I'm using html5, JQuery Mobile and KnockoutJS, I Have a foreach template that renders a grid like GUI from an observable array.
However, when I add items to the bound array, the styles are not applied to any new items.
They appear unstyled, most of the times.
some times they appear with style, but once the styling fails, it stays broken for as long as I run my app.
Does anyone have any idea how to resolve this problem?
Snippet:
<div id="timeEntryList" data-bind="foreach: timeEntries">
<div data-role="header" data-theme="c">
<h1>some header</h1>
The odd thing is that it works sometimes.
Hard to guess without any code. But I guess you 're saying jqm doesn't render properly after dynamically adding elements. That's right it doesn't. I guess it's like the list. And you probably can do something like $('#mylist').listview('refresh'); but I don't know what sort of component you're talking about.
you can find more info in the documentation
jQM might not support more than one data-role="header" section. I would try conforming to their standard page layout with one header, one content and one footer section and see if that helps.
I've found that if I update my KO observables in pagebeforeshow I don't have to use .listview('refresh')
Related
I added a subscription box widget and I need to change the style to put the submit button inside the input box. It currently looks like this:
enter image description here
[enter image description here][2]
And I want it to look like this:
[2]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/Z4Aqe.png
Which I know how to do with plain html, but I'm not sure how to change the Wordpress widget html while keeping the functionality. Here is the widget code:
<!-- wp:group -->
<div class="wp-block-group"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container"><!-- wp:group -->
<div class="wp-block-group"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container"><!-- wp:group -->
<div class="wp-block-group"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container"><!-- wp:genesis-blocks/gb-newsletter {"instanceId":0} /--></div></div>
<!-- /wp:group --></div></div>
<!-- /wp:group --></div></div>
<!-- /wp:group -->
Thank you in advance.
That is markup outputted from the WordPress' new block-based syntax (Background)
It's not quite HTML in that if you edit it, it would not render as you would expect; it will break, because the additional block code (not shown on the screen) expects only certain .
You have a couple options here depending how much time you want to devote to this:
Determine whether your has block styling options (borders, font, font-size, etc) already built-in to the block settings. Check the genesis blocks documentation to verify this. This will be the easiest option to do what you want but if you're asking this question, I'm guessing that the block doesn't have these options.
This is probably the best route to take:
In your group block container, on the right hand side, create a css class shown in this picture. Then, go to your theme's CSS; add a selector of that CSS class and begin adding the rules that you want. This may require some trial and error because you're likely need to write some additional selectors and increase the level of specificity so you can style exactly how you want it and override some other rules already written.
(You may also need to include !important as for your rules but that is a last resort and not a best practice for writing CSS)
You may also need to do this for the gb-newsletter block as well.
Writing your own blocks (which has frustratingly has a high learning curve, imho); this will offer the most customization but will be a LOT of time.
This is a question regarding Angular 2 selectors, Custom tags vs. Custom attributes, SEO and browser rendering.
When I first started to look over Angular 2, the very first thing I did when following their quickstart, right of the bat, was to change my selector to '[my-component]' (attribute selector) instead of 'my-component' (tag selector), so I could have <div my-component></div> in my html instead of <my-component></my-component>, which isn't valid html. So I would write html according to standards. Well, at least pretty close to standards (because my-component isn't a valid html attribute, but I could live with only that html validation error)
Then, at some point in a video on youtube, someone from the angular team mentioned that we should use the tag selector, performance wise at least.
Alright I said, screw html validation... or shouldn't I?
So:
Say I ignore the W3C screaming about my html being completely invalid because of the <custom-tags>. I actually have another bigger and more real concern: how does this impact SEO?
I mean don't just think client-side app, because in the real world (and for my angular 2 project as well) I also have server-side rendering, for 2 very important reasons: SEO and Fast initial rendering of the site to the user for that initial view, before the app bootstraps. You can not have a very high traffic SPA otherwise.
Sure, google will crawl my site, regardless of the tags I use, but will it rank it the same in both scenarios: one with <custom-make-believe-tags> and the other with only standard html tags?
