keywords internal
tabyl.data.frame <- function(.data, ...){
...
}
(I omitted the #title, #description, #param, #return, #examples lines to keep this question shorter but can edit them in if relevant).
The generic methods are exporting as intended, so that the user only sees myfun() and not myfun.default() or myfun.data.frame(), unless they use the triple colon :::. I'd like to retain that behavior, so the user just calls myfun, while also having an entry for myfun in the package manual.
I removed #keywords internal in the two myfun. methods and that did it: myfun appears in the package's manual. I also switched to #rdname myfun instead of #describeIn myfun, to eliminate the section "Methods (by class):" in the function's documentation.
What made this hard to isolate was that if I run devtools::document() and then don't restart the session, the methods myfun.data.frame and myfun.default are visible in RStudio's autocomplete and can be called directly. They are not supposed to be accessible to the user, and I thought my Roxygen2 documentation was to blame.
In fact, all I had to do was remove #keywords internal.
The methods myfun.data.frame and myfun.default do appear in the autocomplete after typing ?, e.g., ?myfun.default, but I think there's no way around that (and it directs to the single help page for all three myfun functions, anyway). This is standard. For example, ?print.aov is a visible help file while print.aov() cannot be called directly.

Control where method documentation goes for simple generic, while hiding from package index

I'm writing an R package and largely following Hadley's book on the topic. I'm running into a problem with documenting methods for simple generics like print, plot, head, and tail. When I use the #describeIn tag to control where the method documentation goes, I get the nice feature of them showing up in the help file for the main analysis function that returns an object of the given class. The problem is that these generics also show up in the package's index. If I add #keywords internal to the generics, then they are removed from the package's index, but so is the main analysis function (they are in the same .R file). If I document the generics in a separate .R file, then I can gain control over what is and is not in the package's index, but I have two issues: the main analysis function doesn't come first in the Usage section of the help file; and if add the #keywords internal for the generics, this removes the analysis function from the package index too, even though they are documented (in this instance) in separate files. The crux of the problem seems to be that #keywords internal applies to all functions in the given .R file, and maybe even any function referenced in #describeIn, while #describeIn is designed for documenting multiple functions in a given .R file.
For now, I have the analysis function and generics in the same .R file to control where the method documention goes and its ordering in the Usage section, but am not using #keywords internal and leaving the index cluttered.
Here's a rough sketch of an exported analysis function:
#' #inheritParams foo
#' #export
seats <- function(judgeit.object, ...) {
[...omitted...]
class(out.object) <- "judgeit.seats"
return(out.object)
}
And a generic:
#' #describeIn seats Print a \code{\link{seats}} output
#' #keywords internal
#' #export
print.judgeit.seats <- function(x,...) print(x$output,...)
I want the help file for ?seats to look like this:
seats(judgeit.object, ...)
## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
print(x, ...)
## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
head(x, ...)
## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
tail(x, ...)
I do not want print.judgeit.seats, head.judgeit.seats, etc. to appear in the package index, because it quickly becomes very cluttered.
Unfortunately, I am not aware of any easy fix for what you are asking.
Tags and their effect
#export will make your function visible in the global environment. CRAN requires that you document any such functions that is not hidden (i.e. that starts with .).
If you use #describeIn or #rdname, an automatic alias is created. Any alias creates an entry in the index, but points to the same .Rd file. For example, adding
#' #name myfunction
#' #aliases foo foobar`
would create foo and foobar entries in the index, but refer to the myfunction.Rd documentation file. If you try to delete manually the \alias{} in the .Rd file, CRAN will complain.
#describeIn will list the functions in the order they appear in the .R files (if they are documented in multiple files, they are listed according to the alphabetical order of the .R file, then the order of appearance). Reordering your functions can give you what you want.
#keywords internal (along with #export, a title and a description) will have Roxygen create a .Rd file that can be accessed by the user using ?, but will not be visible in the index (if you have only the tags, Roxygen will not create a .Rd file and you will get a warning because your function is not documented).
If you have a #keywords internal in any of the functions calling #describeIn, that function will be masked from the index. This does not apply to all functions in a .R file, only those which are aliases.
#usage requires you to have an alias for each method documented. You can try using instead #section Usage:, but note sections are listed in alphabetical order and the spacing will be larger.
Workaround
If you document a NULL function, you can add the #param you want. and include a multiple lines #Section: Usage field to include (manually) the S3 methods with your comments. Give it a name such as #name Seats (it cannot be the name of the function, otherwise you have ?seats pointing to two different files).
Then, document your function seats with a different #name tag and a different title, and use #internal' to hide it from the user. Use \code{\link{seats}}` to refer to that documentation.
#' Seats
#' Description of the function
#' #param judgeit.object object
#' #param x object from seats
#' #param ... additional arguments
#' #name seats
#' #section Usage:
#' \preformatted{seats(judgeit.object, ...)
#' ## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
#' print(x, ...)
#' ## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
#' head(x, ...)
#' ## S3 method for class 'judgeit.seats'
#' tail(x, ...)}
NULL
#' Seats function
#' #name internal-function
#' #inheritParams seats
#' #export
#' #keywords internal
#' #seealso \code{\link{seats}}
seats <- function(judgeit.object, ...) {
[...omitted...]
class(out.object) <- "judgeit.seats"
return(out.object)
}
#' Print a \code{\link{seats}} output
#'
#' #inheritParams seats
#' #describeIn internal-function
#' #export
print.judgeit.seats <- function(x,...) print(x$output,...)
This way, the user calling ?seats will be pointed to the overall documentation.

