I'm trying to work out how to use active record to return some data based on a nested model.
My relationship is setup as below:
User - Has many books
Book - Has many users
UserBook - belongs to user and belongs to book
I can access users through books like so:
book.users.first
book.users.second
etc.
I'd like to select all the books, that does not have a particular user.
I have generated a query like this, please note, the 'near', method is provided by the Geocoder gem.
Book.near(location, distance).joins(:users).where("users.id != #{#current_user.id}")
I believe the syntax is correct, no errors occur, however, the query still returns books with the current user.
The issue appears to be that if book.users contains a user id that is not current user id AND also contains the current user id, book is still returned.
I can get the desired result using code like this, but I presume there is a way to get ActiveRecord to do it for me.
search = Book.near(location, distance).reject do |book|
if book.users.include?(#current_user)
book
end
end
Related
Our former security admin team off-boarded terminated users by deleting their user profiles from the system. We have changed that policy but there is potential for duplicates. I am attempting to find user ids on the various module tables that are not on the OPRDEFN but having no luck.
I would like to query the major tables to return a list of all user ids to compare to the current OPRDEFN. From there, I can either have them added or create a reference list the admins to use prior to creating a new user id.
Does anyone have any tips or already written SQL? I am not the best SQL writer, I've tried several different things but nothings works.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Here you have a list of tables using the OPRID field. I have already formatted it in a way you can just run the result to get the Oprids.
Also, consider other columns like OPERATOR
SELECT 'SELECT DISTINCT OPRID FROM PS_'||RECNAME||';' FROM PSRECDEFN WHERE RECTYPE=0
AND RECNAME IN
(SELECT RECNAME FROM PSRECFIELD WHERE FIELDNAME IN ('OPRID','OPERATOR'))
AND RECNAME NOT LIKE '%AET'
AND RECNAME NOT LIKE '%TMP'
Also, you may just look at PSACCESSLOG, it will show you when someone access, so you may save time by querying it only
I am using firestore for creating a food blog where users can upload posts and like it.
Call it facebook for food.
Below I will give you summary of 2 firestore database collections which are going to be used in my question.
First is Users - where the document name is based on UID and it stores information like, username/emailID
Second is Posts - where the document name is based on UID, however in the structure of the collection
It has a column named as "Likes" which is an array object. This stores 2 values : 1. Name of the person who liked the post and 2. UID of the person who liked the post.
Please find the structure of LIKES column in posts document below :
I am trying to add more validations to the likes part of the document.
However, from postman it is possible to change the name of the person who is liking the post.
The logic of the restrictions has to be on 2 things.
LIKES - UID should be present in my users collection. Also, UID in LIKES column shouldn't be changeable.
LIKES - Name should not be allowed to be changed.
I tried a of way of doing it but it doesnt work :
exists(/databases/$(database)/documents/users/$(request.resource.data.likes[request.resource.data.likes.size() -1].userId))
What it does is checks the last UID of person liking that document. However, in this scenario if there are more than 1 Likes, the name/uid could be altered for the ones which were present earlier.
Not a very efficient way.
Also, Loops dont work in rules so I cant loop it up to get it.
Any help would be really appreciated.
Please let me know if there are any more snippets which would be required.
How do things like google classroom do this:
classroom.google.com/c/(random characters here)
When you go to that link, because of the random characters, it knows what information to show
how would I do something like that in asp.net
Well, in .net you often might have grid or pick list of say hotels. When the user clicks on a hotel from that list, then you can jump/navigate to the hotel and display information. In these cases you actually want to AVOID having to use parameters in the URL. So, you can use session() to pass the value to the new web form/page.
However, often you might want to say email a link to someone else, or say send a email with a link called:
Click here for your Hotel Booking details.
So for above? What is often done is you create a table in the database. I often call it tblHotelJump or whatever. In that table you have this:
ID: (standard PK value all tables have).
CusotmerID: the PK of the customer - you might not need this, but if you using logons
and security - then you might only want the the link to work for the given
user.
HotelID: - PK value of hotel. This is where you can now pull the Hotel information
from the hotel table. (or maybe the booking table ID
JumpGUID: {3434sl%$#*} - a random generated number or GUID is often used.
userLogonID: internal user logon ID - obtained from logon authentication system.
So, now, we can pass a URL like this:
www.MyBookings.com/HotelInformation.aspx?JID={3434sl%$#*}
So the above is now a link you can send to a user.
They click on above, and your code behind on the page load does this:
If Not IsPostBack Then
' get parms
Dim strGuid As String
strGuid = Request.QueryString("JID")
So the above gets/grabs that parameter.
