Does anyone out there know how to integrate ContentFlow (http://www.jacksasylum.eu/ContentFlow) and Lightbox2 (http://lokeshdhakar.com/projects/lightbox2/)?
I need the ability for the image to not only open in a lightbox, but when opened, also have the user be able to the next and previous images.
Right now, I'm using ContentFlow with the Lightbox Addon (you can find this on the ContentFlow website), but that only uses the original Lightbox, so I can't make a gallery (or at least I can't figure out how to).
ContentFlow seems to be a pretty fickle product, and it doesn't accept lots of things.
Thank you all for your help and please comment!
On official site of ContentFlow there is AJAX section,
and example of how it should be used : http://www.jacksasylum.eu/ContentFlow/ajax_example.inc.php.
Main idea is that all those images are processed in a single place.
var ajax_cf = new ContentFlow('ajax_cf',
...
function addPictures(t){
var ic = document.getElementById('itemcontainer');
var is = ic.getElementsByTagName('img');
for (var i=0; i< is.length; i++) {
ajax_cf.addItem(is[i], 'last');
}
}
appPictures is callback function to be called when images are done loading.
You can group them in a hidded div according to the structure lightbox would expect.
I am using it with the callback from jquery preloader
jQuery.preloadImages = function () {
if (typeof arguments[arguments.length - 1] == 'function') {
var callback = arguments[arguments.length - 1];
} else {
var callback = false;
}
if (typeof arguments[0] == 'object') {
var images = arguments[0];
var n = images.length;
} else {
var images = arguments;
var n = images.length - 1;
}
var not_loaded = n;
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
jQuery(new Image()).attr('src', images[i]).load(function () {
if (--not_loaded < 1 && typeof callback == 'function') {
callback();
}
});
}
}
Usage :
$.preloadImages(imagesArray, function () {
addPictures();
});
imagesArray in my case is array of relative path's
Note that ContentFlow is catchy with:
clearing and repopulating the flow
showing only two images
circular view
pushing more than 10 images at once
Related
I am attempting to piece together an example from ml5 on image style transfer (https://ml5js.org/docs/style-transfer-image-example) with p5.js examples parsing a JSON of image URLs, and adding them to an array to display as images. I am hitting a dead end as I do not think I fully understand the ways that p5 stores images in an array, nor do I fully understand the difference between createImg() createImage() or loadImage() (which one to use!!)
The goal is to use Bing image API to return a list of URLS from a search (this part is working fine) and run those images through a pretrained model (this part is working fine when just used on a local image). It is the bringing the two together that I am unable to figure out. Any suggestions or advice (is this even possible??!) greatly appreciated.
I have already tried loading images into an array and iterating through the array in the draw() function. The problem happens when I need to address an image in order to actually apply the style transfer model. It seems like my array is empty when I attempt to refer to it anywhere except draw(). I am sure I am thinking about this incorrectly.
var imageData;
let imgArray = [];
var w = (window.innerWidth)/3;
var h = (window.innerHeight)/4;
var index = 0;
var xPos = 0;
var yPos = 0;
var indexMax = 3;
let style;
let resultImg;
function preload() {
loadData();
}
function loadData(){
var url = api + search + subscriptionKey;
loadJSON(url, gotData);
}
function gotData(data) {
imageData = data;
for (var i=0; i < indexMax; i++){
_url = imageData.value[i].contentUrl;
imgArray.push(loadImage(_url));
}
function displayImages(){
if (index < 3){
index++;
} else {
index = 0;
};
function setup() {
createCanvas(1200, 800).parent('canvasContainer');
var button = select('#display');
button.mousePressed(displayImages);
var transferBtn = select('#transferBtn');
transferBtn.mousePressed(transferImages);
//create style method
style = ml5.styleTransfer('/model', modelLoaded);
}
function draw() {
image(imgArray[index], xPos, yPos, w, h);
}
//ml5 stuff
function modelLoaded() {
if (style.ready){
select('#status').html('Model Loaded');
//style.transfer(gotResult);
}
}
function transferImages(){
select('#status').html('applying style transfer');
style.transfer(tempImg, function(err, result){
createImg(result.src);
});
select('#status').html('done');
}
I am attempting to (unsuccessfully) create a "tempImg" from imgArray[0] to try to figure out where this createImage needs to go, but have not gotten this to work. I have CORS enabled, so I didnt think this was the problem, but am getting the following error. Please help me understand how to think about this differently.
You should use loadImage instead of createImg.
style.transfer(tempImg, function(err, result){
p5CompatibleImage = loadImage(result.src);
});
I'm working on a requirement where I have a datasource named 'emailSearchResults' where I search for email messages metadata and load the results in the datasource.
