the issue i am fighting through is a bit complicated. Ill explain the setup envoironment to you first.
I am using PHPStorm to work on a Symony2 Project.
My Apache is hosted on a Debian-VM connected to PHPStorm via "Deployment Tool".
/* So far: I can edit code and update the server automaticaly on save. Works*/
My problem now is, that i am using the composer, which is ment do get me the right bundles into the vendor folder.
I WANT to create kind of a symlink from the server directly into the project.
I DONT WANT to download the vendor folder from the server hard into the project.
COMPACT:
I want to create a symbolic link within a PHPStorm project. Linking a folder from a server into the Project. The linked in folder should be unidirectional updated on source change. The Classes and Namespaces should be known to the Project.
Is there any native way to get this done?
Or does anyone know a plugin which could handle such affairs?
I hope i expressed my point clearly :/ Please ask, if anything is unclear.
Greetings and thanks upfront.
It's not possible to do directly from PhpStorm, see the related issue. You can use some third-party tool like ExpanDrive to map a server directory to the drive letter by SFTP and then add this local directory as a content root to your PhpStorm project. Note that it may affect the performance dramatically.
Related
Probably a silly question, but I cannot find any good advice on the internet so far, so hopefully you guys have some good advice. I would like to use GIT for version control and use it to deploy changes to my websites to the server(s). It's easy when I use NodeJS, but a bit more complicated when using a CMS system, to my opinion.
When I use NodeJS
When I use NodeJS it's quite easy to have a node_modules folder which contains all the external libraries which I will install on deployment. The rest(my own files) will be saved on Github and deployed to my server if changed. Obviously I will not store the node_modules folder on my Github account or send it to my server (node modules will be installed on the server, on deployment). So it's pretty easy to keep those two (third-party an my own files) seperated.
When I use Wordpress, Magento or something similar
Now it gets complicated. Mostly because CMS systems like Wordpress have a folder structure like wp_content/themes/theme_name/, so your own theme files are more or less entangled with the core structure, instead of separated like NodeJS. And it doesn't seem right to commit all my core files to my Github account as well or send all those core files to my server on every deploy (I would prefer to install them using composer or something, serverside), because I'll never touch the core files, obviously.
So is there any advice? Is there a better whey to handle this? Maybe change a configuration file with the path to my theme folder or something?
The best way to do this is to move your wp-content folder outside of your standard installation. I tend to have a folder called "wp" with the basic WordPress installation in it and a folder called "wp-content" at the same level for my content files. You can then tell WordPress that your content folder is elsewhere with the following:
define('WP_CONTENT_DIR', dirname(__FILE__) . '/content');
That goes into wp-content.php which you can also take out of the main WordPress install (and thus add to git) and place at the same level as your folders.
To make things even better consider looking at composer https://getcomposer.org/ and using that to bring in WordPress core and plugins https://wpackagist.org/ is your friend here. This guide got me started on using composer with WordPress and its a good start https://roots.io/using-composer-with-wordpress/ you can pull in your theme from git as well via composer which is great for when you deploy etc... Capistrano for example can run composer on a server :)
I currently have my resources (images) in ...
C:\inetpub\wwwroot\images
I also have the images in the same location on my production server. How can I set it up so that I don't have to constantly sync up the folders? Seems like an easy thing but I'm not sure...
Any other information let me know and I will provide. Thanks!
Why don't you include them in your web project? That way when you deploy the web project the images are included by default :)
You can also use one of SCM's such as SVN or GIT to keep files in sync, if you don't want each time redeploy your application. But you should "checkout" to synchronize files or make a .bat file which will do that automatically.
I've been trying to wrap my head around module development for DotNetNuke for the past day and I keep running into roadblocks. Prior to this, being the *NIX/OSX grognard that I am, I have managed to create a Skin and a few Widgets "The Hard Way" by creating the manifest file myself with a python script, coding everything in Textmate and using a Makefile to create the packages anytime I update it, then installing it onto a remote development site on some shared hosting. However, I want to try things the "DotNetNuke way", so I've been looking around for instructions now that I've got a Windows VM up and running.
From what I've found, this is what you're actually supposed to do:
Create a local dotnetnuke website.
When the dotnetnuke website has been created, go to Host -> Extensions -> Create Extension
Select Module and fill out all the forms.
