edits in a ggplot2, geom = "line" - r

I have a line plot of some event at a hospital that I have been struggling with.
The challenges that I haven't solved yet are, 1) sorting the lines on the plot so that the patient-lines are sorted by Assessment-date, 2) coloring the lines by the variable 'openCase' and finally, 3) I would like to remove the Discharge-point (the blue square) for the cases that are in the year 2014 (or at some other random cut of date).
Any help would be appreciated?
Here is my sample data,
library(ggplot2)
library(plyr)
df <- data.frame(
date = seq(Sys.Date(), len= 156, by="5 day")[sample(156, 78)],
openCase = rep(0:1, 39),
patients = factor(rep(1:26, 3), labels = LETTERS)
)
df <- ddply(df, "patients", mutate, visit = order(date))
df$visit <- as.factor(df$visit)
levels(df$visit) <- c("Assessment (1)", "Treatment (2)", "Discharge (3)")
qplot(date, patients, data = df, geom = "line") +
geom_point(aes(colour = visit), size = 2, shape=0)
I'm aware that my example data is not perfect as some of the assessment datas is after the treatments and some of the discharge data is before the assessments data, but that part of the challenge that my base data is messed up.
What it looks like at the moment,
Update 2012-04-30 16:30:13 PDT
My data is delivered from a database and looks something like this,
df <- structure(list(date = structure(c(15965L, 15680L, 16135L, 15730L,
15920L, 15705L, 16110L, 15530L, 15575L, 15905L, 16140L, 15795L,
15955L, 15945L, 16205L, 15675L, 15525L, 15830L, 15625L, 15725L,
15855L, 15840L, 15615L, 15500L, 15780L, 15765L, 15610L, 15690L,
16080L, 15570L, 15685L, 16175L, 15740L, 15600L, 15985L, 15485L,
15605L, 16115L, 15535L, 15755L, 16145L, 16040L, 15970L, 16000L,
16075L, 15995L, 16010L, 15990L, 15665L, 15895L, 15865L, 16120L,
15880L, 15930L, 16055L, 15820L, 15650L, 16155L, 15700L, 15640L,
15505L, 15750L, 15800L, 15775L, 15825L, 15635L, 16150L, 15860L,
16100L, 15475L, 16050L, 15785L, 15495L, 15810L, 15805L, 15490L,
15460L, 16085L), class = "Date"), openCase = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L), patients = structure(c(1L,
1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L,
6L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 11L, 11L,
11L, 12L, 12L, 12L, 13L, 13L, 13L, 14L, 14L, 14L, 15L, 15L, 15L,
16L, 16L, 16L, 17L, 17L, 17L, 18L, 18L, 18L, 19L, 19L, 19L, 20L,
20L, 20L, 21L, 21L, 21L, 22L, 22L, 22L, 23L, 23L, 23L, 24L, 24L,
24L, 25L, 25L, 25L, 26L, 26L, 26L), .Label = c("A", "B", "C",
"D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O", "P",
"Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", "Z"), class = "factor"),
visit = structure(c(2L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 3L,
1L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 3L,
2L, 1L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 1L,
3L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 3L,
2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 1L,
3L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 3L), .Label = c("zym", "xov", "poi"
), class = "factor")), .Names = c("date", "openCase", "patients",
"visit"), row.names = c(NA, -78L), class = "data.frame")
The number of levels in visit, and specific labeling, will most likely change so I would like some kind of code where I rank or sort based on my existing data instead (visit) of generating new variables.