Let's talk browsers and css:
As I started to build my first SPA site in Angular 2, I was immediately faced with another concern:
Say (in a non SPA site) I have the following html markup:
<header>
<a class="logo">
...
</a>
<div class="widgets">
<form class="frm-quicksearch"> ... </form>
<div class="dropdown">
<!-- a user dropdown menu here -->
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="video-listing">
<div class="video-item"> ... </div>
<div class="video-item"> ... </div>
...
</div>
Angular 2 wise I would have the following component tree:
<header-component>
<logo-component></logo-component>
<widgets-component>
<quicksearch-component></quicksearch-component>
<dropdown-component></dropdown-component>
</widgets-component>
</header-component>
<video-listing-component>
<video-item-component></video-item-component>
...
</video-listing-component>
Now, I have 2 options. Let's just take the <video-listing-component> for example, to keep this simple... I either
A) place the entire standard html tags which I already have (<div class="video-item"></div>) within the <video-item-component> tag, and once rendered will result in this:
<video-listing-component>
<div class="video-listing>
<video-item-component>
<div class="video-item>...</div>
</video-item-component>
...
...
</div>
</video-listing-component>
OR:
B) Only put the content of <div class="video-item"> directly into my <video-item-component> component and adding the required class (class="video-item") for styling on the component tag, resulting in something like this:
<video-listing-component class="video-listing">
<video-item-component class="video-item"></video-item-component>
<video-item-component class="video-item"></video-item-component>
...
</video-listing-component>
Either way (A or B), the browser renders everything just fine.
BUT if you take a closer look (after everything is rendered in the dom, of course), by default the custom tags don't occupy any space in the dom. They're 0px by 0px. Only their content occupies space. I don't get it how come the browser still renders everything as you would want to see it, I mean in the first case (A):
While having float: left; width: 25%; on the div class="video-item", but each of these divs being within a <video-item-component> tag, which doesn't have any styling... Isn't it just a fortunate side-effect that the browser renders everything as you'd expect? With all the <div class="video-item"> floating next to eachother, even though each of them are within another tag, the <video-item-component> which does NOT have float: left? I've tested on IE10+, Firefox, Chrome, all fine. Is it just fortunate or is there a solid explanation for this and we can safely rely for this kind of markup to be rendered as we'd expect by all (or at least most) browsers?
Second case (B):
If we use classes and styling directly on the custom tags (<video-item-component>)... again, everything shows up fine. But as far as I know, we shouldn't style custom components, right? Isn't this also just a fortunate expected outcome? Or is this fine also? I don't know, maybe I'm still living in 2009... am I?
Which of these 2 approaches (A or B) would be the recommended one? Or are both just fine?
I have no ideea!!
EDIT:
D'oh, thanks Günter Zöchbauer. Yeah, since my divs have float: left, that's why the (custom or not) tag they're wrapped in doesn't expand it's height. Seems I've forgotten how css works since I started to look over Angular 2:)
But one thing still remains:
If I set a percentage width on a block element (call it E), I would assume it takes x% of it's immediate parent. If I set float: left, I would expect floating within the immediate parent. In my A case, since the immediate parent is a custom tag with no display type and no width, I would expect for things to break somehow, but still... my E elements behave like their parent isn't the custom tag they're each wrapped in, but the next one in the dom (which is <div class="video-listing> in my case). And they occupy x% of that and they float within that. I don't expect this to be normal, I would think this is just a fortunate effect, and I'm afraid that one day, after some browser update... I'll wake up to find all my Angular 2 sites looking completely broken.
So... are both A and B an equally proper approach? Or am I doing it wrong in case A?
EDIT2:
Let's simplify things a bit. As I got part of my question answered, let's take another example of generated html (simplified a bit, with inlined css):
<footer>
<angular-component-left>
<div style="float: left; width: 50%;">
DIV CONTENT
</div>
</angular-component-left>
<angular-component-right>
<div style="float: left; width: 50%;">
DIV CONTENT
</div>
</angular-component-right>
</footer>
In the original, not yet implemented html (whithout <angular-component-...>, those divs should float left and each occupy 50% of the <footer>. Surprisingly, once they're wrapped in the <angular-component-...> custom tags, they do the same: occupy 50% of the footer. But this just seems like good fortune to me, dumb luck... Unintended effect.