The fields in the datasource are not relevant, however I set the datasource to have 50 records per page as per the below screenshot:
The script I used to load the datasource is shown in the query field, that call the following script:
function getMessageDetails(userId, msgID)
{
var messageDetails = [];
var messageData;
var msgID_,subject_,from_,date_;
messageData=Gmail.Users.Messages.get(userId,msgID,{format:"metadata", metadataHeaders:["Message-ID", "Subject", "From", "Date"]});
console.log(messageData.payload.headers);
//console.log(msgID);
//console.log(messageData.payload.headers[3].value);
date_="<na>";
from_="<na>";
subject_="<na>";
msgID_="<na>";
for (var counter =0;counter<4;counter++)
{
if (messageData.payload.headers[counter].name=="Message-ID")
{
msgID_=messageData.payload.headers[counter].value;
}
if (messageData.payload.headers[counter].name=="Subject")
{
subject_=messageData.payload.headers[counter].value;
}
if (messageData.payload.headers[counter].name=="From")
{
from_=messageData.payload.headers[counter].value;
}
if (messageData.payload.headers[counter].name=="Date")
{
date_=messageData.payload.headers[counter].value;
}
}
messageDetails.push(date_);
messageDetails.push(from_);
messageDetails.push(subject_);
messageDetails.push(msgID_);
return messageDetails;
}
function searchMessages(userId,condition)
{
//
// first we build the conditions
// we can make it fixed
// or we can make it dynamic
var searchResult;
var deleteResult;
var currentMessage;
var results = [];
var pageToken;
var params = {};
var _stat;
var options = {
includeSpamTrash: "true",
pageToken: pageToken
};
var msgRecord = [];
do
{
searchResult=Gmail.Users.Messages.list(userId,options);
for (var i = 0; i < searchResult.messages.length; i++)
{
var record=app.models.emailSearchResults.newRecord();
msgRecord=getMessageDetails(userId,searchResult.messages[i].id);
record.msgMainID=searchResult.messages[i].id;
record.msgID=msgRecord[3];
record.subject=msgRecord[2];
record.senderAddress=msgRecord[1];
record.msgDate=msgRecord[0];
/*console.log(searchResult.messages[i].id);
console.log(msgRecord[3]);
console.log(msgRecord[2]);
console.log(msgRecord[1]);
console.log(msgRecord[0]);
return;*/
results.push(record);
msgRecord=null;
}
if (searchResult.nextPageToken) {
options.pageToken = searchResult.nextPageToken;
}
} while (searchResult.pageToken);
searchResult=null;
return results;
}
On the main page I put a table and linked it to the datasource, and I enabled pagination on the table, so I get the pager buttons at the bottom of the table as below:
When I execute the app and the datasource is filled, I see the first page results in a correct way, however when I want to move to the next page, I click the next page button and once the loading is complete I find out that I still see the same results from the first page on the table.
I am not familiar with how to make the table show the results of the second page then the third page, and I am going in circles on this...
Hope the explanation is clear and addresses the issue..
I would really appreciate any help on this!
Regards
Currently pagination isn't working as expected with calculated datasources. You can, however, build your own. There are several changes you'll need to make to accomplish this. First you'll want to refactor your searchMessages function to something like this:
function searchMessages(userId, pageToken){
var results = [];
var options = {
includeSpamTrash: "true",
pageToken: pageToken,
maxResults: 50
};
var searchResult = Gmail.Users.Messages.list(userId, options);
for (var i = 0; i < searchResult.messages.length; i++){
var record = app.models.emailSearchResults.newRecord();
var msgRecord = getMessageDetails(userId,searchResult.messages[i].id);
record.msgMainID = searchResult.messages[i].id;
record.msgID = msgRecord[3];
record.subject = msgRecord[2];
record.senderAddress = msgRecord[1];
record.msgDate = msgRecord[0];
results.push(record);
}
return {records: results, nextPageToken: searchResult.nextPageToken};
}
Then you'll want to change your datasource query. You'll need to add a number parameter called page.
var cache = CacheService.getUserCache();
var page = query.parameters.page || 1;
var pageToken;
if(page > 1){
pageToken = cache.get('pageToken' + page.toString());
}
var results = searchMessages('me', pageToken);
var nextPage = (page + 1).toString();
cache.put('pageToken' + nextPage, results.nextPageToken);
return results.records;
You'll need to modify the pagination widget's various attributes. Here are the previous/next click functions:
Previous:
widget.datasource.query.pageIndex--;
widget.datasource.query.parameters.page = widget.datasource.query.pageIndex;
widget.datasource.load();
Next:
widget.datasource.query.pageIndex++;
widget.datasource.query.parameters.page = widget.datasource.query.pageIndex;
widget.datasource.load();
You should be able to take it from there.
