EDIT: you can view the page here: http://websitem.gazi.edu.tr/test/index.html
I'm trying to do the effect in the screenshot below:
The first one is from Chrome. Firefox show the same. But Internet Explorer from version 7 up to 9 shows the second picture.
My html structure is this:
<div class="header-menu">
<div class="container">
<div class="header-curve"></div>
<div class="header-building"></div>
</div>
</div>
And my css is this (dont bother with LESS specific syntax)
.header-menu {
#gradient > .vertical(#baseColor, #baseColorDark);
height: 82px;
margin-top: 82px;
.header-curve {
background: #baseColor url(/ui/frontend/themes/default/ui/img/header-curve.png) center top no-repeat;
height: 82px;
margin-top: -82px;
width: 1020px;
}
.header-building {
background: url(/ui/frontend/themes/default/ui/img/header-building.png) 20px top no-repeat;
height: 214px;
margin-top: -82px;
width: 1000px;
}
}
how can i solve the problem with IE? i already tried position: relative and zoom:1 fixes.
Thanks.
It looks like the filter style on your .header-menu class is causing it to be hidden in IE, is this necessary?
I think you were on the right track with the position: relative;, but also add a z-index value in there (play with the value until it appears correctly).
I might be missing something, but I still don't understand why you're bothering with the negative margin. The following CSS would do exactly the same, no?
.header-menu {
#gradient > .vertical(#baseColor, #baseColorDark);
.header-curve {
background: #baseColor url(/ui/frontend/themes/default/ui/img/header-curve.png) center top no-repeat;
height: 82px;
width: 1020px;
}
.header-building {
background: url(/ui/frontend/themes/default/ui/img/header-building.png) 20px top no-repeat;
height: 214px;
width: 1000px;
}
}
Related
I have a page that displays correctly in Google Chrome, Firefox, and Opera, but has an error in Internet Explorer 11.
Here is the HTML, with the unnecessary parts stripped out:
<div class="container">
<div class="page-content">
<div id="corner"></div>
... page contents here
</div>
</div>
And here is the CSS:
.container {
margin: 0;
min-height: 100%;
padding: 0;
}
.page-content::after {
content: "";
display: block;
height: 1px;
}
.page-content {
background: linear-gradient(137deg, transparent 121px, #ffffff 20px) repeat scroll 0 0 rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
margin: 190px 100px 150px;
max-width: 64em;
padding: 10px 120px 145px;
z-index: 2;
}
.page-content {
margin: auto;
max-width: 64em;
padding: 0 1em 1em;
}
#corner {
background-color: #ffffff;
background-image: url("corner.png");
display: block;
height: 200px;
left: 120px;
position: absolute;
top: 20px;
width: 200px;
z-index: -1;
}
As you can see in this screenshot the #corner element is not positioned correctly.
I'm really not sure what to try, since this is specific to Internet Explorer. Been trying different things with the code over the past couple of hours with no luck so far.
try adding position:relative to the containing elements of div#corner, .container and/or .page-content
position:relative on a containing element sets the bounds of an absolutely positioned element equal to the parent element, rather than the whole page.
so a value of left:0px isn't equal to the top left side of the page, but the left side of the parent element.
It is somewhat surprising this only occurs in ie11 though as its a pretty straightforward issue which makes me suspect that there could easily be a secondary solution, but then again, having had to support IE since ~ie6 I guess I'm not really all that surprised if its just IE sucking.
Side note: Not sure if this is what you're trying to do, but min-height:100% does not make content's size to 100% the height of the screen.
Replace that with this:
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
Anyway, you've set #corner to
position: absolute;
top: 20px;
left: 120px;
And that's where IE is placing it, relative to the entire page. It's doing what you're telling it to do. With the other browsers, it's position is absolute compared to that header. But to take a guess, you probably wanted to set it to position: relative.
