I'm trying to create an invisible div, over the facebook comments plugin in order to disable the plugin's functionality in an Editor View. This invisible div works in all browsers except IE8. How can I fix this?
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="coveriframe"></div>
<div data-bind-component="fbml: fbml">(RENDER JS COMMENTS VIA KO)</div>
</div>
Try in IE8:
http://jsfiddle.net/pkbz4/19/
The above code works in ALL other Major browsers. WTF Microsoft?
Stylesheet:
#container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
#navi,
#coveriframe {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
#coveriframe {
z-index: 10;
}
I've done this several times in IE8. The solution that works for me is to assign a background color to the div and then set opacity to 0. IE8 then recognizes the div as "existing" above the rest of the content. I also find setting position: absolute and all four directions to 0 is more reliable than 100% width and height. Like this:
#coveriframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
z-index: 3007;
background: #fff;
filter: alpha(opacity=0);
opacity: 0;
}
Here's my update to your jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/pkbz4/21/
CSS Specification says:
The percentage is calculated with respect to the height of the
generated box's containing block. If the height of the containing
block is not specified explicitly (i.e., it depends on content
height), and this element is not absolutely positioned, the value
computes to 'auto'.
Basically, In older versions of IE (including IE8) percentage heights are based on the height of the parent element. If the parent element doesn't have an explicit height, the percentage is ignored and set to Auto (in this case, 0px).
So, to fix this, you'll either want to explicitly set the height/width of #coveriframe or its parent. One thing you could try is setting the height of html and body to 100% (I'm assuming those are the parent elements).
html, body { height:100%; }
#container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
#navi,
#coveriframe {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
#coveriframe {
z-index: 10;
}
why did you want to do in javascript and it works well in all browsers, I'll let my example I hope you work:
-----------------DIV-----------------
<div id="div1" style="display: block;">
<div class="mainbody">
<br />
</div></div>
-----------------JavaScript----------------
function showHideDiv(divX) {
if (divX == "1") {
document.getElementById("div1").style.visibility = "visible";
document.getElementById("div2").style.visibility = "hidden";
}
-----------------button HTML----------------
<li>click_Aqui</li>
The problem is that internet explorer up to ie9 doesn't recognize the mouse hover when hovered over a transparent background. Zach Shipley answer offers a good solutions.
But in case you want to add a border or an element to the transparent div or text the easiest way of doing this is by adding a 1px transparent png as background.
#coveriframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
z-index: 3007;
background-image: url("pixel-transparent.png");
}
Make sure that you are putting fixed height & width to that DIV.
As Shaquin Trifonoff mentioned above sometimes 100% or any length in % may not work onIE8. Always I am trying to avoid % in such situation.
Code snippet :-
html,body{ //This makes your page expandable as per screen resolution
height:100%;
}
#your-hide-div{
height:100px;
width: 100px;
display:block;
}
Related
I am trying to fix my footer to the bottom, despite where I am on the page. I tried
.home-footer{
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 5;
}
but it only works if I take the footer outside of the body and position it right below the html element. How can I make this work while keeping it in the body?
EDIT I found the issue was that my body had transform: translateX(0). That seemed to be conflicting with the fixed footer, because as soon as I got rid of that, it worked. However, I need that rule, or else my slide in navigation breaks.
I found out the issue was a conflict between applying a transform to the body, and having a fixed footer. There appears to be an issue combining those two rules together like that. I resorted to using left positioning for my animation, rather than transform, and it fixed the issue. It's not ideal, but it worked.
Try this:
HTML:
<body>
<div class="container">
<footer>Your footer</footer>
</div>
</body>
CSS:
// wrapper in your body, where your footer will be in
.container {
position: absolute;
top: 30px;
}
footer {
position: relative;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 20px;
}
Add this to your CSS:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
How can I set mix-blend-mode on an element, but not it's children? Setting the children to the default value of normal does not seem to work:
http://jsfiddle.net/uoq916Ln/1/
The solution on how to avoid mix-blend-mode affects children:
Make child element position relative, give it a width and height;
Create some real or pseudo element inside the child with absolute position, and apply mix-blend-mode to it;
Create inner element inside the child for your content. Make it's position absolute, and put it on top of other elements;
Live example
html
<div class="bkdg">
<div class="blend">
<div class="inner">
<h1>Header</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
css
.blend {
position: relative; /* Make position relative */
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.blend::before { /* Apply blend mode to this pseudo element */
content: '';
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 1;
background-color: green;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.inner { /* This is our content, must have absolute position */
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
}
h1 {
color: white;
}
I know this was asked over two years ago, but it could be useful in the future as it could be a better solution than creating pseudo-elements.
There is the CSS isolation property that allows to choose wether the child element should be rendered in its parent's context (auto) or as part of a new context, thus without any blend mode applied to it (isolate).
