I have the following filter for one of my profile:
filter type: Include Pattern Only
filter field: user_defined_variable (AUTO)
filter pattern: \[53\]
case sensitive: no
In my content, I have the following javascript:
_userv=0;
urchinTracker();
__utmSetVar("various string in here");
Now, the issue is that in this profiles, there are files that are showing up in the report that shouldn't. For instance, for a specific profile, in the Webmaster View > Content By Title, a page with the following variable (as seen from the source) shows up :
__utmSetVar("[3][345]")
I have no idea why this is happening. The filter pattern doesn't match thus it shouldn't show up.
It turns out that it's supposed to include files that may have a different pattern. The reason is that it will report on all the files that were seen during a single visit, which includes other files with different custom variables.
To see the report on the custom vars:
Marketing Optimization
- Visitor segment performance
-- User defined
Related
I already implemented the creation of a document set at library root level. For this I used the following link: Is it possible to create a project documentset using graph API?
I follow the following steps :
1- Retrieve the document library's Drive Id:
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites/${siteId}/lists/${listId}?$expand=drive
2- Create the folder:
POST https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/drives/${library.drive.id}/root/children
The body of the request is the following
{
"name": ${folderName},
"folder": {},
}
3- Get the folder's SharePoint item id:
GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites/${siteId}/drives/${library.drive.id}/items/${folder.id}?expand=sharepointids
4- Update the item in the Document Library so that it updates to the desired Document Set:
PATCH https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites/${siteId}/lists/${listId}/items/${sharepointIds.listItemId}
I do send the following body to the patch request:
{
"contentType": {
"id": "content-type-id-of-the-document-set"
},
"fields": {}
}
I'm looking now how to create a document set in a specific folder in Sharepoint.
For example, i want to create the following folder structure.
The documents folder is at the library root and I want to create a document set named billing.
documents
|_ billing
|_ 2021
|_11
|_01
|_ document1.pdf
|_ document2.pdf
|_ document3.pdf
|_02
...
|_03
...
|_04
|_10
...
thanks
I'm doing something similar but I'm a little behind you, haven't yet created the Document Set (almost there!), but may I respectfully challenge your approach?
I'm not sure it's a good idea to mix Folders and Document Sets, mainly because a Folder breaks the metadata flow, you could achieve the same results just using Document Sets.
I am assuming that your 'day' in the data structure above is your Document Set (containing document1.pdf, etc.) You might want to consider creating a 'Billing' Document Set and either specifically add a Date field to the Document Set metadata or, perhaps better still, just use the standard Created On metadata and then create Views suitably filtered/grouped/sorted on that date.
This way you can also create filtered views for 'Client' or 'Invoice' or 'Financial Year' or whatever.
As soon as your documents exist in a folder, you can no longer filter/sort/group etc., the document library based on metadata.
FURTHER INFORMATION
I am personally structuring my Sales document library thus:
Name: Opportunity; Content Type: Document Set; Metadata: Client Name, Client Address, Client Contact
Name: Proposal; Content Type: Document; Metadata: Proposal ID, Version
Name: Quote; Content Type: Document; Metadata: Quote ID, Version
Etc...
This way the basic SharePoint view is a list of Opportunities (Document Sets), inside which are Proposals, Quotes etc., but I can also filter the view to just show Proposals (i.e. filter by Content Type), or search for a specific Proposal ID, or group by Client Name, then sort chronologically, or by Proposal ID etc.
I'm just saying that you get a lot more flexibility if you avoid using Folders entirely.
p.s. I've been researching for days now how to create Document Sets with graph, it never occurred to me that it might be a two-step process i.e. create the folder, then patch its content type. Many thanks for your post!!
Just re-read your post and my assumption that the 'day' would be your document set was incorrect. In this case, there would be no benefit having a Document Set containing Folders because the moment a Folder exists in the Document Set, metadata flow stops, and the only reason (well, the main reason*) to use Document Sets in preference to Folders is that metadata flow.
*Document Sets also allow you to automatically create a set of documents based on defined templates.
I could really use some help regarding a problem I'm facing. I have a project where I'm supposed to fetch the names and prices of some products. I must retrieve data from the first 5 pages of a given category.I'm trying to implement it using R, the rvest package and the SelectorGadget extension to choose the appropriate css selectors. I've written a function to do that:
readDataProject2<-function(){
url<-readline(prompt="Enter url: ")
nameTags<-readline(prompt="Enter name tags: ")
priceTags<-readline(prompt="Enter price tags: ")
itemNames<-read_html(url)%>%html_nodes(nameTags)%>%html_text()
itemPrices<-read_html(url)%>%html_nodes(priceTags)%>%html_text()
itemPrices<-itemPrices[-c(1,2)]
page<-cbind(itemNames,itemPrices)
}
and here's the page anesishome.gr. From this specific page I can go to the next etc to fetch a total of...240 products. But even when I provide the url for the next page, second page, I keep getting the data of the first page. Needless to say that choosing the option to present 240 in one single page didn't do any good. Can anybody point me to what I'm doing wrong?
