I have php that is generating content within <p> tags. I have two classes that I want to use.
Looks something like:
foreach ($record as $r){
print "<p>" . $r['content'] . "</p>";
}
One class is called readmore. I want to assign it to anything with an <a href>.
The other is called list01. I want to assign it to any <ul> tags.
Could anyone assist?
Add a class to your paragraph so that you can distinguish it from others, then use this CSS:
.myParagraphClass a
{
/* Your readmore styles go here */
}
.myParagraphClass ul
{
/* Your list01 styles go here */
}
You do not need to target those elements directly with a class since you can target them by the parent child relationship they have to the paragraph
You can use a number of ways to solve this, adding classes would be done in your PHP or after DOM load by Javascript/Jquery.
Using just CSS (and you don't care about ie6) you could:
p > a
{
/* <a> Styles here */
}
p > ul
{
/* <ul> styles */
}
Or maybe target just the last <a> in the <p>
p a:last-child
{
/* Last child styles */
}
Related
I have multiple css classes that make up a button using SCSS.
.ghost-button {
// CSS goes here
}
.ghost-button-label {
// CSS goes here
}
.plus-circle {
//CSS goes here
}
Using Angular I can control the disabled state using the following feature.
[class.disabled]="booleanFlag"
I wanted to have a disabled state for this button with out having multiple disabled classes like so,
.ghost-button.disabled {
// CSS goes here
}
.ghost-button-label.disabled {
// CSS goes here
}
.plus-circle.disabled {
//CSS goes here
}
This is an example of what I am trying to do. This did not work for me.
.ghost-button .ghost-button-label .plus-circle-position .disabled {
//CSS goes here
}
Here is the markup I use for the button,
<div style="padding-top: 10px" (click)="handleClickAdd($event)">
<div class="ghost-button ghost-button-label icon-custom icon-margin plus-circle plus-circle-position" [class.disabled]="blockAdditions">
<div>
<div>Add</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Is there a way to do this? Thanks.
This doesn't work because it means each class is a descendant of the previous:
.ghost-button .ghost-button-label .plus-circle-position .disabled {
//CSS goes here
}
If you're trying to just select that one div with all four classes, just remove the spaces:
.ghost-button.ghost-button-label.plus-circle-position.disabled {
//CSS goes here
}
If you're trying to select any elements that have the disabled class plus one of the three other classes, then you use commas to separate the different combinations:
.ghost-button.disabled,
.ghost-button-label.disabled,
.plus-circle-position.disabled {
// CSS
}
Of course you could just select .disabled if you want this CSS applied to every element with the disabled class:
.disabled {
// CSS
}
Just be sure to take into account View Encapsulation. You may need to put this CSS in the global style file styles.css if this class exists in more than one component.
Just a note, you are not setting the disabled state here, you are adding a class with the name "disabled". disabled is a boolean attribute you can set via HTML, which you can then select with the pseudo-class :disabled.
button:disabled {
color: red
}
<button>Not Disabled</button>
<button disabled>Disabled</button>
If this is what you were actually trying to do then in Angular it would be:
[disabled]="booleanFlag"
You can target a disabled element with the :disabled pseudo-class https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:disabled
So depending on the relationship between your button/label/plus-circle you should be able to target those as well based on whether the button is disabled. For example, if the button and label are siblings you could do this:
.ghost-button:disabled,
.ghost-button:disabled + .ghost-button-label,
.ghost-button:disabled + .plus-circle {
// CSS goes here
}
That would only work if the label and circle were siblings that come after the button, if they are before the button, you can't select them that way.
I'm trying to select input elements of all types except radio and checkbox.
Many people have shown that you can put multiple arguments in :not, but using type doesn't seem to work anyway I try it.
form input:not([type="radio"], [type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
Any ideas?