This is part-way:
Starting from after your initial definition of the data.
First, I think you want rank(date) rather than order(date) -- it made more sense to me, anyway.
df <- ddply(df, "patients", mutate, visit = rank(date))
df$visit <- as.factor(df$visit)
levels(df$visit) <- c("Assessment (1)", "Treatment (2)", "Discharge (3)")
Reorder patients by minimum date value (= Assessment date):
df$patients <- reorder(df$patients,df$date,function(x) min(as.numeric(x)))
Create a new data set missing the Discharge point, where they are after Jan 1 2014 (if you wanted to drop the Discharge point for cases that were assessed after a given date, you'd need to use ddply):
df2 <- subset(df,!(visit=="Discharge (3)" & date > as.Date("2014-01-01")))
As #Joran pointed out above it's a bit hard to get two separate colour scales for different variables, but this sort-of works (you have to make openCase into a factor in order to combine it with the colour scale for visit)
ggplot(df, aes(date, patients)) + geom_line(aes(colour=factor(openCase))) +
geom_point(data=df2,aes(colour = visit), size = 2, shape=0)
Alternately (and I think this is prettier anyway), you could code openCase with line type:
ggplot(df, aes(date, patients)) + geom_line(aes(linetype=factor(openCase))) +
geom_point(data=df2,aes(colour = visit), size = 2, shape=0)

I'm still not sure I understand what is wrong with #Ben's answer, but I'll try adding one of my own. Starting with the df given in the edit.
Create a new variable Visit (note the capital V) which is Assessment/Treatment/Discharge based on the ordering of the dates given. This is #Ben's code, just re-written.
df <- ddply(df, "patients", mutate,
Visit = factor(rank(date),
levels = 1:3,
labels=c("Assessment (1)", "Treatment (2)", "Discharge (3)")))
I don't understand how this relates to the visit column in the data originally; in fact, the original visit column is not used hereafter:
> table(df$Visit, df$visit)
zym xov poi
Assessment (1) 16 7 3
Treatment (2) 3 16 7
Discharge (3) 7 3 16
Reorder the patients (again copying Ben):
df$patients <- reorder(df$patients,df$date,function(x) min(as.numeric(x)))
Determine the subset of points that should be shown (same idea as Ben, but different code)
df2 <- df[!((df$Visit == "Discharge (3)") & (df$date > as.Date("2014-01-01"))),]
To add something new, here is a way to make the lines different colors without impacting the legend
ggplot(df, aes(date, patients)) +
geom_blank() +
geom_line(data = df[df$openCase == 0,], colour = "black") +
geom_line(data = df[df$openCase == 1,], colour = "red") +
geom_point(data = df2, aes(colour = Visit), size = 2, shape = 0)

Related

Label an axis generated by axis() function

I'm plotting a dual axis graph in r base and I can't add a label to the secondary axis. Here's what I'm working with:
dados = structure(list(IDADE = c(65L, 35L, 65L, 42L, 50L, 44L, 0L, 58L,
22L, 27L, 34L, 31L, 0L, 24L, 34L, 20L, 4L, 34L, 20L, 27L, 8L,
2L, 20L, 31L, 45L, 26L, 26L, 40L, 50L, 34L), ESTADO = c(1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L), TIPINT = c(3L,
1L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L,
3L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 1L), DIARIAS = c(2L,
2L, 4L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 10L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 1L, 2L, 3L,
6L, 10L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 6L, 1L, 1L, 2L)), .Names = c("IDADE",
"ESTADO", "TIPINT", "DIARIAS"), row.names = c(NA, 30L), class = "data.frame")
#Define boxplot base
bx = boxplot(dados$IDADE~dados$TIPINT,axes=F, xlab=NA,ylab=NA,col=heat.colors(3,0.6))
#Posiciona eixos
par(mar = c(5,5,2,5))
#Plota bar
barplot(table(dados$TIPINT),col=heat.colors(3,0.4),names=c("Tipo 1","Tipo 2","Tipo 3"),
ylab = "Quantidade de pacientes")
#Plota box
par(new=T)
bx2 = bxp(bx,boxwex = 0.50, at = c(0.9, 2,3.1),axes=F, xlab=NA, ylab="l",boxfill=heat.colors(3,0.7))
axis(side=4)
Which gets me the following graph
I'm trying to label the right axis, but axis(side=4,labels="labels") is for something else and axis(side=4,ylab="label") doesn't work.
Thanks
You can use the function mtext to add a label to a secondary axis, using the line=2 argument to move it the appropriate distance from the axis.
mtext("label", 4, line=2)
Alternatively you could use just text to have finer control, if say, you want to reorient the label. You can pull the plot dimensions from par("usr") and adjust accordingly.
p <- par("usr")
text(p[2]+0.4, mean(p[3:4]), labels = "label", xpd=NA, srt = -90)