So, is it or isn't it "dumb luck"?
Should I leave it like that, or rewrite so instead of the above code, I would have something like this:
<footer>
<angular-component-left style="display: block; float: left; width: 50%;">
DIV CONTENT
</angular-component-left>
<angular-component-right style="display: block; float: left; width: 50%;">
DIV CONTENT
</angular-component-right>
</footer>
Note that the inline styling is introduced here for simplicity, I would actually have a class instead which would be in an external css file included in the <head> of my document, not through style or styleUrls from my angular components.
The issue is your HTML validator. The - in the element name is required for elements to be treated as custom elements and it is valid HTML5. Angular doesn't require - in element names but it's good practice.
Check for example https://www.w3.org/TR/custom-elements/#registering-custom-elements (search for x-foo) or https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/custom/#custom-elements-custom-tag-example. I'm sure this dash rule is specified somewhere but wasn't able to find the spec. It is for example required in Polymer that depends on elements being proper custom elements while this doesn't matter much in Angular. The only difference as far as I know is that when you query the element, you get a HTMLUnknownElement when the - is missing in the name and a HTMLElement when it contains a -.
See also this question I asked a few years ago Why does Angular not need a dash in component name
BUT if you take a closer look, by default the custom tags don't occupy any space in the dom. They're 0px by 0px. Only their content occupies space. I just don't get it how come the browser still renders everything as you would want to see it
I'm not sure I understand this question. When Angular processes the template it adds the content dynamically. When you see the content in the browser than it's also available in the DOM and has actual dimensions.
Search engine crawlers are able to process pages that are generated by JavaScript. If this isn't enough, server-side rendered pages can provide static HTML to crawlers that contain the whole view.
I am using ng-view to render dynamic data on my page. When the page loads, if I use static html I get this (top):
When Angular loads the page the data is there but it's like the element is still empty (bottom).
If I make even the slightest adjustment in Chrome dev tools, the items snap into place but I cannot get them to prefill without using CSS to make them static sizes, which doesn't work because text is different sizes. The elements in question have CSS of inline-block.
As you can see in this screenshot, I have tried two ways of populating the data, both with the same result:
<div class="cd-rating" ng-class="caseData.scoreClass">
<span class="score" ng-bind="caseData.adjustedScore | number:0" ng-cloak>N/A</span>
<span class="verdict">{{caseData.recommendation}}</span>
</div>
Here is the what the HTML looks like in the browser:
<div class="cd-rating medium" ng-class="caseData.scoreClass">
<span class="score ng-binding" ng-bind="caseData.adjustedScore | number:0">349</span>
<span class="verdict ng-binding">review</span>
</div>
If I hard-code that HTML identically, then it renders perfectly. It's only when Angularjs renders it that the elements are collapsed, appearing if there is not content.
I would also like to add that I am using RequireJS and manually bootstrapping the app instead of using the ng-app directive, in case that matters.
Any ideas on how to make the view fill the elements?
EDIT: Here is a video that demonstrates the behavior: http://youtu.be/zTwv-o6mWRM
I am not able to figure out what exactly you mean by the "..data is still there but the element is empty.." - the only issue that I find with the rendering by AngularJS is that the "Review" (button?) is overwritten with the number.
Looking at your code (which, as #Wingman4l7 suggests needs to be posted in the question rather than as a image), I see that you are using bindings to define a class dynamically. Instead, can you use the ng-class directive and see if it resolves the issue?
That is, replace:
<div class="cd-rating {{caseData.scoreClass}}">
with
<div class="cd-rating" ng-class="caseData.scoreClass">
instead and check if the issue gets resolved?
margin-left: 100 + 20%;
I want to do something the same as above. But CSS does not have any format. How can I successfully use these together ?
Without javascript? Only by wrapping that content into another element (usually <div>) and splitting that margin to two elements.
