log4Net eventlog permissions issue using non-administrator account - iis-7

This probably isnt an issue with SiteCore per se but I've included it for completeness. I have sitecore 6.3 running under IIS7 using a custom identity for the app pool. I cant get Sitecore to write its logging information (using the default log4net settings) to the eventlog. I've followed the advice here: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/faq.html#Why%20doesn%27t%20the%20EventLogAppender%20work? and although it works fine when I make the custom identity a member of the administrator's group I need to find a way to get it working in production without such a security hack.
The weird thing is that I have a MSI that installs it (running under an account which IS a member of the administrator's group) and creates the correct registry keys in the eventlog for me and yet despite that, I am still getting the following error when I run the application using the custom identity (without it being a member of administrators).
log4net:ERROR DOMConfigurator: Could not create Appender [EventLogAppender] of type [log4net.Appender.EventLogAppender]. Reported error follows.
System.Security.SecurityException: Requested registry access is not allowed.
at Microsoft.Win32.RegistryKey.OpenSubKey(String name, Boolean writable)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.GetEventLogRegKey(String machine, Boolean writable)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.FindSourceRegistration(String source, String machineName, Boolean readOnly)
at System.Diagnostics.EventLog.DeleteEventSource(String source, String machineName)
at log4net.Appender.EventLogAppender.ActivateOptions()
at log4net.Repository.Hierarchy.DOMHierarchyConfigurator.ParseAppender(XmlElement appenderElement)
The Zone of the assembly that failed was:
MyComputer
log4net:ERROR DOMConfigurator: Appender named [EventLogAppender] not found.
Thinking I could narrow it down to a registry permission issue I granted Everyone full permissions to the following registry key and subkeys but it didnt work either: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog
The custom identity is a member of the following groups:
Event Log Readers
IIS_USERS
Performance Monitor Users
I've also seen the following question which seems to ask the same thing. The Microsoft article seems to suggest it might be a problem with ACLs on an event log and gives examples on how you can change SSDLs but I'd rather avoid that if at all possible.
EDIT:
I have another server running where the log is being populated fine. The custom identity was a member of administrators so I revoked that and rebooted, trying to purposely break it but I cant. Config is identical on both boxes and same identity used to run the MSI which creates the registry keys. Have run procmon on both (after doing a IISReset and spinning up the app pool again) to examine registry activity. Strange thing is - on the box that works you get 477 name not found records for my event source in the wrong places (Application, and a different Custom EventLog "MyCompany"). No hits for the place where it is logging which is "MyCompany\MyCompany.SiteCore". Whilst on the box which is broken, it does appear to be requesting to read the right key (albeit only 6 times) but you then get the Log4Net registry access error.

As I understand it EventStores are stored in the registry, so you only need write permission to registry to create or delete an EventStore. This is usually only needed once and most applications create this as part of the install procedure so that the application does not need to be run as Administrator during normal execution.
However your error message (in the question) includes the method DeleteEventSource from which I would deduce/guess that the EventSource does exist but is wrong in some way. So perhaps this is currently registered as writing to the event log named MyCompany and you are now trying to change it to "MyCompany\MyCompany.SiteCore" which requires you to delete the old eventsource and create a new one.
So it sounds like your installation routine is creating a different EventSource from the one that your application is actually using.
If that doesn't help, then I would suggest enabling internal logging for Log4net (but obviously not to the eventlog) which will probably give you more information.
Giving full permission to the registry key is not enough.
According to Microsoft
To create an event source in Windows Vista and later or Windows Server 2003, you must have administrative privileges.
The reason for this requirement is that all event logs, including security, must be searched to determine whether the event source is unique. Starting with Windows Vista, users do not have permission to access the security log; therefore, a SecurityException is thrown.
Starting with Windows Vista, User Account Control (UAC) determines the privileges of a user. If you are a member of the Built-in Administrators group, you are assigned two run-time access tokens: a standard user access token and an administrator access token. By default, you are in the standard user role. To execute the code that accesses the security log, you must first elevate your privileges from standard user to administrator. You can do this when you start an application by right-clicking the application icon and indicating that you want to run as an administrator.