plot area truncated when using geom_dotplot

consider the following example data:
ex = structure(list(group = structure(c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L,
2L, 3L, 4L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L,
2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L,
1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L,
5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 5L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 5L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
4L), .Label = c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F"), class = "factor"),
ID = structure(c(35L, 35L, 35L, 35L, 35L, 35L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 6L, 6L, 6L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 7L, 9L, 9L,
9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 11L, 11L, 11L, 11L,
11L, 11L, 12L, 12L, 12L, 12L, 12L, 12L, 13L, 13L, 13L, 13L,
13L, 13L, 14L, 14L, 14L, 14L, 14L, 14L, 21L, 21L, 22L, 22L,
22L, 22L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 8L, 15L, 16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 19L,
20L, 23L, 24L, 25L, 26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 30L, 31L, 32L,
33L, 34L), .Label = c("10", "107", "108", "109", "124", "17",
"18", "187", "19", "21", "24", "26", "27", "28", "335", "336",
"339", "340", "341", "342", "38", "39", "576", "577", "578",
"579", "580", "581", "582", "583", "584", "585", "586", "592",
"6"), class = "factor"), value = c(1L, 7L, 4L, 4L, 3L, 9L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 5L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L,
2L, 1L, 33L, 27L, 28L, 21L, 28L, 1L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L)), class = "data.frame",
row.names = c(NA, -88L), .Names = c("group", "ID", "value")
)
Note that in group A, value = 1 for every ID. I use ggplot2 to create dot plot based on counts of the value variable using geom_dotplot and faceting by group:
ggplot(ex) + aes(x = value) +
geom_dotplot(binwidth = 1, method = "histodot") +
facet_wrap(~ group)
The dot stack in the first facet is cut off, even when exported using ggsave. Changing the y-axis limits has no effect, but changing the aspect ratio so that H >= W seems to fix the issue (usually by adding way more space to the top than necessary). Is this a bug, or am I specifying my dot plot incorrectly?
EDIT
One workaround is to flip my dotplot and bin by the y variable:
ggplot(ex) + aes(x = group, y = value) +
geom_dotplot(binwidth = 1, method = "histodot",
binaxis = "y", stackdir = "centerwhole") +
facet_wrap(~ group, scales = "free_x")
Two other parameters that can help you are stackratio and dotsize. For example:
ggplot(ex) + aes(x = value) +
geom_dotplot(binwidth = 1, method = "histodot", stackratio = 0.9, dotsize = .75) +
facet_wrap(~ group) +
scale_y_continuous(NULL, breaks = NULL)
You would need to tweak the numbers until you got the layout you wanted.
I found an interesting workaround using geom_bar that achieves the same structure as a dot plot but with rectangles:
ggplot(ex) + aes(x = value, group = ID) +
geom_bar(color = "black", fill = "white", width = 1) +
facet_wrap(~ group)
Although it results in rectangles (rather than dots) and you can't control the stack spacing. The rectangles get resized according to the plot window, which would be equivalent to tweaking the dot size in geom_dotplot. Also, it begs the question "why not just use a regular bar plot?"

