Getting variable of Public Property from external script - asp-classic

I'm wondering how to get a Public Property from an external script. The test code is below and and it seems to display an empty variable for tValue using this method.
Is there something I'm not doing here?
'External Code
Set nObj = New Test
Response.Write(nObj.tValue)
'The Class
Class Test
Public Test1
Public Property Get tValue
tValue = Test1
End Property
Sub Loadit
Test1="123"
End Sub
End Class

The name of your constructor is incorrect. The default name of the constructor of a class in classic ASP is Class_Initialize. Based on that, your code should be:
'External Code
Set nObj = New Test
Response.Write("tValue = " & nObj.tValue)
'The Class
Class Test
Private Test1
Public Property Get tValue
tValue = Test1
End Property
Public Sub Class_Initialize
Test1 = "123a"
End Sub
End Class
Or if you wish to keep the code of your class as-is, you should change your external code to:
'External Code
Set nObj = New Test
nObj.Loadit
Response.Write(nObj.tValue)

Nevermind, Its because it wasn't calling the Sub first.
This fixed it.
'External Code
Set nObj = New Test
Call nObj.Loadit
Response.Write(nObj.tValue)

Related

Declaring static list of strings and accessing by names [duplicate]

I am using Window Application for my project. There is situation where i need to define string enum and using it in my project.
i.e.
Dim PersonalInfo As String = "Personal Info"
Dim Contanct As String = "Personal Contanct"
Public Enum Test
PersonalInfo
Contanct
End Enum
Now i want value of that variable PersonalInfo and Contract as "Personal Info" and "Personal Contanct".
How can i get this value using ENUM? or anyother way to do it.
Thanks in advance...
For non-integer values, Const in a Structure (or Class) can be used instead:
Structure Test
Const PersonalInfo = "Personal Info"
Const Contanct = "Personal Contanct"
End Structure
or in a Module for direct access without the Test. part:
Module Test
Public Const PersonalInfo = "Personal Info"
Public Const Contanct = "Personal Contanct"
End Module
In some cases, the variable name can be used as a value:
Enum Test
Personal_Info
Personal_Contanct
End Enum
Dim PersonalInfo As String = Test.Personal_Info.ToString.Replace("_"c, " "c)
' or in Visual Studio 2015 and newer:
Dim Contanct As String = NameOf(Test.Personal_Contanct).Replace("_"c, " "c)
You could just create a new type
''' <completionlist cref="Test"/>
Class Test
Private Key As String
Public Shared ReadOnly Contact As Test = New Test("Personal Contanct")
Public Shared ReadOnly PersonalInfo As Test = New Test("Personal Info")
Private Sub New(key as String)
Me.Key = key
End Sub
Public Overrides Function ToString() As String
Return Me.Key
End Function
End Class
and when you use it, it kinda looks like an enum:
Sub Main
DoSomething(Test.Contact)
DoSomething(Test.PersonalInfo)
End Sub
Sub DoSomething(test As Test)
Console.WriteLine(test.ToString())
End Sub
output:
Personal Contanct
Personal Info
How about using Tagging. Something like:
Public Enum MyEnum
<StringValue("Personal Contact")>Contact
<StringValue("My PersonalInfo")>PersonalInfo
End Enum
You would have to write the StringValue attribute as:
Public Class StringValueAttribute
Inherits Attribute
Public Property Value As String
Public Sub New(ByVal val As String)
Value = val
End Sub
End Class
To get it out:
Public Function GetEnumByStringValueAttribute(value As String, enumType As Type) As Object
For Each val As [Enum] In [Enum].GetValues(enumType)
Dim fi As FieldInfo = enumType.GetField(val.ToString())
Dim attributes As StringValueAttribute() = DirectCast(fi.GetCustomAttributes(GetType(StringValueAttribute), False), StringValueAttribute())
Dim attr As StringValueAttribute = attributes(0)
If attr.Value = value Then
Return val
