I need to implement a Google Maps collaborative project, but MyMaps is unsuitable as I need to restrict the participants' editorial rights to prevent them from editing each other's markers (which MyMaps allows).
So my questions are:
Can Google Maps API (javascript v. 3) be used to construct a collaborative map?
If so, can registered users have different editorial privileges?
Can registered users be administered through Google Apps for the project domain?
How technically demanding and time consuming would development of a basic collaborative map be?
Any advice appreciated!
Thanks
Related
I am working on a project which doesn't allow us to use the AdSupport Framework. We are wondering what data we will lose / won't have access to with Firebase because of that.
The official documentation only states that "Some Analytics features, such as audiences and campaign attribution, and some user properties, such as Age and Interests, require the AdSupport framework to be enabled. Without this framework, Analytics cannot collect information needed for these features to function properly."
I can't find any additional details anywhere (including here).
I would appreciate the feedback from experts who faced the same situation.
Thanks a lot!
There is a warning on the Firebase best practices documentation against using Firebase with multi-tenant applications: https://firebase.google.com/docs/projects/learn-more#multi-tenancy
This is what I am most concerned about: "Multi-tenancy can lead to serious configuration and data privacy concerns problems, including unintended issues with analytics aggregation, shared authentication, overly-complex database structures, and difficulties with security rules."
There is also plenty of official Google documentation supporting the use of Firebase for multi-tenancy, for instance: https://cloud.google.com/identity-platform/docs/multi-tenancy-authentication .
Do you know why they would have these conflicting recommendations and examples? Does use of Google Identity Platform fix the core security deficits mentioned in the warning?
I am re-posting this question, with additional clarification in the title, and a few edits/removals from the body, to specify that I am only looking for why this widely used product has this particular warning in its official documentation. I have removed most subjective content. I have no opinion on this that is relevant to the question - I am only looking to understand the warning. It seemed there was one good answer before the previous question was closed, so I will link that here for reference: Why is Google Firebase not recommended by Google in their own documentation for multi-tenant applications?
That does make sense if you manage 2 separate applications which have no relation with each other. Let's say you have an app that manages a school's information and other one is a restaurant management app. Now in this case I don't see any event that the school app might need access to restaurant data.
If you use the same project, then all the firebase services (auth, database, analytics, etc) will be shared among them. It'll be hard for you to separate analytics for each of the app. As the database is shared, you'll have to explicitly separate data of both apps by separating the path in db. (/apps/school for school, /apps/restaurant for restaurant).
That being said, any user registered on the school app can login on restaurant app without creating a new account there as you are sharing the same project among them.
Now if your client pays you a the Firebase costs every month, you cannot distinguish between how much should the school client pay. Now even if both the apps are your, the complexity will increase significantly if you go on using it.
https://firebase.google.com/docs/projects/learn-more#multi-tenancy <-- this explains how "Firebase Projects" works and https://cloud.google.com/identity-platform/docs/multi-tenancy-authentication explains about "Google Identity Kit" multi-tenant auth. So that's not a Firebase-only thing.
We are planning to develop a new application that should offer:
Android-capable
Turn by turn with voice navigation
Offline maps (and perhaps routing?)
Satellite maps
Truck issues
As fas as I can see, all of the requirements (but the offline routing) is included in different Here Maps developer plans. Nevertheless, I still have some questions:
On their web (https://developer.here.com/plans/api/consumer-mapping), there are two main divisions (API plan and Mobile SDS plans). Which one is better for me and what is the difference?. I mean, it seems clear that I should go for the mobile plans, but not sure if this will be limiting my development in the future.
There appear no pricing options for the Mobile SDKs. We are planning to make the app available to our customers on a free basis and they will be charged for enhanced services. But seeing that API plans are based on a volume basis... how does the mobile plans work? (does it have any cost depending on the number of transactions too?).
Finally, customized POI are the main advantage of our app and is closed to other users (will no be made publicly available). Does the Here api include the option to add our POIs coming from another (ous) database on the fly?.
Thanks in advance,
Jose.
