Hi making a simple plugin that replaces the wrong russian month with the right ones.
But I can't find any filters that works.
I have tried these filters without success:
add_filter('get_the_modified_date', 'russian-month');
add_filter('the_modified_date', 'russian-month');
add_filter('date_rewrite_rules', 'russian-month');
Just found out that you can use more functions as filters and not only the ones on http://codex.wordpress.org/Plugin_API/Filter_Reference#Date_and_Time_Filters
add_filter('get_the_date', 'russian-month');
did the trick for me :)
Related
This is a little strange, but I have a situation where it'd be beneficial for me to know which traversal an element came from.
For a simple example, something like this:
.union(
select('parent').out('contains'), //traversal 1
select('parent2').out('contains') //traversal 2
)
.dedup()
.project('id','traversal')
.by(id())
.by( //any way to determine which traversal it came from? or if it was in both? )
Edit: One thing I found is that I can use Map with Group/By to get partly there:
.union(
select('parent').out('contains')
.map(group().by(identity()).by(constant('t1'))),
select('parent2').out('contains')
.map(group().by(identity()).by(constant('t2'))),
)
.dedup() //Dedup isn't gonna work here because each hashmap will be different.
.project('id','traversal')
.by( //here I can't figure out how to read a value from the hashmap inline )
The above query without the project/by piece returns this:
[{v[199272505353083909]: 't1'}, {v[199272515180338177]: 't2'}]
Or is there a better way to do this?
Thanks!
One simple approach might be to just fold the results. If you get back an empty list you will know you did not find any on that "branch":
g.V('44').
union(out('route').fold().as('a').project('res','branch').by().by(constant('b1')),
out('none').fold().as('b').project('res','branch').by().by(constant('b2')))
which yields
{'res': [v[8], v[13], v[20], v[31]], 'branch': 'b1'}
{'res': [], 'branch': 'b2'}
UPDATED after discussion in comments to include an alternative approach that uses nested union steps to avoid the project step inside the union. I still think I prefer the project approach unless the performance when measured is not good.
g.V('44').
union(local(union(out('route').fold(),constant('b1')).fold()),
local(union(out('none').fold(),constant('b2')).fold()))
which yields
[[v[8], v[13], v[20], v[31]], 'b1']
[[], 'b2']
I am using querybuilder debugger and want to do a search where "nodename=.pdf OR nodename=.doc*" and "path=/content/dam/1 OR path=/content/dam/2".
I have been trying to find an example but no luck on the web. What I have below is not quite right - just wondering what I am missing.
The query does work but there is a huge difference in the amount of time that it runs when compared with when I just query using one nodename instead of 2.
Thanks in advance,
Jerry
type=dam:asset
mainasset=true
1_group.p.or=true
1_group.1.nodename=*.pdf
1_group.2.nodename=*.doc*
2_group.p.or=true
2_group.1_path=/content/dam/1
2_group.2_path=/content/dam/2
p.limit=-1
orderby=path
I thought maybe something as simple as this might work but no luck....
type=dam:asset
mainasset=true
group.p.or=true
group.1_nodename=*.doc*
group.1_path=/content/dam/1
group.2_nodename=*.doc*
group.2_path=/content/dam/2
group.3_nodename=*.pdf
group.3_path=/content/dam/1
group.4_nodename=*.pdf
group.4_path=/content/dam/2
p.limit=-1
orderby=path
Try splitting your query if this won't affect the behaviour you're trying to achieve.
path=/content/dam/1
type=dam:asset
mainasset=true
group.1.nodename=*.pdf
group.2.nodename=*.doc*
p.limit=-1
orderby=path
path=/content/dam/2
type=dam:asset
mainasset=true
group.1.nodename=*.pdf
group.2.nodename=*.doc*
p.limit=-1
orderby=path
zsh version 5.2
I'm attempting an array assignment using filename generation like so:
files=(/some/path/*/dir/myfile)
Indeed this is the way the zshoptions manual recommends to achieve what I want.
When no matches exist I want the array to be empty. Instead it's producing
no matches found: /some/path/*/dir/file
and the script terminates.
I've tried setting NULL_GLOB, CSH_NULL_GLOB and ensured NOMATCH is not set.
When matches do exist it works as expected.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Wayne
Well of course I found the solution after posting my question.
For this to work EXTENDED_GLOB needs to be set as well as NULL_GLOB. Or a glob qualifier can be used so that NULL_GLOB only effects this particular expansion.
