I need to get the list of localized items of a publication programatically using coreservice in tridion. Could any one suggest me.
I would use the GetListXml method and specify a BluePrintChainFilterData filter object.
var subjectId = "[TCM Uri of your item]";
var filter = new BluePrintChainFilterData
{
Direction = BluePrintChainDirection.Down
};
var subjectBluePrintChainList = coreServiceClient.GetListXml(subjectId, filter);
You then still need to verify the localized items from the received list.
This wasn't in my original answer, and probably isn't complete because I don't take into account namespaces, but the following would work to select the localized (not shared) items.
var localizedItems = subjectBluePrintChainList.Elements("Item")
.Where(element => "false".Equals(element.Attribute("IsShared").Value, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
The only way I know is to use search functionality:
var searchQuery = new SearchQueryData();
searchQuery.BlueprintStatus = SearchBlueprintStatus.Localized;
searchQuery.FromRepository = new LinkToRepositoryData{IdRef = "tcm:0-5-1"};
var resultXml = ClientAdmin.GetSearchResultsXml(searchQuery);
var result = ClientAdmin.GetSearchResults(searchQuery);
Related
I have two tables that are related as follows:
PMLprojects ONE - MANY Inovice_stat
I have a script to create a record in the Invoice_stat table. It goes as follows:
var myProjectList = app.datasources.PMLprojects;
var myProjectListID = myProjectList.Id;
var myDatasource = app.datasources.Invoice_stat;
var myCreateDatasource = myDatasource.modes.create;
now = new Date();
var draft = myDatasource.modes.create.item;
draft.EmailStatus = "Yes";
draft.PaidStatus = "No";
draft.DateCreate = now;
myCreateDatasource.createItem(function(newRecord) {
var key = newRecord._key;
});
myDatasource.saveChanges();
All the fields are properly populates except the relation to PMLprojects. How can I related the record from Invoice_stat to PMLprojects? I'm getting the following message:
Error log :
com.google.apps.appmaker.client.datasource.AbstractModelDataSource
WARNING: Could not select element with key RecordKey{key=private$6,
model
key=1Y8Ijd68IZyWFllY3d_C9fhAOFtVgKCtH|Gu5LnmmFmZHfEbrL5Ug1fybNaVLSEPn6}.
No records bound.
Here is some proposed edited code for you to try. However, do remember that if your PMLprojects datasource is not loaded on the client, then this will still fail. I also highly recommend that you check out the official documentation here https://developers.google.com/appmaker/models/relations#modify_associations.
var myProjectList = app.datasources.PMLprojects.item; //change this line to point to an item in the datasource
//var myProjectListID = myProjectList.Id; This line is not necessary
var myDatasource = app.datasources.Invoice_stat;
var myCreateDatasource = myDatasource.modes.create;
now = new Date();
var draft = myCreateDatasource.item; //you already declared the create mode
draft.EmailStatus = "Yes";
draft.PaidStatus = "No";
draft.DateCreate = now;
draft.YourRelationToPMLprojects = myProjectList; //here is where you create your relation, replace YourRelationToPMLprojects with your actual relation name should show up in code autocomplete
myCreateDatasource.createItem(function(newRecord) {
var key = newRecord._key;
});
myDatasource.saveChanges();
Since you are probably using both tables with the Manual Save mode... then #MarkusMalessa's approach might return you an error. If that is so, you have to make sure that you create the relation after you create the item but before you save changes. For that, take into consideration the following example:
var project = app.datasources.PMLprojects.item; //project item
var ds = app.datasources.Invoice_stat;
var createDs = ds.modes.create;
var draft = createDs.item;
draft.EmailStatus = "Yes";
draft.PaidStatus = "No";
draft.DateCreate = new Date();
createDs.createItem(function(){
ds.item.PMLproject = project; //here is where you create your relation
ds.saveChanges();
});
Just remember, this will only work as long as the PMLprojects datasource has already been loaded, otherwise you will probably get an error.
I wonder if it's somehow possible to query a SPListCollection object using SPQuery, as with SPListItemCollection. Imagine that you want to find out which lists were created by a given Author or visible for a given user, for example.
No, this is not possible with SPQuery! But i would prefer you using KeywordQuery:
using (SPSite siteCollection = new SPSite("http://server/sitecollection"))
{
KeywordQuery keywordQuery = new KeywordQuery(siteCollection);
keywordQuery.QueryText = "SharePoint";
SearchExecutor searchExecutor = new SearchExecutor();
ResultTableCollection resultTableCollection = searchExecutor.ExecuteQuery(keywordQuery);
var resultTables = resultTableCollection.Filter("TableType", KnownTableTypes.RelevantResults);
var resultTable = resultTables.FirstOrDefault();
DataTable dataTable = resultTable.Table;
}
Within the Keywordquery you could use for example contentclass STSList to retrieve only lists. And in this case when only using contentclass:"STSList" then you would get all lists where the executor has permissions. You can narrow down by adding additional query parameters. SharePoint search is what you are looking for.
I'm trying to understand the purpose of the BasedOnSchemas option in the OrganizationalItemItemsFilterData filter.
