I find that img descendants of flexbox positioned items with max-width: 100% rule doesn't work on firefox.
I've tryed the solutions from:
Firefox 34+ ignoring max-width for flexbox
and,
Firefox flexbox image width
As the code is quite long I wrote a pen: http://codepen.io/vandervals/pen/raXBNj
As you can see in this pen, this is a problem for small sized screens. I found a not very elegant solution:
img{
max-width: 500px;
width: 100%;
}
The problem with this approach is that we lose the global use of the rule max-width: 100% for every image, no matter the actual dimensions of the image.
Has anyone solved this problem?
On this page, the columns for the video thumbnails don't seem to display consistently (equally) on Chrome. On IE and FF, both column widths are equally displayed.
My global CSS for image have been set to:
img {
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
Altering any values will affect other image rendering. Any ideas?
The issue is that you don't actually set a width, meaning browsers and images can render any way they want, giving unpredictable results as you've seen.
The easiest solution is to just size your columns to a fixed 50% width, like so:
.page-videos .view-video td {
width: 50%;
}
Leave the max-width: 100% in place, it will ensure that even large images fit this 50% perfectly.
Feel free to replace the classes of my sample code, they are simply a best guess at ensuring we only change this one table, but you may know better/more-specific classes for this project.
Removing max-width globally fixes it, or override it with min-width instead. max-width only sets the maximum width permitted, not an actual width
.cboxElement img {
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
}
I'm developing a website. Everything looks great on 100% zoom but when I'm zooming in or out in chrome and IE (not Firefox) the style changes and div blocks move! I have a container div with a background and some div blocks on it. Everything should be in exact position and it is important in my site.
You can see in picture how it makes my style look so bad.
I tried to use percentage instead of pixel for sizing and positioning of all elements in the page but its not working.
My CSS:
.container{
width: 880px;
background-image: url('b80.png');
}
.picture{
margin-left:13px;
margin-top:11px;
}
I too faced the same problem, when I tested in a different screen size.
Try position: relative or display: inline-block for .picture. This may solve the issue.
I'm new to responsive images but have figured out how to get my images to scale in Safari, Opera, and Chrome (don't know about IE) with the following CSS:
img {
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
}
As the screen size is changed, the image scales. In Firefox, the image doesn't scale, unless I change width:auto to width:100%; Then Safari scrunches up the image to nothing upon load or reload; although, clearing cash makes it full size. I'm working on Drupal with the Zen 7.5-dev responsive theme. And I'm keeping my css files in SASS, but this is probably just a CSS issue. Maybe I've missed something on the HTML 5 or CSS3 side of things.
Anyway, I got things to work by overriding the image width a Firefox specific directive like this:
/* Make Firefox images scale with screen width. The width:100% messes up on Safari */
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
img {
width: 100%;
}
}
I don't think I should have to do this, and googling doesn't seem to come across this issue.
This is the default CSS that is used for responsive Images:
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width:100%;
}
And this is the indispensable Javascript: Bongard.net
Thanks to David Bongard for the Javascript.
Now add the following to the "if safari" rule of the Script:
for (var i = 0; i < document.getElementsByTagName("img").length; i++) {
document.getElementsByTagName("img")[i].style.width = "auto";
}
Safari wants width:auto; the rest of the browsers i tested are happy with width:100%;
This works for me
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
img{
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
}
#media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {
img{
max-width: 100%;
}
}
I have similar problem, and found out setting max-width on the wrapper element kinda solves the issue. (Only tested with Firefox 23, but it should works with earlier Firefox too.) See also these JSFiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/CLUGX/ (demonstrate the issue on Firefox)
http://jsfiddle.net/CLUGX/1/ (uses max-width on wrapper to fix the issue)
http://jsfiddle.net/CLUGX/4/ (demonstrate that responsive sizing works, try resizing inner frame)
Before max-width:
After max-width:
One thing to note, however, if you happens to set padding on wrapper element, it won't be taken into img's width calculation and will cause inconsistent results between Firefox and Safari (http://jsfiddle.net/CLUGX/3/):
Chances are your image is inside a shrink-wrapping container, which then has to compute it's width based on the width of the image. And then the max-width of the image is 100% of the container's width.
If that's what's going on, the CSS spec doesn't actually define the behavior of such markup, where the parent's width depends on the child and the child's width depends on the parent.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823483 for some discussion on the issue.
If you use the width for image in px or gave padding or used display:table instead of display:block for the image, then image responsiveness will not work properly on some/all browsers
Well after trying all sorts of codes and fidles, this simple edition on my css did the trick for me:
img {width: 100%;}
Simply then where you wish your images to resize, define them without adding the "width" parameter (sizing to original from source); and then if you do wish to fix their size, simply add the "width" parameter on SRC style (regular width="" definition won't work). If it's an inline image on your paragraph, simply wrap it in a div and align that div to whatever side you'd like. Reeeeally simple!
It works both for Google, Firefox and IE. Cheers!
I have just had this problem and found a solution: When I set the img max-width in my CSS sheet, nothing happens - the image won't scale. When I set max-width in the page itself - where the image is called, it works in all browsers and on all devices.
No:
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto; }
Yes:
<img src ="image.jpg" style="max-width:100%; height:auto;">
If anyone can shed some light of wisdom on this, please do.
I used Kridsada Thanabulpong's jsfiddle but only got it to work when I removed display:table from the div wrapping my image.
When using a css background such as in the footer on the page below (in the elements div.footer_head and div.footer_footer), if the browser window is resized to less than about 1000px the divs themselves remain at the full width but scrolling right in the browser causes whitespace to appear where the background should be.
I was sure I'd find a similar question on here but can't seem to word it correctly enough to find it in search.
If someone could point me in the right direction I'm sure I can figure this out.
Look at how the divs with class footer_head and footer_footer behave when you resize the browser to be quite thin and scroll to the right.
screenshot http://printanomics.unbranded-nomads.co.uk/picture-2.jpg
You need to add a min-width:1000px to .footer-container.
.footer-container {
float: left;
line-height: 1.5;
margin-top: 20px;
width: 100%;
min-width: 1000px; /* add this */
}
This will mean the smallest width the .footer-container will get is 1000px. Though after that it will expand to 100%.
If you have a look at your css file you will see that the footer width is set to 100% and not 1000px as the other divs. This also applies to your background as your background won't be bigger than the div itself.
I don't know if you use this, but Firebug is a very good Firefox plugin to identify troubles in CSS files.