End If
Next
Throw New ArgumentException("The value '" & value & "' is not supported.")
End Function
Public Function GetEnumByStringValueAttribute(Of YourEnumType)(value As String) As YourEnumType
Return CType(GetEnumByStringValueAttribute(value, GetType(YourEnumType)), YourEnumType)
End Function
And then a call to get the Enum (using string attribute):
Dim mEnum as MyEnum = GetEnumByStringValueAttribute(Of MyEnum)("Personal Contact")
To get the "Attribute" value out (removed handling 'Nothing' for clarity):
Public Function GetEnumValue(Of YourEnumType)(p As YourEnumType) As String
Return DirectCast(Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(ForValue(p), GetType(StringValueAttribute)), StringValueAttribute).Value
End Function
Private Function ForValue(Of YourEnumType)(p As YourEnumType) As MemberInfo
Return GetType(YourEnumType).GetField([Enum].GetName(GetType(YourEnumType), p))
End Function
And the call to get the string attribute (using Enum):
Dim strValue as String = GetEnumValue(Of MyEnum)(MyEnum.Contact)
How can i get this value using ENUM? or anyother way to do it.
There are three common ways of mapping enum values to strings:
Use a Dictionary(Of YourEnumType, String)
Decorate the enum values with attributes (e.g. DescriptionAttribute) and fetch them with reflection
Use a Switch statement
The first of these options is probably the simplest, in my view.
I know this is an old post put I found a nice solution that worth sharing:
''' <summary>
''' Gives acces to strings paths that are used often in the application
''' </summary>
Public NotInheritable Class Link
Public Const lrAutoSpeed As String = "scVirtualMaster<.lrAutoSpeed>"
Public Const eSimpleStatus As String = "scMachineControl<.eSimpleStatus>"
Public Const xLivebitHMI As String = "scMachineControl<.xLivebitHMI>"
Public Const xChangeCycleActive As String = "scMachineControl<.xChangeCycleActive>"
End Class
Usage:
'Can be anywhere in you applicaiton:
Link.xChangeCycleActive
This prevents unwanted extra coding, it's easy to maintain and I think this minimizes extra processor overhead.
Also visual studio shows the string attributes right after you type "Link"
just like if it is a regular Enum
If all you want to do is display the enums in a list or combo, you can use tagging such as
Private Enum MyEnum
Select_an_option___
__ACCOUNTS__
Invoices0
Review_Invoice
__MEETINGS__
Scheduled_Meetings0
Open_Meeting
Cancelled_Meetings0
Current_Meetings0
End Enum
Then pull the MyEnum into a string and use Replace (or Regex) to replace the tags: "___" with "...", "__" with "**", "_" with " ", and remove trailing numbers. Then repack it up into an array and dump it into a combobox which will look like:
Select an option...
**ACCOUNTS**
Invoices
Review Invoice
**MEETINGS**
Scheduled Meetings
Open Meeting
Cancelled Meetings
Current Meetings
(You can use the numbers to, say, disable a text field for inputting an invoice number or meeting room. In the example, Review Invoice and Open Meeting might be expecting additional input so a text box might be enabled for those selections.)
When you parse the selected combo item, the enumeration will work as expected but you only really need to add a single line of code - the text replacement - to get the combo to look as you wish.
(The explanation is about 10 times as involved as the actual solution!)
This technique from Microsoft - "How to: Determine the String Associated with an Enumeration Value (Visual Basic)" - will be useful in some situations (it didn't help with mine unfortunately though :( ). Microsoft's example:
VB:
Public Enum flavorEnum
salty
sweet
sour
bitter
End Enum
Private Sub TestMethod()
MsgBox("The strings in the flavorEnum are:")
Dim i As String
For Each i In [Enum].GetNames(GetType(flavorEnum))
MsgBox(i)
Next
End Sub