Turn by turn guidance will be only available via the (Premium) MobileSDK. Via REST APIs you can get routing, but not TbT voice guidance. Also Offline is only avaiulable via the Premium MobileSDK. Beside this, the native MobileSDK offers native vectorbased map rendering, when you use the REST APIs you would need to use the raster tiles. So in a nutshell: if you target Mobiles, you should definitely go with the MobileSDK. If you need any feature that's only available via web APIs (platform extensions, isoline routing, and some more), you can still combine these web APIs with the MobileSDK.
Pricing depends on your usecases, so you should discuss your usecase with HERe Sales: https://developer.here.com/contact-us?interest=mobile-sdk#contact-sales
Customized POIs is quite general, but of course you can load datasets from your servers and show them as POIs on the map, but you could also use the Platform Extension CLE, that also allows you to search within your dataset and is seamless integrated in the MobileSDK already.
I need a tool which can be installed on .aspx platform (on a intranet of a company) which can be used to create collaborative data flow chart diagrams (multiple users can edit the diagram by visiting the intranet webpage).
Have you tried gliffy? - I've seen it used on intranets before, not sure if it's .net or if you can share it, but I recommend it.
I am not aware of a collaborative diagram program that allows you to store the data on your servers. An on premise solution would probably be prohibitively expensive. These SaaS guys aren't really setup to provide that option. You probably would have to get an open source solution and build it out yourself. The company that I work for (Lucidchart) does have a flow chart maker that allows you to lock down the domain so you can't share it with third parties and allows license de-provisioning for someone who leaves the company.
Source: I works for a diagramming company.
I am building a new web site in asp.net, and im newbie with using maps.
For my web site i will need the following functionality:
display a map of specific location.
display route map between two or more location
calculate distance between 2 locations.
I found most of the functionality at the Bing Maps interactive SDK site:
and it works fine.
My questions are:
does it cost money to use this SDK ?
for the third task, i understand that i will have to use MapPoint Services.
(is there another way??) does it code money to use it?
I will really appreciate it if you dont send me links, cause my english is not the best one...
thanks a lot
It sounds like you're at the decision making stage of your project and weighing up the pros and cons of various frameworks. Due the nature of developing commercial applications using maps (supplied by Google, Bing, Yahoo, or any other map provider), it might be an idea to code against a library called MapStraction.
It allows you to easily swap and change map providers depending on commercial and/or customer requirements. It also provides a consistent interface so changing your map provider half way through the project isn't a big deal.
Have a look at using OpenStreeMaps. It's completely free, and so far I have been very impressed with it. In my area, it's more accurate and detailed than Google maps.
In the UK OS maps are also free.
Bing Maps is a good option. If your website is public and the map is publically available, then you can make use Bing Maps for free if you have less than 125,000 page views (similar to a session) of your map page in a year as noted here: http://www.microsoft.com/maps/product/licensing.aspx
If you expect a higher volume of usage then you would need a license. Note that Bing Maps licenses tend to be cheaper the Google licenses. This is pretty neat as Bing Maps has much more data than Google.
Also, MapPoint Web Services are not need, nor do they exist anymore.
Read the licenses carefully, both Bing and Google Maps cost money, if you use it for commercial purpose.
E.g. read this blog post:
http://www.47hats.com/2009/07/google-maps-the-10k-gotcha/
However, if you using it for your non-commercial app, it is free.
Another option to consider for those looking at this thread is Azure Maps, Microsoft's newer enterprise mapping platform. It usually costs less than Bing Maps and provides more features and services. It is also a part of Azure which make things a lot easier if you are already developing in Azure. Find more information at https://azure.com/maps
You can do all of that using just Bing Maps. The Bing Maps routing service can b sued to calculate the driving distance between two locations. If you want the straight line (as the crow flies) distance then it's just a simply calculation.
For Bing Maps you will always need a license, however there are free licenses. If you qualify for free usage depends on your use case. There's a good tool available for figuring out if you need an Enterprise license or if you qualify for free usage here: http://www.microsoft.com/maps/Licensing/licensing.aspx