The documentation clearly states:
"Gets or sets the BasedOnSchemas condition to return only items that are using the given schemas"
So it should be possible to only retrieve components of a specific schema, right?
here's my code:
LinkToSchemaData[] schemaLinks = new[] {
new LinkToSchemaData { IdRef = "tcm:113-362325-8" }
};
OrganizationalItemItemsFilterData filter =
new OrganizationalItemItemsFilterData();
filter.BaseColumns = ListBaseColumns.Extended;
filter.ItemTypes = new ItemType[] { ItemType.Component };
filter.Recursive = true;
filter.BasedOnSchemas = schemaLinks;
XElement items = client.GetListXml("tcm:113-14192-2", filter);
The XElement items will however, contain multiple types of components, not only those of schema tcm:113-362325-8
How can I retrieve only those components that are based on my schema?
Using both BasedOnSchemas and Recursive = true is not supported. Remove the the recursiveness and you'll find that the schema filter works.
If you want to get a "recursive" list of all Components for a certain Schema, consider doing a WhereUsed on the Schema.
GetListXml("tcm:5-59-8", new UsingItemsFilterData())
I want to get the all fields along with type/datatype of the metadata fields of a Metadata schema.
I have written below sample code to achieve the functionality and I am able to get Name, Description etc but could not find any property with type/dataType. If anyone of you have any idea, please suggest...
var client = new SessionAwareCoreService2010Client();
client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential.UserName = "myUserName";
client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential.Password = "myPassword";
client.Open();
if (client.State == System.ServiceModel.CommunicationState.Opened)
{
var schemaUri = "tcm:1-47-8";
var fields= client.ReadSchemaFields(schemaUri, true, new ReadOptions());
var fieldName = fields.MetadataFields[0].Name;
}
To know the type of a field, you only need to examine the .NET type of the field.
I typically use an "is" check, but you can also call GetType if you want.
For example:
var client = new SessionAwareCoreService2010Client();
client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential.UserName = "myUserName";
client.ClientCredentials.Windows.ClientCredential.Password = "myPassword";
client.Open();
if (client.State == System.ServiceModel.CommunicationState.Opened)
{
var schemaUri = "tcm:1-47-8";
var fields= client.ReadSchemaFields(schemaUri, true, new ReadOptions());
foreach (var field in fields.MetadataFields)
{
if (field is SingleLineTextFieldDefinitionData)
{
// Do something specifically for single-line text fields
}
}
}
The ReadSchemaFields method exposes only the definition of the fields. So it is essentially a wrapper around the properties you enter while you define the field in a schema.
The Content and Metadata are exposed by ComponentData.Content and ComponentData.Metadata respectively. But those are exposed as XML strings, so you will have to do your own parsing of them.
If you (understandably) don't feel like that, have a look at this helper class: http://code.google.com/p/tridion-practice/wiki/ChangeContentOrMetadata
You might also want to read my answer to this question: Updating Components using the Core Service in SDL Tridion 2011
Ruby on Rails controllers will automatically convert parameters to an array if they have a specific format, like so:
http://foo.com?x[]=1&x[]=5&x[]=bar
This would get converted into the following array:
['1','5','bar']
Is there any way I can do this with an ActionScript 3 HTTPService object, by using the request parameter? For example, It would be nice to do something like the following:
var s:HTTPService = new HTTPService();
s.request['x[]'] = 1;
s.request['x[]'] = 5;
s.request['x[]'] = 'bar';
However, that will simply overwrite each value, resulting in only the last value being sent. Anyone have a better idea? I know I could just append stuff to the query string, but I'd like to do it in the POST body.
I was working on this same problem as well. Fortunatly, Flex supports this out of the box.
Just use an Array for the field value:
var service:HTTPService = new HTTPService();
service.useProxy = true;
service.destination = "myservicet";
service.resultFormat = HTTPService.RESULT_FORMAT_XML;
var fields:Array = ["categories", "organisation"];
var params:Object = new Object();
params.q = "stackoverflow";
params.rows = 0;
params.facet = "true";
params["facet.field"] = fields;
service.send(params);
The HTTPService will convert this t0 the url parameters:
facet=true&q=stackoverflow&facet%2Efield=categories&facet%2Efield=organisation&rows=0
Hope this helps!
Added for more clarity. When there is only 1 argument in the array, do not pass the fields as an array. For some reason, flex will not send this to the http service
I usually do something like this...
var s:HTTPService = new HTTPService();
s.url = "http://foo.com";
s.method = "post";
// add listeners...
s.addEventListenser(ResultEvent.RESULT,function(event:ResultEvent){
mx.controls.Alert.show(event.result.toString());
});
// send the data...
s.send({
a: 1,
b: 5,
c: "bar"
});
which would result in the HTTP Get / POST of:
http://foo.com?a=1&b=5&c=bar
You could also just create an associative array and pass it to the HTTPService send method, that would be something like:
var postdata:Object = {};
postdata["a"] = 1;
postdata["b"] = 5;
postdata["c"] = "bar";
// s is the HTTPService from above...
s.send(postdata);
You mentioned that All POST parameters must have the same name.
Elements that have the same name will overwrite each other in an associative array.
However, I have dealt with calendar cells before, and all 31 cells belong to the Date category.
What I did was:
var params:Object = new Object;
for (var i:uint=0; i<31; i++){
params["Date"+(jj.toString())] = date[i];
}
HTTPService....etc.
HTTPService.send(params);
So, on the POST receiving side, it would be interpreted as Date0...Date31.
Don't know if this was what you wanted, and the post was so long ago.
Come to think about it.
Why don't you do an array push of all of the elements under the same index name?
However, this means you are sending an array to the receiving side.
If you are POST-ing this, how will this be URL-referenced?