Lets say this markup:
<div id="socialMedia">
<a class="Twitter">Twitter</a>
</div>
What i want is only to be visible the first letter of the text (in this case, just a T)
(Actually I won't end up using it but I am curious about this; sure can be helpfull later)
So this was my a attempt:
#socialMedia .Twitter{
display:none;
}
#socialMedia .Twitter:first-letter {
display: block !important;
}
I was able to check that it won't achieve it. Question is why? and is there some work-around this?
-EDIT-
We are looking for IE=+7/8 version capable solutions..
Salut
Try something like this:
.Twitter {
font-size: 0;
}
.Twitter:first-letter {
font-size: 12px;
}
<div class="Twitter">Twitter</div>
Maybe this is not the best solution, but it works.
Edit: Disclaimer: this does not work according to comments. Please don't use as-is without checking it fits your needs.
If you check the specification for the :first-letter pseudo-element, you'll notice the following:
The :first-letter pseudo-element must select the first letter of the first line of a block, if it is not preceded by any other content (such as images or inline tables) on its line.
The important word here is "block."
You are trying to use the pseudo-element on an <a/> tag with class of Twitter. By default, anchor tags are inline elements (not block level elements).
For your given markup, one solution to your problem would be to style the anchor this way:
.Twitter {
display:block;
visibility:hidden;
}
.Twitter:first-letter {
visibility:visible;
}
I'm not sure exactly what you are going for, but that is good enough for experimental purposes. Check out a demo here: http://jsfiddle.net/H7jhF/.
Another way is to use color: transparent
.twitter{
display: block;
color: transparent;
}
.twitter:first-letter{
color: #000;
}
<div id="socialMedia">
<a class="twitter">Twitter</a>
</div>
JSFiddle
However, this won't work for lte IE8.
References:
IE7 IE8 IE9 color:transparent property
color: transparent is not working in Internet Explorer
What you're doing is like hiding a parent element and trying to show one of its children, it won't work because the parent's style overrides it. The parent element also has to be a block level element for it to work. Like a div or p tag, or display: block; on the a tag.
Here's something using color:
HTML
<div id="socialMedia">
<a class="Twitter">Twitter</a>
</div>
CSS
body {
background-color:#FFF;
}
.Twitter{
display: block;
color:#FFF;
}
.Twitter:first-letter {
color:#000;
}
shoot the content off the page and show the letter using dynamic content:
.twitter{
text-indent:-9999px;
display:block;
position:relative;
}
.twitter:before,.twitter::before{
content:"T";
position:absolute;
width:10px;
height:15px;
z-index:100;
text-indent:9999px;
}
at play in this fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/jalbertbowdenii/H7jhF/67/
Why not just use JavaScript and split the string into an array and use the first item in the array. Or charAt()
The pure-CSS answers use visibility and color tricks to hide the remaining letters, but they are still present and affecting layout. It could cause layout issues, e.g. if you wish to float the element and put something beside it.
I found a funny way to do this without hidden elements. The trick is to shrink the entire word down to almost nothing and then blow up just the first letter. It's a bit like OP was trying to do, but it works because it's operating on a continuous spectrum rather than display: none which just shuts down anything inside it. (Kind of an analogue > digital situation.)
Demo
HTML:
<div>Ding Dong</div> and other stuff
CSS:
div {
font-size: 0.0000016px;
float: left;
}
div::first-letter {
color: red;
font-size: 10000000em;
}
Result:
Here's what I do:
.Twitter{
display:block;
width:1ch;
overflow:hidden;
white-space: nowrap;
}
Related
This is likely something I am just stupidly overlooking, but would you please tell me why hovering over the second division element doesn't cause the background color of the first letter to change to rgb(50,50,50) from rgb(150,150,150)?
Hovering over the first division, which starts out with no styling on the first letter, reacts to the style changes upon hover. But the second division, which starts out with the same styles that the first displays upon hover, does not change to the darker background upon hover.
I'm using the latest version of Firefox developer edition. I see now that it works in Chrome; so must be a Firefox issue.
Thank you.
div > p:before { content: 'This text.'; }
div:nth-child(2) > p::first-letter,
div:first-child:hover > p::first-letter
{
float: left;
padding: 0.5rem;
background-color: rgb(150,150,150);
}
div:nth-child(2):hover > p::first-letter
{
background-color: rgb(50,50,50);
}
<div><p></p></div>
<div><p></p></div>
This snippet works in Firefox. It seems that to get the ::first-letter to be styled both without and with :hover a letter has to be there apart from the content added by :before or :after.
div > p:after { content: 'his text.' }
div > p::first-letter
{
float: left;
padding: 0.5rem;
background-color: rgb(150,150,150);
}
div:hover > p::first-letter
{
background-color: rgb(70,70,70);
color: white;
}
<div><p>T</p></div>
I applied #Sydney Y's solution to the above snippet just to show that it works in Firefox. I don't think it is an isue of the :hover not being recognized because the snippet above recognizes it. It appears to be an issue of not including the text added through :before { content: ... } such that there is a first letter to which to apply the style. But adding no content on :hover using :after seems to alter that and works for variable content.
