How to float image inside of div - css

I have this html:
<div class="speaker-list">
<div class="view-content">
<div class="views-row views-row-1 views-row-odd views-row-first">
<div class="views-field views-field-title">
<span class="field-content">
Keith Anderson
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-job-title">
<div class="field-content">VP, Digital Advisory</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-company">
<div class="field-content">RetailNet Group</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-title-1">
<span class="field-content">
Store of the Future
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-headshot">
<div class="field-content">
<div id="file-53" class="file file-image file-image-jpeg contextual-links-region">
<div class="content">
<img typeof="foaf:Image" src="/kanderson.jpg" width="180" height="180" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It's dynamically generated by a Drupal view, so I can't change the output html at all. I need to work with what is here. Here's the desired result:
Without any styling on the headshot, this is what it looks like:
I tried to style the image to force it to float to the left of the text:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row div.views-field
div.field-content div.file-image div.content img {
border: 1px solid #666;
float: left;
position: relative; /* tried with and without position (inc. absolute) */
left: 30px;
}
Obviously I'm doing something wrong, because this is what I get (with relative position):
and with absolute position:
I've also tried putting the float on the "uppermost" div class that holds the image, with no position on the div:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row
div.views-field-field-headshot {
float: left;
}
It gives the same result as the position: relative screenshot.
Where am I going wrong? If I had control over the html I'd do it differently, but I'm not sure how to deal with all of these nested divs.
EDITED TO ADD NEW SCREENSHOT FOR #WEX
Here's what it looks like when I tried to use your code with the html reordered - http://jsfiddle.net/mPa7z/

I'll try to explain the "right" way to use float so that you can see why your way didn't work.
In your post, you try to apply float: left to the <div> surrounding your image, but that technique only works when the element you are floating is above all the elements you want to wrap around it. That "may" solve your problem, but that technique has it's pitfalls if you're trying to use it to create two distinct columns - if the text on the right is taller than the floated element, the text on the right will wrap below it. So then you have to add another container around your non-floated elements to ensure that it won't wrap. This solves your problem, but doesn't really help if you can't even edit your markup!
I'd argue that the technique I've posted below works better, and solves your problem: http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/AQQwX/
.view-content {
position: relative;
min-height: 180px;
padding: 0 0 0 180px; }
.views-row { padding: 20px 0 0 20px; }
.views-field-field-headshot {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0; }​

If you have access to the View itself in Drupal, you can reorder the elements. When logged into Drupal, open the View (in Drupal 7: Structure > Views > Viewname), look for "Fields" and click on the triangle next to "add", which will have a popup, then click "rearrange". You can then drag the photo field to be the first item in the View, then adjust your CSS to float the image to the left.

EmmyS,
Instead of trying to get the headshot to float:left, have you considered making the others float:right? This will give the impression that the image is floating left without having to change the markup in any way.
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field {
float:right;
clear:both;
}
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field.views-field-field-headshot {
float:none;
clear:none;
}
The above CSS should work with that specific configuration without altering any of your other Drupal generated markup. In order to make sure that other CSS does not interfere, I've applied as much specificity as possible. Since the headshot will be back in the containing <div>, you shouldn't need to alter the size of it unless the store is simply too large (I don't know without looking at your data). Finally the CSS is concise, so you can add any additional styling you need on a per-element basis.
Hope this helps,
FuzzicalLogic

When you can drop somewhere else on the page some code, you can gain control over the HTML by using jQuery. Then you could make modifications to the DOM tree.
But I do not understand why you can not edit the HTML. Isn't Drupal open source? You should be able to find the file using FTP and manipulate it.

Related

How to put multiple joomla modules in one module position?

