when i click print option background image is not printing..could u please help me out.
here is my css
.OldNote {
background-image: url(/images/icons/arkiv.gif);
background-repeat: repeat;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0px;
}
Usually it is up to the user and their browser settings to print or not print background images. Check your browser settings.
If you don't want to rely on that, don't place the image in the background, place it on your page in an <img>-tag.
You can just add an image tag like this, whereever you want the image to be displayed :
<img src="url" class='printableonly' />
Then in the css, you can do like this :
#media screen {
.printableonly{
display: none;
}
}
#media print{
.printableonly {
display: inline;
}
}
i just add, if you want it to be background, there is no know way to make it repeat like a common backgrond. To put it under the content you may use css as adding it in other element before the content and giving both elements css position: absolute style, together with the *z-index: .. *, where z-index of content will be bigger.
Maybe you may look into full size background solution which is made very similar
Related
I have a page with a searchable table, when someone use the text box to search for data the jQuery code will give live results "like google search suggestion" but inside the table itself.
When there is no text inside the search text box, the table show all data inside it. and the background work great on that, no matter how long the page is.
My problem is when someone search on specific thing and the table only show a few data like "1 or two" the background crop and a blank white background appear in the footer.
What am I doing wrong?
Here is my CSS:
body {
margin: 30px 0 0 0;
background: url(https://example.com/how/900.jpg) no-repeat center center fixed;
background-size: cover;
color: #000000;
height: auto;
}
Add this as the first rule in your stylesheet
{
html, body{ height:100%; }
}
Remove height: auto; from you body selector.
Since you did not "reset" your styles, the browser is using the default one, and sadly the default style for the body does not render it as at least the full height as the viewport allows
Change height: auto to height: 100vh will resolve your issue. Thanks
I'm so confused, take this example
I had a page on WordPress that I wanted to turn to kinda landing page.
I hid the
Nav Bar and the header
I used this code
.page-id-58 .image-bg-header,
.page-id-58 .hero-container {
display: none;
}
It worked perfectly
I also selected full width while editing that page on the editor
I had to use the same color to make that page look like a landing page, so I used that code
.page-id-58 #content article {
background-color: #000000 }
.page-id-58 #content {
background-color: #000000 }
Here's the issue...
It is NOT full width, not as I wanted to be, there's still a lot of space in the left and the right side
As you can see here https://i.stack.imgur.com/07AEt.png
What am I missing, please?
Website preview
Your theme is using Bootstrap 3 and so the maximum width is 1170. If you want to change this to 100%, add this to your theme's 'style.css'.
#media (min-width: 1200px) {
.container { width: 100% !important; }
}
Also your image dimension is low - try adding big image and check.
Check the screenshot below for the image dimension change.
If you want to set full width of your image then you should be use this css
Hope this help
Let me know further clarification
.page-id-58 img.alignnone.wp-image-65 {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
Image Rollover, no JavaScript, no Link, pure CSS, code validate and Browser compatible.
Hello all, I have been working 24hours strait to come up with this fairly easy solution. I want to know if everything is all right and if there are ways to improve. It's quite elegant, here we go:
I have only one image "Logo" but it will show as 2 different logo each with a rollover effect.
I use a sprite (only 1 image containing my 4 logos) and I just change it's position.
Here I insert my image in a div with
<div id="logo-rollover-1" class="logo-rollover">
<img title="whatever" alt="whatever" src="path-to-your-image">
</div>
Then I insert in another div the same image but with a different id
<div id="logo-rollover-2" class="logo-rollover">
<img title="whatever" alt="whatever" src="path-to-your-image">
</div>
Now my CSS:
.logo-rollover {
background: #ffd42a url('path-to-your-image');
width: 230px;
float: left;
height: 130px;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
.logo-rollover img { width: 460px; height: 260px; }
.logo-rollover :hover { opacity: 0; filter:alpha(opacity=0); }
#logo-rollover-1 { background-position: 0px -130px; }
#logo-rollover-2 { background-position: -230px -130px; }
#logo-rollover-2 img { right: 230px; position: relative; display: block; }
Explanations: when someone hover an image it becomes transparent and show the background witch is the same image but with a different position. opacity: 0 for Firefox, Google and filter:alpha(opacity=0) for Explorer. position: relative on the .logo-rollover class is for compatibility of hidden overflow with IE6 & IE7. display:block; is added to the id img for the Opera browser.