Why :not just use two :not:
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"])
Yes, it is intentional
If you're using SASS in your project, I've built this mixin to make it work the way we all want it to:
#mixin not($ignorList...) {
//if only a single value given
#if (length($ignorList) == 1){
//it is probably a list variable so set ignore list to the variable
$ignorList: nth($ignorList,1);
}
//set up an empty $notOutput variable
$notOutput: '';
//for each item in the list
#each $not in $ignorList {
//generate a :not([ignored_item]) segment for each item in the ignore list and put them back to back
$notOutput: $notOutput + ':not(#{$not})';
}
//output the full :not() rule including all ignored items
&#{$notOutput} {
#content;
}
}
it can be used in 2 ways:
Option 1: list the ignored items inline
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
#include not('[type="radio"]','[type="checkbox"]'){
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
}
Option 2: list the ignored items in a variable first
$ignoredItems:
'[type="radio"]',
'[type="checkbox"]'
;
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
#include not($ignoredItems){
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
}
Outputted CSS for either option
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
}
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]) {
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
Starting from CSS Selectors 4 using multiple arguments in the :not selector becomes possible (see here).
In CSS3, the :not selector only allows 1 selector as an argument. In level 4 selectors, it can take a selector list as an argument.
Example:
/* In this example, all p elements will be red, except for
the first child and the ones with the class special. */
p:not(:first-child, .special) {
color: red;
}
Unfortunately, browser support is somewhat new.
I was having some trouble with this, and the "X:not():not()" method wasn't working for me.
I ended up resorting to this strategy:
INPUT {
/* styles */
}
INPUT[type="radio"], INPUT[type="checkbox"] {
/* styles that reset previous styles */
}
It's not nearly as fun, but it worked for me when :not() was being pugnacious. It's not ideal, but it's solid.
If you install the "cssnext" Post CSS plugin, then you can safely start using the syntax that you want to use right now.
Using cssnext will turn this:
input:not([type="radio"], [type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
Into this:
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
https://cssnext.github.io/features/#not-pseudo-class
I have the following in my css file:
md-menu-content.md-menu-bar-menu.md-dense .md-menu > .md-button:after{
display:none;
}
And here's my HTML:
<md-menu-content class="ZZZ">
Hello
</md-menu-content>
I have some Javascript (material design) that adds lots of stuff to the <md-menu-content> elements.
I would like to apply the above CSS to certain <md-menu-content> elements (only if they have the ZZZ class) and leave all others behaving as normal. I'm very stuck. Is this possible in CSS?
To apply the css that you want to all items of the ZZZ class, you should use code like this:
.ZZZ {
//your code here
}
The . before the ZZZ signifies that it applies to items with the class ZZZ. This can be done with any class, as all you have to do is put a . (period) before the class name.
I think you are over thinking this, just use the css styling like you would any other time, and it works just fine. See fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/pyexm7us/3/
HTML
<md-menu-content class="ZZZ">
Hello
</md-menu-content>
<md-menu-content>
World
</md-menu-content>
CSS
md-menu-content{background-color: red; color: white;}
.ZZZ{background-color: blue; color: white;}
This is absolutely possible with CSS
To apply styling to elements with the same class simply use the prefix .
.ZZZ {
//styling for elements with class ZZZ
}
If you want to work with id's then use the prefix #
#ZZZ {
//styling for elements with the ID ZZZ
}
I'm trying to select input elements of all types except radio and checkbox.
Many people have shown that you can put multiple arguments in :not, but using type doesn't seem to work anyway I try it.
form input:not([type="radio"], [type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
Any ideas?
Why :not just use two :not:
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"])
Yes, it is intentional
If you're using SASS in your project, I've built this mixin to make it work the way we all want it to:
#mixin not($ignorList...) {
//if only a single value given
#if (length($ignorList) == 1){
//it is probably a list variable so set ignore list to the variable
$ignorList: nth($ignorList,1);
}
//set up an empty $notOutput variable
$notOutput: '';
//for each item in the list
#each $not in $ignorList {
//generate a :not([ignored_item]) segment for each item in the ignore list and put them back to back
$notOutput: $notOutput + ':not(#{$not})';
}
//output the full :not() rule including all ignored items
&#{$notOutput} {
#content;
}
}
it can be used in 2 ways:
Option 1: list the ignored items inline
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
#include not('[type="radio"]','[type="checkbox"]'){
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
}
Option 2: list the ignored items in a variable first
$ignoredItems:
'[type="radio"]',
'[type="checkbox"]'
;
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
#include not($ignoredItems){
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
}
Outputted CSS for either option
input {
/*non-ignored styling goes here*/
}
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]) {
/*ignored styling goes here*/
}
Starting from CSS Selectors 4 using multiple arguments in the :not selector becomes possible (see here).