I realize that this of little interest to anyone who doesn't want to use drop caps and change their style based on hover.
div > p:before { content: 'This text.' }
div > p::first-letter
{
float: left;
padding: 0.5rem;
background-color: rgb(150,150,150);
}
div:hover > p::first-letter
{
background-color: rgb(70,70,70);
color: white;
}
div:hover > p:after { content: ''; }
<div><p></p></div>
Yep, just some mix-ups, your accessors are correct. Each block of CSS needs to apply to both divs:
div > p:before { content: 'This text.'; }
div> p::first-letter {
padding: 0.5rem;
background: red;
}
div:hover> p::first-letter{
background: black;
}
div:hover > p:after { content: ''; }
Thanks for the snippet, that's cool!
Edit: getting closer! Code is updated. Still attempting on Firefox.
Edit: Solved, kind of. It works, but it's kind of a hack. The
issue: In Firefox the hover doesn't trigger a repaint in this specific
instance, so I added an empty bit of content on hover because the
:after or content seem to have a kind of a hook. You may be able to
achieve the same thing with a different hack other than content.
But good news is: this works in both Chrome and Firefox.
Awesome problem. I can't imagine ever coming across this issue again, but it was super interesting to troubleshoot.
There is a bug in firefox that nth-child() is not going to work on syntax that's why it is not working. Anyway if not want the same functionality as first one with different color this can be done with you just need to put hover in front of this code
"div:nth-child(2) > p::first-letter,div:first-child:hover > p::first-letter ". I hope this will help. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:nth-child
Hi I am having a label which is having a value but I need to add different styles to that words.
<label> 00001 M2 Available </label>
label{
font-size:15px;
}
The font size 15px should be applied to 0001 only. Can anyone help me out regarding this how to achieve using css.
The only way that this is possible, currently, is to wrap that first-word (or whichever other words) in a specific element and style that element:
<label><span>0001</span> M2 Available</label>
label span {
font-size: 15px;
}
You can style the ::first-letter and the ::first-line pseudo-elements with CSS but, for some reason, the W3C chose not, or didn't think, to allow a ::first-word pseudo-element.
It appears, from testing (in Chromium 28/Win XP) that using the ::first-line pseudo-element will style the first-word (though I don't think this is a specified behaviour), so it might not be reliable cross-browser:
label {
display: inline-block;
}
label::first-line {
font-size: 2em;
}
JS Fiddle demo.
References:
CSS Pseudo-elements.
First of all, David's solution is perfect, but if you do not want to add any extra elements, than you can use content: "" property.. if still you can't use this, than you need to go JavaScript
Demo
label.class_name:before {
content: "00001";
color: red;
}
Check the js fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/9v2n4/
<label> <span style="font-size:15px">00001</span> M2 Available </label>
HTML:
<label><p class="p01">00001</p> M2 Available</label>
CSS:
p.p01{
font-size:15px;
}
Give your label span with a class <label><span class="labelItem"> 00001</span> M2 Available </label>. then style that class .labelItem { font-size: 15px; }
We have a left nav that I am trying to tweak just a tad. Please don't critique the validity of the HTML, we have a CMS and external developers that are driving the ship and, frankly it works for now.
What I want to do is apply a style to <DIV>s that are after the <DIV class="nav_selected">, I just want indent them with some padding-left:30px;
Thats it, but everything I have tried applies to the "nav_selected" div as well which is what I dont want. It is kind of a header, and the divs under that are children.
<div class="left_nav_2">
<div class="left_nav_2_container">
<ul class="no_bottom_border">
<div class="nav_selected"><li><h2>Link 1 Selected</h2></li></div>
<div><li>Link 2</li></div>
<div><li>Link 3</li></div>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
You can try creating a class for the first line, then use a negation pseudo class to utilize it.
:not(/*put all the classes in your css document here.*/){ /* put the css you want for it here.*/}
Something like this could work too:
CSS
.no_bottom_border li{
padding-left: 30px;
}
.no_bottom_border .nav_selected li{
padding-left: 0px;
// or just the opposite values of the .no_bottom_border li
}
Is it something like that?
ok you can use this:
ul.no_bottom_border > div:not(:first-child) {
padding-left: 30px;
}
hope it helps
Here it is which you want
Add padding-left to both the divs like
.no_bottom_border li{
padding-left: 30px;
}
.nav_selected li{
padding-left: 0px;
}
I'm having some issues with the CSS "hierarchy" (not sure if it's proper to call it a hierarchy). I'm trying to style the below bit of HTML.
<body>
<section id="content">
<article>
<ul class="posts-list">
<li class="post-item">
<h2>[post title]</h2>
<p class="item-description">...</p>
<p class="item-meta">...</p>
</li>
...
</ul>
</article>
</section>
</body>
Since section#content changes on every page I have, I wanted to maintain consistent styles across all of them, so I wrote some "global" CSS rules.