Creating a Web Service Request

I would like to feed data to a proxy which creates a soap XML request formatted as below:
<dat:MusicCollection>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<dat:Song>
<dat:songUserkey>TakemeHome</dat:songUserkey>
</dat:Song>
</dat:MusicCollection>
I have written the file to call the service and provide the details as below:
dim ucizi1 as SongRequest 'this is the request class in the proxy
dim Songs as Song = New Song
Songs.songUserKey = "TakeMeHome"
dim ucz
ucz = Songs.SongUserKey
ucizi1.SongCollection.Add(ucz)
The MusicCollection class is as follows:
<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute(), _
System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Runtime.Serialization", "4.0.0.0"), _
System.Runtime.Serialization.CollectionDataContractAttribute(Name:="ProductCollection", [Namespace]:="http://ucizi.Musicservice/DataContracts", ItemName:="Song")> _
Public Class SongCollection
Inherits System.Collections.Generic.List(Of ucizi.Music.DataContracts.Song)
End Class
The song class is as follows:
<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute(), _
System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Runtime.Serialization", "4.0.0.0"), _
System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContractAttribute(Name:="Product", [Namespace]:="http://Ucizi.Music/DataContracts")> _
Partial Public Class Product
Inherits Object
Implements System.Runtime.Serialization.IExtensibleDataObject
Private extensionDataField As System.Runtime.Serialization.ExtensionDataObject
Private SongUserkeyField As String
Public Property ExtensionData() As System.Runtime.Serialization.ExtensionDataObject Implements System.Runtime.Serialization.IExtensibleDataObject.ExtensionData
Get
Return Me.extensionDataField
End Get
Set
Me.extensionDataField = value
End Set
End Property
<System.Runtime.Serialization.DataMemberAttribute(IsRequired:=true)> _
Public Property SongUserkey() As String
Get
Return Me.SongUserkeyField
End Get
Set
Me.SongUserkeyField = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
However, when I run this code, I get an error: unable to cast object of type 'system.string' to type 'ucizi.music.DataContracts.Song'.
I cant see where this error is coming from, can some1 please help me and advise how I can correct this.
In lines
Songs.songUserKey = "TakeMeHome"
dim ucz
ucz = Songs.SongUserKey
ucizi.SongCollection.Add(ucz)
you set ucz to be SongUserKey - which is string.
Then, you add it to collection SongCollection
Public Class SongCollection
Inherits System.Collections.Generic.List(Of ucizi.Music.DataContracts.Song)
End Class
Which is expected Song
added the following code after the Songs.songUserKey = "TakeMeHome"
dim ucizi2 as songCollection
ucizi2.Add(song)
ucizi1.songcollection = ucizi2
This sorted the problem smoothly. You guys opened my eyes.

Do I Need a Class if I only need 1 Property (at the moment)?

Update: I didn't make it clear but I meant this to be a question about where/how I would use a function to return a list of strings when I'm trying to just work with classes.
I have a class called Account.
I have data access class called AccountDAO.
I have various functions that return lists of objects like GetAllAccounts, GetAccountByID etc.
I want to populate a drop down list with just the account names and nothing else. It's proving rather slow when using lists of objects and databinding them to the dropdownlist.
I feel like I should be using a simple "Select Account_Name From blah" type statement and returning a list of strings but I don't know how to work this into my class and data access class.
How should I handle this predicament?
You can use a list of string,s and bind the list of strings to a dropdownlist no problem... the DDL can support that, just leave out DataTextField and DataValueField props, and it will display the account name as is, which that name would be accessible through the ListItem's Text and Value property.
I like to use objects to be consistent with the rest of the app (which other areas might need a class), and if for some reason you want to add AccountKey later, if you use an object, all you need to do is add a property. Otherwise, if using strings, you'd have to switch up the binding later to point to the object.
HTH.
There is nothing wrong by making a function that only returns a list of strings. YOu could however wonder if it's not better to restrict the number of records you want to put in the list and use some kind of paging.
Assuming that you're using a List<>, you can try something like this:
IEnumerable<string> nameList = accountList.Select(t => t.AccountName);
Or if you need a List:
List<string> nameList = accountList.Select(t => t.AccountName).ToList();
Go with your feelings. Use a datareader to select the list and then load them into an arraylist which can then be bound to the dropdown. Alternately, use something like this method I use to provide both a DisplayMember and a ValueMember which uses a class (with both values) as members of the arraylist. This should give you the general idea. (Note: I normally include this code in a data access class (MyBase) where StartReader, _datRdr, ReadNext and_ReaderValid are a members. But the general idea is intact.)
Public Sub LoadDataSource(ByRef PlantDataSource As PlantSource, Optional ByVal Filter As String = "", Optional ByVal IncludeBlankItem As Boolean = False)
PlantDataSource = New PlantSource
If IncludeBlankItem Then
PlantDataSource.Add(0, "")
End If
If Filter = String.Empty Then
Call StartReader(" Order by PlantName")
Else
Call StartReader(String.Concat(" Where ", Filter, " Order by PlantName"))
End If
If _DatRdr.HasRows Then
While MyBase._ReaderValid
PlantDataSource.Add(PlantId, PlantName)
ReadNext()
End While
End If
Call CloseReader()
End Sub
Private Class PlantListing
Private _PlantList As New ArrayList
Public Sub Add(ByVal PlantId As Integer, ByVal PlantName As String)
_PlantList.Add(New PlantDataItem(PlantId, PlantName))
End Sub
Public ReadOnly Property List() As ArrayList
Get
Return _PlantList
End Get
End Property
End Class
Private Class PlantDataItem
Private _PlantId As Integer
Private _PlantName As String
Public Sub New(ByVal pPlantId As Integer, ByVal pPlantName As String)
Me._PlantId = pPlantId
Me._PlantName = pPlantName
End Sub
Public ReadOnly Property PlantName() As String
Get
Return _PlantName
End Get
End Property
Public ReadOnly Property PlantId() As Integer
Get
Return _PlantId
End Get
End Property
Public ReadOnly Property DisplayValue() As String
Get
Return CStr(Me._PlantId).Trim & " - " & _PlantName.Trim
End Get
End Property
Public Overrides Function ToString() As String
Return CStr(Me._PlantId).Trim & " - " & _PlantName.Trim
End Function
End Class

