I've wired up the CompletionData no problem, inserting etc into the Avalon Edit control.
The challenge is the searching algorithm.
In the example below, I want new-obj to "match" *New-Object**** in the list and not do a partial find on ***New-DataObject*.
Is there a flag I can set? Or do I need to override the search and implement my own?
Thank you
Doug
http://dougfinke.com/Stackoverflow/avalonedit.png
Unfortunately this behavior is currently not customizable. It's hard-coded in the private method CompletionList.GetMatchQuality.
That said, I cannot reproduce your problem. The AvalonEdit matching logic doesn't work like your screenshot seems to suggest.
AvalonEdit supports 8 types of matches (with the higher ones having priority over the others):
// 8 = full match case sensitive
// 7 = full match
// 6 = match start case sensitive
// 5 = match start
// 4 = match CamelCase when length of query is 1 or 2 characters
// 3 = match substring case sensitive
// 2 = match substring
// 1 = match CamelCase
"new-obj" is a type 5 match for "New-Object", and no match at all for "New-DataObject".
The completion window is displayed suspiciously far to the right of the word start. I think only "obj" is in your completion segment. You'll have to check your code that finds the word start and sets CompletionWindow.StartOffset, I suspect it is considering the dash to be a word border.
Related
I plan to create an firebase tree solution to make possible to some operator link a person to some data before that person has an account.
So, when that person create its account, it will be possible to find that data. I was thinking about create some tree like this:
- Before_Signup_Link_User
- $user_email
- OperatorONE: true
- OperatorTWO: true
After signup and with its email informed on Firebase, the user would get the operator ID to find data on another path.
The problem is that Firebase does no let us put email as child. Do you have some ideia to do that.
Maybe you can use space char instead of dot char.
For Example:
- user#mail com
- OperatorONE: true
- OperatorTWO: true
a basic solution.. :)
From what I understand, Firebase doesn't allow some special characters (its indicated on their old docs, but I believe its still a valid rule on the new version)
A child node's key cannot be longer than 768 bytes, nor deeper than 32 levels. It can include any unicode characters except for . $ # [ ] / and ASCII control characters 0-31 and 127.
So if you want to use the email as child, you'll have to provide its proper unicode value
I need to fetch from BaaS data store all records that doesn't match condition
I use query string like:
https://api.usergrid.com/<org>/<app>/<collection>?ql=location within 10 of 30.494697,50.463509 and Partnership eq 'Reject'
that works right (i don't url encode string after ql).
But any attempt to put "not" in this query cause "The query cannot be parsed".
Also i try to use <>, !=, NE, and some variation of "not"
How to configure query to fetch all records in the range but Partnership NOT Equal 'Reject' ?
Not operations are supported, but are not performant because it requires a full scan. When coupled with a geolocation call, it could be quite slow. We are working on improving this in the Usergrid core.
Having said that, in general, it is much better to inverse the call if possible. For example, instead of adding the property when the case is true, always write the property to every new entity (even when false), then edit the property when the case is true.
Instead of doing this:
POST
{
'name':'fred'
}
PUT
{
'name':'fred'
'had_cactus_cooler':true
}
Do this:
POST
{
'name':'fred'
'had_cactus_cooler':'no'
}
PUT
{
'name':'fred'
'had_cactus_cooler':'yes'
}
In general, try to put your data in the way you want to get it out. Since you know upfront that you want to query on whether this property exists, simply add it, but with a negative value. The update it when the condition becomes true.
You should be able to use this syntax:
https://api.usergrid.com/<org>/<app>/<collection>?ql=location within 10 of 30.494697,50.463509 and not Partnership eq 'Reject'
Notice that the not operator comes before the expression (as indicated in the docs).
THE GOAL I WANT TO ACHEIVE:
Control AE timelines using ONE EXPRESSION LAYER (much like using Actionscript) to trigger frequently used comps such as blinking, walking, flying etc... for cartoon animation.
I want animate a the blinking of a cartoon character. (and other actions, explained below) Rather than "re posting" the comp or key frames movements every time I want a blink or a particular action, I want to create a script where I can trigger the Blink comp to play. Is this possible? (Sidenote: A random blink through entire movie would be nice) but I still want to know how to do this for the reasons below.
Ideally: I would like to create an "Expressions layer" in the main comp to TRIGGER other comps to play. At certain points I would like to add triggers to call frequently used comps that contain actions like.. Blinking, Walking, Flying, Look Left and Right etc...
IT WOULD BE AMAZING IF somehow we could trigger other comps to begin, repeat, stop, maybe reverse, and do this all from one Main Comp using an expression layer.
WHY DO IT THIS WAY?
Why not just paste a comp in the spot you want it to play every time you want such action? Well in after effects if you wanted a "blink comp" to play 40 times in two minutes you would have to create 40 layers, or pate the key frames on that comp 40 times. Wouldn't it be awesome to trigger or call it from one one layer when you wanted it from one expressions layer?
We do something like this in Flash using Actionscript all the time. It would be awesome if there was a method out there to achieve this effect. This would be an OUTSTANDING tutorial and I believe it would be very popular if someone did it. It could be used for a MULTITUDE of amazing effects and could save a ton of time for everyone. Heck, help me figure this out and perhaps I will make a tutorial.
Thank you all ye "overflowing Stackers" who contribute! :)
I found the answer and that is...
IT'S NOT POSSIBLE.
After Effects expressions can not control other timelines. Unfortunately you have to put an expression on each layer you want to affect.
The next best solution, and to achieve something close to what I was asking can be found on this link: motionscript.com/design-guide/marker-sync.html
We can only hope that Adobe will someday give the power to expressions like they did with action-script.