Predicting values in ordinal regression analysis with R

I have two questions that are almost completely related to how to do things in R.
I am running an ordinal regression analysis in R. The dependent variable has three levels (0=no action; 1=warning; 2=sanction).
I use the lrm command in the rms package:
print( res1<- lrm(Y ~ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6, y=TRUE, x=TRUE, data=mydata))
I simply couldn't make any sense of the information generated my ?predict.lrm. What I want to do is to calculate the marginal effects of all explanatory variables for each level of the dependent variable. In Stata, this is very simple: mfx compute, predict (outcome(#0)); mfx compute, predict (outcome(#2)) and mfx compute, predict (outcome(#3)).
So my first question is: how do I generate marginal effects for each outcome in R? Please keep in mind that my skills in R are not advanced.
The second question is related to interaction effects, which I need to include in the same model:
print( res1<- lrm(Y ~ x1+x2+x3+x4+x5+x6+x5*x6, y=TRUE, x=TRUE, data=mydata))
If I knew the answer to the first question, I would have ran marginal effects with the interaction term included. Then, I would have plotted the predicted values of the interaction term.
So the second question is: how do I plot the effects (predicted values) of variables in the interaction term?
Many thanks!
EDIT:
Small sample from my dataset (only one country)
dput(mydatasample)
structure(list(year = 1989:2014, country = structure(c(1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), .Label = "Canada", class = "factor"),
id = structure(1:26, .Label = c("CAN 1989", "CAN 1990", "CAN 1991",
"CAN 1992", "CAN 1993", "CAN 1994", "CAN 1995", "CAN 1996",
"CAN 1997", "CAN 1998", "CAN 1999", "CAN 2000", "CAN 2001",
"CAN 2002", "CAN 2003", "CAN 2004", "CAN 2005", "CAN 2006",
"CAN 2007", "CAN 2008", "CAN 2009", "CAN 2010", "CAN 2011",
"CAN 2012", "CAN 2013", "CAN 2014"), class = "factor"), stage1 = c(1L,
1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
0L, 2L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L), x1 = c(1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L), x2 = c(1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), x3 = c(9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L,
9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 8L, 9L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L,
10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L, 10L), x4 = c(31L, 31L, 31L, 31L,
31L, 30L, 30L, 30L, 31L, 30L, 29L, 30L, 28L, 28L, 28L, 27L,
29L, 29L, 29L, 28L, 25L, 24L, 23L, NA, NA, NA), x5 = structure(1:26, .Label = c("17,12528685",
"17,14022279", "17,15382785", "17,16610202", "17,17704534",
"17,18665779", "17,19493938", "17,20571103", "17,21628118",
"17,22493732", "17,23321101", "17,242041", "17,25213621",
"17,26110753", "17,27106985", "17,2810902", "17,29094924",
"17,29891768", "17,30861622", "17,31943819", "17,33088659",
"17,34202619", "17,35190237", "17,36381421", "17,37537139",
"17,38618117"), class = "factor"), x5.1 = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 0L,
1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L)), .Names = c("year", "country",
"id", "stage1", "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x5.1"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA,
-26L))