Now you code pulls that one row from the tblHotelsJump like this:
Dim cmdSQL As New SqlCommand("SELECT * from tblHotelJump
where JumpGUID = #GUID ORDER BY WhenTime DESC", GetCon())
cmdSQL.Parameters.Add("#GUID", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = strGuid
Dim rstGUID As DataTable = MyrstP(cmdSQL)
If rstGUID.Rows.Count > 0 Then
' Ok, valid jump row, get Hotel information and display it.
So now we can display hotel information since we have the HotelID and can display that data record.
Now in some cases, you might see something like:
www.MyBookings.com/ShowHotel.aspx?ID=343
And again the code will now simply use ID 343 and pull that hotel information from the database table with ID = 343. This idea ONLY works if you don't need security. So, say weather for a city. But you can't and don't want to use the actual database ID like above, since then users can type in ANY number and not just 343 in above example
In fact in the VERY early days of the internet, apparently a credit card company used a ID with customer number. if you typed in someone else customer number, then you could see their information!!! So using parameters is not appropriate for all cases. For public data, sure, it works well and makes sense. No harm done if you change the city parameter in the URL for weather.
So, that's why a GUID or some next to impossible number to guess is often used. Now for weather in a city? Well, then that don't matter and the WHOLE idea is to allow users to get/see the weather in any location. But for sensitive data? Then you need GUID.
And on top of the above, in that "jump table", I also included the User ID, and thus I would not display that web page unless:
The user is logged on (so a page protected by valid logons).
The Hotel information I pulled from that jump table ALSO matches the user logon id.
So, in a lot of cases? I think the parameters in the URL is VERY ugly and messy. However, for VERY large scale web sites they often use the parameters in the URL since then their server side code does NOT have to chew up memory and resources to hold/retain/keep the session() data. But with session() then you can jump around and use URL's without ugly parameters. So in .net we often avoid parameters, but in some cases the parameters in the URL is desired since then you can send/share that link. So for a say "click here" to view your order? Then sure, a GUID in the link may well be used. But even then, once that first page is hit with the GUID (along with above security), then any additional pages to view things about the order will not in fact require the parameters.
So paramters are easy, often used, and they reduce loads on the server side software, and as above shows, most development languages for the web have a "ready made" easy way to grab/get/use parameters in the URL. However, as noted, unless you building the next google, or say you need to send a customer a "link" to allow jumping to a particular order? Well then in .net we tend to avoid the parameters because we don't need them most of the time and .net has a whole bunch of really cool OTHER ways to store/keep values and pass them from one web form to the next web form without having to use parameters.
But if you using a limited web scripting language, then using parms in the URL is often your only practical choice.
In any social network, you can follow a person, a post or anything, everything you followed will be displayed in your wall, now I wanna implement the same feature in asp.net mvc, but I have problem on design table to query all following things of a user. This is tables I designed:
[User(id,name,email,password)]
[Following(id,personId,followingId,source)]
[Post(id,title,description,authorId)]
So when a user followed other user,a new record will be pushed on Following table with followingId is userId, and source is "User" table, the same as with following a post with followingId is postId and source is "Post" table.
The problem is when fetch data from what your following, the query join many tables to return result if user followed more things than a Post, and Other User (such as a Tag, a Topic...). this will be not good performance and query time to return data to user.
Do you have any idea about this ? I'm very appreciate to hear your solution, thanks a lot!
Your database design is flawed, instead of one "link" table with a string to identify where the "Followed thing" resides makes it hard to query effectively.
Instead you need one link table per thing linked. SO in your simplified example you might have
[User(id,name,email,password)]
[Post(id,title,description,authorId)]
[UserFollowingUser(id, userId, followedUserId]
[UserFollowPost(id,userId,postId)]
Therefore to get all users following a post, or all posts followed by a user, or get all users following a particular user, or get all users followed by a particular user is easy as pie.
Does anyone have some code or a link as to how to create the user login name as a parameter during a sql query in ASP.NET?
Basically I want to use the default membership structure with a new field ClubID, then I want to add a new table called aspnet_Clubs which contains things such as Club Name, stadium name, Balance etc etc... and then use a relationship between ClubID and a field in the aspnet_Clubs table to tie things together.
Then when each user logs in they should see the clubs information specific to their loginID.
I know the syntax to use for the query, its getting the loginname parameter and being able to use/assign it as part of the search that is causing me the problem.
In general it is not recommended to break the default schema of the aspnetdb where the Membership data is stored. It can bring you to unexpected consequences in the future.
I had a similar question a couple of days ago, please check it here, may be you will be able to adopt something from the discussion to your situation.