I am trying to process the response message for an X12 278 message and the XML that is being produced does not seem to be following the schema properly.
When the raw/native format runs through the EDI pipeline, the message comes out looking like the following:
<ns0:X12_00501_278 xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006">
<ST>
<ST01_TransactionSetIdentifierCode>278</ST01_TransactionSetIdentifierCode>
<ST02_TransactionSetControlNumber>0001</ST02_TransactionSetControlNumber>
<ST03_ImplementationGuideVersionName>005010X216</ST03_ImplementationGuideVersionName>
</ST>
<ns0:BHT_BeginningofHierarchicalTransaction_TS278A1>
<BHT01_HierarchicalStructureCode>0007</BHT01_HierarchicalStructureCode>
<BHT02_TransactionSetPurposeCode>44</BHT02_TransactionSetPurposeCode>
<BHT03_SubmitterTransactionIdentifier>123456789</BHT03_SubmitterTransactionIdentifier>
<BHT04_TransactionSetCreationDate>20120313</BHT04_TransactionSetCreationDate>
<BHT05_TransactionSetCreationTime>1108</BHT05_TransactionSetCreationTime>
</ns0:BHT_BeginningofHierarchicalTransaction_TS278A1>
The message should look like the following:
<ns0:X12_00501_278 xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006">
<ST>
<ST01_TransactionSetIdentifierCode>278</ST01_TransactionSetIdentifierCode>
<ST02_TransactionSetControlNumber>0001</ST02_TransactionSetControlNumber>
<ST03_ImplementationGuideVersionName>005010X216</ST03_ImplementationGuideVersionName>
</ST>
<A3_BHT_Loop>
<ns0:BHT_BeginningofHierarchicalTransaction_TS278A3>
<BHT01_HierarchicalStructureCode>0007</BHT01_HierarchicalStructureCode>
<BHT02_TransactionSetPurposeCode>44</BHT02_TransactionSetPurposeCode>
<BHT03_SubmitterTransactionIdentifier>123456789</BHT03_SubmitterTransactionIdentifier>
<BHT04_TransactionSetCreationDate>20120313</BHT04_TransactionSetCreationDate>
<BHT05_TransactionSetCreationTime>1108</BHT05_TransactionSetCreationTime>
</ns0:BHT_BeginningofHierarchicalTransaction_TS278A3>
In the latter example, notice the inclusion of the *A3_BHT_Loop* element and also the fact that the BHT segment is now labelled properly as *BHT_BeginningofHierarchicalTransaction_TS278A3*.
Is there a setting that needs to be made to get the messages to resolve to the proper schema? Or is there something that should be in the response message to have the pipeline detect which format should be applied?
In BizTalk 2010 you would specify the namespace of the EDI schema and the release/version information as part of the agreement configuration. Here is a link that goes over this process: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff629750.aspx
Thanks,
Related
I started to use LocustIO for load testing a 3rd party API which provides a way to do batch requests (http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.01/odata-v4.01-part1-protocol.html#sec_BatchRequests).
How can this be done using LocustIO?
I tried with the following:
def batch(self):
response = self.client.request(method="POST", url="/$batch", auth=("ABC", "DEF"), headers={"ContentType": "multipart/mixed; boundary=batch_36522ad7-fc75-4b56-8c71-56071383e77b"}, data="Content-Type: application/http\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: binary\n\nGET putyoururlhere HTTP/1.1\nAccept: application/json\n\n\n")
Auth is something I need to have authentication to the API, but that's not the point of the question and "putyoururlhere" should be replaced with the actual url. Either way, it gives errors when executing the test, so I must be doing something wrong.
People with experience how to do this?
Kind regards!
The data parameter should be your POST body (only), you cant put additional headers in it the way you did. You probably just want to add them as additional entries in the dict you pass as headers
Se the documentation for python requests library for more details. https://requests.readthedocs.io/en/master/
I am defining a pipeline in data factory, I had some errors that I correct.
