I would like to have a small red div with full width at a fixed top position, inside another div that has overflow: scroll. I hope the jsFiddle makes it clear: http://jsfiddle.net/mCYLm/2/.
The issue is that the red div is overlapping the scrollbar. I guess right: 0 means the right hand side of div.wrapper; it does not subtract the scrollbar of div.main. When I move the overflow: scroll into div.wrapper, then the red banner has the right size (fiddle). However, it is not at a fixed position anymore (scrolling down makes the banner scroll up).
How can I achieve the following two things together?
The red banner is at the fixed position like in this fiddle.
The red banner has full width except the scrollbar like in this fiddle.
I'd like to get this working in Google Chrome.
HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="red-banner"></div>
<div class="main">
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
div.wrapper {
position: relative;
}
div.main {
height: 200px;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
div.item {
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
}
div.red-banner {
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
height: 20px;
}
Seems like this isn't possible with pure CSS, so here's a JavaScript (jQuery) hack:
$(function() {
var $container = $("<div>").css({ height: 1, overflow: "scroll" }).appendTo("body");
var $child = $("<div>").css({ height: 2 }).appendTo($container);
window.SCROLLBAR_WIDTH = $container.width() - $child.width();
$container.remove();
});
then:
$("div.red-banner").css({
right: SCROLLBAR_WIDTH
});
HTML
<div class="scroller">
<div class="banner-wrapper">
<div class="banner"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="main">
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
</div>
CSS
* { margin: 0; padding: 0 }
body {
padding-top: 30px;
}
div.main {
height: 200px;
width: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
position: absolute;
z-index: 50;
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, center top, center bottom, from(white), to(rgba(255,255,255,0)));
}
div.item {
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
}
div.scroller {
height: 20px;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 100;
overflow: hidden;
}
div.banner-wrapper {
background: transparent;
position: relative;
height: 20px;
overflow-y: scroll;
left: 0;
margin-right: -20px;
}
div.banner {
height: 20px;
background: -webkit-gradient(linear, center top, center bottom, from(white), to(rgba(255,255,255,0)));;
margin-left: 20px;
margin-right: 40px;
}
Development version: http://jsfiddle.net/mCYLm/13/
Final version: http://jsfiddle.net/mCYLm/14/
Works with zooming and variable viewport width.
! BUG: Scrollbar button from the right top is not accessable/clickable.
Tested in:
IE6,7,8,9 (windows)
FF11 (Windows)
Google Chrome 18 (ubuntu)
Safari 5.1 (OSX)
Related
Why my nested sticky element with left: 0 does not stick while the nested element with top: 0 sticks normally?
.scroll {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
}
.container {
width: 600px;
height: 1000px;
}
.sticky-left {
position: sticky;
left: 0;
}
.sticky-top {
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
<div class="scroll">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top-nested</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left-nested</div>
</div>
</div>
Let's add some border and we will clearly see what is happening:
.scroll {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
}
.scroll > div {
border:2px solid green;
}
.container {
width: 600px;
height: 1000px;
border:2px solid red!important;
}
.container > div {
border:2px solid green;
}
.sticky-left {
position: sticky;
left: 0;
}
.sticky-top {
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
<div class="scroll">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top-nested</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left-nested</div>
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the nested sticky elements are both having their width equal to parent width (since they are block element) so there is no room for the left-sticky to have any sticky behavior1 since it has width:100% unlike the top one that can still stick because its height is less that the parent height.
For the non-nested elements I think it's clear.
Make the element inline-block or reduce the width and you will have a sticky behavior:
.scroll {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
}
.scroll > div {
border:2px solid green;
}
.container {
width: 600px;
height: 1000px;
border:2px solid red!important;
}
.container > div {
border:2px solid green;
width:150px;
}
.sticky-left {
position: sticky;
left: 0;
}
.sticky-top {
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
<div class="scroll">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top-nested</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left-nested</div>
</div>
</div>
1 A stickily positioned element is an element whose computed position value is sticky. It's treated as relatively positioned until its containing block crosses a specified threshold (such as setting top to value other than auto) within its flow root (or the container it scrolls within), at which point it is treated as "stuck" until meeting the opposite edge of its containing block.ref
In your case you were always meeting the opposite edge.