I have been trying to create a Placemark that I can hide and show (like turning visibility on and off) on demand (on click)... I am using this to make the placemark:
function placemark(lat, long, name, url, iconsrc){
var placemark = ge.createPlacemark(name);
ge.getFeatures().appendChild(placemark);
placemark.setName(name);
// Create style map for placemark
var icon = ge.createIcon('');
if(iconsrc == "0")
icon.setHref('http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/paddle/red-circle.png');
else{
icon.setHref(iconsrc);
}
var style = ge.createStyle('');
style.getIconStyle().setIcon(icon);
if(iconsrc != "0")
style.getIconStyle().setScale(2.5);
placemark.setStyleSelector(style);
// Create point
var point = ge.createPoint('');
point.setLatitude(lat);
point.setLongitude(long);
//point.setAltitudeMode(1500);
placemark.setGeometry(point);
google.earth.addEventListener(placemark, 'click', function(event) {
// Prevent the default balloon from popping up.
event.preventDefault();
var balloon = ge.createHtmlStringBalloon('');
balloon.setFeature(placemark); // optional
balloon.setContentString(
'<iframe src="'+ url +'" frameborder="0"></iframe>');
ge.setBalloon(balloon);
});
}
I have tried everything... from this:
function hidePlacemark(name){
var children = ge.getFeatures().getChildNodes();
for(var i = 0; i < children.getLength(); i++) {
var child = children.item(i);
if(child.getType() == 'KmlPlacemark') {
if(child.getId()== name)
child.setVisibility(false);
}
}
}
to using this ge.getFeatures().removeChild(child);
can anyone point me to the right direction on creating a function that will allow me to turn the visibility on/off on demand please.
Your hidePlacemark function is missing some {} in your final IF statement
if(child.getId()== name)
you have
function hidePlacemark(name){
var children = ge.getFeatures().getChildNodes();
for(var i = 0; i < children.getLength(); i++) {
var child = children.item(i);
if(child.getType() == 'KmlPlacemark') {
if(child.getId()== name)
child.setVisibility(false);
}
}
}
make it
function hidePlacemark(name){
var children = ge.getFeatures().getChildNodes();
for(var i = 0; i < children.getLength(); i++) {
var child = children.item(i);
if(child.getType() == 'KmlPlacemark') {
if(child.getId()== name) {
child.setVisibility(false);
}
}
}
}
HOWEVER ------- you are better off doing this as it is much faster as you don't need to loop through ALL your placemarks
function hidePlacemark(name) {
var placemark = ge.getElementById(name);
placemark.setVisibility(false);
}
I think the plain ge.getFeatures().removeChild(placemark); works.
I played with this GooglePlayground, and just added the following code to line 8 (that is empty in this GooglePlayground Sample):
addSampleButton('Hide Placemark', function(){
ge.getFeatures().removeChild(placemark);
});
Clicking the button Hide Placemark hides the placemark like a charm here. Any chances your problem is somewhere else in your code?
I used a javascript FocusChange() in my aspx page. I have couple of controls and I need Hit enter key need to move next control based on tab index. It is working good in IE7 but not working in IE8... Please help me on this..
Thanks for your help in advance. The java script is given below.
function FocusChange() {
if (window.event.keyCode == 13) {
var formLength = document.form1.length; // Get number of elements in the form
var src = window.event.srcElement; // Gets the field having focus
var currentTabIndex = src.getAttribute('tabindex'); // Gets its tabindex
// scroll through all form elements and set focus in field having next tabindex
for (var i = 0; i < formLength; i++) {
if (document.form1.elements[i].getAttribute('tabindex') == currentTabIndex + 1) {
for (var j = i; j <= formLength; j++) {
if (document.form1.elements[j].disabled == false) {
document.form1.elements[j].focus();
event.returnValue = false;
event.cancel = true;
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
I've got the same request as you, but solved it in a different manner, just replacing the Enter for Tab
<script language="JavaScript">
document.onkeydown = myOnkeydown;
function myOnkeydown()
{
var key = window.event.keyCode;
if (key == 13) //13 is the keycode of the 'Enter' key
{window.event.keyCode = 9; //9 is the code for the 'Tab' key. Essentially replacing the Enter with the Tab.
}
}
</script>
Warning: Works in IE only.
I have a Webforms, AJAX-enabled web page which, when rendering large amounts of data, is extremely slow to load in IE (we're married to IE - no other browser options). In an attempt to determine the source of the slowness, I viewed the HTML source (about 2.5 MB) and copied all of it (except for the Ajax JavaScript calls) to a blank .html file. IE renders this file MUCH faster than when the rendering happens through .Net. This seems to indicate that the AJAX JavaScript is slowing down the display of the page. Does this sound plausible? Any recommendations on improving performance here?
