Media Query grouping instead of multiple scattered media queries that match - css

I'm experimenting with LESS (not a fan of the SASS syntax) and have been trying to find out what the best way to do media queries with it would be.
I read through this blog post on how to "do" media queries with LESS, but it points out the fact that this causes all the media queries to be separated and scattered throughout the resulting CSS. This doesn't really bother me (I could care less about the result and more about it working). What did bother me was a comment that talked about issues when viewing from iOS devices and the commenter found that once the media queries were consolidated the issue was resolved.
Has anyone found a good solution for using media queries with LESS?
The way I invision this working would be something like...
//Have an overall structure...
.overall(){
//Have ALL your CSS that would be modified by media queries and heavily use
//variables that are set inside of each media queries.
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024px){
//Define variables for this media query (widths/etc)
.overall
}
I understand that there could be some issues with this, but the current setup doesn't seem to be that beneficial.
So I guess my question is if there have been any good solutions/hacks to allow for grouped media queries?
(Just incase it matters I use dotless as the engine to parse my .less files)

First, your solution given in the question certainly has some usefulness to it.
One thing I thought, however, was that it would be nice to define all the media query variables "near" one another (your solution would have them under each media query call). So I propose the following as an alternative solution. It also has drawbacks, one being perhaps a bit more coding up front.
LESS Code
//define our break points as variables
#mediaBreak1: 800px;
#mediaBreak2: 1024px;
#mediaBreak3: 1280px;
//this mixin builds the entire media query based on the break number
.buildMediaQuery(#min) {
#media only screen and (min-width: #min) {
//define a variable output mixin for a class included in the query
.myClass1(#color) {
.myClass1 {
color: #color;
}
}
//define a builder guarded mixin for each break point of the query
//in these is where we change the variable for the media break (here, color)
.buildMyClass1() when (#min = #mediaBreak1) {
.myClass1(red);
}
.buildMyClass1() when (#min = #mediaBreak2) {
.myClass1(green);
}
.buildMyClass1() when (#min = #mediaBreak3) {
.myClass1(blue);
}
//call the builder mixin
.buildMyClass1();
//define a variable output mixin for a nested selector included in the query
.mySelector1(#fontSize) {
section {
width: (#min - 40);
margin: 0 auto;
a {
font-size: #fontSize;
}
}
}
//Again, define a builder guarded mixin for each break point of the query
//in these is where we change the variable for the media break (here, font-size)
.buildMySelector1() when (#min = #mediaBreak1) {
.mySelector1(10px);
}
.buildMySelector1() when (#min = #mediaBreak2) {
.mySelector1(12px);
}
.buildMySelector1() when (#min = #mediaBreak3) {
.mySelector1(14px);
}
//call the builder mixin
.buildMySelector1();
//ect., ect., etc. for as many parts needed in the media queries.
}
}
//call our code to build the queries
.buildMediaQuery(#mediaBreak1);
.buildMediaQuery(#mediaBreak2);
.buildMediaQuery(#mediaBreak3);
CSS Output
#media only screen and (min-width: 800px) {
.myClass1 {
color: #ff0000;
}
section {
width: 760px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
section a {
font-size: 10px;
}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) {
.myClass1 {
color: #008000;
}
section {
width: 984px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
section a {
font-size: 12px;
}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1280px) {
.myClass1 {
color: #0000ff;
}
section {
width: 1240px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
section a {
font-size: 14px;
}
}

For responsive Wordpress sites I use a starter theme called Bones by Eddie Machado ( http://themble.com/bones/ ). I rather like the way it uses media queries, it has different stylesheets for different breakpoints (480+, 768+ etc) which you can change depending on your design.
It then imports these with #import into one stylesheet underneath the appropriate media queries. You edit all of these in LESS and, I use Simpless by Kiss ( http://wearekiss.com/simpless ) to compile my .less stylesheets into .css automatically. I really find it a really good starting point for developing a simple responsive site. Even if you're not developing in Wordpress you may want to check out how they're structured their media queries as it all seems to work fine even with the use if LESS.

Related

Can I use mixins to generate new mixins in LESS?