This is how to set NULL_GLOB for a single operation:
files=(/some/path/*/dir/myfile(N))
Hope that can help someone else who encounters this.
Wayne
Im scrapping the price of some products from a website . In Python I used the urllib2 without problems, but when I tried using RCurl in R I couldn't donwload the source code.
I have to paste the source code with the product code, then I catch the price. The path of a product is: http://www.americanas.com.br/produto/code_of_product.
Actually, I can't download the source code of a product with RCurl. When I try for example getURL('http://www.americanas.com.br/produto/111467594') it returns "".
I tried using getURL('.../produtos/111467594') and I could download the source, but in this way I'm unable to get the price. :(
Anyone know how could I get the price of the products?
Thanks.
Ps.: Sorry for my bad english. :)
welcome to StackOverflow.
It's hard to say for me why it doesn't work, could you include a verbose=TRUE in the getURL? Also, I notice there's different prices on the webpage you linked. You want all or just the first? How about this to get the "Por price":
library("stringr")
productwebpage<-readLines("http://www.americanas.com.br/produto/111467594")
pricerow<-productwebpage[grep("p class=\"sale price\"",productwebpage)]
price<-str_extract_all(pricerow,"\\(?[0-9,.]+\\)?")[[1]]
You could also substitute the grep("p class=\"sale price\"",productwebpage) to either grep("<p><span class=\"regular price\">",productwebpage) (to get the "de price" / old price) or grep("<span class=\"p-v interest\">",productwebpage) (which will give you the "sem jouros" price / per month payment). For the last example you will get the months first and the payment after so it will be:
> price
[1] "12" "83,25"
This should hopefully work for other products as well (just tried 5 and seemed to work for all of them).
This question already has answers here:
Multiline Comment Workarounds?
(11 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I found this old thread (from over a year ago), which explains how come R doesn't support a multi-line comments (like /* comment */ of PHP, for example).
I am wondering if this has been resolved in the past year, or if there are other alternatives? (For example, in notepad++ with npptor, you can mark a bunch of lines and press ctrl+q to mark them all as comments, are there similar solutions for other IDE's ?)
R Studio (and Eclipse + StatET): Highlight the text and use CTRL+SHIFT+C to comment multiple lines in Windows.
For macOS, use command+SHIFT+C.
You can, if you want, use standalone strings for multi-line comments — I've always thought that prettier than if (FALSE) { } blocks. The string will get evaluated and then discarded, so as long as it's not the last line in a function nothing will happen.
"This function takes a value x, and does things and returns things that
take several lines to explain"
doEverythingOften <- function(x) {
# Non! Comment it out! We'll just do it once for now.
"if (x %in% 1:9) {
doTenEverythings()
}"
doEverythingOnce()
...
return(list(
everythingDone = TRUE,
howOftenDone = 1
))
}
The main limitation is that when you're commenting stuff out, you've got to watch your quotation marks: if you've got one kind inside, you'll have to use the other kind for the comment; and if you've got something like "strings with 'postrophes" inside that block, then there's no way this method is a good idea. But then there's still the if (FALSE) block.
The other limitation, one that both methods have, is that you can only use such blocks in places where an expression would be syntactically valid - no commenting out parts of lists, say.
Regarding what do in which IDE: I'm a Vim user, and I find
NERD Commenter an utterly excellent tool for quickly commenting or uncommenting multiple lines. Very user-friendly, very well-documented.
Lastly, at the R prompt (at least under Linux), there's the lovely Alt-Shift-# to comment the current line. Very nice to put a line 'on hold', if you're working on a one-liner and then realise you need a prep step first.
CTRL+SHIFT+C in Eclipse + StatET and Rstudio.
if(FALSE) {
...
}
precludes multiple lines from being executed. However, these lines still have to be syntactically correct, i.e., can't be comments in the proper sense. Still helpful for some cases though.
No multi-line comments in R as of version 2.12 and unlikely to change. In most environments, you can comment blocks by highlighting and toggle-comment. In emacs, this is 'M-x ;'.
Put the following into your ~/.Rprofile file:
exclude <- function(blah) {
"excluded block"
}
Now, you can exclude blocks like follows:
stuffiwant
exclude({
stuffidontwant
morestuffidontwant
})
Unfortunately, there is still no multi-line commenting in R.
If your text editor supports column-mode, then use it to add a bunch of #s at once. If you use UltraEdit, Alt+c will put you in column mode.