What's the math behind CSS's background-size:cover - css

Question

I'm creating an "image generator" where users can upload an image and add text and/or draw on it. The outputted image is a fixed size (698x450).
On the client side, when the user uploads their image it is set as the background of a div that's 698x450 with background-size:cover. This makes it fill the area nicely.
The final combined image is generated by PHP using GD functions. My question is, how can I get the image to scale in PHP the same way it does in CSS. I want the result of the PHP script to look the same as if the image was set in CSS as it was above.
Does anyone know how browsers using background-size:cover calculate how to scale the image appropriately? I want to translate this into PHP.
Thanks

Answer 1

Here's a logic behind cover calculations.
You have four base values :
imgWidth // your original img width
imgHeight
containerWidth // your container width (here 698px)
containerHeight
Two ratios derived from these values :
imgRatio = (imgHeight / imgWidth) // original img ratio
containerRatio = (containerHeight / containerWidth) // container ratio
You want to find two new values :
finalWidth // the scaled img width
finalHeight
So :
if (containerRatio > imgRatio)
{
finalHeight = containerHeight
finalWidth = (containerHeight / imgRatio)
}
else
{
finalWidth = containerWidth
finalHeight = (containerWidth / imgRatio)
}
... and you have the equivalent of a background-size : cover.

Answer 2

I know this is a very old question, but the answer I wrote is actually cleaner by using max and mins on the ratios between the images instead of each image with itself:
var originalRatios = {
width: containerWidth / imageNaturalWidth,
height: containerHeight / imageNaturalHeight
};
// formula for cover:
var coverRatio = Math.max(originalRatios.width, originalRatios.height);
// result:
var newImageWidth = imageNaturalWidth * coverRatio;
var newImageHeight = imageNaturalHeight * coverRatio;
I like this approach because it is very systematic — maybe it's the wrong word —. What I mean is you can get rid of the if statements and make it work in a more "math formula" kind of way (input = output, if that makes sense):
var ratios = {
cover: function(wRatio, hRatio) {
return Math.max(wRatio, hRatio);
},
contain: function(wRatio, hRatio) {
return Math.min(wRatio, hRatio);
},
// original size
"auto": function() {
return 1;
},
// stretch
"100% 100%": function(wRatio, hRatio) {
return { width:wRatio, height:hRatio };
}
};
function getImageSize(options) {
if(!ratios[options.size]) {
throw new Error(options.size + " not found in ratios");
}
var r = ratios[options.size](
options.container.width / options.image.width,
options.container.height / options.image.height
);
return {
width: options.image.width * (r.width || r),
height: options.image.height * (r.height || r)
};
}
Usage
const { width, height } = getImageSize({
container: {width: 100, height: 100},
image: {width: 200, height: 50},
size: 'cover' // 'contain' | 'auto' | '100% 100%'
});
Playground
I created a jsbin here if you want to take a look at what I mean with systematic (it also has a scale method that I thought was not needed in this answer but very useful for something other than the usual).

Answer 3

Thanks to mdi for pointing me in the right direction, but that didn't seem quite right.
This is the solution that worked for me:
$imgRatio = $imageHeight / $imageWidth;
$canvasRatio = $canvasHeight / $canvasWidth;
if ($canvasRatio > $imgRatio) {
$finalHeight = $canvasHeight;
$scale = $finalHeight / $imageHeight;
$finalWidth = round($imageWidth * $scale , 0);
} else {
$finalWidth = $canvasWidth;
$scale = $finalWidth / $imageWidth;
$finalHeight = round($imageHeight * $scale , 0);
}

Answer 4

I stumbled across this QA after a long search for a way how to scale and position a background image on a div to match an html background image while also supporting browser resizing and ad-hoc positioning of the div and I came up with this.
:root {
/* background image size (source) */
--bgw: 1920;
--bgh: 1080;
/* projected background image size and position */
--bgscale: max(calc(100vh / var(--bgh)), calc(100vw / var(--bgw)));
--pbgw: calc(var(--bgw) * var(--bgscale)); /* projected width */
--pbgh: calc(var(--bgh) * var(--bgscale)); /* projected height */
--bgLeftOverflow: calc((var(--pbgw) - 100vw) / 2);
--bgTopOverflow: calc((var(--pbgh) - 100vh) / 2);
}
JS equivalent
window.onresize = () => {
const vw100 = window.innerWidth
const vh100 = window.innerHeight
/* background image size (source) */
const bgw = 1920
const bgh = 1080
/* projected background image size and position */
const bgscale = Math.max(vh100 / bgh, vw100 / bgw)
const projectedWidth = bgw * bgscale | 0
const projectedHeight = bgh * bgscale | 0
const leftOverflow = (projectedWidth - vw100) / 2 | 0
const topOverflow = (projectedHeight - vh100) / 2 | 0
console.log(bgscale.toFixed(2), projectedWidth, projectedHeight, leftOverflow, topOverflow)
}
Try resizing a window with this snippet to see the result.
Best viewed in Full page view. tip: Open console.
window.onresize = () => {
const vw100 = window.innerWidth
const vh100 = window.innerHeight
const bgw = 1920
const bgh = 1080
const bgscale = Math.max(vh100 / bgh, vw100 / bgw)
const projectedWidth = bgw * bgscale | 0
const projectedHeight = bgh * bgscale | 0
const leftOverflow = (projectedWidth - vw100) / 2 | 0
const topOverflow = (projectedHeight - vh100) / 2 | 0
console.log(bgscale.toFixed(2), projectedWidth, projectedHeight, leftOverflow, topOverflow)
}
:root {
/* background image size */
--bgurl: url('https://i.stack.imgur.com/3iy4y.jpg');
--bgw: 1000;
--bgh: 600;
--bgscale: max(calc(100vh / var(--bgh)), calc(100vw / var(--bgw)));
--pbgw: calc(var(--bgw) * var(--bgscale));
--pbgh: calc(var(--bgh) * var(--bgscale));
--bgLeftOverflow: calc((var(--pbgw) - 100vw) / 2);
--bgTopOverflow: calc((var(--pbgh) - 100vh) / 2);
}
html {
background: #000 var(--bgurl) no-repeat center center fixed;
background-size: cover;
overflow: hidden;
}
#panel {
--x: 100px;
--y: 100px;
--w: 200px;
--h: 150px;
position: absolute;
left: var( --x);
top: var( --y);
width: var(--w);
height: var(--h);
background-image: var(--bgurl);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: calc(0px - var(--bgLeftOverflow) - var(--x)) calc(0px - var(--bgTopOverflow) - var(--y));
background-size: calc(var( --bgscale) * var(--bgw));
filter: invert(1);
}
<div id="panel"></div>

Answer 5

When using background-size: cover, it is scaled to the smallest size that covers the entire background.
So, where it is thinner than it is tall, scale it until its width is the same as the area. Where it is taller than it is thin, scale it until its height is the same as the area.
When it is larger than the area to cover, scale it down until it fits (if there is less overflow in height, scale until the same height, if there is less overflow in width, scale until the same width).