I have one site that serves EN and FR users. Each language has it's own domain, so englishcontent.com and frenchcontent.com. I'm setting up profiles, one for each. For the filters, would this be the correct setting
Type: Custom > Include
Field: Hostname
Pattern englishcontent.com
I would then have a profifile for French with the similar settings.
is this the best way to do this?
Yes, it should work, but keep in mind keep always a view without filter, in you case you need to have 4:
EnDomain View
FRDomain View
AllDomain View (No domain filter, but ip filter or any other needed)
Raw View (No Filter at all , this in case of something fails)
Take care of the variation of the domains and your filter. For example whats happens with the www variations or the subdomains.
Greetings
Example
PS: This structure is not the recomended one by Google, it suposes one account per brand, one property per domain and the desired views.
more information on:
https://analyticsacademy.withgoogle.com/course/1/unit/4/lesson/2
once again I have to ask you for a help.
I have a problem with creating public variable and using it in formula.
The details of this issue is:
1, right after starting a Lotus Notes Application i have to create public variable EmpNum which will be contain an employee number (the number will be imported from IBM Blue Pages)
2, this EmpNum variable will be used to filter the data in a view, so I have to use it in formula in View Selection.
I'll be very grateful if you help with this issue.
Maybe there is possible any simplest solution of this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Tomasz (td2003)
EDIT:
Torsten, Panu, thank you.
I've decided to try write an EmpNum variable in notes.ini using #SetEnvironment and read it by #GetEnvironment, and it works.
BUT (!) there is a very strange thing:
1) when I entered formula "SELECT((form="ITForm") & (Status="Completed") & (TX_EmployeeNumber=#Environment("EmpNum")))" the view shows me all document where "TX_EmployeeNumber" is EMPTY;
2) otherwise when I entered formula "SELECT((form="ITForm") & (Status="Completed") & (TX_EmployeeNumber!=#Environment("EmpNum")))" (not equal) the view shows me all document where "TX_EmployeeNumber" is NOT EMPTY and no matter if TX_EmployeeNumber have exactly the same value as EmpNum.
For example: if EmpNum="P11" the view with 2nd formula shows the documents where TX_EmployeeNumber fields contains "P11", "P22", "A32" and so on.
I'm sure that #Environment("EmpNum") retrieves correct data from notes.ini.
I'm totally confused and completely don't know what's going on.
Do you have any idea about this?
First of all: There are NO public variables in Lotus Notes as you request it. Neither in LotusScript nor in Formula. Every variable just lives in its context, never in the complete client.
There are two places to put such a variable:
in the notes.ini, where you can set / read it using Formula (#Environment, #SetEnvironment, #getEnvironent) or LotusScript (NotesSession.GetEnvironmentString, NotesSession.SetEnvironmentVar).
In a Profile document in a database, where you can get it using #GetProfileField (Formula) or NotesDatabase.GetprofileDocument() (LotusScript)
Both of these approches will NOT help you for your number 2.
There is only ONE View- Selection- Formula for ALL Users. Putting something "userspecific" in there will let it render correctly for ONE value (the one, that the server uses when building the view- index), but not for all the others.
To solve your problem you can use:
a) An embedded View
A view that is categorized by empNum
A Form that has this view embedded and a Formula for "Show single category" for this embedded view set
b) A SPOFU view
SPOFU is "Shared, private on first use" and means, that every user has his own copy of the view. These views have some caveats and are hard to maintain. You should NOT use them, if you are not totally aware of the implications (getting the ACL right is one very important thing for these views)...
EDIT (due to change in question): SPOFU will neither work with Environment nor with Profile- documents, as the methods to read them are not supported in Views... So b) is not really an option... Sorry...
It is possible to use the #SetViewInfo formula in the QueryOpen and/or PostOpen of a view to get the view to only present data from one category. Be careful with this because you will need to touch EVERY view so that the value is cleared if the user navigates to a view which is not categorized by the employee num...
FWIW: I only have done this using #UserName not with another piece of data. I suggest you do that by having the import process add the fully qualified Notes name of the user to the documents as they are imported.
You can modify view selection formula with NotesView class. In this case you would have to use private views.
A better solution would be to use an XPage to show the view and use category filter. Or if you want to use traditional style then embed the view to a form or page and use "Show Single Category" feature.
I have been trying to create a page using views that will list down all the nodes authored by a specific user.
The user name will be specified in the path (like - stuff/[user-name] )
Can someone please tell me how to do this using Views.
I am stuck on a dead end
for the views url path specify: stuff/%
in the arguments section add: user -> user: name
Should do it, but I'm not sure if it isn't buggy (see this issue: http://drupal.org/node/744468)
If you use user:id instead of username, you will be fine.