I am knitting an .Rnw file and, unexpectedly, vertical space is lost from the bottom inner margin of my plots and added to the top outer margin.
Here is a minimal working example:
\documentclass{article}
\setlength{\parskip}{1em}
\begin{document}
<<mwe-plot, dev="tikz", dev.args=list(bg="grey95")>>=
par(mar=rep(2,4), oma=rep(0,4))
x <- seq(0, 2*pi, length.out=21)
plot(x, sin(x), type="l")
box("inner")
#
\end{document}
knit() generates mwe-plot-1.pdf, which looks like this:
, but what I expect is this:
.
The issue is apparently due to an interaction between \parskip and tikzDevice, since it is corrected by setting \parskip to zero in the preamble or switching from dev="tikz" to the default dev="pdf". While these are possible solutions, I am looking for a fix that doesn't require doing either.
Note that I tried adding \setlength{\parskip}{0em} immediately before the chunk (after \begin{document}) but this didn't affect the output.
Any hints are appreciated...
Your proximal problem is that the \setlength{\parskip}{1em} statement is being included in the tikz .tex file, which is throwing off the spacing. The solution is to move it from your preamble into the body of your document, i.e.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\setlength{\parskip}{1em}
...
I figured this out by descending through the layers - first looking at the .tex output created by knit (before the LaTeX -> PDF conversion), then looking at figure/mwe-plot-1.pdf (and realizing, as you suggested, that the problem isn't with stuff that knitr puts in the LaTeX file, but with stuff that tikzDevice puts in the tikz-.tex file), then looking at figure/mwe-plot-1.tex and realizing that it had the \parskip statement embedded. I looked around for a tikzDevice option that would override it, but then realized that it was probably only including stuff from the preamble ...
I have a .Rpres file in RStudio. I would like to include code, but not have it run (I am only showing the code to explain how it works). Is it possible to accomplish this (and ensure that it will not produce errors, because it is not running)?
Have you tried eval=FALSE in the knitr code chunk options? e.g.:
```{r eval=FALSE}
print("Don't run me")
```
{r, eval=F, echo=T} will include the R source code in the output file while it is not evaluated
Posting for anyone who may come across this like I have. I've found that for small examples (if you don't want to use chunks), you can also just use back ticks like you would with regular markdown inline, but just don't add the "r" at the beginning:
`plot(cars)`
Will print the code itself, but will not print the plot.
I am using knit()and markdownToHTML() to automatically generate reports.
The issue is that I am not outputting plots when using these commands. However, when I use RStudio's Knit HTML button, the plots get generated. When I then use my own knit/markdown function, it suddenly outputs the plot. When I switch to another document and knit that one, the old plot appears.
Example:
```{r figA, result='asis', echo=TRUE, dpi=300, out.width="600px",
fig=TRUE, fig.align='center', fig.path="figure/"}
plot(1:10)
```
Using commands:
knit(rmd, md, quiet=TRUE)
markdownToHTML(md, html, stylesheet=style)
So I guess there are 2 questions, depending on how you want to approach it:
What magic is going on in Rstudio's Knit HTML?
How can I produce/include without depending on RStudio's Knit HTML button?
The only issue I see here is that this doesn't work when you have the chunk options {...} spanning two lines. If it's all on one line, it works fine. Am I missing something?
See how this is not allowed under knitr in the documentation:
Chunk options must be written in one line; no line breaks are allowed inside chunk options;
RStudio must handle linebreaks in a non-standard way.
This is really embarrassing, I really thought I read the documentation carefully:
include: (TRUE; logical) whether to include the chunk output in the
final output document; if include=FALSE, nothing will be written into
the output document, but the code is still evaluated and plot files
are generated if there are any plots in the chunk, so you can manually
insert figures; note this is the only chunk option that is not cached,
i.e., changing it will not invalidate the cache
Simply adding {..., include=TRUE} did the trick. I would say it would be a pretty sensible default though.
I am producing a latex report which produces multiple plots in a dlply call. The dlply call is of course in a single chunk and in order to get labels and captions to change I am using a snippet from Steve Powell below. The approach works but it seems knitr doesnt quite format the output correctly. A simple example that demonstrates:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
<startup,echo=FALSE,results='hide',message=FALSE,tidy=FALSE,warning=FALSE,fig.keep='all',comment=NA>>=
require(knitr)
require(ggplot2)
opts_knit$set(progress = F, verbose = F)
opts_chunk$set(comment=NA,
tidy=FALSE,
warning=FALSE,
message=FALSE,
echo=FALSE,
dpi=600,
fig.width=6.75, fig.height=4, # Default figure widths
dev=c("pdf",'tiff'),
dev.args=list(pdf=list(NULL),tiff=list(compression='lzw')),
error=FALSE)
#
<<plotloop,results='asis'>>=
for(x in seq(1,20)){
x1<-data.frame(x=seq(1,10),y=seq(1,10))
plt<-ggplot(data=x1,aes(x,y))+geom_point()
figLabel=paste('Figure',x,sep='')
capt<-paste('Caption for fig.',x)
cat(knit(text=(paste("<<",figLabel,",fig.pos='ht',fig.cap='",capt,"'>>=\nplt\n#",sep=''))))
}
#
\end{document}
This almost works. The trouble is that knitr places the closing \caption brace outside the \label brace which can be seen in the snippet from the .tex file below:
\begin{knitrout}
\definecolor{shadecolor}{rgb}{0.969, 0.969, 0.969}
\color{fgcolor}
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=\maxwidth]{figure/Figure1} \caption[Caption for fig]{Caption for fig. 1\label{fig:Figure1}}
\end{figure}
\end{knitrout}
latex can handle this if there are only a few figures like this but with larger numbers of plots, it starts to place them incorrectly.
