I'm trying to take away a white border that is appearing from behind an image on my sidebar. I can't figure out what is causing the white border. I thought it was the padding, and then I thought it was the border. If you visit our home page (http://noahsdad.com/) and look on the side bar under the "new normal" picture you will see a "Reece's Rainbow" image. I'm trying to remove that white around the image. I pasted in the code below, but it's not doing anything. Any thoughts as to what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks.
#text-23 { background: none}
the reason it's not working is the background: none is never getting to the img which has the background set on it (backgrounds don't cascade down they exist in the element and you can have multiple elements layered on top of each other much like a painting. Which has the effect of the background cascading)
#text-23 img { background: none; }
that should resolve your problems. I am assuming that when you call the class textwidget you still want it to append the white background, just not for this instance. So if you set the above it will cascade properly with the correct specificity while leaving the rest of your page alone.
This can also be done by
#text-23 .textwidget img { background: none; }
but that level of specificity is not required. However if you try to just do:
.textwidget img { background: none; }
this will override all of the instances where the background is set on an image in the textwidget container.
You have added the white border yourself by setting the following in line 884 of style.css:
.textwidget img {
background: #fff;
padding: 5px;
max-width: 290px;
}
Simply remove the background declaration. If you only want to remove this instance of a white border, add the following rule:
#text-23 .textwidget img {
background: none;
}
This seems to be the conflicting CSS class.
.textwidget img {
background: white;
padding: 5px;
max-width: 290px;
}
If you want to debug css you should really look into Firebug(a plugin for Firefox) or Opera and use builtin dragonfly
These allow you to rightclick on your HTML page and inspect it.
Go to your style.css file and search for .textwidget img and change the background-color property to none. It is currently set to #FFFFFF which is the hex color code for white and is resulting in the white border or background (precisely).
.textwidget img {
background-color: none;
}
Related
I want to have a background image on my site. It comes from the top of the page and is only behind the header. The problem is, my theme forces me to have a background color for the header so you can't see my background image at all. Here is a photo of what I want the site to look like:
And you can see what it actually looks like here. I'm using the Brunch Pro theme on Wordpress.
Is there a way to make the header background transparent or is there a better way to do this?
Add this to the end of the custom.css or style.css of your theme:
.brunch-pro .site-header{
background: transparent;
}
If you can edit the CSS (which I presume you can in WP), look for where .site-header has it's CSS properties set. Remove the background and background-color properties.
You could also just add a new CSS property and apply it to the header. Something like:
header.site-header {
background: none !important;
}
The !important will override already set properties...
If background-color property is required, you could use rgba color and make it transparent. background: rgba(0,0,0,0); makes background-color black, but fully transparent, without opacity and other tricks. Like so:
.black-but-transaprent {
color: red;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0);
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div class="black-but-transaprent">Test</div>
I would like to change the home icon of the Primefaces Breadcrumb with another icon but I can't find how.
I tried with CSS but it is not working for the icon:
.ui-breadcrumb {
background: none !important;
border: none !important;
icon: url('resources/images/look/bandeau.png')
}
It should be enough with:
.ui-breadcrumb .ui-icon-home {
background-image: url("#{resource['images/look/bandeau.png']}");
background-position: 0; /* asuming bandeau.png is a single image */
}
But you have to make sure two things:
First, that you are overriding primefaces css correctly, you shouldn't need !important. See this. If you are doing it right, at least you will see that the default image dissapear.
Second, you have to make sure that you are referring to the image correctly. In my code, I show how I do it myself, but it depends on your configuration so you should also check this.
Try to target that specific icon by doing so:
.ui-breadcrumb ul li .ui-menuitem-link.ui-home {
background: none !important;
border: none !important;
background-image: url('resources/images/look/bandeau.png') !important;
}
Also check if the background image hyperlink is correct.
This question was asked before but the solution is not applicable in my case. I want to make sure certain background images are printed because they are integral to the page. (They are not images directly in the page because there are several of them being used as CSS sprites.)
Another solution on that same question suggests using list-style-image, which only works if you have a different image for every icon, no CSS sprites possible.
Aside from creating a separate page with the icons inline, is there another solution?
With Chrome and Safari you can add the CSS style -webkit-print-color-adjust: exact; to the element to force print the background color and/or image
Browsers, by default, have their option to print background-colors and images turned off. You can add some lines in CSS to bypass this.