#content {
color: #000;
margin-left: 300px;
max-width: 620px;
padding: 0px 10px;
position: relative;
}
#content p,
#content li {
color: #111;
font: 16px / 24px serif;
}
I wanted to style HTML within a ul.posts-list differently, so I wrote these rules.
li.post-item > * {
margin: 0px;
}
.item-description {
color: #FFF;
}
.item-meta {
color: #666;
}
However, I ran into some issues. Here is how Chrome is rendering the CSS:
For some reason, the rules #content p, #content li are overriding my rules for .item-description and .item-meta. My impression was that class/id names are considered specific and thus higher priority. However, it seems that I have a misunderstanding of how CSS works. What am I doing wrong here?
Edit: Also, where can I read up more about how this hierarchy works?
Elements id have the priority in CSS since they are the most specific.
You just have to use the id:
#content li.post-item > * {
margin: 0px;
}
#content .item-description {
color: #FFF;
}
#content .item-meta {
color: #666;
}
Basically id have the priority on class which the priority on tags(p,li,ul, h1...). To override the rule, just make sure you have the priority ;)
The "hierarchy" in which CSS rules are measured is called specificity. Each part of a CSS rule has an actual numerical base-10 value. IDs are worth 100 while classes are only 10.
For more information see http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2007/07/27/css-specificity-things-you-should-know/
Targeting ID's is more specific than targeting classes. More specific styling will overwrite less specific styling. It should be noted that in-line styling in HTML is more specific and will therefore overwrite ID-targeted styling. In other words:
<p style="color:white" id="itemDescId" class="item-description">...</p>
With the CSS:
p{color:blue;}
#itemDescId{color:red;}
.item-description{color:green}
The text will appear white - not because it's closest to the html code, but because it's higher in the specificity hierarchy. If you remove the inline styling (and you normally should for cleaner more manageable code), then the text would become red. Remove the ID and it will be green. And finally it will be blue once the class is removed.
This is one of the more complex topics to understand in CSS, and I'm only scratching the surface, but the easiest description I've found on how CSS specificity works is over at CSS tricks:
http://css-tricks.com/specifics-on-css-specificity/
My response should have been a "comment" on the answer, but I have the correct fix although #tibo answered correctly:
li.post-item > * {
margin: 0px !important;
}
.item-description {
color: #FFF !important;
}
.item-meta {
color: #666 !important;
}
The !important rule will override the order of evaluation between id and class.
Here is a link to an article, When Using !important is The Right Choice, that will help you to understand... it made my life easier :)
Better to follow the CSS standards.
choose css selector and makeit under its parent then u may not to get conflicts when loading css fles (like .css files)
Users can enter descriptions which may include paragraphs or lists. Or they may just enter text without any enclosing <p> or <ul> elements. What I need to do is remove most of the padding and margin above the first element and below the last element so that the user entered content has a nice tight border around it. So I could do one of the following:
Use a css rule I was unaware of to target only the first and last elements
Use css3 or html5 (I assume there's something within these to easily do what I want) and hope everyone upgrades their browsers asap while the older browsers just get a slightly uglier version of the page
Find the first and last elements with Javascript and modify accordingly
Modify the html to add a class like <p class="first">
Ideally the 1st solution exists, does it? I'm ok with the 2nd solution though if not, does it exist? The last 2 I don't care for...
UPDATE: don't care about IE6. But I do need to deal with the situation that if there's just text to begin with, without any <p> or <ul> or other elements, then actually nothing special needs to be done for the top margin/padding.
Use :first-child and :last-child like this. Note that > and :first-child (CSS2) doesn't work in IE6 and below, and :last-child (CSS3) doesn't work in IE8 and below. The only real workaround to both is to use a .first and .last class respectively (you can add them dynamically with JavaScript as Phrogz says).
.description > p, .description > ul {
margin: 1.5em 0;
}
.description > :first-child {
margin-top: 0;
}
.description > :last-child {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
I added the > combinator to prevent elements like strong or li getting selected. What does it mean?
Something like this?
.container * + p, .container * + ul
{
margin: 1em 0 0;
}
.container p, .container ul
{
margin: 0;
}
BoltClock's answer works great in most cases, but IE8 and earlier ignores the :...-child pseudo-selectors.
You can use jQuery to accomplish the same thing, while targetting more browsers.
//On ready...
$(function(){
//Update styles dynamically
$('ul:last').css({'margin-bottom':0,'padding-bottom':0});
$('ul:first').css({'margin-top':0,'padding-top':0});
});
Have you considered wrapping the content in a container with a negative margin? It requires the content to at least be wrapped in a single p element (not hard to test/add melodramatically).
CSS:
.container {border:1px solid black;}
.container .subcontainer {margin:-1em 0;}
.container p {margin:1em 0;}
HTML:
<div class="container"><div class="subcontainer">
<p>My first paragraph.</p>
<p>My second paragraph.</p>
</div></div>