The first activity is calling an usql script to do some aggregation, I changed the script plenty of time but the error is still:
[{"errorId":"E_CSC_USER_SYNTAXERROR","severity":"Error","component":"CSC","source":"USER","message":"syntax
error. Final statement did not end with a semicolon","details":"at
token 'usql', line 4\r\nnear the ###:\r\n**************\r\nCLARE
#lineitemsfile string =
\"/datalakerepo/input/2016/01/01lineitems.txt\";\nDECLARE #ordersfile
string = \"/datalakerepo/input/2016/01/01orders.txt\";\nsales.usql ###
\n","description":"Invalid syntax found in the
script.","resolution":"Correct the script syntax, using expected
token(s) as a
guide.","helpLink":"","filePath":"","lineNumber":4,"startOffset":228,"endOffset":232}].
seem like not all usql script is read from the data factory, so I though that may be the "rerun in upstream in pipeline" have something to do with this, like clear cache from previous script.
Anyone knows what "rerun in upstream in pipeline" does?
Many thanks!
"Rerun with upstream in pipeline" basically means "recalculate with all dependencies". For example, if one has pipeline1 -> dataset1 -> pipeline2 and tries to rerun pipeline2 with dependecies, then pipeline1 and pipeline2 will be both executed. I believe it works same with several chained activities within single pipeline.
I have asked another question with almost same scenario, A catch 22 in generating 999 file
Basically, I am inbounding HIPPA 837 files and am required to generate 999 response file.
Today I inbounded a file with ST02 element missing.
The TA1 created with Accept status, cause it only cares ISA-IEA level and that part is good.
BizTalk inbounded the file, found the issue, and actually generated a 999 message, but it failed to send out as a physical file because:
Unable to read the stream produced by the pipeline.
Details: Error: 1 (Field level error)
SegmentID: AK2
Position in TS: 3
Data Element ID: AK202
Position in Segment: 2
Data Value:
1: Mandatory data element missing
So here's the catch 22: A 999 should be created to report error for this incoming 837 file, The 999's AK202 is a required field reference to incoming file's transactionnumber defined in ST02.
And the error of the incoming file is it is missing this ST02.
Now, for this scenario, it ends up with an accept TA1 and a pending message in BizTalk messageBox.
In our trading partners view, they send a file and ONLY get a TA1 response with accept status.
My question goes here:
1. Which is the right file to report this kind of error (ST02 missing), TA1 or 999?
Is there anyway to bypass this error and have the 999 created?
There's an RFI on this at x12.org: http://rfi.x12.org/Request/Details/55?stateViewModel=WPC.RFI.Models.ViewModels.RequestViewModel
The TLDR version: you should reject the entire functional group, and use the control identifier from the functional group in AK202.
Here's the relevant text:
Description
What Segments/Data Elements should be used in the 997 when reporting an error in ST02 (Transaction Set Control Number) when the error is related to syntax or min/max? If you attempt to create a 997 back to the submitter with the inbound data from ST02 in AK202 of the 997 you would be creating an invalid 997 transaction. It appears there may be a gap in the 997 standard for reporting errors at this level. If we have misinterpreted the use of the transaction and it can be reported, please let us know how.
Response
Data elements AK102 and AK202 located within transaction set 997 and transaction set 999 are to be used to convey the values of control numbers in the functional group or transaction sets being acknowledged. If including a copy of the value of a data element in the 997 or 999 would cause a syntax violation in the 997 or 999, then if the violation is to be reported at the level at which it was found it must be reported at the next higher level.
Recommendation
The official response to a formal RFI is a letter from the current ASC X12 chair. This website often displays a summary of the RFI. Click here to view a PDF of the letter for this RFI.