Reshape a large matrix with missing values and multiple vars of interest [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Convert data from long format to wide format with multiple measure columns
(6 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I need to reorganize a large dataset into a specific format for further analysis. Right now the data are in long format, with multiple records through time for each point. I need to reshape the data so that each point has a single record, but it will add many new columns of the time-specific data. I’ve looked at previous similar posts but I need to ultimately convert several of the current variables into columns, and I can’t find an example of such. Is there a way to accomplish this in a single reshape, or will I have to do several and then concatenate the new columns back together? Another wrinkle before I post the example is that not all points were sampled at each time-step, so I need those values to show up as NA. For example, (see data below) SitePoint A1 was not sampled at all in 2012, SitePoint A10 was not sampled during the first round in 2012, but K83 was sampled all nine times.
mydatain <- structure(list(SitePoint = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L,
4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L,
5L, 5L, 6L, 6L), .Label = c("A1", "A10", "K145", "K83", "T15",
"T213"), class = "factor"), Year_Rotation = structure(c(1L, 2L,
3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 8L, 9L, 1L, 2L, 4L, 5L,
6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 1L, 2L, 3L,
4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 1L, 7L), .Label = c("2010_1", "2010_2",
"2010_3", "2011_1", "2011_2", "2011_3", "2012_1", "2012_2", "2012_3"
), class = "factor"), MR_Fire = structure(c(5L, 6L, 6L, 2L, 9L,
9L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 2L, 9L, 9L, 7L, 8L, 16L, 17L, 21L, 22L, 23L,
25L, 3L, 4L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L, 18L, 19L, 20L, 1L,
2L, 2L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 11L, 11L, 12L, 7L, 24L), .Label = c("0",
"1", "10", "11", "12", "13", "14", "15", "2", "23", "24", "25",
"35", "36", "37", "39", "40", "47", "48", "49", "51", "52", "53",
"8", "9"), class = "factor"), fire_seas = structure(c(2L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 3L), .Label = c("dry", "fire", "wet"
), class = "factor"), OptTSF = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L,
1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
0L, 1L, 1L)), .Names = c("SitePoint", "Year_Rotation", "MR_Fire",
"fire_seas", "OptTSF"), row.names = c(31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L,
36L, 67L, 68L, 69L, 70L, 71L, 72L, 73L, 74L, 10543L, 10544L,
10545L, 10546L, 10547L, 10548L, 10549L, 10550L, 14988L, 14989L,
14990L, 14991L, 14992L, 14993L, 14994L, 14995L, 14996L, 17370L,
17371L, 17372L, 17373L, 17374L, 17375L, 17376L, 17377L, 17378L,
19353L, 19354L), class = "data.frame")
Ultimately I need something like this:
myfinal <- structure(list(SitePoint = structure(1:6, .Label = c("A1", "A10",
"K145", "K83", "T15", "T213"), class = "factor"), MR_Fire_2010_1 = c(12L,
12L, 39L, 23L, 0L, 14L), MR_Fire_2010_2 = c(13L, 13L, 40L, 24L,
1L, NA), MR_Fire_2010_3 = c(13L, 13L, NA, 25L, 1L, NA), MR_Fire_2011_1 = c(1L,
1L, 51L, 35L, 12L, NA), MR_Fire_2011_2 = c(2L, 2L, 52L, 36L,
13L, NA), MR_Fire_2011_3 = c(2L, 2L, 53L, 37L, 13L, NA), MR_Fire_2012_1 = c(NA,
NA, 9L, 47L, 24L, 8L), MR_Fire_2012_2 = c(NA, 14L, 10L, 48L,
24L, NA), MR_Fire_2012_3 = c(NA, 15L, 11L, 49L, 25L, NA), season_2010_1 = structure(c(2L,
2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 1L), .Label = c("dry", "fire"), class = "factor"),
season_2010_2 = structure(c(2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, NA), .Label = c("dry",
"fire"), class = "factor"), season_2010_3 = structure(c(1L,
1L, NA, 1L, 1L, NA), .Label = "fire", class = "factor"),
season_2011_1 = structure(c(2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, NA), .Label = c("dry",
"fire"), class = "factor"), season_2011_2 = structure(c(2L,
2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, NA), .Label = c("dry", "fire"), class = "factor"),
season_2011_3 = structure(c(2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, NA), .Label = c("dry",
"fire"), class = "factor"), season_2012_1 = structure(c(NA,
NA, 2L, 1L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("fire", "wet"), class = "factor"),
season_2012_2 = structure(c(NA, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, NA), .Label = c("fire",
"wet"), class = "factor"), season_2012_3 = structure(c(NA,
1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, NA), .Label = c("fire", "wet"), class = "factor"),
OptTSF_2010_1 = c(1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 1L), OptTSF_2010_2 = c(1L,
1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, NA), OptTSF_2010_3 = c(1L, 1L, NA, 1L, 1L,
NA), OptTSF_2011_1 = c(1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, NA), OptTSF_2011_2 = c(1L,
1L, 0L, 0L, 1L, NA), OptTSF_2011_3 = c(1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L,
NA), OptTSF_2012_1 = c(NA, NA, 1L, 0L, 0L, 1L), OptTSF_2012_2 = c(NA,
1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, NA), OptTSF_2012_3 = c(NA, 1L, 1L, 0L, 0L,
NA)), .Names = c("SitePoint", "MR_Fire_2010_1", "MR_Fire_2010_2",
"MR_Fire_2010_3", "MR_Fire_2011_1", "MR_Fire_2011_2", "MR_Fire_2011_3",
"MR_Fire_2012_1", "MR_Fire_2012_2", "MR_Fire_2012_3", "season_2010_1",
"season_2010_2", "season_2010_3", "season_2011_1", "season_2011_2",
"season_2011_3", "season_2012_1", "season_2012_2", "season_2012_3",
"OptTSF_2010_1", "OptTSF_2010_2", "OptTSF_2010_3", "OptTSF_2011_1",
"OptTSF_2011_2", "OptTSF_2011_3", "OptTSF_2012_1", "OptTSF_2012_2",
"OptTSF_2012_3"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -6L
))
The actual dataset is about 23656 records X 15 variables, so doing it by hand is likely to cause major headaches and potential for mistakes. Any help or suggestions are appreciated. If this has been answered elsewhere, apologies. I couldn’t find anything directly applicable; everything seemed to related to three columns and only one of those being extracted as new variables. Thanks.
SP
dcast from the devel version of data.table i.e., v1.9.5 can cast multiple columns simultaneously. It can be installed from here.
library(data.table) ## v1.9.5+
dcast(setDT(mydatain), SitePoint~Year_Rotation,
value.var=c('MR_Fire', 'fire_seas', 'OptTSF'))
You can use reshape to change the structure of your dataframe from long to wide using the following code:
reshape(mydatain,timevar="Year_Rotation",idvar="SitePoint",direction="wide")

