Recommended date format for REST GET API - http

Question

What's the recommended timestamp format for a REST GET API like this:
http://api.example.com/start_date/{timestamp}
I think the actual date format should be ISO 8601 format, such as YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ for UTC time.
Should we use the ISO 8601 version without hyphens and colons, such as:
http://api.example.com/start_date/YYYYMMDDThhmmssZ
or should we encode the ISO 8601 format, using for example base64 encoding?

Answer 1

Check this article for the 5 laws of API dates and times HERE:
Law #1: Use ISO-8601 for your dates
Law #2: Accept any timezone
Law #3: Store it in UTC
Law #4: Return it in UTC
Law #5: Don’t use time if you don’t need it
More info in the docs.

Answer 2

REST doesn't have a recommended date format. Really it boils down to what works best for your end user and your system. Personally, I would want to stick to a standard like you have for ISO 8601 (url encoded).
If not having ugly URI is a concern (e.g. not including the url encoded version of :, -, in you URI) and (human) addressability is not as important, you could also consider epoch time (e.g. http://example.com/start/1331162374). The URL looks a little cleaner, but you certainly lose readability.
The /2012/03/07 is another format you see a lot. You could expand upon that I suppose. If you go this route, just make sure you're either always in GMT time (and make that clear in your documentation) or you might also want to include some sort of timezone indicator.
Ultimately it boils down to what works for your API and your end user. Your API should work for you, not you for it ;-).

Answer 3

Every datetime field in input/output needs to be in UNIX/epoch format. This avoids the confusion between developers across different sides of the API.
Pros:
Epoch format does not have a timezone.
Epoch has a single format (Unix time is a single signed number).
Epoch time is not effected by daylight saving.
Most of the Backend frameworks and all native ios/android APIs support epoch conversion.
Local time conversion part can be done entirely in application side depends on the timezone setting of user's device/browser.
Cons:
Extra processing for converting to UTC for storing in UTC format in the database.
Readability of input/output.
Readability of GET URLs.
Notes:
Timezones are a presentation-layer problem! Most of your code shouldn't be dealing with timezones or local time, it should be passing Unix time around.
If you want to store a humanly-readable time (e.g. logs), consider storing it along with Unix time, not instead of Unix time.

Answer 4

RFC6690 - Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format Does not explicitly state what Date format should be however in section 2. Link Format it points to RFC 3986. This implies that recommendation for date type in RFC 3986 should be used.
Basically RFC 3339 Date and Time on the Internet is the document to look at that says:
date and time format for use in Internet protocols that is a
profile of the ISO 8601 standard for representation of dates and
times using the Gregorian calendar.
what this boils down to : YYYY-MM-ddTHH:mm:ss.ss±hh:mm
(e.g 1937-01-01T12:00:27.87+00:20)
Is the safest bet.

Answer 5

Always use UTC:
For example I have a schedule component that takes in one parameter DATETIME.
When I call this using a GET verb I use the following format where my incoming parameter name is scheduleDate.
Example:
https://localhost/api/getScheduleForDate?scheduleDate=2003-11-21T01:11:11Z

Answer 6

For JavaScript,
I normally save date as ISO format by writing: new Date().toISOString();.
Hopefully, it helps with your project.