Check out this page for examples
someone commented that the the whole block is rendered with the effect and that is why you're having the issue. I am able to accomplish what you're are trying to do by removing the h1 from the block, position absolute, and a z-index of 1. here is a jsfiddle to show the effect.
html
<div class="bkdg">
<h1>Header</h1>
<div class="blend">
</div>
</div>
css
.blend {
background-color: green;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
width: 700px;
height: 35px;
}
h1 {
color: white;
position: absolute;
top: -15px; left: 10px;
z-index: 1;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/jckot1pu/
It’s impossible to remove an element’s mix-blend-mode from its children.
MDN says that mix-blend-mode:
sets how an element's content should blend with the content of the element's parent and the element's background
To achieve the desired effect, place the child in a separate stacking context and make sure it renders on top of the element with mix-blend-mode set.
You need two things to make this work:
Make sure that your opaque content (your text) is not a child of the element that sets the background and the blend mode. For example, with CSS Grid Layout.
Make sure the text is rendered over, and thus not affected by, the element that sets the background and the blend mode. Setting mix-blend-mode on your background will create a stacking context for it, and you may need to give your content its own stacking context to ensure it gets rendered above it.
Position your elements with CSS Grid:
define a grid container with one auto-sized grid area
place both the background element and the text element into that one grid area (so that they overlap)
let the text element dictate the size of the grid area
have the background element stretch to the size of the grid area, which is dictated by the size of the text element
Then, set isolation: isolate on the text element to ensure it gets rendered above, and not under the background element.
A working example
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-areas: 'item';
place-content: end stretch;
height: 200px;
width: 400px;
background-image: url(https://picsum.photos/id/237/400/200);
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.container::before {
content: '';
grid-area: item;
background-color: seagreen;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.item {
grid-area: item;
isolation: isolate;
color: white;
}
h1,
p {
margin: 0;
padding: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">
<h1>HEADLINE</h1>
<p>Subhead</p>
</div>
</div>
An important note if you're using the excellent pseudoelement ::before/::after solution posted by Rashad Ibrahimov.
I found that I had to remove z-index from the parent element and apply it only to the pseudoelements and child elements before mix-blend-mode: multiply would work.
For example
#wrapper {
position: relative;
}
#wrapper .hoverlabel {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
/* z-index: 90; Uncomment this to break mix-blend-mode. Tested in Firefox 75 and Chrome 81. */
}
#wrapper .hoverlabel::before {
position: absolute;
content: "";
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
z-index: 90;
background-color: rgba(147, 213, 0, 0.95);
}
I have been trying to figure out how a pixel pattern overlay can be applied over a website section like in this site: http://www.tinkeringmonkey.com/ (over the background video image at top and image in bottom section)
I'm sure this is fairly straightforward, I just don't know what to google to try and find the css or whatever I need to implement it.
Thanks heaps for any replies!
David
If you inspect the website using your browser's developer tools you will see that they have simply included an empty div, scaled it to 100% width and height of it's container, positioned it absolutely, given it a higher z-index than the video container and used a tile-able background image to produce the diagonal lines you see. In this instance the class applied to the div is called mk-section-mask and the css applied to that class is...
.mk-section-mask {
background: url(../../images/video-mask.png) center center repeat;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 3;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
where video-mask.png is a 4px square png with a diagonal line running through it... See here
Hope that helps
Dan
Here take a look at this fiddle
With pseudo element :after, you can add a repeated background and make its position:absolute with top-left-right-bottom to zero.
CSS
div {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: block;
position: relative;
background: url(https://placekitten.com/g/300/300);
}
div:after {
content: "";
background: url(http://dev.bowdenweb.com/a/i/style/patterns/tileables/06/dot-grid-1.png) repeat;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
position: absolute;
opacity: 0.5;
}
In general, when you want to know how a certain effect or layout is achieved, try the web inspecting tools in your browser. I use Google Chrome to develop sites, it comes with a very complete tool set.
As for your specific question, there's several ways to attain this. If you want to apply this overlay to a non-void element, my approach would be using HTML pseudo-elements:
.overlay {
position: relative;
}
.overlay:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%;
background: url(path/to/your/transparent/overlay.png) repeat scroll 0 0;
}
Apply the class overlay to whatever <div> and you're good to go. There's a catch, though: elements inside the .overlay won't respond to mouse/touch events, because the overlay on top will get them first.
I want to have a site that is 100% of the height of the browser at all times, with the width scaling with an aspect ratio when the height is changed.
I can achieve this using the new vh unit: http://jsbin.com/AmAZaDA/3 (resize browser height)
<body>
<div></div>
</body>
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
div {
height: 100%;
width: 130vh;
margin: 0 auto;
background: #f0f;
}
However, I worry about fallback for IE8 and Safari, as it this unit is not supported there.
Are there any other CSS only methods of achieving this effect?
I have a solution that works also with IE8 (using Pure CSS 2.1), but not perfectly.
because I need the browser to recalculate things when he get resized, and apparently it doesn't do that unless he has to (and I cant find a way to make him think he has to), so you will have to refresh the page after resizing.
as far as I know, the only element that can scale reserving his ratio is an <img>, so we will use the <img> to our advantage.