I'm trying to use LESS to dynamically generate a set of mixins that would help me write cleaner media query code. So far in my limited knowledge of the language I've put together code that looks like this:
#sizes: xxs, xs, sm, md, lg;
.mediaQueries(#iterator:1) when(#iterator <= length(#sizes)) {
//Extract name
#sizeName: extract(#sizes, #iterator);
//Attempt to build min-width query
.MQ-min-#{sizeName} (#content) {
#media (min-width: #screen-#{sizeName}) {
#content();
}
}
//Attempt to build max-width query
.MQ-max-#{sizeName} (#content) {
#media (max-width: #screen-#{sizeName}) {
#content();
}
}
.mediaQueries((#iterator + 1));
}
.mediaQueries();
The goal is to have a set of mixins that would allow me to easily and cleanly define some CSS properties for a specific breakpoint, like so:
.generic-class {
background: black;
//Sizes #screen-sm and up
.MQ-min-sm({
background: transparent;
})
}
It doesn't work. Something to note, I'm trying to interpolate the size name into a variable name that would then output me a the px value of that variable into the #media query. Is something like this even possible?
Otherwise my compiler currently breaks on the start of the nested mixin (.MQ-min-#{sizeName} (#content) {) with the error:
Potentially unhandled rejection [2] Missing closing ')' in file ../mixins.less line no. 43
Is something like what I'm trying to achieve possible?
I think the simplest way for you to achieve this is by using a single parametric mixin like given below. This avoids the need for all those iterations, dynamic mixin creations etc.
#sizes: xxs, xs, sm, md, lg;
#screen-xxs: 100px;
#screen-sm: 200px;
.MQ(#content, #sizeName, #max-min) { /* get ruleset, size name and min/max as input */
#selector: ~"(#{max-min}-width: #{screen-#{sizeName}})"; /* form the media selector */
#media #selector { /* use it */
#content();
}
}
.generic-class {
background: black;
.MQ({
background: transparent;
}, /* ruleset */
sm, /* screen size */
max /* min/max */
);
}
If the mixins are for your own usage then this is all that you need. If it is for distribution as library then you may want to put some guards on #sizeName and #max-min variables to restrict invalid values.
Note: Less compiler always had a problem with the interpolation here - #media (min-width: #screen-#{sizeName}) also (I am not sure if it has been addressed) and that's why I created a temp variable.

Possible Bug in Nested Mixins in Media Queries using LESS

EDIT: RESOLVED
I am working on a way to easily write LESS code that takes parameters but still works with media queries. This is turning out to be rather convoluted, but I have gotten it working – on all sizes except one. The medium and large sizes work, but small is for some reason not printing the parameter, leaving me with css like font-size: ;.
Here I define my media sizes:
#m-small = ~"screen and (max-width: 799px)";
#m-medium = ~"screen and (min-width: 800px) and (max-width: 1299px)";
#m-large = ~"screen and (min-width: 1300px)";
Then, the main function I call, where #attr is the CSS property (e.g. font-size) and #parameter is the variable (e.g. fs-medium). To use this, I can write .media('font-size', 'fs-medium'), which is significantly less verbose than defining every media query.
Edit: There was a bug here, hence the problem; I have fixed it.
.media(#attr, #parameter) {
#media #m-small {
.small(#attr, #parameter);
}
#media #m-medium {
.medium(#attr, #parameter);
}
#media #m-large {
.large(#attr, #parameter);
}
}
These functions store the default values for parameters at various sizes, allowing me to consolidate where I define my variables, grouped by media query:
.small(#attr, #parameter) {
#fs-small : 1.4rem;
#fs-medium : 2.0rem;
#fs-large : 3.4rem;
#logo-width : 10rem;
.guards();
}
.medium(#attr, #parameter) {
#fs-small : 1.4rem;
#fs-medium : 2.4rem;
#fs-large : 3.8rem;
#logo-width : 12rem;
.guards();
}
.large(#attr, #parameter) {
#fs-small : 1.4rem;
#fs-medium : 1.8rem;
#fs-large : 5rem;
#logo-width : auto;
.guards();
}
In the above code, I call .guards() to render the content. This checks through my list of guards for one with a matching attribute, because LESS does not allow variables to be used in CSS property names. In these guards, I dynamically call the parameter, so that if I passed fs-medium, it will render #fs-medium's value.
.guards() when (#attr = 'font-size') {
font-size: ##parameter;
}
.guards() when (#attr = 'width') {
width: ##parameter;
}
Now, as I said, this works fine for the medium and large sizes, so I feel like there is either a typo in my code (I've checked) or a bug in LESS. One piece of code that uses this is as follows:
nav {
.media('font-size', 'fs-medium');
}
Which renders the following content:
#media screen and (max-width: 799px){
nav{ font-size:; }
}
#media screen and (min-width: 800px) and (max-width: 1299px){
nav{ font-size:2.4rem; }
}
#media screen and (min-width: 1300px){
nav{ font-size:1.8rem; }
}
Why is the small font-size missing?
I have discovered that I do indeed have a typo in my question, where I typed 'paremeter' under the .small mixin. I have edited it in the original post, but I am leaving it here for others trying to use media queries in LESS in a generalized way.
Verdict: typo.