Something like:
<div style="margin-left:20%">
<div style="margin-left:100px">
<!-- content -->
</div>
</div>
Hi there and welcome to StackOverflow. Unfortunately CSS doesn't have this (good) behaviour, but LESS will. For a JavaScript implementation, look here. If you want a PHP implementation, look here. You may be confused as to why I'm talking about JS and PHP, but what LESS will do is take your .less file and turn it into a vanilla CSS file, either on the client (JS), or on your server (PHP).
I'm using KML and the GGeoXml object to overlay some shapes on an embedded Google map. The placemarks in the KML file have some custom descriptive information that shows up in the balloons.
<Placemark>
<name />
<description>
<![CDATA[
<div class="MapPopup">
<h6>Concession</h6>
<h4>~Name~</h4>
<p>Description goes here</p>
<a class="Button GoRight FloatRight" href="#"><span></span>View details</a>
</div>
]]>
</description>
<styleUrl>#masterPolyStyle</styleUrl>
...Placemarks go here ...
</Placemark>
So far so good - the popups show up and have the correct text in them. Here's the weird thing: I'm trying to use CSS to format what goes in the popups, and it halfway works.
Specifically:
The <h6> and <h4> elements are rendered using the colors and background images I've specified in my stylesheet.
Everything shows up in Arial, not in the font I've specified in my CSS.
The class names seem to be ignored (e.g. none of the a.Button formatting is applied; if I define a style like the one below, it's ignored.)
div.MapPopup { background:pink; }
Any ideas? I wouldn't have been surprised for the CSS not to work at all, but it's weird that it only partly works.
Update
Here's a screenshot to better illustrate this. I've reproduced the <div class="MapPopup"> markup further down on the page (in yellow), to show how it should be rendered according to my CSS.
As suggested I've gone in with Firebug to see what's going on. It looks like Google is doing two obnoxious things:
It's stripping out all class attributes from my HTML.
It's throwing all kinds of hard-coded styles around.
Here's my HTML along with the first couple of wrappers inserted by Google:
<div style="font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: small;">
<div id="iw_kml">
<div>
<h6>Concession</h6>
<h4>BOIS KASSA 1108000 (Mobola-Mbondo)</h4>
<p>
Description goes here</p>
<a target="_blank"><span />View details </a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, my classes (e.g. MapPopup in my first div, Button etc. in the <a> tag) have all been stripped out.
Knowing this I'll be able to work around Google's interference, using !important and targeting the container div for the whole map - still, this is annoying, and unexpectedly clumsy coming from Google.
More related obnoxiousness related to the HTML in a KML <description> block: Any links are given the attribute target="_blank", whether you like it or not. I'm currently exploring ways to undo that, using jQuery, but what a drag. I really don't understand why Google feels the need to tamper with this HTML.
See also this thread on the official Google Group.
I've had similar issues. I don't know how you are implementing your Marker, or if you are using InfoWindow, or .addListener, but they way I have had to get css styling to work inside of the "pop up bubble" (over the Marker) is to use what is called "inline styling." So I have a variable that I pass into InfoWindow. Assuming you have initialized a variable "marker" with some options, and have the "map" instance created, some example code would look like this:
/*start of myHtml2 variable*/
var myHtml2 = "<div style=\"background-color:lightgray\"><div style=\"padding:5px\"><div
style=\"font-size:1.25em\">Some text</div><div>Some more text<br/>
Yet more text<br/></div><table style=\"padding:5px\"><tr><td><img src=\"A lake.jpg\"
width=\"75px\" height=\"50px\"></td><td>More text<br/>Again, more text<br/><div
style=\"font-size:.7em\">Last text</div></td></tr></table></div></div>"
/*end of variable*/
var infowindow2 = new google.maps.InfoWindow({content: myHtml2});
/*mouseover could be 'click', etc.*/
google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'mouseover', function(){
infowindow2.open(map, marker);
});
I know the css styling code is cumbersome, but I haven't found a way to use complicated css styling inside "the bubble pop up" using css in the head, or from a style sheet There are always conflicts, and some features don't render properly.
My first guess is that you're running into an issue with CSS specificity. There is a good article on it at http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/07/27/css-specificity-things-you-should-know/, so if you can include a container element ID, that may help.
Let me know if this doesn't turn out to be the problem and I'll come up with more ideas.