I've already eliminated as many UpdatePanel controls as I can from the page, but it doesn't seem to help with render time.
Thanks for the help!
Update... In the HTML source, I noticed that at the bottom of the screen, a call to WebForm_InitCallback() appears. When I executed this call directly through javascript:alert(WebForm_InitCallback());, the CPU spikes for 12 seconds before it completes! This call is here because I implemented ICallbackEventHandler to try to accomplish some traditional-style AJAX handling. Looking at WebResource.axd, that WebForm_InitCallback() method iterates through the entire form and attaches some kind of events to EVERY SINGLE textbox, checkbox, radiobutton, etc. So I guess I really need to abandon ScriptManager and UpdatePanel altogether here. Poop.
Andy
I hate to say this, but can you take the Microsoft AJAX out of the equation? Try it with doing an XMLHTTP request and populate the data yourself. That way at least you could step through the js and figure out if it is time on the server, time turning the resulting XML or JSON into an object, or time spent populating your data on screen.
This is an old topic but I thought I should share what I recently did to fix long running script error in IE 7 caused by WebForm_InitCallback.
I had a page with over 2000 form elements and in IE 7 was causing a long running script warning / browser freeze for a client. We have other pages with many more form elements and paging or other options aren't options due to needing a quick turn around to improve performance.
I narrowed it down to WebForm_InitCallback, and even further to the following line:
element = theForm.elements[i];
By saving a reference to theForm.elements instead and using it to access the index, I found significant performance gains.
var elements = theForm.elements;
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
element = elements[i];
....
}
I made a jsperf to test the difference since I didn't expect such impressive gains from not calling the refinement every time.
Beyond that, I found better performance by replacing the concatenation in WebForm_InitCallbackAddField to adding the strings to an array and joining it together after the for loop in WebForm_InitCallback completes and saving it back into __theFormPostData.
Here are the original two function that you'll see in the WebResource:
function WebForm_InitCallback() {
var count = theForm.elements.length;
var element;
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
element = theForm.elements[i];
var tagName = element.tagName.toLowerCase();
if (tagName == "input") {
var type = element.type;
if ((__callbackTextTypes.test(type) || ((type == "checkbox" || type == "radio") && element.checked))
&& (element.id != "__EVENTVALIDATION")) {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
else if (tagName == "select") {
var selectCount = element.options.length;
for (var j = 0; j < selectCount; j++) {
var selectChild = element.options[j];
if (selectChild.selected == true) {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
}
else if (tagName == "textarea") {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
}
function WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(name, value) {
var nameValue = new Object();
nameValue.name = name;
nameValue.value = value;
__theFormPostCollection[__theFormPostCollection.length] = nameValue;
__theFormPostData += WebForm_EncodeCallback(name) + "=" + WebForm_EncodeCallback(value) + "&";
}
And here is the javascript I added to my page to overwrite them. It's important that this code is inserted after the WebResource is added and before WebForm_InitCallback is called.
var __theFormPostDataArr = [];
if (typeof (WebForm_InitCallback) != "undefined") {
WebForm_InitCallback = function () {
var count = theForm.elements.length;
var element;
var elements = theForm.elements;
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
element = elements[i];
var tagName = element.tagName.toLowerCase();
if (tagName == "input") {
var type = element.type;
if ((type == "text" || type == "hidden" || type == "password" ||
((type == "checkbox" || type == "radio") && element.checked)) &&
(element.id != "__EVENTVALIDATION")) {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
else if (tagName == "select") {
var selectCount = element.options.length;
for (var j = 0; j < selectCount; j++) {
var selectChild = element.options[j];
if (selectChild.selected == true) {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
}
else if (tagName == "textarea") {
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField(element.name, element.value);
}
}
__theFormPostData = __theFormPostDataArr.join('');
}
WebForm_InitCallbackAddField = function (name, value) {
__theFormPostDataArr = [];
var nameValue = new Object();
nameValue.name = name;
nameValue.value = value;
__theFormPostCollection[__theFormPostCollection.length] = nameValue;
__theFormPostDataArr[__theFormPostDataArr.length] = WebForm_EncodeCallback(name);
__theFormPostDataArr[__theFormPostDataArr.length] = "=";
__theFormPostDataArr[__theFormPostDataArr.length] = WebForm_EncodeCallback(value);
__theFormPostDataArr[__theFormPostDataArr.length] = "&";
}
}
Ultimately, it took the run time of WebForm_InitCallback from 27 seconds to 4 seconds on my IE 7 machine.