Just add:
* {
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Chrome, Safari 6 – 15.3, Edge */
color-adjust: exact !important; /* Firefox 48 – 96 */
print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Firefox 97+, Safari 15.4+ */
}
I found a way to print the background image with CSS. It's a bit dependent on how your background is laid out, but it seems to work for my application.
Essentially, you add the #media print to the end of your stylesheet and change the body background slightly.
Example, if your current CSS looks like this:
body {
background:url(images/mybg.png) no-repeat;
}
At the end of your stylesheet, you add:
#media print {
body {
content:url(images/mybg.png);
}
}
This adds the image to the body as a "foreground" image, thus making it printable.
You may need to add some additional CSS to make the z-index proper. But again, its up to how your page is laid out.
This worked for me when I couldn't get a header image to show up in print view.
You have very little control over a browser's printing methods. At most you can SUGGEST, but if the browser's print settings have "don't print background images", there's nothing you can do without rewriting your page to turn the background images into floating "foreground" images that happen to be behind other content.
The below code works well for me (at least for Chrome).
I also added some margin and page orientation controls.(portrait, landscape)
<style type="text/css" media="print">
#media print {
body {-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;}
}
#page {
size:A4 landscape;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin: 0;
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;
}
</style>
Make sure to use the !important attribute. This dramatically increases the likelihood your styles are retained when printed.
#example1 {
background:url(image.png) no-repeat !important;
}
#example2 {
background-color: #123456 !important;
}
Like #ckpepper02 said, the body content:url option works well. I found however that if you modify it slightly you can just use it to add a header image of sorts using the :before pseudo element as follows.
#media print {
body:before { content: url(img/printlogo.png);}
}
That will slip the image at the top of the page, and from my limited testing, it works in Chrome and the IE9
-hanz
Use psuedo-elements. While many browsers will ignore background images, psuedo-elements with their content set to an image are technically NOT background images. You can then position the background image roughly where the image should have gone (though it's not as easy or precise as the original image).
One drawback is that for this to work in Chrome, you need to specify this behavior outside of your print media query, and then make it visible in the print media query block. So, something like this...
.image:before{
visibility:hidden;
position:absolute;
content: url("your/image/path");
}
#media print {
.image{
position:relative;
}
.image:before{
visibility:visible;
top:etc...
}
}
The drawback is that the image will often be downloaded on normal page loads, adding unnecessary bulk. You can avoid that by just using the same image/path you'd already used for the original, visible image.
it is working in google chrome when you add !important attribute to background image
make sure you add attribute first and try again, you can do it like that
.inputbg {
background: url('inputbg.png') !important;
}
Browsers, by default, have their option to print background-colors and images turned off. You can add some lines in CSS to bypass this. Just add:
* {
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact !important; /* Chrome, Safari */
color-adjust: exact !important; /*Firefox*/
}
Note: It's not working on the entire body but you could speciy it for a inner element or a container div element.
You can use borders for fixed colors.
borderTop: solid 15px black;
and for gradient background you can use:
box-sizing: border-box;
border-style: solid;
border-top: 0px;
border-left: 0px;
border-right: 0px;
border-image: linear-gradient(to right, red, blue) 100%;
border-image-slice: 1;
border-width: 18px;
https://gist.github.com/danomanion/6175687 proposes an elegant solution, using a custom bullet in place of a background image. In this example, the aim is to apply a background image to an a element with class logo. (You should substitute these for the identifier of the element you wish to style.)
a.logo {
display: list-item;
list-style-image: url("../images/desired-background.png");
list-style-position: inside;
}
By including this within a
#media print {
}
block, I'm able to replace a white-on-transparent logo on the screen, rendered as a background-image, with a black-on-transparent logo for print.
You can do some tricks like that:
<style>
#page {
size: 21cm 29.7cm;
size: landscape
/*margin: 30mm 45mm 30mm 45mm;*/
}
.whater{
opacity: 0.05;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 9999;
}
</style>
In body tag:
<img src="YOUR IMAGE URL" class="whater"/>
i have the following css to put padding around a div:
.orangeAllDay, .orangeAllDay a {
background: #fab384 !important;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
it works great until the content (which happens to be inside a cell in an html table takes up two lines. When i look at this in firefox, it looks like its trying to add the padding to each line of the content (even though its all inside one div) so i get some weird overlap of space above the second line that covers part of the first line.