HOPEFULLY SOON! Anyone reading this who works for Adobe please plead our case. Thanks
Part 1: Reference other layers in pre-Comps
Simply replace "thisComp" with "comp("ComName")"
To reference Effect-Controllers between compositions, follow the below formula:
comp("ComName").layer("LayerWithExpression").effect("EffectControlerName")("EffectControllerType")
More In-depth Answer: Adobe's Docs - Skip to the Layer Sub-objects part
As I understand the Adobe documentation, only Layers can be accessed,
not footage. What this means is that you will need to create your
expression link utilizing a pre-Comp. Footage can not access this so
that also means no nulls, adjustment layers, etc.
As an added bonus, if you use the essential graphics panel, you can put all the controllers in one pre-comp, but have the controls available no matter which comp you are in. Just select it in the Essential-Graphics dropdown.
Part 2: Start/End based on other layers within pre-comps:
Regarding the next part where you want the expressions to activate based on other compositions, I recommend using the in-out Point expression.
inPoint | Return type: Number. Returns the In point of the layer, in seconds.
outPoint | Return type: Number. Returns the Out point of the layer, in seconds.
If you utilize the start time overrides you can pull this from:
startTime | Return type: Number. Returns the start time of the layer, in seconds.
Alternate Option:
I would recommend avoiding this as the keyframes are basically referenced as an index, so things can get messed up if you add one ahead of a keyframe you were already using - def incorporate some error handling.
Refer to the Key attributes and methods (expression reference) Here
Part 3: Interpolation & Time Reversal
You can time reverse the layer in the rightclick->time, otherwise this is all interpolation expressions like loop out etc - you can loopOut("FOO") a pre-comp if you not only cut it correctly, but also enable time remapping.
then use this to loop those keyframes;
try{ timeStart = thisProperty.key(1).time; duration = thisProperty.key(thisProperty.numKeys).time-timeStart; pingPong =
false; //change to true value if you want to loop animationn back &
forth quant=Math.floor((time-timeStart)/duration);
if(quant<0) quant = 0
if(quant%2 == 1 && pingPong == true){
t = 2*timeStart+ (quant+1)*duration - time;
}
else{
t = time-quant*duration;
}
}
catch(err){
t = time;
}
thisProperty.valueAtTime(t)
I have a broker query where I need to sort by 2 different fields (using JSP and 2011 SP1)
The API has the method "addSorting" which I am applying.
It appears, however, that the second addSorting call is overwriting the first addSorting call - rather than adding the second sort:
// Sort by Date
CustomMetaKeyColumn customMetaKeyColumnDate = new CustomMetaKeyColumn("date", MetadataType.DATE);
query.addSorting(new SortParameter(customMetaKeyColumnDate, SortParameter.DESCENDING));
// Sort by Owner
CustomMetaKeyColumn customMetaKeyColumnOwner = new CustomMetaKeyColumn("owner", MetadataType.STRING);
query.addSorting(new SortParameter(customMetaKeyColumnOwner, SortParameter.ASCENDING));
They sorts work fine individually.
Is this expected? Is addSorting really a setSorting - where only 1 sort can be specified or am I missing a way to combine 2 sorts?
The addSorting method works just fine. However, it simply does not work for CustomMeta columns!!! There is already a confirmed defect regarding this subject with the following summary: "SortParameter does not work with two metadata fields". This is still an open defect for 2011SP1 and is scheduled to be fixed only for the next release.
Cheers,
Daniel.
For a web application, I need to get a list or collection of all SalesOrders that meet the folowing criteria:
Have a WarehouseKey.ID equal to "test", "lucmo" or "Inno"
Have Lines that have a QuantityToBackorder greater than 0
Have Lines that have a RequestedShipDate greater than current day.
I've succesfully used these two methods to retrieve documents, but I can't figure out how return only the ones that meet above criteria.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc508527.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc508537.aspx
Please help!
Short answer: your query isn't possible through the GP Web Services. Even your warehouse key isn't an accepted criteria for GetSalesOrderList. To do what you want, you'll need to drop to eConnect or direct table access. eConnect has come a long way in .Net if you use the Microsoft.Dynamics.GP.eConnect and Microsoft.Dynamics.GP.eConnect.Serialization libraries (which I highly recommend). Even in eConnect, you're stuck with querying based on the document header rather than line item values, though, so direct table access may be the only way you're going to make it work.
In eConnect, the key piece you'll need is generating a valid RQeConnectOutType. Note the "ForList = 1" part. That's important. Since I've done something similar, here's what it might start out as (you'd need to experiment with the capabilities of the WhereClause, I've never done more than a straightforward equal):
private RQeConnectOutType getRequest(string warehouseId)
{
eConnectOut outDoc = new eConnectOut()
{
DOCTYPE = "Sales_Transaction",
OUTPUTTYPE = 1,
FORLIST = 1,
INDEX1FROM = "A001",
INDEX1TO = "Z001",
WhereClause = string.Format("WarehouseId = '{0}'", warehouseId)
};
RQeConnectOutType outType = new RQeConnectOutType()
{
eConnectOut = outDoc
};
return outType;
}
If you have to drop to direct table access, I recommend going through one of the built-in views. In this case, it looks like ReqSOLineView has the fields you need (LOCNCODE for the warehouseIds, QTYBAOR for backordered quantity, and ReqShipDate for requested ship date). Pull the SOPNUMBE and use them in a call to GetSalesOrderByKey.
And yes, hybrid solutions kinda suck rocks, but I've found you really have to adapt if you're going to use GP Web Services for anything with any complexity to it. Personally, I isolate my libraries by access type and then use libraries specific to whatever process I'm using to coordinate them. So I have Integration.GPWebServices, Integration.eConnect, and Integration.Data libraries that I use practically everywhere and then my individual process libraries coordinate on top of those.