Using Play N framework, Is there a way to to connect an image layer(ie. an Image) with physics bodies? (i.e. they have no image attached, only a border)?
I want them to be physically simulated as dynamic objects as well. So that i can give a graphical look to physics bodies.
I think you might be able to draw the border of the physics body using a CanvasImage via the method described here and add that to a Physics Image Layer you create.
Related
I have created a react app Which is very similar to office whiteboard. I would like to generate a thumbnail or card preview of each whiteboard and wondering how to go about it.
My initial thought was to just create a card component and render the shapes to that the same way I do for the real whiteboard. However, the points for each shape will be outside the stage and I can't think of how I can scale it down.
Any ideas?
Take a look at the official canvas thumbnail demo from Konva.
You can use a similar approach with react-konva.
Create a special component for the preview.
I think this approach will work better and probably more performant (depending on your app). You just need to create another Stage and draw all objects into it. It will be better if you can draw simplified versions of the shape, because the drawing is much smaller, so not all details are visible.
You will have to calculate your own scale ratio.
Use image preview
Instead of making a full components tree for the whiteboard, you can just export the main stage into an image and show it. You have to do reexport from time to time.
Context
I'm using Paper JS to build a multi-player drawing game. At any given point, a single user will be drawing to his/her canvas, and the data will get sent to the server to be broadcast to other users. Each user's canvas may be of variable size, and it resizes as the window resizes while maintaining the same aspect ratio.
The goal is for each user to have a scaled representation of the drawing (i.e. everything fits inside the different sized canvases and the content doesn't get distorted). This should be the case if a drawing transfers from a larger canvas to a smaller canvas, and vice-versa. The project supports a drawing tool as well as an eraser tool.
Problem
Approach 1 below scales the drawings the way I want, but there is substantial lag. Approach 2 deals with the lag, but doesn't scale the drawings the way I want.
My understanding is that SVGs will scale nicely whether they are scaled-up or scaled-down. But rasters are pixel-based and will become "blurry" when scaled-up. When I test approach 2, a drawing from a smaller canvas gets blurred on a larger canvas. The result is the same whether I use export/importJSON or export/importSVG. Is there a way to get both good performance and scaled-drawings? See below for example implementations of the tools.
Approach 1: Paths + Symbols:
Every path/symbol placement is kept in the active layer.
The eraser tool draws a white rectangle (defined as a symbol) to
mimic an "erasing" effect.
This works fine as a demo, but will start to lag very quickly as the
number of items in the active layer increases. The eraser tool in
particular will not function smoothly.
Relevant sketch
Approach 2: Rasterization:
After a path is drawn or a symbol is placed, the active layer is
rasterized and its children are removed.
This seems to work quite well on a single canvas, and the eraser
doesn't lag like in the first approach. There are only 2 items in the
active layer after each rasterization.
When a drawing from a client with a smaller canvas is exported (using exportJSON or exportSVG) to a client with a larger canvas, the result is "blurry".
The above also happens when a drawing is made and then the canvas is re-sized to be larger.
Relevant sketch
You could send your objects as SVG and rasterize them once received.
I am trying to implement a tool into my application. the tool would allow the user to plot a triangle meshes using the mouse. I have looked everywhere for a way to do this, tutorials, examples, etc and have not been successful. I have seen the FXyz library but that does not really simulate What I am trying to accomplish. The goal of the program looks as follows:
Use Case Sequence:
The user adds a png image to the 3D scene or drags it into the 3D scene using the mouse.
Once the image is being displayed the user would then be able to plot a mesh around the image.
Once the user has finished plotting the mesh. There would have to be a way to add the image being overlayed by the mesh as a texture to the mesh. The image should look the same after being added as a texture. Is this too hard or beyond the scope of what can be achieve in JavaFX?
Theoretically It would then be possible to drag the vertices of the mesh at draggable points and successfully applying transformations to the texture. Would this be possible?