Connect reusable ASP.NET WebControl to a method for loading data

I'm trying to create a control that can extend other webcontrols and set some properties like visible and enabled, based on user permissions.
Here's an example where your user role would need to include the "CanSave" permission:
<asp:Button ID="btn1" runat="server" Text="Save"/>
<myControls:PermissionsExtender runat="server" ControlToSet="btn1" Permission="CanSave"/>
I'm trying to keep this reusable, that's why the PermissionExtender is in a separate project that can not have any dependencies to other projects. To make a decision, the control of course needs to get this info from somewhere else (database or something). I made another control and, using events, the above extender will be set by a master control, so only that needs to know where to look up the information.
The master control now needs to be configured to know where the information about roles and permissions will be coming from. My idea was to have an interface inside the reusable project, and implement that somewhere else, then configure my control to go and find the class that implements the method I need and load it through reflection. But I'm unclear how this could work. I would probably place the master control in the masterpage and supply it a class name like PermissionClass="SecurityLibrary.PermissionsClass". Kinda like ObjectDatasource does it, but other suggestions are welcome.
The method signature would be like:
bool HasPermission(string permission)
It would know the current users role and using that combination, looks up if the role includes the permission.
How can I wire up a call from the control to a method inside my main project that can supply the necessary information without making them dependent.
I think I've got something that will work for you (tested fine for me but I may have misunderstood part of what you were looking for). With this implementation the asp.net designer code will look like this:
<web:PermissionMasterControl runat="server" ID="masterController" PermissionClass="SecurityLibrary.RandomPermissionClass" />
<asp:Button ID="btnSave" runat="server" Text="save" />
<web:PermissionExtender runat="server" ControlToSet="btnSave" Permission="CanSave" MasterControllerID="masterController" />
Now for the SecurityLibrary. Pretty straight forward, I included a simple "RandomPermissionClass" that randomly returns true/false.
Namespace SecurityLibrary
Public MustInherit Class PermissionClass
Public MustOverride Function HasPermission(ByVal permission As String) As Boolean
End Class
Public Class RandomPermissionClass
Inherits PermissionClass
Private rand As New Random()
Public Overrides Function HasPermission(permission As String) As Boolean
Return If(rand.Next(2) = 0, False, True)
End Function
End Class
End Namespace
Now we have the "myControls" library, which contains no references to SecurityLibrary. I created two controls and a delegate. The controls are "PermissionMasterControl" and "PermissionExtender". The delegate is what is used to actually perform the check against the reflected object.
Namespace myControls
Public Delegate Function HasPermissionDelegate(ByVal permission As String) As Boolean
Public Class PermissionMasterControl
Inherits System.Web.UI.Control
Public Property PermissionClass As String
Get
Return If(ViewState("PermissionClass") Is Nothing, "", ViewState("PermissionClass").ToString())
End Get
Set(value As String)
ViewState("PermissionClass") = value
End Set
End Property
Private ReadOnly Property PermissionDelegate As HasPermissionDelegate
Get
If _permissionDel Is Nothing Then
If Not String.IsNullOrEmpty(PermissionClass) Then
Dim t = Type.GetType(PermissionClass, False)
If t IsNot Nothing Then
_permissionObj = Activator.CreateInstance(t)
Dim mi As MethodInfo = _
t.GetMethod("HasPermission", BindingFlags.Public Or BindingFlags.Instance)
_permissionDel = [Delegate].CreateDelegate(GetType(HasPermissionDelegate), _permissionObj, mi)
End If
End If
End If
Return _permissionDel
End Get
End Property
Private _permissionObj As Object = Nothing
Private _permissionDel As HasPermissionDelegate = Nothing
Public Function HasPermission(ByVal permission As String) As Boolean
If PermissionDelegate Is Nothing Then
Throw New NullReferenceException("The specified permission class (" + PermissionClass + ") could not be loaded/found.")
End If
Return PermissionDelegate(permission)
End Function
End Class
Public Class PermissionExtender
Inherits System.Web.UI.Control
Public Property ControlToSet As String
Get
Return If(ViewState("ControlToSet") Is Nothing, "", ViewState("ControlToSet").ToString())
End Get
Set(value As String)
ViewState("ControlToSet") = value
End Set
End Property
Public Property Permission As String
Get
Return If(ViewState("Permission") Is Nothing, "", ViewState("Permission").ToString())
End Get
Set(value As String)
ViewState("Permission") = value
End Set
End Property
Public Property MasterControllerID As String
Get
Return If(ViewState("MasterControllerID") Is Nothing, "", ViewState("MasterControllerID").ToString())
End Get
Set(value As String)
ViewState("MasterControllerID") = value
End Set
End Property
Protected ReadOnly Property MasterController As PermissionMasterControl
Get
If _mastercontroller Is Nothing Then
_mastercontroller = Me.Page.FindControl(MasterControllerID)
End If
Return _mastercontroller
End Get
End Property
Protected ReadOnly Property ManagedControl As Control
Get
If _controlToSet Is Nothing Then
_controlToSet = Me.NamingContainer.FindControl(ControlToSet)
End If
Return _controlToSet
End Get
End Property
Private _controlToSet As Control = Nothing
Private _mastercontroller As PermissionMasterControl = Nothing
Protected Overrides Sub OnLoad(e As System.EventArgs)
MyBase.OnLoad(e)
Dim bResult As Boolean = MasterController.HasPermission(Permission)
ManagedControl.Visible = bResult
End Sub
End Class
End Namespace

