I've messed around with a few responsive designs, and I'm curious about what CSS properties determine how float elements are positioned vertically when the overall resolution is reduced and they are scrunched together.
For example, if I have a div block with float:left and a div block with float:right, which of those end up on top when the max width of the container is reduced to the point where they can't fit inline anymore.
If you look at my fiddle, the left side element ends up on top when you reduce the width to the point where they both can't fit. Is there a property that makes it so? Does it do it in order? Is there anything I can add to the right div block that would make it above the left element when width is reduced?
http://jsfiddle.net/JXXLK/
Many thanks SO
The simplest solution to put your right div on top when the window is rescaled is to define it first in your html code:
<div class="container">
<div class="rightside">
RIDE SIDE HOMBRE!
</div>
<div class="leftside">
LEFT SIDE DUDE!
</div>
</div>
I'm not sure how this can be controlled using purely css properties.
Related
For my site, I need an area to sit along the edge of the viewport to reveal a menu when dragged. The div that defines that area cannot be position:fixed, and I am trying to accomplish this without javascript.
Here's my basic html:
<div id="content" class="snap-content">
<div id="toolbar">
<h1>Default</h1>
</div>
// Content
<div id="do-drag"></div>
</div>
That #do-drag div I need to sit along the left edge of the viewport, running top to bottom, about 25px wide, regardless of how much content there is. It cannot be position:fixed. It needs to always be there. And the drag div must sit inside the content div.
Now, I see two possibilities:
A 100% tall absolute div that doesn't actually scroll, or...
A div that scrolls, but that is never shorter than 100% of the viewport
I have tried placing the #do-drag inside of another div and mixing up absolute and relative positioning. I have tried extending the drag div to 800% and using overflow settings to clip it. These, and a couple other attempts, have failed.
I would like to know if it is possible for block elements, floated in a direction, not to wrap when they exceed the width of the parent element.
That was the quick and short question, for a little more details and an example, please see below.
I have done some research about this and I have not found a definite answer of whether it is impossible or not and that is why I am looking for a definite answer here of whether this can be done or not.
And in the case that it is not possible, I would appreciate a quick explanation about it so that I can improve my understanding of how CSS works.
Please see the following example.
I have 1 "container" div and inside it I have 3 "row" divs. Let's say the "container" has a hypothetical width of 200px and each "row" has a hypothetical width 100px. These values are not specified in the css, they vary based on the content on the page.
Each "row" is floated to the left so that they appear horizontally.
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
<div class="row">
Some text
</div>
</div>
.row {
float: left;
}
In this case, when the total width of the "rows" exceeds the width of the "container", is it possible for the "rows" not to wrap and to remain in a single horizontal line ?
Just to emphasize, I cannot specify an exact width for the "container" in the css because I want the layout dynamic in order to accommodate different content.
Thank you.
The behaviour you're looking for can be achieved by replacing float: left with display: inline-block, and having white-space: nowrap on the parent container.
See this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/XYzea/1/
Blocks inside the container are aligned side by side (like float) but their parent has no width specified. By the way, the wrapper encloses nested divs. inline-block works in all modern browsers except IE<8 in which is not possible to use that display property with any hack if the element is a natural block element
The only way I can think of is to have the container > wrapper > rows. The container can be dynamic in size and have overflow:hidden while the wrapper will keep the rows in a single line
Background
I have the following html code:
<div id="parent">
<div id="child">
I'm the child!
</div>
</div>
I want the parent div to be positioned relative to the bottom of the page as with the css properties position: absolute, bottom: 0px.
This works fine if the child div(s) have no padding or border. However, as showcased in this JSFiddle example, if the child has padding or a border, it expands beyond the bottom of the parent div (notice the rendered page is scrollable and there is additional content from the child div below the bottom of the page).
Question
What's the best way to make sure the parent div fully encompasses the child div vertically? (Correct me if I'm wrong, but this doesn't appear to be a problem with horizontal padding/borders)
My best idea was to add the sum of the padding/border/margin of to the padding to the parent div. Using something like SASS to generate the actual css makes this slightly more palatable, but still seems like a really unclean solution. Is there a better way?
Thanks!
(As a side note, when I made the JSFiddle example I noticed the right border was missing on the child div. Is this just a fluke with JSFiddle or something?)
If you get rid of those display: inline;s it will work like a charm.
How can I achieve the following layout? Specifically the positioning of Image and DIV
I've found that unless I set a specific width for the Div, it will just go on to the next line and take up the full width of the container. Additionally aligning it relative to the bottom of the image is giving me trouble. Currently they're both float:left
Edit: The two solutions so far work if the image is a constant width which I guess I could work with, but it's going in a Wordpress theme for an author's profile page and it's possible that images would have slightly variable widths. Is there a solution that would have the Div right next to the image (minus padding) regardless of how wide or narrow the image is? Basically having the div adjust its width to accommodate the image width.
Tested in IE7/8, Firefox, Chrome.
Live Demo #2
CSS:
#container{width:80%; padding:12px; margin:0 auto}
#top{position:relative;overflow:auto}
#top img{float:left; background:red; width:100px; height:180px}
#header{position:absolute; bottom:0; right:0}
#content{height:200px}
JS/jQuery:
$('#header').css('margin-left', $('#top img').width() + 10);
(you might want to change the + 10 for parseInt($('#top img').css('margin-right'), 10))
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="top">
<img src="" />
<div id="header">Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. Some text here that should wrap to fit on row. </div>
</div>
<div id="content">dfgdfg</div>
</div>
I'd put the header image and header div inside its own container and position the items within it using absolute positioning.
I've put together a quick sample here: http://jsfiddle.net/JjxYj/1/
Notice here that if you remove the width of the Div in the header, it will become the width of its content.
Update
To answer the updated part of the question, here's another solution that'll allow the image to be of any width whilst still positioning the header text at the bottom of its containing item: http://jsfiddle.net/JjxYj/5/
I have a simple design. To the left is the navbar, to the right is the content div. I just did float left and float right and it works - unless the monitor is too wide. Then the navbar is far off to the left (like it should) but the content clings to the right. The middle is empty space. I want the content to cling next to the navbar on the left.
How can I accomplish this?
How about floating them both to the left and use percentage values to set their width..
Like below:
#sidebar,#content {float:left;}
#sidebar {width:25%;}
#content {width:75%}
Or if you want to fix the size of your sidebar and have the content fills the rest of the space you can do the following(I use it all the time):
HTML:
<div id="content"><div class="in">
CONTENT HERE
</div></div>
<div id="sidebar">
SIDEBAR HERE
</div>
CSS:
#content,#sidebar {float:left;}
#sidebar {width:300px; position:relative;/*so content won't cover it*/}
#content {width:100%; margin-right:-300px;/*sidebar's width*/}
#content .in {margin-right:300px;
/*sidebar's width or more for space between blocks*/}
There are lots of method to do that.
It depends :
if you want a fixed width layout, or a relative one.
if you want the layout to be centered or not.
etc.
A sketch of what you want or/and your actual code would help.
Anyway, if you're not aware of CSS layout, you could use a CSS framework like blueprint which is easy to use and takes care of your current problem by itself.