SO, we are going to use an image with the ratio that we want (using the services of placehold.it), lets say we want a 13X10 ratio (like in your example), so we'll use <img src="http://placehold.it/13x10" />.
that image will have a fixed height of 100% the body, and now the width of the image scales with respect to the ratio. so the width of the image is 130% height of the body.
that image is enclosed within a div, and that div has inline-block display, so he takes exactly the size of his content. witch is the size you want.
we remove the image from the display by using visibility: hidden; (not display:none; because we need the image to take the space), and we create another absolute div, that will hold the actual content, that will be right above the image (100% width and 100% height of the common container).
That works perfectly when you first initiate the page, but when you resize the page, the browser doesn't always measure the right width and height again, so you'll need to refresh to make that happened.
Here is the complete HTML:
<div class="Scalable">
<img class="Scaler" src="http://placehold.it/13x10" />
<div class="Content"></div>
</div>
and this simple CSS:
html, body, .Content
{
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body
{
text-align: center;
}
.Scalable
{
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
}
.Scaler
{
width: auto;
height: 100%;
margin-bottom: -5px;
visibility: hidden;
}
.Content
{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
background-color: black;
}
Here's a Fiddle (don't forget to refresh after resizing)
I recommend you to copy this code to your local machine and try it there rather then within the fiddle.
In this similar SO question a CSS technique was found and explained on this blog entry that allows an element to adjust its height depending on its width. Here is a repost of the code:
HTML:
<div id="container">
<div id="dummy"></div>
<div id="element">
some text
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#container {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
width: 50%;
}
#dummy {
margin-top: 75%; /* 4:3 aspect ratio */
}
#element {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
background-color: silver /* show me! */
}
Demo Here
If this is sufficient for you, I'd recommend this technique. However, I'm unaware if the technique can be adapted to handle scenarios where you must have an element adjust its width depending on its height.
You can do it with the help of padding on a parent item, because relative padding (even height-wise) is based on the width of the element.
CSS:
.imageContainer {
position: relative;
width: 25%;
padding-bottom: 25%;
float: left;
height: 0;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
}
I am working on a portfolio project. I have a relatively positioned image in a relatively positioned div. Using z-index I have a fixed position div on top of this, inside of which there are three floated divs, each of which has a cursor url specified in css. All of this is in another div. The aim is to have a previous, play and next cursor displayed on top of an image to control the display of images.
It works well in Safari, Firefox, Chrome. It does not work in IE (9,8 or 7). The cursor does not show when over the image. Somehow, the fixed position div is dropping behind the image, even though it's z-index says it should be above.
I have read a lot on this. I have considered the stacking contexts, and I believe they are OK in my code. I have investigated making all the objects have relative positioning in case fixed and relative positioning is creating different stacking contexts. This did not solve it. I have investigated quirks and standard mode. Nothing seems to work.
I have uploaded stripped back example pages of my problem here:
http://bigflannel.com/portfolio/ie-test
Any help very very gratefully appreciated. I'm 8 hours into debugging and stuck.
The HTML
<div id ="website">
<div id="media-panel">
<img id="image0" class="image" src="http://bigflannel.com/portfolio/admin/albums/album-5/lg/fk01117.jpg">
</div><!-- #media-panel -->
<div id="navigation-panel">
<div id="left-area"></div>
<div id="play-pause-area"></div>
<div id="right-area"></div>
</div><!-- #navigation-panel -->
</div><!-- #website -->
The CSS
#website {
position: relative;
z-index: 0;
}
#media-panel {
position: relative;
height: 600px;
z-index: 1;
}
.image {
position: relative;
max-height: 600px;
max-width: 600px;
z-index: 0;
}
#navigation-panel {
position: fixed;
z-index: 9998;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 1500px;
height: 900px;
}
#left-area {
position: relative;
float: left;
cursor: url(http://bigflannel.com/development/mobileApp/bigflannel-portfolio/images/prevL.cur), auto;
width: 500px;
height: 900px;
}
#play-pause-area {
position: relative;
float: left;
cursor: url(http://bigflannel.com/development/mobileApp/bigflannel-portfolio/images/playL.cur), auto;
width: 500px;
height: 900px;
}
#right-area {
position: relative;
float: left;
cursor: url(http://bigflannel.com/development/mobileApp/bigflannel-portfolio/images/nextL.cur), auto;
width: 500px;
height: 900px;
}
Unfortunately IE is very buggy when it comes to cursors. This is actually not a z-index issue. The layering is working as expected. You can test this by putting a background color on the #navigation-panel as it goes over the image. It has to do with IE and the behaviour of cursor.
Solution: (for IE9)
/* Background with no opacity */
#navigation-panel {
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
}
You can probably fix with earlier versions of IE by using the filter.