I've just noticed that Webkit now has some support regarding the CSS Values and Units Module Level spec. And I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a way to reference another CSS selectors (or DOM style) property from a CSS selector?
I'm expecting something like this to be the answer here. Which I know is most likely the case for current browser implementations; but please keep reading...
For instance, in the case where an animation might resize an element (NOTE the ${.element2.width} is fictitious syntax):
<style type="text/css">
.element1 {
.width: /*-webkit-,-o-,-moz-*/calc(80% - ${.element2.width});
}
.element2 {
.width: 100px;
}
.element2:hover {
width: 200px;
transition: all 0.4s ease-in-out;
}
</style>
In this case I would expect the .element1's width to be re-evaluated based off the transition triggered from the hover events on .element2.
I realize that the aforementioned spec. is only a working draft but perhaps the syntax for referring to such a 'referential selector property' is defined within another spec. which I'm yet to discover? Or simply just not a case for concern (thanks to an overlooked work around)?
I added an answer to the question you linked: https://stackoverflow.com/a/11071806/137626
You can use the same declaration block with as many selectors as you want by grouping them (selectors are separated by commas)
You can't reuse the same declaration block later with a different CSS selector without rewriting the whole declaration block preceded by this selector or using a preprocessor/macro that'll do that for you. Or add it to the existing declaration block as above
Now with your example of an element resized by CSS itself: you could use CSS3 Media Queries and its #media rules containing as many declaration blocks as you want. These media queries would adapt to the width of viewport here.
Mixing expanding elements via animation and media queries that would've the reverse effect will be very soon very complicated (and I'll wonder what content you're playing with); if you want to Keep It Simple, then JS is the way to go. There are variables, loops, events ;) and you can start a CSS3 animation by adding or removing a single class from an element (or whatever CSS selector).
CSS3 won't replace JS (and you shouldn't use JS to style HTML as JS isn't activated or existing everywhere and there's already a nice fallback named CSS).
Other than using a pre-compiler such as sass/scss or less, I believe all you can do is wait or hard-code it.
Related
Is there a CSS rule that would match elements based on their width? If not, would it be interesting to propose that in the standard?
One could do something like code:max-width(200px) { white-space: nowrap; } to have all small code tag force line break.
I know I could use some js.
Is there a CSS rule that would match elements based on their width?
No.
If not, would it be interesting to propose that in the standard?
Maybe, but not the Selectors standard, because Selectors is not intended to be tightly coupled with the styling aspect of CSS.
There were proposals to standardize something called "element queries" a few years ago, but other than a few proofs-of-concept, they seem to have mostly dissipated. Probably because they're just not feasible to spec and implement in a way that is robust (cyclic dependencies immediately come to mind).
That might become inconsistent because new elements could be unexpectedly affected. I would just add a class that defines {wrap: nowrap;} to any elements in your html. Or if the element width changes on resize, just use some js.
window.onscroll = function(){
var elementWidth = document.getElementById('elementID').style.width;
if(elementWidth < 200){ .. do something .. }
else{ .. reverse changes .. }
}
It is not possible to do it using CSS3, but you can use Element Queries. Check this library: https://elementqueries.com
Here is an example:
#element code and (max-width: 200px) {
:self {
white-space: nowrap;
}
}
I just saw an example of media queries within a selector, effectively the same thing, although a pseudo-selector would be very nice and likely supplant media queries. I think it would be nice to have a new pseudo-selector :aspect-ratio(4:3) supporting ranges like :aspect-ratio(>4:3). This would be super convenient for styling responsive elements based on their orientation and width to height ratio.
I am getting an html file as a string and I need to change the styling that are coming in to prevent it from changing the parent styling.
Instead of going through each style and changing it from
.inner-div{height: 50px;}
to
.outter-div .inner-div{height: 50px;}
on each element, I would like to do something like
.outter-div {
.inner-div{height: 50px;}
.inner-div2{height: 50px;}
}
however that does not work
Is there a way to have multiple attributes nested inside of another attribute, instead of having to add the parent on each attribute?
To do something like that, you'd have to use a CSS pre-processor.
Two popular candidates are Less and Sass.
Less and Sass extend CSS to provide extra features, including the ability to nest multiple attributes. This Less or Sass code is then fed into a pre-processor, which transforms it into standard CSS that a browser understands and can be deployed as part of your website or app.
Assuming the inner class names all start the same (with 'inner'), then this can be done with an attribute selector. like this:
.outer-div [class^=inner] {
height: 50px;
}
Demo
If this is not the case, then...use a CSS preprocessor like others have mentioned.
PS: just for the record...
CSS selectors level 4 has added the :matches pseudo-class in order to group selectors more easily.
The syntax looks like this: :matches( selector[, selector]* )
In your case, it would be:
.outer-div :-matches(.inner-div, .inner-div2 ) {
height: 50px;
}
You can read more about it this CSS-tricks post
NB:
Currently there is no browser support for :matches, however the :matches pseudo class was once called :any in the spec, supported with -moz- and -webkit- prefixes. See MDN on :any
Here's a working example for webkit using :any:
Codepen
Suppose I have some html like this -:
<div style="blah...blah">Hey Nice</div>
<a style="blah...blah">Great</a>
How do I remove all the inline styling applied to the above elements in my stylesheet considering I don't know what all inline styling exists.
