I am messing around with some navigation for a site and I want three images floating on the right of the screen (which I have). I then want to be able to hover over one of the images and have a menu pop-up next to that image. I can do this with one, but as soon as I introduce the next image in the vertical sequence, the first one stops working. Why?
My HTML:
<DIV id="parent"><img src = "images/parent.png"></DIV>
<DIV id="student"><img src = "images/student.png"></DIV>
<DIV id="teacher"><img src = "images/staff.jpg"></DIV>
<DIV id="pnavi"> <img src = "images/parent.png"></DIV>
My CSS:
#parent {
width: 50px;
position: fixed;
top: 20px;
right: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
#student {
width: 50px;
position: fixed;
top: 70px;
right: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
#teacher {
width: 50px;
position: fixed;
top: 120px;
right: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
#parent:hover + #pnavi {
visibility: visible;
}
#pnavi {
position: fixed;
float: right;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
top: 20px;
right: 0px;
z-index: 1;
visibility: hidden;
}
If I comment out the student and teacher DIV, hover on parent shows #pnavi. Remove the comment (or even add a break after the DIV) and it all stops.
Fiddle is here
I have the second two DIVs currently commented out so that the hover works (first time using Fiddle so I hope I did it right..).
When you use + (direct adjacent combinator), the elements on each side must be adjacent siblings. So, on your case, #pnavi must be right after #parent on the markup (and, by consequence, on the DOM).
There is also an indirect adjacent combinator, ~, that only requires the elements to be siblings, but not directly next to each other. So you might use #parent:hover ~ #pnavi. I'm not sure about browser support, though. It works in Chrome on my mac. See demo.
Related
I have a stackblitz here
This should be the simplest thing but I can't see why its not working.
I have react app with Typescript and a styled components, I'm sure none of that is the problem this is just css.
I'm trying to position two divs on top of each other.
The container has position: relative;
And then the div are absolutely positioned.
.FlexContainerColOne,
.FlexContainerColTwo{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
But both div disappear, what am I missing
From what I am seeing here is that they are not disappearing, you just can't see them because they don't have a width assigned or content. See the following, I added width, and opacity to show the two divs merging over each other.
stackblitz snippet
Result:
flexcontainer {
position: relative;
}
.FlexContainerColOne,
.FlexContainerColTwo {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.FlexContainerColOne {
background: red;
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
opacity: 0.5;
}
.FlexContainerColTwo {
background: green;
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
opacity: 0.3;
}
<flexcontainer>
<div class="FlexContainerColOne"></div>
<div class="FlexContainerColTwo"></div>
</flexcontainer>
I want to align the header text (blue background) to the right/bottom corner of the header so that it is ALWAYS in that position no matter the device (responsive). So far it looks different on every device I've tested on, so I'm stumped. I've spent ALL DAY on this and gotten nowhere. Can anyone help?
Thank you!
[URL removed for privacy]
P.S. I have read CSS Positioning relative to corner of Div and tried to implement it, but am still stuck!
You can give position: relative to the parent and position: absolute; right: 0; bottom: 0; to the child element and the child will be positioned relatively to the parent (it will be at the bottom right corner). Here is an example:
.wrapper {
width: 100%;
height: 150px;
position: relative;
background-color: violet;
}
.target {
position: absolute;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: black;
color: white;
text-align: center;
line-height: 100px;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="target">TARGET</div>
</div>
For a new Wordpress template, I designed (in Photoshop) a round-ish header that overlaps the image beneath.
The Design:
My try:
Code:
Right now, I'm using a border radius, since I want to do it in CSS rather than cutting out an image (also for responsive reasons).
border-radius: 100% / 100%;
No matter how I change the values, the border won't become nicely rounded.
The website so far: http://voorbeeld.website/19/
Maybe I was a little too creative in Photoshop, but nothing is impossible! Right?
Use a pseudo element, in this case I used the :before
Make sure the .wrapper's elements also have a position, relative or absolute, or you need to set z-index: -1 to the :before
.wrapper {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.wrapper:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: -200px;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 400px;
background: lightgray;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.content {
position: relative;
padding: 20px;
text-align: center;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">
Put your content here
</div>
</div>
I have a parent div which has its position as fixed. What i'm trying to do is to get the child div1 to stand out when I blur the page but the entire parent div stands out. After having read a lot of posts which said that the parent div overrides the z-index and the child's z-index has no meaning, I'm stuck here not knowing how to make this work.