In CSS3, the :not selector only allows 1 selector as an argument. In level 4 selectors, it can take a selector list as an argument.
Example:
/* In this example, all p elements will be red, except for
the first child and the ones with the class special. */
p:not(:first-child, .special) {
color: red;
}
Unfortunately, browser support is somewhat new.
I was having some trouble with this, and the "X:not():not()" method wasn't working for me.
I ended up resorting to this strategy:
INPUT {
/* styles */
}
INPUT[type="radio"], INPUT[type="checkbox"] {
/* styles that reset previous styles */
}
It's not nearly as fun, but it worked for me when :not() was being pugnacious. It's not ideal, but it's solid.
If you install the "cssnext" Post CSS plugin, then you can safely start using the syntax that you want to use right now.
Using cssnext will turn this:
input:not([type="radio"], [type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
Into this:
input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]) {
/* css here */
}
https://cssnext.github.io/features/#not-pseudo-class
I'm trying to create a menu system, which is dynamically resizes itself horizontally to fill out depending on how many "li" entries there are, I'm dynamically creating the webpages with XSLT. My thoughts are whether this is possible todo within CSS?
Here's my CSS specifically for the HTML page
nav[role="navigation"] li {
float: left;
width: 10.00%; /* I want to dynamically set this width */
}
Snippet of HTML in question
<nav role="navigation" count="2"><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ul>
<li>
Movies
</li>
<li>
News
</li>
<ul>
</nav>
My thoughts are of whether something like this would be possible to call the CSS with a parameter, or am I going against it's declarative ways?;
nav[role="navigation"] li param {
float: left;
switch(param)
{
case : 5
{
width: 20.00%;
}
case : 3
{
width: 33.33333%;
}
}
}
CSS is not a programming language. CSS3 has a bit of logic here or there, but no switch().
For your purposes, the simplest solution by far is a touch of javascript, supplied here assuming that you use jQuery:
var $navLis = $('nav[role=navigation] > ul > *');
$navLis.addClass('count'+$navLis.length); // add a class to every li indicating
// total number of list items
Then in your CSS:
nav[role=navigation] li { /* default styling & width */ }
nav[role=navigation] li.count2 { /* your conditional styling */ }
nav[role=navigation] li.count5 { /* your conditional styling */ }
/* etc */
or just set the width directly with jQuery:
$navLis.style('width', (100/$navLis.length)+'%');
If you demand pure CSS, then get out your logic hat and look over the CSS3 selectors specification. You can construct some Byzantine and rather brittle CSS code to fake logic, such as the following selector.
nav[role=navigation] li:first-child + nav[role=navigation] li:last-child {
/* matches last of two items if a list has only two items */
}
If you're using a CMS that knows how many items it is going to be putting in the list, then you can get fancy on your server backend by adding little bits of PHP to your CSS:
<?php header('Content-type: text/css');
if (isset($_GET['navcount']) && $_GET['navcount'] != "") {
$navcount = $_GET['navcount'];
} else { $navcount = 5.0; } // Default value
?>
/* ... your css code here... */
nav[role="navigation"] li {
float: left;
width: <?php echo (100.0/$navcount); ?>%;
}
Then you request the CSS/PHP script like this from your HTML:
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/path/to/style.php?navcount=5" />
There's a few great tools out there for writing stylesheets that mix down nicely into CSS, and some even provide PHP implementations to do so dynamically. The strongest CSS extension right now is Sass, which has just the sort of syntax that you're looking for. I'd recommend using Sass through Compass, which is a framework for Sass that really gives it some teeth. You can parse Sass into CSS on-the-fly in PHP using phamlp
Although Compass (and Sass) are awesome tools, plugging them into an existing project could be more trouble than its worth. You might just want to do simple logic using Javascript.
have you tried LESS?
LESS extends CSS with dynamic behavior
such as variables, mixins, operations
and functions. LESS runs on both the
client-side (IE 6+, Webkit, Firefox)
and server-side, with Node.js.
It is not possible with simple CSS.
But for this specific example, you might look at the display: table-cell; property.