Open up the website in Visual Studio.
Find your module in the <site>/DesktopModules and start hacking away at it
When you want to redistribute your package, go to Host -> Extensions -> Edit Module -> Create Package.
There are a couple of problems with this, however. I get as far as step 5, and for some reason I can't seem to find my module in DesktopModules. I have tried looking elsewhere in the directory tree for my test module and I can't find it anywhere. In addition, when I try editing a package, I can't see any "Create Package" button.
Any ideas where I'm going wrong? I'm using the absolute latest DotNetNuke as of this writing (5.6.0), by the way.
Update: Okay, feeling a little foolish I first have to create the module in Visual Studio, then create the module in the website and attach it to the manifest of my module. However, when I do this, my site blows up because it seems to assume that I'm using a company name of "YourCompany". Fine. I revert, delete the module and try again but creating my module with a namespace of my company name doesn't seem to change any "YourCompany" names, they're still all over the created files. What in the heck is going on here?
You need to do a search and replace in the entire project as well as the settings in the Projects settings. Also here is a link that may help link
Have a look in the project/solution properties under application make sure root namespace is not YourCompany
I want to programmatically create a directory on the server using ASP.NET.
I have done this using System.IO's Directory.CreateDirctory. however, the newly created folder is not accessible in the code.
after searching a bit, I came to know that the newly create folder is not included the project and hence not accessible.
OK...From your answer to my comment I think you can try this thing out:
images.ImageUrl = "~/Images-" + ObjectName + "/Slide1.png";
Hope this helps...!!
You mention that it is not included in the project. Are you referring to the project in Visual Studio? If so, it will not show up there as it is not a listing of file system directories. It is a listing of project files as build in the proj file. You will need to add it there.
If you are referring to the application then it should be available as soon as it is successfully created.
Please let us know where your issue is happening.
Be careful when modifying the content of the web site in IIS : it detects such modifications and restarts the application immediately.
Is it possible to exclude a folder in a web project from being published? We've got some documentation and scripts that included in a particular project folder, and are added to the project, but when I do a VS publish, I don't want them to go up to the production server.
I know they shouldn't be in the project, but I thought I'd find a workaround before I try to convince the owner to modify the way he's doing things.
Old question, but I found if I mark the folder as hidden in Windows Explorer, it doesn't show/publish in your solution.
This is good for example to stop original photoshop images being included in uploads which aren't used and are big. Anything more complex though you'll probably want to write your own publish tool.
This doesn't answer your question, exactly, but my feeling is that unless you are a single developer publishing to a server, you would be better off doing builds on a dedicated workstation or server using MSBuild (or some other building and deploying solution) directly (and thereby would be able to very granularly control what goes up to production). MSBuild can not only build, but using some extensions (including open source types), it can also deploy. Microsoft has a product called MSDeploy in beta, and that might be an even better choice, but having no experience with it, I cannot say for certain.
In our situation, we have a virtual workstation as a build box, and all we have to do is double click on the batch file that starts up an MSBuild project. It labels all code using VSS, gets latest version, builds the solution, and then deploys it to both servers. We deploy exactly what we want to deploy and nothing more. We're quite happy with it.
The only downside, if it could be considered a downside, is that at least one of us had to learn how to use MSBuild. VS itself uses MSBuild.
For the files you don't want to go, loop at the properties and set the 'Copy to Output Directory' to 'Do not copy'
This option is not available for directories, however.
Can you not exclude them from the project through visual studio to stop them being published. They will the still exist in the filesystem
The only way that you can do this to my knowledge would be to exclude it from the project, do the publish, then re-include it in the project. That can be an issue.
There are probably much better ways to solve this problem but when we publish a build for our dev servers, we'll run a batch file when the build is complete to remove the un-needed folders and web.configs (so we don't override the ones that are already deployed).
According to http://www.mahingupta.com/mahingupta/blog/post/2009/12/04/AspNet-website-Exclude-folder-from-compilation.aspx you can just give the folder the "hidden" attribute in windows explorer and it won't publish. I tested this and it works for me.
Seems like a straightforward solution for quick and dirty purposes, but I don't think it will carry through our version control (mercurial).
Select all the files that should not be published.
Go to Properties
Set
Build Action -> None
Have to repeat the process for each sub-directory.