If not getting this to work, can anyone help me with a solution for this?
This is easily achievable when you don't actually contain the intended children in the parent element, but instead fake hierarchy visually while keeping the DOM layout flat. A sample is built below:
http://jsfiddle.net/4KLRU/1/
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div class="child">Something</div>
<div class="child behind_parent">Something else</div>
<div class="child">Something else entirely</div>
<div id="parent"></div>
</div>
Notice that the parent element isn't actually around the so-called children elements.
CSS:
#container {
position: fixed;
padding: 10px;
}
#parent {
background: orange;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
.child {
position: relative;
background: red;
margin: 5px;
z-index: 2;
}
.behind_parent {
z-index: 0;
}
Without knowing exactly what your markup looks like, you could try the following approach:
#parent {
position: fixed;
...
}
#child {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
...
}
I've got 2 elements, 2 images of exactly the same dimensions, positioned one on top of the other. Say they're called A and B (A is the top one). What I've done is made it so when you hover over A, its z-index decrements by 2 so that B is now on top, and B's hover: increments its z-index by 2 so it's now higher by 1 than A's original z-index (thus image B stays on top until you remove mouse). So basically...
#A {z-index: 5;}
#B {z-index: 4;}
#A:hover {z-index: 3;}
#B:hover {z-index: 6;}
This works perfectly in Firefox and Chrome, but IE doesn't want to hear about it, and my images keep spazzing while hovering over them. Any help is appreciated. Positioning is Absolute, if that matters.
#jklm313
That actually works in my IE9 as well. Maybe I should post the full code since one of my "images" is actually a social network button. So here it is:
HTML:
<div id="myTweetBrown"></div>
<div id="myTweet"><?php include ("myPHP/homepageSoc/tweet.php") ?></div>
CSS:
#myTweetBrown {
position: absolute;
background-image: url('../images/tweetBrown.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
height: 20px;
width: 54px;
left: 381px;
top: 662px;
z-index: 5;
}
#myTweetBrown:hover {
position: absolute;
z-index: 3;
}
#myTweet {
position: absolute;
height: 20px;
width: 54px;
left: 381px;
top: 662px;
z-index: 4;
}
#myTweet:hover {
position: absolute;
z-index: 6;
}
tweet.php:
Tweet
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
Link to demo website: ***** -- scroll down to Tweet button
This will be up only for so long, because I don't want people to have access like that <.<
Just going to rewrite my whole answer now the source code has been provided.
All "modern" versions of IE, when not in quirks mode, accept this code perfectly fine for divs and links. The problem in IE arises for iframes and other unusual elements, at which point its rendering engine seems to fail. (Shock!) You'll get this flickering for no apparent reason, except perhaps the conflicting doctypes in the iframe and page, which I would also try avoid if possible.
Presuming this link is generated by twitter, I would advise a fallback approach for IE. Instead of hovering between your button image and a twitter provided button image, I would just manipulate the css of the button twitter provided inside the iframe using javascript.
document.getElementsByTagName('iframe')[0].getElementsByTagName('a')[0].className += 'myTweetBrown';
The button looks to be generated by HTML5 rather than being a static image, so it shouldn't be difficult to manipulate:
.myTweetBrown:hover {
background-image: url('../images/tweetBrown.png') !important;
background-repeat: no-repeat !important;
background-position: center center !important;
height: 20px !important;
width: 55px !important;
}
.myTweetBrown:hover * {
display: none;
}
The other approach you could take is keep doing what you were doing before, but applying the styles differently like so, dependant on display:
#myTweetBrown {
position: absolute;
background-image: url('../images/tweetBrown.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
height: 20px;
width: 54px;
left: 381px;
top: 662px;
z-index: 5;
}
#myTweetBrown:hover {
opacity: 0;
}
#myTweet {
position: absolute;
height: 20px;
width: 54px;
left: 381px;
top: 662px;
z-index: 3;
}
Technically, CSS doesn't actually specify how and when elements go in and out of the "hover" state. So it sounds like when A goes under B, your version of IE removes the hover state from A and it immediately pops back in front of B, before B gets the hover state and pops further in front.
How about wrapping the two in a div, and testing for the hover state on that? Does that work?
http://jsfiddle.net/X64au/
Try wrap them in a div
.parent
{
position:relative;
z-index:1000;
}
.a
{
position: absolute;
z-index : 1001;
display: inline-block;
}
.b
{
position: absolute;
z-index: 1002;
display: inline-block;
}