Error using predict with klaR package, NaiveBayes

I'm using the klaR package's predict method as mentioned in the post Naive bayes in R:
nb_testpred <- predict(mynb, newdata=testdata).
nb_testpred is my Naive Bayes model, developed on traindata; testdata is the remaining data.
However, I get this error:
Error in FUN(1:10[[4L]], ...) : subscript out of bounds
I'm not sure what's going on - testdata has fewer rows than traindata, and the same number of columns.
For reference, my code looks like this:
ind <- sample(2, nrow(mydata), replace=TRUE, prob=c(0.9,0.1))
traindata <- mydata[ind==1,]
testdata <- mydata[ind==2,]
myformula <- as.factor(dep) ~ X1 + as.factor(X2) + as.factor(X3) + as.factor(X4) + X5 + as.factor(X6) + as.factor(date) + as.factor(hour)
mynb <- NaiveBayes(myformula, data=traindata)
nb_testpred <- predict(mynb, newdata=testdata) #where I'm getting an error...
A sample of the data is here (the original file has 100,000+ rows):
sampledata <- structure(list(dep = c(1L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 0L, 1L), X1 = structure(c(2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("A", "B"), class = "factor"), X2 = c(200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L, 200L,
200L, 200L), X3 = structure(c(4L, 2L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 3L), .Label = c(".", "1400000", "2400000", "900000"), class = "factor"), X4 = c(0L, 0L, 0L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 0L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 0L), X5 = c(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE), X6 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L), date = structure(c(1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L), .Label = c("9/23/2012",
"9/24/2012"), class = "factor"), hour = c(18L, 17L, 23L, 8L, 1L, 19L, 19L, 16L, 22L, 2L, 12L, 16L, 15L, 9L, 1L, 9L,
13L, 19L)), .Names = c("dep", "X1", "X2", "X3", "X4", "X5", "X6", "date", "hour"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -18L))
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
You can act as follows:
traindata$dep=factor(traindata$dep)
mynb <- NaiveBayes(dep~.,traindata)
Then it works, however you should refine your data to have avoid constant columns.

Resources