I have also tried this with a
fig.cap=paste('testLoop',seq(1,20))
approach and get the same result.
Further clarification: I found this on wikipedia's Latex/Floats... page:
If you want to label a figure so that you can reference it later, you have to add the label after the caption (inside seems to work in LaTeX 2e) but inside the floating environment. If it is declared outside, it will give the section number.
The 'inside seems to work in LaTeX 2e' part caught my attention. It seems it works only because the error is ignored a number of times? I am using
LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>.
I think the bit of code is in hook_plot_tex function line 120 of hooks-latex.R:
fig2 = sprintf('\\caption%s{%s\\label{%s}}\n\\end{%s}\n', scap, cap,
paste(lab, if (mcap) fig.cur, sep = ''), options$fig.env)
This would fix it?
fig2 = sprintf('\\caption%s{%s}\\label{%s}\n\\end{%s}\n', scap, cap,
paste(lab, if (mcap) fig.cur, sep = ''), options$fig.env)
Suggestions? I am not familiar with the github process...
Thanks!
Short answer is it seems to be a LaTeX issue caused by too many \includegraphics commands and no pagebreaks. Function to accomplish multiple figures with captions and labels from within loop (with credit to Steve Powell and Yihui):
plot.knit<-function(chunkLabel,#text for chunk label which is also used for figure file name
capt,#text for caption
plt)#plot object to be placed
{
cat(knit(text=(paste("<<",chunkLabel,",fig.pos='h',fig.cap='",capt,"'>>=\nplt\n#",sep=''))))
}
cat('\\newpage')#some sort of page break must be inserted along the way to keep latex from breaking.
This can be modified to add any of chunk options you would like.
Long Answer:
Here is what I did to get it to work. I downloaded knitr from github, made the suggested alteration above, compiled, and ran example. The altered code did not change the outcome. Further investigation of latex error took me to the LaTeX FAQ where it states:
The error also occurs in a long sequence of float environments, with no intervening text. Unless the environments will fit “here” (and you’ve allowed them to go “here”), there will never be a page break, and so there will never be an opportunity for LaTeX to reconsider placement. (Of course, the floats can’t all fit “here” if the sequence is sufficiently prolonged: once the page fills, LaTeX won’t place any more floats, leading to the error.
Techniques for resolution may involve redefining the floats using the float package’s [H] float qualifier, but you are unlikely to get away without using \clearpage from time to time.
So, I added
cat('\\clearpage')
after the plots are generated in each step of the loop. This resulted in no errors being thrown and the figures in correct locations. Also,
cat('\\newpage')
works and seems to do a better job at placing the figures 2 on a page in my actual document.
The working code:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
<<startup,echo=FALSE,results='hide',message=FALSE,tidy=FALSE,warning=FALSE,fig.keep='all',comment=NA>>=
require(knitr)
require(ggplot2)
opts_knit$set(progress = F, verbose = F)
opts_chunk$set(comment=NA,
tidy=FALSE,
warning=FALSE,
message=FALSE,
echo=FALSE,
dpi=600,
fig.width=6.75, fig.height=4, # Default figure widths
dev=c("pdf",'tiff'),
dev.args=list(pdf=list(NULL),tiff=list(compression='lzw')),
error=FALSE)
#
<<plotloop,results='asis'>>=
for(x in seq(1,20)){
x1<-data.frame(x=seq(1,10),y=seq(1,10))
plt<-ggplot(data=x1,aes(x,y))+geom_point()
figLabel=paste('Figure',x,sep='')
capt<-paste('Caption for fig.',x)
cat(knit(text=(paste("<<",figLabel,",fig.pos='h',fig.cap='",capt,"'>>=\nplt\n#",sep=''))))
cat('\\newpage')
}
#
\end{document}
I would like to make an R code chunk (in Sweave) printed inside a framed box in the resulting pdf.
Is there an easy solution for doing that?
The short answer is that yes, there is an easy way. Just add the following lines, or something like them to the preamble of your Sweave document:
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim} {xleftmargin=2em,
frame=single}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{xleftmargin=2em,
frame=single}
This works because the appearance of code (and output) chunks is controlled by the definition of the Sinput and Soutput environments. These are both Verbatim environments as provided by the LaTeX package fancyvrb. (Click here for a 73 page pdf describing the numerous options that fancyvrb provides).
A quick look in the file Sweave.sty reveals the default definition of those two environments:
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim}{fontshape=sl}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Scode}{Verbatim}{fontshape=sl}
To change those definitions, just add \DefineVerbatimEnvironment statements of your own devising either: (a) at the end of the Sweave.sty file; or (b) at the start of your *.Snw document.
Finally, here's an example to show what this looks like in practice:
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{Sweave}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Sinput}{Verbatim} {xleftmargin=2em,
frame=single}
\DefineVerbatimEnvironment{Soutput}{Verbatim}{xleftmargin=2em,
frame=single}
\title{Sweave with boxes}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
<<echo=FALSE>>=
options(width=60)
#
Here is an example of a code chunk followed by an output chunk,
both enclosed in boxes.
<<>>=
print(rnorm(99))
#
\end{document}
knitr, a successor of Sweave, by default outputs all echoed R code in boxes, and also formats it to the margins. Other nice features include syntax coloring and PGF integration.
Sweave code of average complexity needs only minor if any adaptions to run with knitr.