Media query not working in one environment, but working in another

I have a LESS environment that is bringing together multiple files and putting everything together into a massive .CSS file (forced to work this way).
However, in one environment the "#media (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 979px)" declaration is being validated and the custom CSS for it is rendering properly in all instances. However, in another environment with the exact same media query and CSS, it is not even acknowledging it within the CSS file.
Working environment: giving.massgeneral.org
[CSS^] https://www.dropbox.com/s/4hxtevg0ft0hsae/base.css
Non-working environment: secure.massgeneral.org/bootstrap-library
[CSS^] https://www.dropbox.com/s/ncrbgxs2ot184cm/bbnc.css
The most notable issue is the following query that is completely being ignored in the "secure." environment:
// Tablets & small desktops only
#media (min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 979px) {
// Hide everything else
.hidden-desktop { display: inherit !important; }
.visible-desktop { display: none !important; }
// Show
.visible-tablet { display: inherit !important; }
// Hide
.hidden-tablet { display: none !important; }
}
It is successfully generating this code and placing it into the "bbnc.css" file, however, it is not associating the styles with the classes above when in the viewport designated in the "secure." environment.
Any advice outside would be greatly appreciate on getting this to validate.

Where to put CSS3 media queries?

I am having a philosophical debate with myself over the best place to put media queries within style sheets. I am attempting to structure my CSS modularly (like OOCSS or SMACSS, etc). Given that context, I see two choices:
Put all media queries together in a separate stylesheet or section of the main stylesheet.
Put media queries below their base counterparts. For example, if I have a module called "news-item", I could put any necessary media query styles right below the definition of that module.
I am leaning towards the latter, but it would mean I'd have many more separate media queries (separate ones for each logical block of CSS requiring a responsive adjustment).
Any thoughts on this?
How about using media queries just to load device specific stylesheets
like:
#import url(mydevice.css) this and (that);
or:
<link rel="stylesheet" media="only this and (that)" href="mydevice.css" />
...if you're looking at the device specific adjustments as a kind of "subthemes" to a main layout (just overwriting some properties), this would make sense to me, too.
Approach #2 works better for me.
When I was a newbie, I was using Approach #1 - I was writing my media queries together (at the bottom of my stylesheet or in another file).
.header { ... }
.news-item { ... }
.footer { ... }
/**
* ...
*
* bla bla, imagine a huge amount of styles here
*
* ...
*/
/** All style tweaks for screens < 1024px */
#media screen and (max-width: 1024px) {
.header { ... }
.news-item { ... }
}
This approach has a few downsides. Based on my experience, the most notable one is that the maintainability is a hard. The main reason: .news-item logic is spread across multiple unrelated lines of CSS.
Later on, naturally, I decided to keep the related styles together. Approach #2:
/** Header's styles and media queries */
.header {
...
}
#media screen and (max-width: 1024px) {
.header { ... }
}
#media screen and (max-width: 720px) {
.header { ... }
}
/** News-item's styles and media queries */
.news-item {
...
}
#media screen and (max-width: 1024px) {
.news-item { ... }
}
#media screen and (max-width: 720px) {
.news-item { ... }
}
/** ... and so on */
However, in this approach, repeating media queries max-width values all-around doesn’t look maintainable enough. I solved this issue by using a CSS pre-processor (like SASS) that allows me to replace all them with variables and define them once.
To boost up the maintainability and to make these definitions a lot more elegant I started to use an abstraction on top of the Media Queries.
If you're interested in more details, please read on my blog post :-)
With Sass it's easier to use the media queries directly below the counterparts. But if your CSS is well commented in your modules, I don't see a problem to put the queries bellow since that would be easy to find.
You'll end up writing a little more code retyping the queries, but not a big deal.
May be you can try css variables, which is native support reuse your css!
:root {
--main-color: #F06D06;
}
.main-header {
color: var(--main-color);
}
.main-footer {
background-color: var(--main-color);
}
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Using_CSS_variables
https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2016/02/css-variables-why-should-you-care
https://css-tricks.com/difference-between-types-of-css-variables/

