I started to look into DotNetNuke recently as a client asked me to do so.
I noticed straight away that DNN is different from other CMS I'm familiar with in a way that it mixes its own controls with site's presentation. (Other cms like Umbraco, Wordpress, Orchard have separate interfaces for content management).
I'm building a responsive website and using Zurb foundation for it. The problem I have is that DNN's css start to mess Zurb's css. I don't want to edit neither css and the problem seems very serious. Is it addressed somehow in DNN?
Bearing in mind how popular mobile browsing has become responsive desings and hence frameworks like Zurb or Twitter bootstrap will gain more and more popularity. And it looks like DNN doesn't play nicely with them, it may become a huge no no for DNN.
The whole idea of mixing site's presentation with cms controls looks wrong to me. Is it possible to prevent them from mixing and messing with each other?
Cheers.
There is a Portal.css file that always gets loaded no matter what DNN skin you use. Then each DNN skin loads a skin.css file associated with the skin/theme and any other specific CSS files it needs to reference.
The issue you are probably having is that the default styles set in Portal.css are conflicting with your theme. What you may need to do is override the CSS that is causing trouble at the top of your skin file.
But yes, this does happen since DNN declares styles for modal popups, dropdowns, links etc that are used in the admin functionality and since that is inline with the actual site design they can conflict if you are using a framework like bootstrap, etc.
We created a Foundation DNN Skin specifically to solve what you're looking for - https://github.com/Ethanhackett/foundation-5-dnn-skin
It avoids the CSS conflicts and has some jQuery no conflict resolutions which need to be addressed since DNN is on jQuery v1... and Foundation is using jQuery 2...
I hope that helps.
Related
I'm confused with some css templates in bootstrap.
I've been a developer for years already but I never worked in a company that let me create an entire website as front-end developer say for example an e-commerce site.
So if someone would say "do an e-commerce site", do I have to ask them for a ready made css template? If so, then is it possible there are already other sites that bought it, other than me, e.g. we may have the same web face?
I am not really an expert in css nor an artist. I have created a website for personal use but it was pure bootstrap. I can see other templates in bootstrap; they have other components manipulated, like a different menu which is not present in their list of components.
How did they do that? Is it another individual css, js, html component? Do I have to create my own component sometimes?
For you to understand me, I can create relatively easily any site written in either React or Angular but I cannot create my own css design.
The examples and templates that you see in Bootstrap uses the Bootstrap framework, but the CSS and JS design components are changed to better define what the user wants it to be like.
For example
form-group-lg select.form-control{height:46px;line-height:46px}
This is the pre-defined CSS value from Bootstrap CDN, changing this CSS value to something else, changes your design, but you still are based on Boostrap. Basically, Bootstrap is not only about design, it's following a library, a framework, a skeleton to make your web development (specially frontend) easier.
I'm trying to reach the best css practice on my website using my own custom css till I found out I can use css framework such as bootstrap or foundation zurb instead. I thought using such framework directly without the need of making my own custom css is possible, but it turns out that all css frameworks are limited to some point yet I need to add extra custom css so my site look the way I want.
I want to use css framework because of the fact that it is being served over CDN so no extra bandwidth, and also for load speed and performance.
now my question, is it possible to be using only css framework on a website without the need of adding a custom css?
also how about creating my own custom css and using #import to a css framework inside the custom file, is that a good practice?
can anyone enlighten me to an efficient method serving a css file with/without css framework to my website?
You can use a plain framework without writing any custom CSS if you either a) Are happy with how it looks without custom CSS or b) like one of the many themes you can get for such frameworks.
You can #import a framework into your own custom CSS - in fact, many frameworks are available as less and importing them allows you to use variables from the framework in your own CSS as well.
As far as efficiency goes, are you sure this is the performance problem you have? If you haven't measured the performance, you aren't ready to optimise! It will, of course, be a straight economic trade-off between looking exactly as you want, and keeping the page load fast.
using a css framework is always a good option. You can use either bootstrap/foundation. along with the various functionalities on the site it would provide u the animation effects as well. And would help to complete the site faster as they provide the snippets of code. You can use less/sass and have the styling customized in the variables so you wont have to include extra custom css file.
We have a legacy application based on EXT-JS.
We like to add new module into the existing application, using AngularJS and bootsrap.
My problem is that bootstrap’s CSS are conflicting with CSS of the legacy code.
The new module, which written using bootstrap and AngularJS, wrapped around by legacy code, so I need to import exists CSS and new CSS on the same page.