I thought I knew how to do this but something odd is happening.
I put 2 modules in the same module position. I set the Module Class Suffix for both of them to " fouracross".
I add the css...
.fouracross {
width: 45%;
float: left;
border: solid; 1 px;}
}
The modules do indeed sit side by side each taking up 45% of the space BUT the text within each module also only takes up 45% of the space in that module!
You can see the result on this experimental page - I've temporarily put a border on the modules so you can see the outline - http://www.cotswoldplayhouse.co.uk/jm3
It seems that the style is being applied both the the module container AND to a container round the text.
Any ideas how to fix this?
Thanks
This is because it appears to be applying the fouracross class to both the parent and the child elements as shown below:
<div class="art-block clearfix fouracross"> <<< HERE
<div class="art-blockheader">
<h3 class="t">Vouchers</h3>
</div>
<div class="art-blockcontent">
<div class="custom fouracross"> <<< AND HERE
<p>Cotswold Playhouse vouchers make an ideal present. Any value can be purchased and they can be exchanged for tickets for any event for up to one year after purchase.</p>
<p>Full details are available here</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Go to the following location:
modules/mod_YOURMODULE/tmp/default.php
and will most likely have something like this:
<div class="custom <?php echo $moduleclass_sfx ?>">
which you can change to:
<div class="custom">
You have to change rule to affect only the container and not inner divs.
This should work:
.art-block.fouracross {
width: 45%;
float: left;
border: solid; 1 px;
}

How to position div elements

I'm new to designing web pages. I need to create a page that will have 2 sections.
The first section will have a logo on the top left corner. The second section will be in the middle of the page with some content generated by iframes.
I have put 2 div tags on the page: one for the image and another for content like this:
<div class="logo">
<a href="http://somelink.com/">
<img src=someimage.png'/></a>
</div>
<div class="content">
<iframe src="somepage.php></iframe>
</div>
How can I do it?
Than you
Try something like this:
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/bjfxq/
Use CSS to position your elements. To learn more about styling, try this interactive tutorial:
http://www.codecademy.com/courses/css-coding-with-style/0/1
HTML
<div class="logo"><img src='http://www.w3.org/html/logo/downloads/HTML5_Logo_128.png'/></div>
<div id="content"><iframe src="http://www.stackoverflow.com"></iframe></div>
CSS
#content {
text-align:center;
}
There are a million other ways to do this, but your question was basic, so my answer was basic.
CSS
.logo
{
float: left;
}
.content
{
text-align: center;
}

Center Section Not Fitting in 3-Column Responsive CSS Layout

I have a 3-column layout that works pretty well:
http://jsfiddle.net/nicorellius/YNyHW/7/
My goal is to add a pre-existing modular unit into the center div, the one with class two-inner. The markup is like so:
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<div>
<div class="container">
<div class="one">
<div class="one-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="two">
<div class="two-inner"></div>
</div>
<div class="three">
<div class="three-inner"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The CSS can be seen in the fiddle. Part of the modular unit is actually built from some PHP where some data from a database is fetched and displayed. I have some arrays that I'm using for testing that mimic 6 entries and gives the modular unit a 2-wide by 3-tall box layout. My problem is that when I add this unit into the layout above, I get something like the test site below.
The markup for the modular unit is like so:
<section class="unit">
<section class="buttons margin-top-2em">
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 1</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 2</button>
</div>
<div class="button-fixed-width">
<button type="button" class="<bootstrap-button>">button 3</button>
</div>
</section>
<div class="row">
<?php // loop through some arrays to get module unit ?>
</div>
</section>
I've tried various tweaks to try and get it up but the only thing that does it is making the heights of the outer classes one, two, and three close to zero.
Although I've tried changing heights and other bits to get it to fit, I'm still having trouble figuring out why that center div won't go up. What am I missing?
The CSS for the unit class is in the fiddle. On it's own, it works OK, and I have some breakpoints that collapse it down into a single column. I just cant get passed this part...
EDIT
After trying some ideas from #kozlovski5, I am able to get the divmoving up and down as I need. But there is something going on that is making me uneasy. I'm not too familiar with the display: table, display: table-cell layout so Im sure I'm missing something. For example, when I add text to the divs in question, either the classes one, two, or three, or the inner classes, the adjustments recommended by #kozlovski5 go away. So in other words if I don't use top: -37.5em; and just fill the divs with text, everything seems to work as it should. It's when I try to model the layout with bordered sections that I get the strange behavior.
I ended up going with floats instead. See test site above for final.
I applied:
div > .modular {
display: block;
}
This seems to solve the problem. Here is an updated jsFiddle. http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/4/
OP has provided a test case for his website, so my updated answer is:
.two-inner {
background-color: #cba;
border: 1px solid gray;
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
top: -596px;
left: 0;
}
Ugghhh.. Another Edit
I think the whole display: table and div > div. { display: table-cell;} is causing this issue and instead of working on patches let's hit the problem head straigh on instead of working on fixes.
Just get rid of the display table etc. And use floats instead here is an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/YNyHW/6/