Is there a workaround for this issue or another solution that doesn't break on multiline.
It is adding this padding because you have included both the .orangeAllday and .orangeAll Day a together, so both the link & the elemenent .orangeAllday will get padding of 5px.
You would need to separate them like so:
.orangeAllDay {
background: #fab384 !important;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
}
.orangeAllDay a {
background: #fab384 !important;
color: white;
}
this is done with the assumption that you want padding on the .orangeAllDay element only, but wish to retain background / color for link a.
You've got the padding around the div (.orangeAllDay) and the link. What you are seeing is the padding of the link. There are several ways around this, depending on how exactly the HTML looks like.
If it only contains the link, I'd suggest to actually drop the div and just have the link display as a block:
...
a.orangeAllDay {
background: #fab384 !important;
color: white;
padding: 5px;
display: block;
}
I have a CSS rule like this:
a:hover { background-color: #fff; }
But this results in a bad-looking gap at the bottom on image links, and what's even worse, if I have transparent images, the link's background color can be seen through the image.
I have stumbled upon this problem many times before, but I always solved it using the quick-and-dirty approach of assigning a class to image links:
a.imagelink:hover { background-color: transparent; }
Today I was looking for a more elegant solution to this problem when I stumbled upon this.
Basically what it suggests is using display: block, and this really solves the problem for non-transparent images. However, it results in another problem: now the link is as wide as the paragraph, although the image is not.
Is there a nice way to solve this problem, or do I have to use the dirty approach again?
Thanks,
I tried to find some selector that would get only <a> elements that don't have <img> descendants, but couldn't find any...
About images with that bottom gap, you could do the following:
a img{vertical-align:text-bottom;}
This should get rid of the background showing up behind the image, but may throw off the layout (by not much, though), so be careful.
For the transparent images, you should use a class.
I really hope that's solved in CSS3, by implementing a parent selector.
I'm confused at what you are terming "image links"... is that an 'img' tag inside of an anchor? Or are you setting the image in CSS?
If you're setting the image in CSS, then there is no problem here (since you're already able to target it)... so I must assume you mean:
<a ...><img src="..." /></a>
To which, I would suggest that you specify a background color on the image... So, assuming the container it's in should be white...
a:hover { background: SomeColor }
a:hover img { background-color: #fff; }
I usually do something like this to remove the gap under images:
img {
display: block;
float: left;
}
Of course this is not always the ideal solution but it's fine in most situations.
This way works way better.
a[href$=jpg], a[href$=jpeg], a[href$=jpe], a[href$=png], a[href$=gif] {
text-decoration: none;
border: 0 none;
background-color: transparent;
}
No cumbersome classes that have to be applied to each image. Detailed description here:
http://perishablepress.com/press/2008/10/14/css-remove-link-underlines-borders-linked-images/
Untested idea:
a:hover {background-color: #fff;}
img:hover { background-color: transparent;}
The following should work (untested):
First you
a:hover { background-color: #fff; }
Then you
a:imagelink:hover { background-color: inherit; }
The second rule will override the first for <a class="imagelink" etc.> and preserve the background color of the parent.
I tried to do this without the class="", but I can't find a CSS selector that is the opposite of foo > bar, which styles a bar when it is the child of a foo. You would want to style the foo when it has a child of class bar. You can do that and even fancier things with jQuery, but that may not be desirable as a general technique.
you could use display: inline-block but that's not completely crossbrowser. IE6 and lower will have a problem with it.
I assume you have whitespaces between <a> and <img>? try removing that like this:
<a><img /></a>
I had this problem today, and used another solution than display: block thanks to the link by asker. This means I am able to retain the link ONLY on the image and not expand it to its container.
Images are inline, so they have space below them for lower part of letters like "y, j, g". This positions the images at baseline, but you can alter it if you have no <a>TEXT HERE</a> like with a logo. However you still need to mask the text line space and its easy if you use a plain color as background (eg in body or div#wrapper).
body {
background-color: #112233;
}
a:hover {
background-color: red;
}
a img {
border-style: none; /* not need for this solution, but removes borders around images which have a link */
vertical-align: bottom; /* here */
}
a:hover img {
background-color: #112233; /* MUST match the container background, or you arent masking the hover effect */
}
I had the same problem. In my case I am using the image as background. I did the following and it resolved my problem:
background-image: url(file:"use the same background image or color");