I thought of 2 possible solutions:
Having a prefix to bootstrap’s css file and apply it only to inner part of the page content (AngularJS, new module). The problem is that popup, and angular-bootstrap 3rd party component still interrupted by legacy CSS.
Having my whole inner page (AngularJS module) in separate IFrame, embedded into page that contains the legacy CSS.
It seems like using IFrame solves my problem, but I aware that using IFrame is discouraged, and I am looking for optimal solution for my problem.
Do you think that IFrame is a good practice in this scenario?
Do you have other proven solution?
Planning to use iframes just to get around the css conflicts - not a very good idea. Though iframes can come handy in some cases mostly its usage has been abused just to get around some issues easily.
Do you think that IFrame is a good practice in this scenario?
No. The only issue here is the conflicting css styles between bs and extjs. And planning to use Iframe to get around this is really a bad choice. As you are using angularjs I feel using iframe may restrict its usage to some extent. For instance,embedding it in iframe I think the navigation back and forward buttons wont work as expected, in case your are planning to use angularjs routing. And when using Iframe it will be very hard to debug front end issues.
Do you have other proven solution?
Well I do not have a proven solution but you already have mentioned an idea which may work easily. Bootstrap can be customized to any extent you want to using less variables.
For instance for your issue just namespace the bootstrap styles using less.
.bs {
#import "less/bootstrap.less";
}
And don't get into the mindset using less/sass to compile css is complex. Once you get used to it, this will make this will make FE developement much easier than before.
I'm developing a ASP .NET web project that uses: jQuery, jQuery UI, reset/normalize css stylesheets. Most of the CSS is crap, so I'm going to rewrite it + I will have a budget to it :)
I came across two fancy solutions that I would like to learn:
SASS
Bootstrap
I wonder, how to "mix" my existing application with these solution. When it comes to SASS, it seems to me pretty obvious - just rewrite CSS and be proud of new clean meta CSS, however I'm not sure about Bootstrap. What are the advantages of it if I don't want to change the layout of my site?
Another thing: can I run into possible issues when including Bootstrap / SASS into my site?
Twitter Bootstrap (TBS) is a CSS framework and its original purpose was for website and web app prototypes. So if you want to start from scratch with very thorough and well styled CSS, then bootstrap is great.
Twitter Bootstrap is NOT necessarily the right solution if you want to keep the majority of your existing UI, especially if your existing UI doesn't match up well with their scaffolding, grid system, and other elements of their UI styles (forms inputs, buttons, typography etc). You'll find yourself having to override a lot the framework's properties, which kind of defeats the purpose.
As #Nathron mentioned, if you try to mix TBS with your existing code, you could run into conflicts. Creating a customized build of TBS that includes only the elements of their framework that you want would be the best approach there: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/customize.html.
Regarding SASS, if you want to use it in combination with TBS, check out https://github.com/jlong/sass-twitter-bootstrap.
From their site: The Boostrap JS is for "interactive components for things like tooltips, popovers, modals, and more". So if you are using any of those, make sure you don't have conflicting JS functions.
You could run into issues with the CSS if your class names are the same as the ones that Bootstrap uses. Many of them are a little obscure like "darkwell", but some of them are common like "dropdown", so you just have to keep an eye out for that.
Easiest way to see is to download it and play around with it :)
i want to manage all the design of my website(asp.net) through my css.
my client requirement is he should be able to change all design of website within 4-5 hrs.
is this possible.
is there any trick to do this?
Sure it is. ASP.NET doesn't but render html, css and javascript. What you need it to let it render the html you're after and hook in css for layouting.
ASP.NET also provides you with some great functionality: Themes and skins. These make changing css, images, ... a snap by either configuration or setting a certain premaid theme in code. I suggest you take a look at these videos for more information:
Customize my Site with Profiles and Themes?
Create User Selectable Themes for a Web Site
Use Skins with CSS for a Flexible and Maintainable ASP.NET Web Site
That's a very tall order indeed. By design does the client mean the color/theme or also the layout?
Basically is boils down to the following:
1. Generate semantic html only from you ASP.NET code. That is no in-line style and use meaning full css class names for html that needs to be styled
2. Break your css files into two. One for style and layout and another for color. If you're using images, they should be a part of your color css file
You can start here but also be clear about what your client means by "should be able to change the design within 4-5 hours".
Yes this possible if you have good knowledge of CSS i.e. 2 and 3. Have look at below links which can provide you and idea about layouts fully dependent on CSS
Yui library
Yui CSS tools
Many more ideas like CSS sprite can be used to achieve what you need