SASS 3.2 Media Queries and Internet Explorer Support

I recently implemented this technique with SASS 3.2 using #content blocks on a project I've been working on, and I've just gotten to the point where I need to include support for older browsers such as IE7 and 8.
Example:
.overview {
padding: 0 0 19px;
#include respond-to(medium-screens) {
padding-top: 19px;
} //medium-screens
#include respond-to(wide-screens) {
padding-top: 19px;
} //medium-screens
}
They both don't support media queries, and I've often handled this in the past by serving up all styles to these browsers when I had my media queries separated into separate partial files such as _320.scss, _480.scss and in my IE stylesheet loading them like so:
#import 320.scss;
#import 480.scss;
etc.
Which would load all styles, and always assign IE7 - 8 a 940px (or whatever the max width is) layout and styles. By nesting styles in SASS 3.2 inline like this, it eliminates the need for separate partial stylesheets, but totally screws up how I load styles for IE.
Any ideas or solutions on how to combat this? I could use a polyfill such as respond.js to force IE to use media queries, but would prefer to just serve up a non-flexible site to IE.
Any ideas on either how to best organize these files, or a better solution?
You can generate a separate stylesheet for IE<9 that contains everything your normal sheet has, but with flattened media queries based on a set width.
Full explanation here http://jakearchibald.github.com/sass-ie/, but basically you have this mixin:
$fix-mqs: false !default;
#mixin respond-min($width) {
// If we're outputting for a fixed media query set...
#if $fix-mqs {
// ...and if we should apply these rules...
#if $fix-mqs >= $width {
// ...output the content the user gave us.
#content;
}
}
#else {
// Otherwise, output it using a regular media query
#media screen and (min-width: $width) {
#content;
}
}
}
Which you'd use like this:
#include respond-min(45em) {
float: left;
width: 70%;
}
This would be inside all.scss, which would compile down to all.css with media queries. However, you'd also have an additional file, all-old-ie.scss:
$fix-mqs: 65em;
#import 'all';
That simply imports all, but flattens media query blocks given a fake width of 65em.
I use LESS for a lot of my work, but on larger projects, with many people working across files, I don't like using breakpoint files, such as 1024.less.
My and my team use a modular approach, such as header.less which contains all the code for just the header, including the associated breakpoints.
To get round IE problems (we work in a corporate environment), I use this approach:
#media screen\9, screen and (min-width: 40em) {
/* Media queries here */
}
The code inside the media query is always executed by IE7 and less. IE9 and above obeys the media queries like a proper browser should. The problem is IE8. To solve this, you need to make it behave like IE7
X-UA-Compatible "IE=7,IE=9,IE=edge"
I've found this doesn't always work if set in the metatags in the HTML, so set it using the server headers.
See the gist here:
https://gist.github.com/thefella/9888963
Making IE8 act like IE7 isn't a solution that works for everyone, but it suits my needs.
Jake Archibald has the best technique I've seen to date for achieving this. This technique automatically creates a separate stylesheet for IE, with all the same styles inside of your media queries but without the media query itself.
I also campaigned to get this technique built into the popular breakpoint extension for Sass, if you're interested in using that!
If you wanted to keep everything under one roof and only have a single http request for your older browser visitors you could do something like this
Setting up your initial respondto mixin
// initial variables set-up
$doc-font-size: 16;
$doc-line-height: 24;
// media query mixin (min-width only)
#mixin breakpoint($point) {
#media (min-width: $point / $doc-font-size +em) { #content; }
}
this will create a min-width media query and output your px value ($point) as an em value.
From this you'd need to create this mixin
#mixin rwdIE($name, $wrapper-class, $IE: true) {
#if $IE == true {
.lt-ie9 .#{$wrapper-class} {
#content;
}
.#{$wrapper-class} {
#include breakpoint($name) {
#content;
}
}
}
#else if $IE == false {
.#{$wrapper-class} {
#include breakpoint($name) {
#content;
}
}
}
}
Here if you pass a piece of Sass(SCSS) like this
#include rwdIE(456, test) {
background-color: #d13400;
}
it will return this code
.lt-ie9 .test {
background-color: #d13400;
}
#media (min-width: 28.5em) {
.test {
background-color: #d13400;
}
}
This will give you the you the IE and 'new browser' CSS in one file. If you write -
#include rwdIE(456, test, false) {
background-color: #d13400;
}
You will get -
#media (min-width: 28.5em) {
.test {
background-color: #d13400;
}
}
I hope this helps, I've got this on a codepen here too - http://codepen.io/sturobson/pen/CzGuI
There is a CSS3 Mixin I use that has a variable for IE filters. You could do something similar by having a global variable, $forIE or something, wrap the media query mixin within an if and then generate the stylesheet with or w/o the queries.
#if $forIE == 0 {
// Media Query Mixin
}
Or use the #if to import a 3rd scss (_forIE.scss?) that will override things with your IE specific styles.

Resources