R-oxygen documentation of S3 method produces error while check [duplicate]

I am writing a package that defines a new class, surveyor, and a print method for this, i.e. print.surveyor. My code works fine and I use roxygen for inline documentation. But R CMD check issues a warning:
Functions/methods with usage in
documentation object 'print.surveyor'
but not in code: print
I have used the following two pages, written by Hadley, as inspiration:
Namespaces and Documenting functions, both of which states that the correct syntax is #method function-name class
So my question is: What is the correct way of documenting the print method for my new class using Roxygen? And more specifically, how do I get rid of the warning?
Here is my code: (The commented documentation indicated attempts at fixing this, none of which worked.)
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' Prints surveyor object
#'
## #' #usage print(x, ...)
## #' #aliases print print.surveyor
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #S3method print surveyor
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
And the roxygenized output, i.e. print.surveyor.Rd:
\name{print.surveyor}
\title{Prints surveyor object.}
\usage{print(x, ...)
#'}
\description{Prints surveyor object.}
\details{Prints surveyor object
#'}
\alias{print}
\alias{print.surveyor}
\arguments{\item{x}{surveyor object}
\item{...}{ignored}}
Update
As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0 the package has gotten a lot smarter at figuring all this out for you. You now just need the #export tag and roxygen will work out what kind of thing you are documenting and do the appropriate thing when writing the NAMESPACE etc during conversion.
There are exceptions where you may need to help out roxygen. An example that Hadley Wickham uses in his R Packages book is all.equal.data.frame. There is ambiguity in that function name as to what is the class and what is the generic function (all, all.equal, or all.equal.data)?
In such cases, you can help roxygen out by explicitly informing it of the generic and class/method, e.g.
#method all.equal data.frame
The original answer below explains more about the older behaviour if you need to explicitly use #method.
Original
The function should be documented with the #method tag:
#' #method print surveyor
On initial reading, #hadley's document was a little confusing for me as I am not familiar with roxygen, but after several readings of the section, I think I understand the reason why you need #method.
You are writing full documentation for the print method. #S3method is related to the NAMESPACE and arranges for the method to be exported. #S3method is not meant for documenting a method.
Your Rd file should have the following in the usage section:
\method{print}{surveyor}(x, ...)
if this works correctly, as that is the correct way to document S3 methods in Rd files.
As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0., you only need #export because roxygen can figure out that print.surveyor is an S3 method. This means that you now only need
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
However, in this case since the documentation isn't very useful, it'd probably better to just do:
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
#export only works if the generic is loaded. If the generic is in another package you need to import the generic. With current roxygen this is solved with a block like
#' #importFrom tibble data_frame
#' #export
tibble::data_frame
taken from dplyr/R/reexport-tibble.r . In this example, the data_frame method is imported from the tibble package, and tibble::data_frame is exported. Such re-exported objects are then documented in a reexports.Rd file that - needless to say - satisfies R CMD check.

New method for plot - how to export?