Just in case this helps someone else:
I had a similar issue. It looked like ie11 was ignoring the 'right' property:
right: -320px;
but it turned out to be because I had set the 'left' property to:
left: initial;
Turns out the 'initial' keyword is unsupported by ie11:
left: initial doesn't work in internet explorer
I am using transform: skew to create the effect of a down arrow on my banner image using both the :before and :after tags. The result should look like the following:
However, in IE 9-11 there seems to be a rounding issue. At some heights there is one pixel from the background image that shows below the skewed blocks resulting in the following:
In my case, the banner is a percentage of the total height of the window. Here is the some sample code which should be able to reproduce the problem:
HTML
<div id="main">
<div id="banner"></div>
<section>
<h1>...</h1>
<p>...</p>
</section>
</div>
CSS
#banner {
position: relative;
background-color: green;
width: 100%;
height: 75%;
overflow: hidden;
}
#banner:before,
#banner:after {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 50%;
height: 1.5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
transform: skew(45deg);
transform-origin: right bottom;
}
#banner:after {
right: 0;
transform: skew(-45deg);
transform-origin: left bottom;
}
body {
background-color: #333;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#main {
max-width: 40em;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
section {
padding: 0 1em 5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
}
And here a working example.
Yes, seems to be a rounding issue – and I don’t know of anything that one could do to fix this. It’s in the nature of percentage values that they don’t always result in full pixel values – and how rounding is done in those cases is up to the browser vendor, I’m afraid.
I can only offer you a possible workaround (resp. “cover up”) that seems to work – if the layout really is as simple as this, and the main content area has a white background, and no transparency or background-image gets involved there.
Pull the section “up” over the banner by a negative margin of -1px (eliminated top margin of h1 here as well, otherwise it adjoins with the top margin of the section – countered by a padding-top), so that its background simply covers up that little glitch:
section {
padding: 1em 1em 5em;
background-color: #FFFFF9;
position:relative;
margin-top:-1px;
}
section h1:first-child { margin-top:0; }
Well, if you look closely, that makes the corner of triangle look slightly “cut off” (by one pixel) in those situations where the rounding glitch occurs – if you can live with that (and your desired layout allows for it), then take it :-) (And maybe serve it to IE only by some means). If not – then sorry, can’t help you there.
I'm trying to make some tabs for a search bar, by using 2 images, inside 2 seperate divs, but for some reason it will only show one image. One or the other. If I comment out the home-searchbar-school id from the css, the professor tab shows, otherwise only the school will show, and it shows up where the professor tab should be. When I look to see where the divs are in google chrome's dev helper, it shows them in the right spot, so Im kind of stumped.
Here's the HTML:
<div id="home-searchbar">
<div id="home-searchbar-tabs">
<div id="home-searchbar-professor" class="home-searchbar-tab">
</div>
<div id="home-searchbar-school" class="home-searchbar-tab">
</div>
</div>
<div id="home-searchbar-container">
</div>
</div>
and the CSS:
#home-searchbar{
margin-left: 20px;
float: left;
height: 115px;
width: 980px;
background-color: green;
}
#home-searchbar-tabs{
float: left;
width: 980px;
height: 32px;
background-color: red;
}
.home-searchbar-tab{
background-color: yellow;
width: 190px;
height: 32px;
float: left;
}
#home-searchbar-professor{
background: url('../img/searchtabs.png') 0 0 no-repeat;
}
#home-searchbar-professor{
background: url('../img/searchtabsinactive.png') 0 -64px no-repeat;
}
#home-searchbar-container{
float: left;
width: 980px;
height: 83px;
background-color: purple;
}
the images are sprites, those are working correctly so I'll only upload one of them.
The other image is the same just different color scheme.
Also a random little question, is that good style for having a class and id in the divs? I'm still learning about CSS so was wondering if that was the correct way/optimal way to use both in a div?
Thanks a lot for any help or advice you can give!
Ok here is the answer:
"both background css uses the same id, #home-searchbar-professor"
ty the rep, and ur css is ok btw
#home-searchbar-professor{
background: url('../img/searchtabs.png') 0 0 no-repeat;
}
#home-searchbar-professor{
background: url('../img/searchtabsinactive.png') 0 -64px no-repeat;
}
both are called home-searchbar-professor, so rename one to home-searchbar-school
Basically I can't get the div that holds all the content to move down with the content itself. If I take out the fixed height on the comborder div it disappears. The content remains in place, though over the bg image. Does anyone see any solution to this? I've tried a whole lot and can't come up with anything. I just want to base the height of the content div on the height of the content, like a div usually works. Thanks a bunch!