zurb foundation is it possible to have full row width

I'm using foundation 3 to build a responsive website but I want to have the Footer and Navigation background width to occupy the entire width? I have named my rows as
class="row navigation"
class="row footer"
I tried looking for how to fix this but I'm out of options. I'm assuming it is a small fix in the foundation.css file but it's a bit too overwhelming at the moment as I'm new to it.
Any poiinters much appreciated.
I ran into the same problem yesterday. The trick is, for full width spanning blocks, you just keep them out of the row/column structure, since row/column will always apply the default padding. Keep your footers and headers on their own, and use row/column inside them.
<header>
This will span the full width of the page
</header>
<div class="row">
<div class="twelve columns">
This text will flow within all typical padding and margins
</div>
</div>
<footer>
This will span the full width of the page
<div class="row">
<div class="twelve columns">
This text will flow within all typical padding and margins
</div>
</div>
</footer>
What I have been doing is to add a custom class so that I can chain it with .row and override the max-width setting.
<div class="row full-width"></div>
.row.full-width {
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
I put width in here too to cover bases, but it is already declared in foundation.css so you can just omit it.
If you're using Zurb Foundation Framework, simply remove the row class and wrap the element in a class container that is 100% width. Now you probably want to center the stuff, use class centered like this:
<div class="container navigation">
<div class="centered">
Some navigation stuff
</div>
</div>
I completely disagree with the answer. You shouldn't have to use !important
Please refer to my article and demo at http://edcharbeneau.github.com/FoundationSinglePageRWD/
You should be able to get what you need from there. The demo is for 2.2 but is very similar in function to v3.
Foundation 6 supports this feature naturally with row expanded. code example:
<div class="expanded row">
...
</div>
Read more here: http://foundation.zurb.com/sites/docs/grid.html#fluid-row
Use "Section" as in:
<section>
<div class="row">
<div class="small-12 columns">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Then, assign an ID to the section and use that for your background.
This is in regards to Foundation 5. None of the answers given so far, provide edge-to-edge, full widths. That's because inner .columns add padding.
For a true edge-to-edge, full width content, add this to your CSS.
.row.full { width: 100%; max-width: 100%; }
.row.full>.column:first-child,
.row.full>.columns:first-child { padding-left: 0; }
.row.full>.column:last-child,
.row.full>.columns:last-child { padding-right: 0; }
Simply add .full class to a .row you wish to extend full width.
<div class="row full">
<div class="medium-6 column">This column touches Left edge.</div>
<div class="medium-6 column">This column touches Right edge.</div>
</div>
Just override the max-width property as max-width: initial;, for example,
.fullWidth {
width: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-width: initial;
}
<div class="row fullWidth"> </div>
this works for me :)
I know that there are already many answers, but I think I have something new to add in this topic if someone is using Foundation 5 and stumbled upon this question (like me).
As Foundation is using REM units, it would be best to alter .row class using them and by adding extra class, so you can have only selected rows full-width. For example by using .full class:
.row.full {
max-width: 80rem; /* about 90rem should give you almost full screen width */
}
You can see that it is used like this even in documentation page of Zurb Foundation (they altered .row class, though): http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/ (just look into page source code)
You really would want to keep the row class otherwise you lose a lot of the power of the grid system. Why not change the setting for $rowWidth from 1000 (default) to 100%. This can be found in the file foundation_and_overrides.scss
Just set the
$row-width: 100%;
http://foundation.zurb.com/forum/posts/927-full-width-layouts
I am not sure if I am missing something, but I had to add a .row div for the .centered to work. I can still style the .header to have a full width background in this case, but the .container method did not work for me.
<header class="header">
<div class="row">
<div class="centered">
Logo and stuff
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
Some navigation stuff
</div>
</header>
If you don't give it the "row" class and put columns inside it works on a 100% width
If you're using sass, this is a better way:
<div class="row full-width"></div>
.row{
&.full-width{
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%!important; //might be needded depending on your settings
&>.column:first-child,
&>.columns:first-child{
padding-left: 0;
}
&>.column:last-child,
&>.columns:last-child{
padding-right: 0;
}
}
}
yes, just use like this:
<div class="large-12 columns">
<h2>Header Twelve Columns (this will have full width of the BROWSER <---->></h2>
</div>