No Hack: When there is no link, there is no need for href="#" or "javascript:void(0)"
Advantages: instead of requesting 4 (or more) images, there is only 1 image (the total size of 1 image sprite is smaller then the total size of 4). the rollover is instant as the image is already downloaded. No hack, no false link, code validate. Add a title to the image. The only browser not rolling over is IE6 but the site is not broken, the logo show correctly. There is a hack for activating hover for IE6 but I didn't bother as IE6 is dead.
Tip: use the same path for your image everywhere.
I mean the "path-to-your-image" needs to be the same for all call. Because of browser caching.
Is this the best elegant way? Can this code be improve? I hope it will help someone because it was a real pain to develop thank to others user here I found some tricks here and there and came up with this.
Comment appreciated.
Why not completely removing inner <img> and create logo using CSS background?
<a id="logo">Logo</a>
#logo { width:100px; height:60px; background:url(path/to/logo.png) 0 0;
overflow:hidden; text-indent:-1000px; display:block; }
#logo:hover { background-position:0 -60px; }
Explanation:
<a> is the only element that supports :hover pseudo selector on IE6. If you want native solution for hover logo you must use this tag. Some people sometimes wrap other elements ex: <a><div></div></a> to give div hover property by accessing it from CSS using a:hover div { }
overflow:hidden; and text-indent:-1000px; hide text from inside the div. It is a good practise to leave text inside for accessibility reasons.
background sets the background color of your div, initialy alligned to 0, 0
background-position does the actual trick and shifts the image - it is moving it within the 'viewport' div making different part of the image visible.
nice description! I see one small improvement: put the background und no-repeat definition in your .logo-rollover class to have less css code (you have to write it only once instead of twice)
UPDATE: I have tried the suggestions below, but I'm still facing the same problem. I've edited the code below to reflect the new stylesheet. If it helps, the page in question is http://japanesenostalgiccar.com/2011/05/06/friday-video-nissan-cedrics-vs-s30-fairlady-z/
In my wordpress blog I'm trying to create a stylesheet where an image or embedded youtube video is 640px wide, while the text beneath it is only 600px wide.
The wordpress-generated HTML looks like this:
<div class="entry-content">
<p>
<a href="uploads/2011/05/ball.jpg">
<img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-15139" width="640" height="211"
src="uploads/2011/05/ball.jpg" title="Ball" />
</a>
This is a baseball.
</p>
</div>
My external CSS file has the following:
.entry-content p{
overflow: visible !important;
padding : 0px 20px 0px 20px;
}
.entry-content p .alignnone, iframe{
overflow: visible !important;
width : 640px !important;
padding : 0px !important;
}
img.alignnone.size-large{
overflow: visible !important;
width: 640px !important;
padding : 0px !important;
}
However, the image (and the text) always displays at 600px, while the embedded youtube videos (using the iframe tag) display at 640px.
Thinking it was a specificity issue, I even added
style="width: 640px;"
as an IMG attribute, but no dice. Thanks in advance.
Based on your updates, I looked at the page in question. I think I might have an answer for you.
Check out the styles that your theme "TwentyTen" is inserting starting at line 778:
/*
Resize images to fit the main content area.
- Applies only to images uploaded via WordPress by targeting size-* classes.
- Other images will be left alone. Use "size-auto" class to apply to other images.