Properly Defining a Singleton in asp.net

I've the following class which is a singleton implementation:
Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic
Imports System.Xml
Public Class GlobalController
Private Shared instance As GlobalController
Private ControlsXmlDoc As XmlDocument
Private xmldocpath As String
Sub New()
ControlsXmlDoc = New XmlDocument
xmldocpath = HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/cp/GlobalControl.xml")
ControlsXmlDoc.Load(xmldocpath)
End Sub
Shared Function GetInstance() As GlobalController
If instance Is Nothing Then
Return New GlobalController
Else
Return instance
End If
End Function
Shared Property IsExtracting() As Boolean
Get
Return Boolean.Parse(GetInstance.ControlsXmlDoc.SelectNodes("global/extraction/proceed").Item(0).InnerText)
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Boolean)
HttpContext.Current.Application.Lock()
Dim node As XmlNode = GetInstance.ControlsXmlDoc.SelectNodes("global/extraction/proceed").Item(0)
If Not Boolean.Parse(node.InnerText) = value Then
node.InnerText = value.ToString
node.Normalize()
SaveDocument()
GetInstance.ControlsXmlDoc.Load(GetInstance.xmldocpath)
End If
HttpContext.Current.Application.UnLock()
End Set
End Property
Shared Sub SaveDocument()
GetInstance.ControlsXmlDoc.Save(GetInstance.xmldocpath)
End Sub
End Class
In my page I am doing something like this:
GlobalController.IsExtracting = False
Response.Write(GlobalController.IsExtracting)
I am always getting the output as "true". What is wrong with the code?
According this link Operator precedence and associativity, ! (or vb.net Not) have greater priority than == (= in VB.NET); so, your expression is always evaluated as
Not(True) And False
and never enters that If statement.
Try to use Boolean.Parse(node.InnerText) != value or Not (Boolean.Parse(node.InnerText) = value) in order to get correct result.
All, thanx for ur answers. I apologize for what I am about to say. I found the bug: it was with the way I implemented the singleton. Forgot to assign the newly created object instance to the shared variable.
Shared Function GetInstance() As GlobalController
If instance Is Nothing Then
instance = New GlobalController
End If
Return instance
End Function

Resources