I think, contrary to the Apache documentation, log4net DOES need write access to the registry – or at least it does in my case. To prove this, I backed up the registry on the server where it wasnt working and granted IIS administrator privileges before spinning up sitecore. Sure enough it started logging away to the eventlog nicely and then when I exported the registry again to run a diff, there WAS a difference.
The value for the eventlogmessage file on my event source had been updated from:
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\EventLogMessages.dll
To
C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2.0.50727\EventLogMessages.dll
So I assumed that merely changing this value in the registry by hand would work.
But it didn’t.
So I ran procmon on the two servers I have: A=the working one, B=the failing one. Sure enough, on server B I have a line which says:
Operation: RegOpenKey, Path: HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\EventLog, Desired Access:Read/Write, Result: ACCESS DENIED.
I’ve traced through with Server A and in exactly the same place, the key is requested with Desired Access:Read.
Conclusion:
It seems unavoidable that I will need to grant my app pool identity administrator privileges in production for at least enough time to programatically do the necessary registry writes the first time from within log4net. I dont know why administrator; I have tried granting Full permissions to the entire eventlog node in the registry for my custom app to no avail. It seems to do something which I cannot identify or pin down. I will then revoke this privilege immediately after it starts to log and monitor whether subsequent installs knock out the functionality afterwards. (Hopefully not).
If anyone has any insight into this behaviour it would be greatly appreciated.

Related

How to configure Oracle 11g to launch sqlplus?

On a RedHat 6 server, a third party application requires to be root to run and needs access to sqlplus. I have a running database, I can run sqlplus as user 'oracle'. When logged in as user root, 'sqlplus usr/pwd#dbname' works as expected. The trouble is that this agent needs to run sqlplus with no parameters and it always returns ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied.
I've read a dozen times that enabling root to launch Oracle is a security issue but I really have no other choice.
Running Oracle 11.2.0.1.0.
Any help will be much appreciated as I've googled for 2 days with no success.
From the documentation, ORA_12546 is:
ORA-12546: TNS:permission denied
Cause: User has insufficient privileges to perform the requested operation.
Action: Acquire necessary privileges and try again.
Which isn't entirely helpful, but various forum and blog posts (way too many to link to, Googling for the error shows a lot of similar advice) mention permissions on a particular part of the installation, $ORACLE_HOME/bin/oracle, which is a crucial and central part of most of the services.
Normally the permissions on that file would be -rws-r-s--x, with the file owned by oracle:dba, and this error can occur when the word-writable flag - the final x in that pattern - is not set. Anyone in the dba group will still be able to execute it, but those outside will not.
Your listener seems to be fine as you can connect remotely, by specifying #dbname in the connect string. The listener runs as oracle (usually, could be grid with HA, RAC or ASM) so it is in the dba group and can happily hand-off connections to an instance of the oracle executable.
When you connect without going via the listener, you have to be able to execute that file yourself. It appears that root cannot execute it (or possibly some other file, but this is usually the culprit, apparently), which implies the world-writable bit is indeed not set.
As far as I can see you have three options:
set the world-writable bit, with chmod o+x $ORACLE_HOME/bin/oracle; but that opens up the permissions for everyone, and presumably they've been restricted for a reason;
add root to the dba group, via usermod or in the /etc/group; which potentially weakens security as well;
use SQL*Net even when you don't specify #dbname in the connect string, by adding export TWO_TASK=dbname to the root environment.
You said you don't have this problem on another server, and that the file permissions are the same; in which case root might be in the dba group on that box. But I think the third option seems the simplest and safest. There is a fourth option I suppose, to install a separate instant client, but you'd have to set TWO_TASK anyway and go over SQL*Net, and you've already ruled that out.
I won't dwell on whether it's a good idea to run sqlplus (or indeed the application that needs it) as root, but will just mention that you'd could potentially have a script or function called sqlplus that switches to a less privileged account via su to run the real executable, and that might be transparent to the application. Unless you switch to the oracle account though, which is also not a good idea, you'd have the same permission issue and options.

Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters

In the Sitecore (6.6 v130404) log file there are so many "Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters." records being created. I have disabled the performance counters in the server.
<!-- ENABLE COUNTERS
Indicates if performance counters are enabled.
Default value: true
-->
<setting name="Counters.Enabled" value="false"/>
Log extract: (For every 6seconds this keeps updating the log)
Heartbeat 19:07:33 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:39 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:45 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:51 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
I have modified the following webconfig setting and set the value as 1hour, as the above log mentions that it's related to a heartbeat setting.
This solved the problem. I have Googled for any effects with this change in this setting, found no results on this. Is this ok to set this setting to 1hour? What is the purpose of this setting?
A Sitecore application pool user (most probably Network Service user) has to be a member of the system “Performance Monitor Users” group to have access to the mentioned registry key. Adding the user to this group and restarting IIS should solve the problem.
As explained in approved answer you need to add app pool user to performance monitor users and performance log users group.
To add your app pool user add iis apppool\{site name}.
You need to restart your machine again or alternatively restart your iis and log off and log in to make sure your changes got picked up by user group membership
Here are a few screenshots.
Powershell solution (works on Windows 10 Home, where you don't have lusrmgr.msc console).
Run PS console as administrator then:
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>Add-LocalGroupMember -Group "Performance Monitor Users" -Member "{UserName}"
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>iisreset
Where the {UserName} is your application pool identity user or Network Service.
Mind that group name may be different (it may be in your local language for non-english Windows version). Then call:
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>Get-LocalGroup
This will list all groups and you will find correct name there.

Unable to Initialize TDSE object. Error Code: 0x80040302 (-2147220734)

I am setting up Tridion R 5.3 content Manger server on Win 2003 Server. My Windows server is not having Active directory service enabled. The Impersonation user that I have set in Tridion Configuration Manager is
WORKGROUP\mtsuser
since the 2003 server is not under any Domain. Now whenever I try accessing console on //localhost/ and enter my credentials for mts user. The following error is shown with Mesaage on Console reading as "You dont have permission to access R 5.3 contact Administrator."
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: Kernel
Event Category: Security
Event ID: 200
Date: 2/15/2013
Time: 2:11:23 PM
User: WORKGROUP\mtsuser
Computer: WORKGROUP
Description:
Unable to Initialize TDSE object.
Access is denied for the user WORKGROUP\mtsuser.
Error Code:
0x80040302 (-2147220734)
Call stack:
SystemBLST.GetUserContext
SystemBLST.IBLSecurityST_GetUserContext
TDSE.Initialize
Please help In dire need of a solution....
If your machine is not under domain then where does WORKGROUP\mtsuser come from? Who is managing its credentials? I think you should use local machine name\mtsuser and manage credentials locally. Besides you are not supposed to be able to access CME with MTSUser. This user is system user and is only to be used by the system. Also, as you are on 5.3 version, you should check documentation and make sure you've granted all the necessary rights and permissions to this user.
And you should really consider one of the supported versions of Tridion
MTSUser should not be set as an impersonation user, this is your SYSTEM account
"Access is denied" means literally that the user doesn't have permissions for a given action. Maybe it's not an allowed Tridion user, since you don't have access to Tridion I'd recommend looking at the TRUSTEES table, and finding the MTSUser account there. If it doesn't match, then it certainly will not work. Add a record to the TRUSTEES table with the correct information.
As user978511 states, 5.3 is pretty old (early 2008), and not officially supported anymore, but I doubt you can do anything about that.
The impersonation account should be the same account that runs the application pool in IIS - by default this is Network Service