Here's the site: http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/community.php?page=profile&id=1
Here's the relevant CSS:
.wrap {margin: 0 auto; }
.abs { position:absolute; }
.rel { position:relative; }
div.comborder {
width:900px;
height:600px;
background-image: url(http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/pics/bg.jpg);
-moz-border-radius: 30px;
border-radius: 30px;
z-index: 10;
}
div.comcon {
background-color: white;
top: 25px;
right: 25px;
bottom: 25px;
left: 25px;
-moz-border-radius: 15px;
border-radius: 15px;
z-index: 11;
}
Here's the relevant HTML:
<div class="comborder wrap rel" style="margin-top:100px;opacity:0.9;z-index:80;">
<div class="comcon abs" style="opacity:none;">
<div class="comhold rel" style="height:100%;width:100%;border:1px solid transparent;">
<?php
if($_GET['page'] == "profile") {
include_once('profile.php');
}
if($_GET['page'] == "editprofile") {
include_once('editprofile.php');
}
?>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Do this:
body.combody {
background-attachment: scroll;
background-clip: border-box;
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("http://www.psdgraphics.com/file/blue-sky-background.jpg");
background-origin: padding-box;
background-position: left center;
background-repeat: repeat;
background-size: 110% auto;
height: 100%;
}
div.comborder {
background-image: url("http://www.drdopamine.com/kineticaid/pics/bg.jpg");
border-radius: 30px 30px 30px 30px;
height: 100%;
width: 900px;
z-index: 10;
}
What is important to notice is that both the body and the div have a 100% height.
That might help you.
Absolute positioning removes the content div (and everything else) from the flow of the page. That makes it so the containers don't know the size of the inner elements.
Remove all the .abs classes from everything inside the container, and the white background will correctly stretch as you want. However, it also stretches over the black border, so you'd have to find different way to create it.
More general advice:
.wrap {margin: 0 auto; }
.abs { position:absolute; }
.rel { position:relative; }
These are just plain bad ideas. It looks like you saw or were told about always putting CSS into a CSS file and never in HTML; a good idea when done right, but classes should identify content, not styles. For example:
.sidebar-image { /* css here */ }
.sidebar-donate ( /* css here */ }
.sidebar-infobox { /* css here */ }
It creates duplicate position: tags and so on, but it's also much easier to understand and much easier to get the results you want, since fixing your current problem involves editing the HTML when it should be a CSS problem.
I usually have my structure laid out something like this:
<div id="all">
<div id="page">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
Where the body will hold a background pattern, "all" will hold a dropshadow for the page going up and down, and "page" may often have a repeating-y background as well.
I have tried variations on using the css height/min-height properties:
html, body {
height:100%;
...
}
#all {
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
}
#page {
height:100%;
min-height:100%;
height:auto !important;
}
It seems like if I remove height:auto from "all" then it seems like it works UNTIL you scroll, then after the scroll the background for all dissappears
example
However if I keep the height:auto there then I get the problem of the background for page not working
example
Hopefully someone knows a fix?
Well, here's what I ended up with for the CSS:
html, body {
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
color: #494949;
text-align: center;
background-color: #3f91a7;
background-image: url(images/bg_body.jpg);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: center top;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12px;
}
#all {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
height:auto !important;
background-image: url(images/bg_all.png);
background-repeat: repeat-y;
background-position: center top;
overflow: hidden;
}
#page {
width: 993px;
padding: 0 0 10000px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: -10000px;
margin-left: auto;
text-align: left;
background-color: #FFF;
background-image: url(images/bg_page.jpg);
background-position: center top;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
height:auto !important;
}
#header, #footer {
text-align: center;
font-size: 16px;
padding: 20px;
}
#content {
padding: 25px;
}
I haven't had a chance to test it in anything other than Firefox, but, hoipefully it will give you a good start.
I would just flip the location of your div#all and div#page...
<div id="page">
<div id="all">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
</div>
Although the question was posted some years ago, I ran into the same challenge and found this earlier thread today. Although I reckon there might be more fine solutions by now, I wanted to share the one I found today nevertheless.
Had the same problem, background 1 full screen, adaptive and fully below everything else and another repeating(-y) background number 2 should go on top, but not scroll out of sight because it was set to follow the height of the window which was given to the particular div which holds background 2.