When reporting errors after the syntactic analysis of the transaction set, the data analyzed must be able to be reported within the acknowledgment. While data element AK404 supports reporting the value of a data element that fails syntactic analysis without violating the syntax of the 997, the same does not apply to AK202. There are two generally accepted methods of acknowledging transaction sets: 1) acknowledge all transaction sets within the functional group or 2) acknowledge only those transaction sets containing errors. It is not recommended to accept a functional group with errors if the transaction set control number in error cannot be reported in AK202. For the example in your request, the appropriate action is to reject the entire functional group containing the ST02 value which when echoed in AK202 would create a syntactically invalid 997. In addition, the same logic applies to the functional group control number;, the appropriate action is to reject the entire interchange containing the syntactically invalid data.
I use twain 2.3 (TWAINDSM.DLL) in my application with HP Scanjet 200 TWAIN Protocol 1.9.
My TWAIIN calls are:
OpenDSM: DG_CONTROL, DAT_PARENT, MSG_OPENDSM
OpenDS: DG_CONTROL, DAT_IDENTITY, MSG_OPENDS
EnableDS: DG_CONTROL, DAT_USERINTERFACE, MSG_ENABLEDS
ProcessDeviceEvent: DG_CONTROL, DAT_EVENT, MSG_PROCESSEVENT
and as a result of the last call I allways get TWRC_NOTDSEVENT instead of TWRC_DSEVENT.
Could please someone help with this?
Once you use DG_CONTROL / DAT_EVENT / MSG_PROCESSEVENT, all messages from the applications message loop must be sent to the data source for processing. Receiving TWRC_NOTDSEVENT means the forwarded message isn't for the source so the application should process it as normal.
Keep forwarding all messages to the source until you receive MSG_XFERREADY which means there is data to transfer. Once the transfer is finished and you have sent MSG_DISABLEDS that's when you can stop forwarding messages to the source.
Twain is a standard, and when many company implement that standard, not all of them do the same way. Along the way to support Twain, we will learn and adjust the code to support all the different implementations.
I experienced this situation before, and this is my workaround:
Instead of placing (rc == TWRC_DSEVENT) at the beginning of code (will skip the following MSG_XFERREADY processing afterward) you can move the comparison to the end after MSG_XFERREADY processing, so that MSG_XFERREADY is always checked and processed.
(rc == TWRC_DSEVENT) is only to determine if we should forward the window message or not.
I don't know your specific situation. I ran into a similar issue because I called OpenDSM with a HWND/wId which is from another process. You should call OpenDSM with the HWND of
the active window/dialog which is owned by current process.
I have set up negative testing for an account then set the error code desired as the Transaction Amount Field for example 106.06 to invoke error code 10606 "Buyer cannot pay” no errors are returned the order is processed.
If I try another error code 10539 “This transaction cannot be processed”. An error is return and the order is not processed.
I am using the The US site error codes: http://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/ebook/PP_APIReference/Appx-ErrorCodes_and_Messages.html and we are in Australia are these the correct error codes?
Any ideas what is causing this? Is this the correct way to use Negative Testing in the sandbox?
Thanks
I know this is late but I stumbled across the answer for me.
You didn't specify the API Name you are working with DoExpressCheckoutPayment and according to Paypal's Negative Testing Docs we are supposed to use an AMT field and
To trigger an error condition on an amount-related field, specify a error code value as a number with two digits to the right of the decimal point. For example, specify a value of 107.55 to trigger the 10755 error.
I found their information to be completely false! What I finally got working was to use PAYMENTREQUEST_0_AMT and NOT use a decimal.
So here is what I came up with
USER={yourUID}&
PWD={yourPSWD}&
SIGNATURE={yourSig}&
TOKEN={yourToken}&
METHOD=DoExpressCheckoutPayment&
VERSION=119&
PAYMENTREQUEST_0_AMT=10486
Edit:
I later found a better option specifically for the Payment Method Refused (10486) that I mentioned above. Take a look: https://developer.paypal.com/docs/classic/express-checkout/ht_ec_fundingfailure10486/#testing-saleorauth