As per the MDN documentation on position: sticky, the top, right, bottom, and left properties determine the final location of positioned elements. My guess is that in order for it to be stickied from the top, it needs to also contain top: 0. The snippet I added seems to work.
.scroll {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
}
.container {
width: 600px;
height: 1000px;
}
.sticky-left {
position: sticky;
left: 0;
top: 0; // Add this so it sticks to top
}
.sticky-top {
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
<div class="scroll">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="sticky-top">sticky-top-nested</div>
<div class="sticky-left">sticky-left-nested</div>
</div>
</div>
I have trouble coding a 1px horizontal seperator line with a logo displayed in the center as pure CSS. Should look like this:
Divider with logo centered
There is a problem with multiple instances: When I add more dividers on a single page only one or two will be displayed with a line, the others will just display the logo.
A question about a centered logo was answered here - but none adressed the bug that happens with multiple instances: Divider with centred image in CSS?
Here is a adapted solution out of that discussion, fiddle below.
CSS:
body {
margin: 0;
background: white;
}
header:after {
content: '';
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 1px;
background: #ccc;
margin-top: -90px; /* Negative margin up by half height of logo + half total top and bottom padding around logo */
}
.logo {
position: relative; /* Brings the div above the header:after element */
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
padding: 40px;
margin: 0 auto;
background: white url("http://placehold.it/200x100") no-repeat center center;
}
.logo img {
display: block;
}
HTML:
<body>
<header>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logo">
</div>
</header>
</body>
The fiddle:
http://jsbin.com/delixecobi/edit?html,css,output
I totally changed the CSS. Give the .logo a position: relative and :after a position: absolute. You are using it for one single header. That's why it didn't work.
body {
margin: 0;
background: white;
}
.logo:after {
content: ' ';
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 1px;
background: #ccc;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -1px;
left: -50%;
width: 200%;
}
.logo {
position: relative; /* Brings the div above the header:after element */
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
padding: 40px;
margin: 0 auto;
background: white url("http://placehold.it/200x100") no-repeat center center;
}
.logo img {
display: block;
}
<header>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logo">
</div>
</header>
Preview
If you want the line not to cross or cut, use a negative z-index.
I found a solution also for my question how to get text centered within the div - thanks to web-tiki for his approach here: Line before and after title over image
In the JSBin I put all together and formatted / commented it a bit to make it easy to work with. You will find:
divider formats with img, text and text in multiple lines
stable in multiple instances
body {
margin: 0;
background: white;
}
.logo:after {
content: ' ';
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 1px;
background: #ccc;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
margin-top: -1px;
left: -50%;
width: 200%;
z-index: -1;
}
.logo {
position: relative;
/* Brings the div above the header:after element */
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
padding: 20px;
/* also padding between line and logo */
margin: 0 auto;
background: white url("http://placehold.it/200x100") no-repeat center center;
}
.logo img {
display: block;
}
.logotext {
width: 100%;
margin: 20 auto;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
font-weight: 300;
color: green;
/* color text */
}
.logotext:before,
.logotext:after {
content: "";
display: inline-block;
width: 50%;
margin: 0 20 0 -55%;
/* 2nd no: space text to line on the left */
vertical-align: middle;
border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc;
/* last: color line */
}
.logotext:after {
margin: 0 -55% 0 20;
/* last no: space text to line on the right */
}
span {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
<header>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logo">
</div>
<div class="logotext">
somesome</div>
<div class="logotext">
somesome</div>
</header>
One major drawback to this solution is that it does not allow the width of the line to be defined to % of the main viewport.
Is there a CSS equivalent to vmin that is relative to the smaller dimension of the parent element rather than the viewport?
I have a page with a navigation panel on the left, so only part of the viewport width is available to the main content, and I am trying to have a responsive square that does not overflow from the main <div>. I found the code for the responsive square as an answer to this question, but the square's height overflows when in landscape mode.
I could use JavaScript by listening to window resizing to recompute the square's width as the minimal dimension between the parent's width and height, but in my actual website, the parent is most of the time in display: none so it has no width and I would like to avoid the need to recompute the dimensions when it appears.
Here's a JsFiddle with an example and backgrounds to highlight the issue : https://jsfiddle.net/wy874pqv/4/.
Below is the code I used.