Let's start with the divs I created:
<div id="full_background">
<img src="images/bkg_main.jpg" alt="" />
<div id="absolute">Contains background set to repeat-y</div>
<div id="content">Contains the content</div>
</div>
the css looks like this:
* { margin: 0px; padding: 0px; }
html { height: 100%; }
body { height: 100%; }
#full_background { width: 100%; min-height: 100%; position: relative; float: left; }
#full_background>img { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; position: fixed; width: 100%; z-index: 1; display: block; }
#full_background>div { position: relative; z-index: 2; }
#absolute { position: fixed !important; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; background: url("../images/bkg2.png") top left repeat-y; }
#content { width: 290px; margin-left: 20px; padding: 30px; line-height: 1.7em; font-family: 'Lato', sans-serif; position: relative; float: left; }
First off, I added a full screen & resizing background image to my site (using the div full_background and the img tag) using the following solution (very easy css solution which works like a charm in every browser and most older versions down to for example IE7) - http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-256494.html > see last answer by aj_nsc
Next, using the following jQuery method - http://nicholasbarger.com/2011/08/04/jquery-makes-100-height-so-much-easier/ - I created a div with id = absolute, which is given the same height as the browser window (also on resizing). I placed my repeating(-y) background number 2 in here. Set this div to position:fixed and it will stay put when the div with the content is being scrolled through.
Then below this div you put the div with your content, which freely expands downwards beyond the browser window.
Upon scrolling, the two backgrounds will keep filling the full area of the browser window (vertically as well) at all times and stay put, with the content scrolling up and down over them.
This way, upon resizing, you also make sure that both backgrounds keep filling the full background area at all times.
I tested this solution in CH, FF, IE7-9 and Safari and it worked in all of them without any problems whatsoever.
Here's what's happening: You've set html & body to have a height of 100%, but that 100% is the height of the viewport, not the document. Since #all's height is set to 100%, it is set to 100% of the parent's height, which happens to be body, which is set at 100% of the height of the viewport. Everything's inheriting the height of the viewport.
The way to fix this problem is actually the same way you would fix clearing floats that have an outer container. All you have to do is put overflow:auto; on #all. You don't even need any height declarations on any other elements, and you may be able to eliminate either the #all or the #page div.
More info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2005/02/26/simple-clearing-of-floats/
Have you tried:
html,
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
#all {
min-height: 100%;
}
? Only for IE 6, you should set height: 100%; for #all (because it interprets that basically as min-height (as a result of a bug). As IE6 doesn't understand the min-height attribute, height effectively becomes a replacement for min-height).
If you set height: 100%; for other browsers, they will take it as 100% height of the viewport, not 100% of the page, so scrolling won't work correctly.
My comment on the downvote:
It has become clear, that my answer doesn't solve the whole problem. What we have here, seems to be quite a complex case - at least no one here seems to have found an answer yet? I've even looked into Ingo Chao's excellent (German) book, which comes to the same conclusion: Setting the parent's height won't work, and setting the child's height won't work, if the parent's height wasn't set explicitly, but rather dynamically by the size of the content.
But my answer could still help to restrict the possibilities a little bit - because setting height on #all will most likely not work on any browser except IE 6. If you disagree, please post a comment, because in that case, I'd also like to learn more about this.
This worked for me:
#page {
width: 993px;
padding: 0px;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: auto;
text-align: left;
background-color: #FFF;
background-image: url(http://jeffkilroy.com/hosted/layout1/images/bg_page.jpg);
background-position: center top;
background-repeat: repeat-y;
/* height:100%; IE6: treaded as min-height*/
height: expression(document.body.offsetHeight); /* sets min-height for IE */
overflow: auto;
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
/* height:auto !important; */
}
Forget 100% on the divs, try moving your background image to the html element and the full height border to the body.
html {
height:100%;
background-color: blue;
}
body {
margin: auto auto;
padding: 0;
color: #494949;
/*min-height: 100%; */
height:100%; /*for ie6*/
border-left:solid 2px red;
border-right:solid 2px red;
background-color:#fff;
width: 960px;
}
Have you tried this :
function getWindowHeight() {
var windowHeight = 0;
if (typeof(window.innerHeight) == 'number') {
windowHeight = window.innerHeight;
}
else {
if (document.documentElement && document.documentElement.clientHeight) {
windowHeight = document.documentElement.clientHeight;
}
else {
if (document.body && document.body.clientHeight) {
windowHeight = document.body.clientHeight;
}
}
}
return windowHeight;
}
window.onload = init;
function init(){
document.getElementByID("all").style.height = getWindowHeight() + "px";
}
Or put page instead of all