Currently I am trying this, but in vain -:
div[style], a[style]{ !important }
You must reset all css properties for elements that have style attribute:
[style] {
position: static !important;
float: none !important;
border: 0 none !important;
margin: 0 !important;
padding: 0 !important;
outline: 0 none !important;
// and so on
}
There are several determining factors determining which CSS property prevails in any situation. In order, these are:
Whether the property value has the !important flag or not.
If the style declaration is applied inline via the style attribute.
The strength of the CSS rule selector
If the rule has any ID clauses, and if so how many
If the rule has class, attribute or pseudo-class clauses, and if so how many
If the rule has any tagname clauses, and if so how many
If the property is parsed later in the source than another property with a rule of the same strength
So the only way to override the properties is to make sure that all the properties applied via style are applied elsewhere in your stylesheet, and have the !important declaration. The most rational way to do this is still very awkward — it would involve applying a very specific reset stylesheet, and including !important on every property on every rule.
But even if this is done, you still couldn't override inline style declarations that have !important themselves.
You've told Mojtaba that there should be a better solution, but that better solution would involve designing CSS to break its own rules. Imagine if there was a simpler solution for overriding inline styles from stylesheets designed into the language of CSS — should there also be another solution for simply overriding the override from inline styles? Where does the cycle end? All in all, I'd recommend using Javascript or giving up. Or describing your specific problem in more detail — there may be another solution!
If you're not happy with using !important overwrites in the CSS (as suggested by others on here), the only way would be to use JavaScript to remove the styles.
This is really easy in jQuery (better if you're able to assign a class name to the elements to select it with):
$('.selector').attr('style', '');
This will simply replace the element's 'style' attribute with nothing, thus removing the inline styles.
This isn't ideal though since it will rely on the visitor having JavaScript enabled, and may well result in the visitor seeing a style 'flash' as the page loads: the styles assigned in-line to the element before the JS kicks in and removes it.
Is it possible to use attribute selectors to partially-search an inline style attribute?
Can anyone find a way to get this bit of code working?
http://jsfiddle.net/v4xPY/1/
It seems that it's not possible to do this .hidden[style*="display: block"] + .below, nor even just [style]
The attribute selector you're trying to use isn't legit CSS, though it is a jQuery attribute selector. As far as I know, CSS is limited to [attribute=value], [attribute~=value] and [attribute|=value]. (derp, see below)
But, since you're already using jQuery to toggle the hidden div, it'd be a lot simpler to just toggle a class on the below div at the same time, rather than wrestling with the attribute selector (unless there's more to it than that).
Modified jQuery:
$(function() {
$('html').click(function() {
$('.hidden').slideToggle();
$('.below').toggleClass('yellow');
});
});
and CSS:
/* Margin of Below should reduce when hidden is opened */
.yellow {
margin-top: 10px;
background: yellow;
}
Fiddle here.
Edit: Okay, I was way off on the bit about the attribute selectors, it is legit CSS3; I don't know the details on browser support, though I'd guess it'd be supported in all the usual "modern" browsers. Also, there's apparently a problem with IE7 targeting the style attribute specifically. There's a pretty good write-up at http://www.impressivewebs.com/attribute-selectors/.
Once more: Though I can't find anything that explicitly confirms this, it looks like the attribute selectors only apply to attributes that are actually hardcoded into the html; basically it's just parsing strings, not examining the dom elements' "states" as such?
I'm building an html5/js/css application that will exist inside of a div on my client's existing html. I want to be sure that none of the client's CSS styles are inherited by my app.
Is there a best practice to reset this div and its descendant elements?
I'm thinking I'll use something like:
#my-id * { //styles }
I'm wondering if there is a better/best-practice approach? Thanks.
That will be very difficult/likely impossible to ensure. The type of solutions that Starx is referring to assume no preset styles other than the browser defaults, and "reset" in that context refers to harmonizing the inconsistencies across various browser defaults.
But in your case, your client CSS may already contain highly specific selectors such as
#someDiv .aClass a{float:left;}
... and applying those "CSS reset" solutions simply will not override this.
You can see that Truth's selectors also have lower specificity than this, and therefore will fail to ovetride the client's styles in such cases.
Your question is very similar: How to remove all inherited and computed styles from an element?
So the short answer is: there is no way to ensure this because you cannot "remove all inherited and computed styles from an element" ... update: ...unless you can anticipate and override every preexisting style declaration with new declarations having appropriate specificity.
If you want to only recent this specific div, than what you have is fine. You forgot to reset the div itself though:
#my-id, #my-id * { /* styles */ }
You are probably looking for Eric's CSS Reset as it one of robust resets out there.
But the reset rule is applied to the whole page, instead of the just the box. SO, modify the rules, by keeping #my-id infront.