I am making a package where I want to define a new method for plot. I am using roxygen in-source documentation. This question seems very similar to:
How to properly document a S3 method of a generic from a different package, using Roxygen?
and
Roxygen2 - how to properly document S3 methods
but I still cannot get it to work.
The relevant parts that are causing me trouble are:
#' Generic plot method
#'
#' #param x \dots
#' #param ... \dots
#' #export
plot <- function(x, ...) UseMethod("plot")
#' Default plot method
#'
#' #param x \dots
#' #param ... \dots
#' #importFrom graphics plot
#' #method plot default
#' #S3method plot default
plot.default <- function(x, ...) graphics::plot(x, ...)
#' Plotting function for ABI object
#'
#' Description.
#'
#' #param x ABI object as generated by newABI.
#' #param base Character. Bases to look at.
#' #param ... Other options passed to plot().
#' #return Nothing. Side-effect: plots graphs.
#' #method plot ABI
#' #S3method plot ABI
plot.ABI <- function(x, base, ...) {
#Overly simplified
plot(1, 1, main = base)
}
When I run this and investigate methods(plot), there is no method defined for ABI objects. Accessing the function by ABI:::plot (ABI is the name of the package) does work. Using :: does not.
During the package build check, there is a warning:
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... WARNING
plot:
function(x)
plot.ABI:
function(x, base, ...)
See section ‘Generic functions and methods’ of the ‘Writing R
Extensions’ manual.
It seems that there is a disagreement in arguments. But I don't understand this, since the generic has arguments x and ... and so does my ABI method (in addition to base).
So there are two problems, which I hope stem from the same issue: The plot.ABI method is not exported and the package check throws a warning.
How do I solve this?
The problem is that your method needs to have the same arguments as the generic. Let's assume you are using the generic supplied with R:
> args(plot)
function (x, y, ...)
NULL
Now plot() is actually a special case as you can essentially ignore that there is an argument y there.
So your method needs to be as you have it:
plot.ABI <- function(x, base, ...)
The issue is that, contrary to your quoted script, you must have redefined the generic as
plot(x)
and as that is missing ..., R CMD check will rightly complain.
So, don't document or provide the generic if it already exists.
A few problems:
Don't include a generic that is already defined elsewhere. Just add your method.
The signatures of every method must at least include every element in the generic, in the same order. It's annoying sometimes, but it's incontrovertible.
Update
I had said, "Your #export needs to list the function name," but apparently this is not correct. See the comments. Note also that listing the method should export it. I seem to recall needing an explicit export in cases where you aren't including the generic in your package's namespace, but I could be wrong (so often am!).

How to properly document a S3 method of a generic from a different package, using Roxygen?

I am writing a package that defines a new class, surveyor, and a print method for this, i.e. print.surveyor. My code works fine and I use roxygen for inline documentation. But R CMD check issues a warning:
Functions/methods with usage in
documentation object 'print.surveyor'
but not in code: print
I have used the following two pages, written by Hadley, as inspiration:
Namespaces and Documenting functions, both of which states that the correct syntax is #method function-name class
So my question is: What is the correct way of documenting the print method for my new class using Roxygen? And more specifically, how do I get rid of the warning?
Here is my code: (The commented documentation indicated attempts at fixing this, none of which worked.)
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' Prints surveyor object
#'
## #' #usage print(x, ...)
## #' #aliases print print.surveyor
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #S3method print surveyor
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
And the roxygenized output, i.e. print.surveyor.Rd:
\name{print.surveyor}
\title{Prints surveyor object.}
\usage{print(x, ...)
#'}
\description{Prints surveyor object.}
\details{Prints surveyor object
#'}
\alias{print}
\alias{print.surveyor}
\arguments{\item{x}{surveyor object}
\item{...}{ignored}}
Update
As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0 the package has gotten a lot smarter at figuring all this out for you. You now just need the #export tag and roxygen will work out what kind of thing you are documenting and do the appropriate thing when writing the NAMESPACE etc during conversion.
There are exceptions where you may need to help out roxygen. An example that Hadley Wickham uses in his R Packages book is all.equal.data.frame. There is ambiguity in that function name as to what is the class and what is the generic function (all, all.equal, or all.equal.data)?
In such cases, you can help roxygen out by explicitly informing it of the generic and class/method, e.g.
#method all.equal data.frame
The original answer below explains more about the older behaviour if you need to explicitly use #method.
Original
The function should be documented with the #method tag:
#' #method print surveyor
On initial reading, #hadley's document was a little confusing for me as I am not familiar with roxygen, but after several readings of the section, I think I understand the reason why you need #method.
You are writing full documentation for the print method. #S3method is related to the NAMESPACE and arranges for the method to be exported. #S3method is not meant for documenting a method.
Your Rd file should have the following in the usage section:
\method{print}{surveyor}(x, ...)
if this works correctly, as that is the correct way to document S3 methods in Rd files.
As of roxygen2 > 3.0.0., you only need #export because roxygen can figure out that print.surveyor is an S3 method. This means that you now only need
#' Prints surveyor object.
#'
#' #param x surveyor object
#' #param ... ignored
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
However, in this case since the documentation isn't very useful, it'd probably better to just do:
#' #export
print.surveyor <- function(x, ...){
cat("Surveyor\n\n")
print.listof(x)
}
#export only works if the generic is loaded. If the generic is in another package you need to import the generic. With current roxygen this is solved with a block like
#' #importFrom tibble data_frame
#' #export
tibble::data_frame
taken from dplyr/R/reexport-tibble.r . In this example, the data_frame method is imported from the tibble package, and tibble::data_frame is exported. Such re-exported objects are then documented in a reexports.Rd file that - needless to say - satisfies R CMD check.

Resources