Consider a graph that has weights on each of its nodes instead of between two nodes. Therefore the cost of traveling to a node would be the weight of that node.
1- How can we represent this graph?
2- Is there a minimum spanning path algorithm for this type of graph (or could we modify an existing algorithm)?
For example, consider a matrix. What path, when traveling from a certain number to another, would produce a minimum sum? (Keep in mind the graph must be directed)
if one don't want to adjust existing algorithms and use edge oriented approaches, one could transform node weights to edge weights. For every incoming edge of node v, one would save the weight of v to the edge. Thats the representation.
well, with the approach of 1. this is now easy to do with well known algorithms like MST.
You could also represent the graph as wished and hold the weight at the node. The algorithm simply didn't use Weight w = edge.weight(); it would use Weight w = edge.target().weight()
simply done. no big adjustments are necessary.
if you have to use adjacency matrix, you need a second array with node weights and in adjacency matrix are just 0 - for no edge or 1 - for an edge.
hope that helped
Related
I have got a graph network and the edges of the graph are weighted. Is there a way to distribute the edge weights to nodes?
I'd like to know if there is a way to derive node weight or edge weight from each other.
I noticed a similar post here, which is the inverse of my problem. I am not sure if there is a similar approach that can be used for my problem.
EDIT:
For instance, for a graph like this (created from the commands given here) and each edge has a weight associated with it.
Example: Nodes i and j are linked by edge $e_{ij}$ that has weight $w_{ij}$
If the node weights are denoted by $nw_i$ (i = 1 to Number of nodes), the weight of any two nodes should sum up to the weight of the edge that links those nodes. i.e. $nw_i$ + $nw_j$ should be equal to $w_{ij}$,
$nw_j$ + $nw_k$ should be equal to $w_{jk}$ and so on.
Is it possible to find all possible directed graphs given a pair of vertices and the information that an edge exists between them? For example if we know the vertices with edge pairs like
1 2
2 3
1 3
The possible directed graphs will be:
1→2, 2→3, 1→3
1→2, 2→3, 3→1
1→2, 3→2, 1→3
1→2, 3→2, 3→1
2→1, 2→3, 1→3
2→1, 2→3, 3→1
2→1, 3→2, 1→3
2→1, 3→2, 3→1
What data-structure to be used here to work with? What can be the working logic?
I was thinking of using adjacency matrix data structure and compute all possible adjacency matrix. Each adjacency matrix will represent a graph. We can use the graph as and when needed for tasks like checking whether cycle is present or not etc.
Apologies that this is more of a discussion than a programming question, but any help will be appreciated
You could maintain one undirected graph data structure G and work with the knowledge that the existence of an edge (u,v) means that there is only one directed edge in a particular instance of digraph possibility D.
If you want to maintain all possible digraphs separately, you would need 2^m many of them, where m is the number of edges. If the vertices and edges are always the same and only the direction is the invariant, then you could maintain 2^m bit-strings, each of length m. Each bit has a 0 or 1 depending on whether the edge (u,v) it corresponds to is u-->v or v<--u. Use the bit string to give direction to the undirected graph suggested above. You just need to generate all 2^m bit strings. Not very efficient... but you can't do better if you need to work with all possibilities.
You could use the bit string to construct a digraph. But, it would be more memory efficient at least to maintain only one bit-string per 'graph' rather than repeating the entire graph data structure with only directional changes. Record bit strings in a hash table: use each edge as a key and then bit value 0/1 depending on direction. Any graph traversal of one of the many possible digraphs D works on undirected G. Then in constant time you can check for incident (undirected) edges of a vertex, which are outgoing/incoming in D. So traversals can occur just as quickly by maintaining only 1 graph object and 1 bit hash table of size 2^m (rather than 2^m graph objects).
My graph is as follows:
I need to find a maximum weight subgraph.
The problem is as follows:
There are n Vectex clusters, and in every Vextex cluster, there are some vertexes. For two vertexes in different Vertex cluster, there is a weighted edge, and in the same Vextex cluster, there is no edge among vertexes. Now I
want to find a maximum weight subgraph by finding only one vertex in each
Vertex cluster. And the total weight is computed by adding all weights of the edges between the selected vertex. I add a picture to explain the problem. Now I know how to model this problem by ILP method. However, I do not know how to solve it by an approximation algorithm and how to get its approximation ratio.
Could you give some solutions and suggestions?
Thank you very much. If any unclear points in this description,
please feel free to ask.
I do not think you can find an alpha-approx for this problem, for any alpha. That is because if such an approximation exists, then it would also prove that the unique games conjecture(UGC) is false. And disproving (or proving) the UGC is a rather big feat :-)
(and I'm actually among the UGC believers, so I'd say it's impossible :p)
The reduction is quite straightforward, since any UGC instance can be described as your problem, with weights of 0 or 1 on edges.
