I have a table where I store relations between two other table with a float indicating relevance between the two rows. I have unique key on the two reference columns. The problem is, that I have to rebuild it regularly, which is kinda lengthy. So, I can't just truncate the table while I'm doing so, but I can't insert the relevance for the same row while they would be duplicates either. That's why I thought it would be great to save the current timestamp to a variable, persist the relations with REPLACE INTO instead of INSERT INTO and then remove everything created before the saved timestamp. However, I couldn't find out how. Any idea? I'm using Doctrine 2.2.0-DEV and Symfony 2.1.0-DEV.
Doctrine 2 doesn't support INSERT REPLACE or UPSERT, sorry.
Related
I am currently working on a database structure in SQLite Studio (not sure whether that's in itself important, but might as well mention), and error messages are making me wonder whether I'm just going at it the wrong way or there's some subtlety I'm missing.
Assume two tables, people-basics (person-ID, person-NAME, person-GENDER) and people-stats (person-ID, person-NAME, person-SIZE). What I'm looking into achieving is "Every record in people-basics corresponds to a single record in people-stats.", ideally with the added property that person-ID and person-NAME in people-stats reflect the associated person-ID and person-NAME in people-basics.
I've been assuming up to now that one would achieve this with Foreign Keys, but I've also been unable to get this to work.
When I add a person in people-basics, it works fine, but then when I go over to people-stats no corresponding record exists and if I try to create one and fill the Foreign Key column with corresponding data, I get this message: "Cannot edit this cell. Details: Error while executing SQL query on database 'People': no such column: people-basics.person" (I think the message is truncated).
The DDL I currently have for my tables (auto-generated by SQLite Studio based on my GUI operations):
CREATE TABLE [people-basics] (
[person-ID] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT
UNIQUE
NOT NULL,
[person-NAME] TEXT UNIQUE
NOT NULL,
[person-GENDER] TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE [people-stats] (
[person-NAME] TEXT REFERENCES [people-basics] ([person-NAME]),
[person-SIZE] NUMERIC
);
(I've removed the person-ID column from people-stats for now as it seemed like I should only have one foreign key at a time, not sure whether that's true.)
Alright, that was a little silly.
The entire problem was solved by removing hyphens from table names and column names. (So: charBasics instead of char-basics, etc.)
Ah well.
I'm working on a symfony application, and i need to insert multiple raws at once, Doctrine ORM is not a good option because for each raw it will open a connection to execute the query, to avoid this and have one connection inserting all the raws i used prepared statement of doctrine dbal and it works fine, except i need to get the ids of the inserted raws, it seems the only available function is lastinsertedid which returns only the last id not all the last inserted ones, how can i achieve this?
any help would be appreciated!
This is actually not related to doctrine at all. If you want all inserted id's it must be possible in MySQL. "It's unlikely that if doctrine don't have batch insert it will support returning list of ids after batch insert :)"
Check answers related to MYSQL:
How can I Insert many rows into a MySQL table and return the new IDs?
MySQL LAST_INSERT_ID() used with multiple records INSERT statement
But it's possible in postgresql (since you didn't mention you DB):
Retrieving serial id from batch inserted rows in postgresql
You can actually generate IDs before inserting content into database. For example, using random UUIDs.
This library might be of use: https://github.com/ramsey/uuid
use Ramsey\Uuid\Uuid;
$uuid4 = Uuid::uuid4();
echo $uuid4->toString()
I'd like to use flyway for a DB update with the situation that an DB already exists with productive data in it. The problem I'm looking at now (and I did not find a nice solution yet), is the following:
There is an existing DB table with numeric IDs, e.g.
create table objects ( obj_id number, ...)
There is a sequence "obj_seq" to allocate new obj_ids
During my DB migration I need to introduce a few new objects, hence I need new
object IDs. However I do not know at development time, what ID
numbers these will be
There is a DB trigger which later references these IDs. To improve performance I'd like to avoid determine the actual IDs every time the trigger runs but rather put the IDs directly into the trigger
Example (very simplified) of what I have in mind:
insert into objects (obj_id, ...) values (obj_seq.nextval, ...)
select obj_seq.currval from dual
-> store this in variable "newID"
create trigger on some_other_table
when new.id = newID
...
Now, is it possible to dynamically determine/use such variables? I have seen the flyway placeholders but my understanding is that I cannot set them dynamically as in the example above.
I could use a Java-based migration script and do whatever string magic I like - so, that would be a way of doing it, but maybe there is a more elegant way using SQL?
Many thx!!
tge
If the table you are updating contains only reference data, get rid of the sequence and assign the IDs manually.