Images showing what I am trying to achieve
As you can see maybe after plotting the mesh the points connecting the vertices can be dragged in order to manipulate or transform the shape of the mesh. If the mesh has a texture over it. would the image then also transform ?
Would this be possible with the TriangleMesh class that JavaFX has which by the way there is very little out there which explains how to use it and how the points, face points and texture points work. Very confusing =(.
Target End Result
My question is would the type of manipulation shown in the image above be possible in JavaFX? Can this sort of functionality be achieved using the TriangleMesh class or other similar class in JavaFX ? As you can see what I am trying to achieve is really image manipulation I would appreciate knowing if there is another better way to do this.
I unfortunately do not have any code I can share. I just cant seem to produce any regarding this task. I am not asking to be given code or for someone to solve the problem for me. I just want to see examples be guided into the right direction on how to do this and to know if it is even possible or should I just give up on it!
If you have read this far Thank you so much for your time I really appreciate it.
I have read your question till the end :-) In contrast to many people here you are at least providing a clear description of what you want to achieve. According to my own experience I would say that what you want to do is easily possible with JavaFX and the MeshView is the way to go here.
You can use your image as the texture for this mesh and you can distort the image by manipulating the vertices of this mesh. I have implemented part of your functionality myself for a project so I know that it works.
I don't know how to explain this but the objects I make in ELEMENT 3D aren't 3D but more like 2.5D.
I made a video so you can see the problem.
https://sendvid.com/s1hv1ay3
My recording software didn't record the Element interface at 0:24, but I was trying to show in that interface that you could rotate it without problems.
You're not understanding how Element3D (and aspects of the AE interface) work. Think of the layer you apply it to as being its own window "into a 3D world". You don't rotate the layer itself, you rotate the objects within the Element3D world by changing the parameters in the timeline or Effects controls pane. You were using the rotate tool in the video with the Element3D-effected layer selected. Don't do that. Use the individual parameters within Element. Another way to rotate around the 3D object(s) is to use the camera. I suspect this is what you were attempting after seeing a tutorial or something. What you do is make a two-node camera and use the camera tool by cycling through the tool with the "c" key until you get camera rotate, which looks a bit similar to the rotate layer tool. With a two-node camera, rotating the camera allows you to rotate around the point of interest of the camera so it rotates around the object in 3D space. I suggest you get a more familiar with how 3D works in AE (which is not "true 3D", not 2.5D, but is "Planar 3D"; the Element3D plugin is one of the best 3D-integrated plugins working within this model).
don't ever move the layer the element 3d model is on.
Use the element effects controls (f3). usually found in group 1
I'm creating a web app in ASP.NET like this one:
http://www.zazzle.com/cr/design/pt-mug
I know how to do everything except wrapping an image around an object.
It would be a simple task to do if I would only have to stack an image on
top of the other, if they were flat, but if it is a round object, as this mug
is, it's kinda tricky.
My first guess was to create some sort of algorithm for GDI+ that would
simulate "wrapping" image around an object (actualy it wouldn't be an 3d object,
it would just be a screenshot of it).
I figured it would be to raw approach and it would result in very bad quality,
if I could ever make it work.
So, my second guess was to implement somekind of 3d renderer to whom I would
give an image map for some object, it would render me that image onto an object
and in real time return me rendered image. Is that posible?
Is there any other way? Where do I start?
If you are willing to try a commercial product, my company makes a raster processing SDK for .NET called DotImage. If you try it, take a look at PolygonTransform. You supply a polygon as a list of points, and the class warps the image to fit inside the polygon. If you need sample code for it, let me know.
It might be some sort of OpenGL 3D rendering, but an image could easily be morphed in a purely 2D way for this effect. Horizontally, it would need to be squished where it goes off the side of the cup. Each column of pixels needs to be shifted vertically by varying amounts depending on which column - such that a horizontal line the image would become like a "U" shape. With the right parameters, such a morph could mimic the proper 3D shape. Lighting effects could be applied to, by brightening/darkening the image a bit in the right places.