Write to Event log from BizTalk

When I try to execute an orchestration with something like EventLog.WriteEntry("MyEsb", "Msg"); in Expression shape, I get the exception The source was not found, but some or all event logs could not be searched. To create the source, you need permission to read all event logs to make sure that the new source name is unique. Inaccessible logs: Security. Why?
I'm running Win 7 64bit if this makes any sense.
When you write the event log from any application, the event source needs to be already created, or the application itself will try to create it before writing to it. Unfortunately, creating an event source is an action which requires local admin priveledges.
So you can do two things:
pre-create the event source
make sure the user which your biztalk host is running as is in local admins (bad)
To pre-create the event source is a nicer option. You can do this via the powershell command
New-EventLog -LogName "Application" -Source "MyEsb"
Might seem like I'm stating the obvious but has the BizTalk User got permission to write to the Eventlog? That is, the account of the Host Instance running the Orchestration.
You'll probably find that it hasn't.
HTH
Finally I've found a solution. As the error says, "To create the source, you need permission to read all event logs to make sure that the new source name is unique. Inaccessible logs: Security." So even though BizTalk User account has enough rights to write to the eventlog it has no rights to read EventLog\Security log as stated here in a Note in the Remarks section:
The reason for this requirement is that all event logs, including security, must be searched to determine whether the event source is unique. Starting with Windows Vista, users do not have permission to access the security log; therefore, a SecurityException is thrown.
So I just granted a Read Access to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Security for BizTalk User and the problem was solved.

Unable to make the session state request to the session state server

Our site is currently having this problem. Basically it only happen when we click some particular links where it will pop-up a new window.
This is the error message we receive :
Unable to make the session state request to the session state server.
Please ensure that the ASP.NET State service is started and that
the client and server ports are the same. If the server is on a
remote machine, please ensure that it accepts remote requests by
checking the value of
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\aspnet_state\Parameters\AllowRemoteConnection.
If the server is on the local machine, and if the before
mentioned registry value does not exist or is set to 0, then the state
server connection string must use either 'localhost' or '127.0.0.1' as
the server name. target site : Void
MakeRequest(StateProtocolVerb, System.String, StateProtocolExclusive,
Int32, Int32, Int32, Byte[], Int32, Int32, SessionNDMakeRequestResults
ByRef)
this is the webconfig that contain sessionstate tag :
<sessionState mode="StateServer" timeout="45" />
I have check the ASP.NET State Service, and it is currently started and set to automatic
I have set the registry stated in the error message to 1, but still not working.
Start–> Administrative Tools –> Services
Right-click on the ASP.NET State Service and click “start”
Additionally you could set the service to automatic so that it will work after a reboot
If you need to change HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\aspnet_state\Parameters\AllowRemoteConnection to 1, remember to restart the ASP.net state service after you change the parameter.
Check that:
stateConnectionString="tcpip=server:port"
is correct. Also please check that default port (42424) is available and your system does not have a firewall that is blocking the port on your system
Type Services.msc in run panel of windows run window. It will list all the windows services in our system. Now we need to start Asp .net State service as show in the image.
Your issue will get resolved.
One of my clients was facing the same issue. Following steps are taken to fix this.
(1) Open Run.
(2) Type Services.msc
(3) Select ASP.NET State Service
(4) Right Click and Start it.
Another thing to check is whether you have Windows Firewall enabled, since that might be blocking port 42424.
I've had the same issue when some ASP.NET installation was corrupted. In that case they suggest running aspnet_regiis -i -enable
I've found that some developers will for some reason define the server's private IP outside of IIS in an unexpected location, like a nonstandard config file (i.e. not web.config) or a text file. This can cause internal operation to fail even when the service is started, ports aren't being blocked, reg keys are correct, etc.
Kaseya, in particular, places a file called serveripinternal.txt in the root IIS directory of the VSA server. I've seen the text of your error when somebody running their own Kaseya instance changed the server's internal IP. The server will be reachable, IIS will respond, and the login page will come up - but login will fail with the cited message.
Not the best answer, but it's an option anyway:
Comment the given line in the web.config.
I recently ran into this issue and none of the solutions proposed fixed it. The issue turned out to be an excessive use of datasets stored in the session. There was a flaw in the code that results in the session size to increase 10x.
There is an article on the msdn blog that also talks about this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johan/archive/2006/11/20/sessionstate-performance.aspx
I used a function to write custom trace messages to measure the size of the session data on the live site.

Resources