If it contains a mix of reference and user data, you need to select the id based on values in other columns.
I have a table in a MS Access 2010 Database and it can easily be split up into multiple tables. However I don't know how to do that and still keep all the data linked together. Does anyone know an easy way to do this?
I ended up just writing a bunch of Update and Append queries to create smaller tables and keep all the data synced.
You must migrate to other database system, like MSSQL, mySQL. You can't do in MsAccess replication...
Not sure what do you mean by split up into multiple tables.
Are the two tables have same structure? you want to divide the table into two pats ... means if original table has fields A,B,C,D ... then you want to split it to Table1: A,B and
Table2: C,D.
Anyways, I googled it a bit and the below links might of what you are looking for. Check them.
Split a table into related tables (MDB)
How hard is it to split a table in Access into two smaller tables?
Where do you run into trouble with the table analyzer wizard? Maybe you can work around the issue you are running into.
However, if the table analyzer wizard isn't working out, you might also consider the tactics described in http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/resolve-and-help-prevent-duplicate-data-HA010341696.aspx.
Under Microsoft Access 2012, Database Tools, Analyze table.. I use the wizard to split a large table into multiple normalized tables. Hope that helps.
Hmmm, can't you just make a copy of the table, then delete opposite items in each table leaving the data the way you want except, make sure that both tables have the same exact auto number field, and use that field to reference the other.
It may not be the most proficient way to do it, but I solved a similar issue the following way:
a) Procedure that creates a new table via SQL:
CREATE TABLE t002 (ID002 INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, CONSTRAINT SomeName FOREIGN KEY (ID002) REFERENCES t001(ID001));
The two tables are related to each other through the foreign key.
b) Procedure that adds the neccessary fields to the new table (t002). In the following sample code let's use just one field, and let's call it [MyFieldName].
c) Procedure to append all values of field ID001 from Table t001 to field ID002 in Table t002, via SQL:
INSERT INTO ID002 (t002) SELECT t001.ID001 FROM t001;
d) Procedure to transfer values from fields in t001 to fields in t001, via SQL:
UPDATE t001 INNER JOIN t002 ON t001.ID001 = t002.ID002 SET t002.MyFieldName = t001.MyFieldName;
e) Procedure to remove (drop) the fields in question in Table t001, via SQL:
ALTER TABLE t001 DROP COLUMN MyFieldName;
f) Procedure that calls them all one after the other. Fieldnames are fed into the process as parameters in the call to Procedure f.
It is quite a bunch of coding, but it did the job for me.
I need to modify a column in a SQLite database but I have to do it programatically due to the database already being in production. From my research I have found that in order to do this I must do the following.
Create a new table with new schema
Copy data from old table to new table
Drop old table
Rename new table to old tables name
That seems like a ridiculous amount of work for something that should be relatively easy. Is there not an easier way? All I need to do is change a constraint on a existing column and give it a default value.
That's one of the better-known drawbacks of SQLite (no MODIFY COLUMN support on ALTER TABLE), but it's on the list of SQL features that SQLite does not implement.
edit: Removed bit that mentioned it may being supported in a future release as the page was updated to indicate that is no longer the case
If the modification is not too big (e.g. change the length of a varchar), you can dump the db, manually edit the database definition and import it back again:
echo '.dump' | sqlite3 test.db > test.dump
then open the file with a text editor, search for the definition you want to modify and then:
cat test.dump | sqlite3 new-test.db
As said here, these kind of features are not implemented by SQLite.
As a side note, you could make your two first steps with a create table with select:
CREATE TABLE tmp_table AS SELECT id, name FROM src_table
When I ran "CREATE TABLE tmp_table AS SELECT id, name FROM src_table", I lost all the column type formatting (e.g., time field turned into a integer field
As initially stated seems like it should be easier, but here is what I did to fix. I had this problem b/c I wanted to change the Not Null field in a column and Sqlite doesnt really help there.
Using the 'SQLite Manager' Firefox addon browser (use what you like). I created the new table by copying the old create statement, made my modification, and executed it. Then to get the data copied over, I just highlighted the rows, R-click 'Copy Row(s) as SQL', replaced "someTable" with my table name, and executed the SQL.
Various good answers already given to this question, but I also suggest taking a look at the sqlite.org page on ALTER TABLE which covers this issue in some detail: What (few) changes are possible to columns (RENAME|ADD|DROP) but also detailed workarounds for other operations in the section Making Other Kinds Of Table Schema Changes and background info in Why ALTER TABLE is such a problem for SQLite. In particular the workarounds point out some pitfalls when working with more complex tables and explain how to make changes safely.