HTML :
<body>
<div id="main">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="one-by-one aspect-ratio"></div>
<div class="content">
<div class="circle">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="leftPanel">
</div>
</body>
CSS :
body {
height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
div#leftPanel {
height: 100%;
width: 20%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
margin: 0;
background: red;
}
div#main {
height: 100%;
width: 80%;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
margin: 0;
background: yellow;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
background: rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.3);
}
.one-by-one.aspect-ratio {
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.wrapper > .content {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
padding: 10%;
}
.circle {
position: relative;
height: 100%;
border: dashed 1px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
Here's my working example:
http://jsfiddle.net/UGhKe/2/
CSS
#body {
height: 200px;
background: black;
width: 100%;
}
.header {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
background: #369;
z-index: 1;
width: 100%;
height: 5em;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: 5em;
overflow: hidden;
height: 1000px;
background: #936;
z-index: 0;
width: 100%;
}
.footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
background: #396;
width: 100%;
}
.large {
font-size: 120%;
padding: 2em;
}
HTML
<div id="body">
<div class="header">
<div class="large">Header</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
Content, you should be able to see this when you scroll to top.
</div>
<div class="footer">
<div class="large">Footer</div>
</div>
</div>
I want the content to be positioned below the header when you scroll the top (but hidden when you scroll down, under header) - this works fine...
However I need to remove top: 5em and use something like "inherit the current height of the header" - is it possible without JS?
If it's really not possible without JS, then I can just use JS but I'd rather try and find a solution in pure CSS.
EDIT:
I should note that the reason I can't use top: 5em is because the header will not have a fixed height - an image (for a logo) will be used inside of the text, and that would be set to max-width: 100% so that it shrinks to right width for an iPhone and doesn't expand too much on say an iPad.
See if thats work for you. http://jsfiddle.net/UGhKe/3/
I added another div with the same height but "non-fixed" to simulate your fixed header.
HTML
<div id="body">
<div id="blockHeader"></div>
<div class="header">
<div class="large">Header</div>
</div>
<div class="content">
Content, you should be able to see this when you scroll to top.
</div>
<div class="footer">
<div class="large">Footer</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
html, body { margin:0; padding:0; }
#blockHeader
{
width:100%;
height: 5em;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
height: 1000px;
background: #936;
z-index: 0;
width: 100%;
}
You can do it using variables(Use SASS or LESS for that). Take a look at the pen.
CODE:
$headerContentVariable: 5em;
#body {
height: 200px;
background: black;
width: 100%;
}
.header {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
background: #369;
z-index: 1;
width: 100%;
height: $headerContentVariable;
}
.content {
position: absolute;
top: $headerContentVariable;
overflow: hidden;
height: 1000px;
background: #936;
z-index: 0;
width: 100%;
}
.footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
background: #396;
width: 100%;
}
.large {
font-size: 120%;
padding: 2em;
}
I am looking to create a vertically scrolling website. I'll have a set of 5 divs that I want to have a height of 100% that are stacked on one another, basically making the body 1500% in height. Yeah?
Here is my code so far:
CSS
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 1500%;
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.panel {
position: relative;
height: 6.66%;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid green;
}
HTML:
<div id="contentWrapper">
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
</div>
This seems to work in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome but it doesn't work on an iPad or iPhone, and knowing how IE like's to behave, it probably won't work there either.
What I am wanting to know is 1) Why is won't work on an iPad/iPhone, 2) is there a better way to do this, maybe with jQuery?
I need each panel to have a height of 100% and have the content (panelGuts) be vertically centered. I'll be using jQuery ScrollTo (or some scrollTo plugin) to scroll to each div. I'd like to NOT have to set a specific height to each div...
Can anyone help?
I actually figured this out with HTML5. It was pretty simple. For anyone who wants to see my results
CSS
body, html {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
background: #FFF;
height: 100%;
}
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.panelContainer { display: inline; }
.panel {
position: relative;
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background:green;
}
article.panel:nth-child(2n+2) {
background:blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid black;
}
And my HTML
<div id="contentWrapper">
<section class="panelContainer">
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 1
</div>
</article>
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 2
</div>
</article>
</section>
</div>
And a Fiddle for you: http://jsfiddle.net/ryanjay/dwspJ/