*/
img.size-auto,
img.size-full,
img.size-large,
img.size-medium,
.attachment img {
max-width: 100%; /* When images are too wide for containing element, force them to fit. */
height: auto; /* Override height to match resized width for correct aspect ratio. */
}
The 'max-width: 100%;' line seems to be the issue. Using Firebug, I just turned that style off for a second and the picture of the Nissan snapped out to be full-width. So to solve it, you should be able to add this to your own stylesheet:
max-width: none;
I hope this helps!!
You have another class on the image of "size-large" - did you check to see what that style is doing to the image? Does that style possibly have a "!important" declaration in it?
I don't know what the other classes on your img are doing, but maybe you could try something like this:
img.alignnone.size-large {width: 640px !important;}
simple:
.entry-content p .alignnone, iframe{
width : 640px;
}
this will take the child element of p, and set it at 640px;
However, you might need to set the
.entry-content p{
overflow-x:visible
}
The image is only 600px wide because of the padding on the paragraph tag.
If you want to display the image and the iframe at 640px, you can add the following:
to the image:
img {
margin: 0 -20px;
display: block;
}
to the iframe:
iframe {
margin: 0 -20px;
}
Did you try separating the div's i.e. tags for the text beneath & that contains the image/video ?
Keep the container that holds (iframe & text) consistent.
Separating the divs for inner elements of the container is a better option.
I am familiar with CSS techniques to replace text with an image. For example, here are 9 of them: http://css-tricks.com/nine-techniques-for-css-image-replacement/
Are there any techniques for replacing images? Is there anyway to set the background of an image to an image and then hide or move the foreground of the image (the image src element).
I am trying to write a skin for a site that has an image that I want to replace. Thanks.
From how I understand it he's trying to do this in pure CSS, with no changes to HTML or JavaScript.
That is correct. I am adding a new stylesheet to an existing page. Let say I can not modify HTML or utilize javascript.
After a little bit of tinkering, I figured it out!
img.someclass {
background: url("NEW IMAGE URL") top right;
height: 0;
width: 0;
padding: 200px 550px 0 0; /* Insert actual image size (height width 0 0) */
}
This will make the height and width of the actual image 0, but will expand the box to fill the size of the image with padding. The only downside to this is it won't look perfect in older versions of Internet Explorer.
If you have an element surrounding the image, e.g. a DIV, you should be able to set a background image (along with no-repeat and a position) on it, then set the image to display:none.
Alternatively, here's a haphazard solution that seems to work. It positions the image off-screen, then uses the :after pseudo-element to set a background image. It should be workable, but you'll need to fiddle with the values to get it working right. It won't work in IE6 though.
<style>
img.test {
background: url('image_to_show.png') no-repeat right top;
position: relative;
left: -16000px;
}
img.test:after {
content: ".";
color: transparent;
display: block;
width: 16000px;
}
</style>
<img class="test" src="image_to_hide.png">
The best way to replace images is to set the background position. First create the two different images and put them one above the other in the same image. Say your skin element is 50x50 pixels, you'd create a 50x100 image.
Then use some code like this:
.skinElement1 {
background: #fff url("image.png") no-repeat 0 0;
}
.skinElement2 {
background: #fff url("image.png") no-repeat 0 -50px;
}
So to view the second image you move the background up by the required amount. You could either use javascript or your server-side code to set the appropriate class.
Maybe you can set an opacity of an element and then set the background to the image you want.
Musicfreak: I meant using TWO elements.
you will have assign different classes for the two states then write some javascript to have the image change upon an event.
for example:
.firsImage { background:transparent url(/images/someImage.jpg) no-repeat; }
.secondIMage { background:transparent url(/images/image2.jpg) no-repeat; }
HTML:
<div id="imageDiv" class="firstImage"> some content </div>
<a onclick="changeImage()">Change the image!</a>
Javascript:
function changeImage(){
var imageDiv = document.getElementById("imageDiv")
if ( imageDiv.className === "firsImage" )
document.getElementById("imageDiv").className = "secondImage"
else
document.getElementById("imageDiv").className = "firstImage"
}