CSS absolute position alignment

I have a login form on my website that displays when a user clicks a button. It is a div that floats over other content. It only takes up a small portion of the page (directly below the sign in link).
It all works fine apart from one small thing. It displays aligned to the left of the sign in link (i attempted a diagram below).
|sign in|
|sign in stuff here|
I actually want it to look like this (align to the right of the sign in link):
|sign
in|
|sign in stuff here|
This is my HTML:
<div class="clear">
<a class="button" id="SignInBtn" href="#" onclick="toggleSignInBox(); return false;"><span id="spanSignIn">Sign In / Register <img src="../../Content/shared/arrow_down.png" border="0" /></span></a>
</div>
<div id="signinbox" style="display:none;">
<p>Who would you like to sign in with?</p>
<p>Google</p>
<p>Yahoo</p>
<p>Other</p>
</div>
And the CSS for the sign in box:
signinbox {background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px; z-index:1; position:
absolute; top:66px; }
Is it possible to do this in just CSS?
Thanks
Wrap the signin info inside another div and call it inner-signin then position that relative to the absolute positioned outter div. You may also have to set the width on the absolute positioned outter div.
div.inner-signinbox {
position: relative;
right: 20px;
}
signinbox {
width: 250px; //ADD A WIDTH
background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px;
z-index:1;
position: absolute;
top:66px;
}
If that does not work, why not just add a "left" property to the signingbox to set the horizontal position as well as the vertical. Is there a reason you don't can't absolute position the element with x and y?
I think you may want to try
float: right
or
text-align: right
Put the sign-in stuff inside the div containing the sign-in button.
Make the container position: relative.
Then give the sign-in stuff position: absolute; and right: 0;.
Incidentally, take care here; requiring Javascript merely to log in is pretty rude. A lot of people run NoScript for a variety of reasons.
I have created new div with class "main-pane". You can adjust the position of "signinbox". from the css by changing the value of "right" and "top".
<div class="main-pane">
<div class="clear">
<a class="button" id="SignInBtn" href="#" onclick="toggleSignInBox(); return false;">
<span id="spanSignIn">Sign In / Register <img src="../../Content/shared/arrow_down.png" border="0" /></span>
</a>
</div>
<div id="signinbox" style="display:none;">
<p>Who would you like to sign in with?</p>
<p>Google</p>
<p>Yahoo</p>
<p>Other</p>
</div>
</div>
.main-pane{
position:relative;
}
#signinbox{
width: 250px;
background-color:#C1DEEE;
padding:10px;
z-index:5;
position: absolute;
top:66px;
right:0px;
}
Thanks,
Arun Krishnan

Resources