What I can see as polynomial approximation is a 1/k-approx (k the number of clusters), using a maximum weight perfect matching (PM) algorithm (we suppose the number of clusters is even, if it's odd just add a 'useless' one with 1 vertex, 0 weights everywhere).
First, you need to build a new graph. One vertex per cluster. The weight of the edge u, v has the weight max w(e) for e edge from cluster u to cluster v. Run a max weight PM on this graph.
You then can select one vertex per cluster, the one that corresponds to the edge selected in the PM.
The total weight of the solution extracted from the PM is at least as big as the weight of the PM (since it contains the edges of the PM + other edges).
And then you can conclude that this is a 1/k approx, because if there exists a solution to the problem that is more than k times bigger than the PM weight, then the PM was not maximal.
The explanation is quite short (lapidaire I'd say), tell me if there is one part you don't catch/disagree with.
Edit: Equivalence with UGC: unique label cover explained.
Think of a UGC instance. Then, every node in the UGC instance will be represented by a cluster, with as many nodes in the cluster as there are colors in the UGC instance. Then, create edge with weight 0 if they do not correspond to an edge in the UGC, or if it correspond to a 'bad color match'. If they correspond to a good color match, then give it the weight 1.
Then, if you find the optimal solution to an instance of your problem, it means it corresponds to an optimal solution to the corresponding UGC instance.
So, if UGC holds, it means it is NP-hard to approximate your problem.
Introduce a new graph G'=(V',E') as follows and then solve (or approximate) the maximum stable set problem on G'.
Corresponding to each edge a-b in E(G), introduce a vertex v_ab in V'(G') where its weight is equal to the weight of the edge a-b.
Connect all of vertices of V'(G') to each other except for the following ones.
The vertex v_ab is not connected to the vertex v_ac, where vertices b and c are in different clusters in G. In this manner, we can select both of these vertices in an stable set of G' (Hence, we can select both of the corresponding edges in G)
The vertex v_ab is not connected to the vertex v_cd, where vertices a, b, c and d are in different clusters in G. In this manner, we can select both of these vertices in an stable set of G' (Hence, we can select both of the corresponding edges in G)
Finally, I think you can find an alpha-approximation for this problem. In other words, in my opinion the Unique Games Conjecture is wrong due to the 1.999999-approximation algorithm which I proposed for the vertex cover problem.
My problem is a generalization of a task solved by [Blossom algorithm] by Edmonds. The original task is the following: given a complete graph with weighted undirected edges, find a set of edges such that
1) every vertex of the graph is adjacent to only one edge from this set (i.e. vertices are grouped into pairs)
2) sum over weights of edges in this set is minimal.
Now, I would like to modify the first goal into
1') vertices are grouped into sets of 3 vertices (or in general, d vertices), and leave condition 2) unchanged.
My questions:
Do you know if this 'generalised' problem has a name?
Do you know about an algorithm solving it in number of steps being polynomial of number of vertices (like Blossom algorithm for an original problem)? I don't see a straightforward generalisation of Blossom algorithm, as it is based on looking for augmenting paths on a graph compressed to a bipartite graph (and uses here Hungarian algorithm). But augmenting paths do not seem to point to groups of vertices different than pairs.
Best regards,
Paweł
Background
I have a tree of nodes and I'm trying to run some machine learning algorithms to classify them. One of the features I want to use is the position of the nodes in the tree, i.e. closer nodes are likely to be in the same class.
My Problem
I'm representing all the features as a vector of numbers. Any thoughts on how I can represent position in the tree as a vector? So that distance b/n two vectors corresponds to distance between nodes in the tree? (I have a small tree of depth around 5-7 and branching around 2-3)
What I tried
P.S. I read about algorithms to find shortest distance between 2 nodes (finding each one's distance to their closest common ancestor) One idea I found was to have a vector x where each index corresponds to possible ancestors in the tree. Then set x[i] = numbers of levels from that ancestor. The problem with that is- I don't know what to do with nodes that aren't ancestors.
just put the path of the tree as the vector. then simply calculate the length of the difference between the two paths. so for example. 2,3,1,5,3 is one path. and 2,3,3,5,9,5 is another path. so 2,3 they have in common. so the length of the difference is 1,5,3 and 3,5,9,5 which is 7. good luck
So there is actually a very nice way to derive the features that you want; you can do so with MDS.
What MDS does is that it takes a N by N matrix (here N is number of nodes) where entry a_{i,j} is the distance between item i and item j (node i and node j) and for each item i it will return a D (pre-specified) position vector, D_i, such that the distance between D_i and D_j is approximately a_{i,j}.
Thus, we can have your feature vector with a bit of pre-processing. First, find the shortest distance (in hops) for each pair of nodes (you could use Floyd-Warshall) then use the distance matrix as input for MDS and specify the number of dimensions for you're position vector, and MDS will output position vectors of said dimensions.
If you search the web I'm sure you can find open sourced implementations to both Floyd-Warshall and MDS.