responsive web design for n columns of random height portlets - css

Briefly:
How do I lay out N columns of random height portlets all in CSS so that if the browser is resized, the number of is columns reduced (using #media (min-width:)) and the portlets still sit nicely together on the page with no gaps.
This is similar to
Float multiple fixed-width / varible-height boxes into 2 columns
but more general.
Detail:
I've built a web application (PHP / Zend Framework) with a "dashboard" page made of a series of portlets. The portlets can be arranged in 1, 2, 3 or 4 equal width columns (user selectable) in a fluid layout. When the user resizes the browser window, the columns expand to fill the available width and the portlets also expand horizontally. The vertical height of each portlet is defined by its content. Some are only 1-2 lines, others can be 30-40+ lines of text / tables / image etc.
I want to turn this into a "responsive design" so that the user doesn't have to select the number of columns. On a small screen (eg iPhone) only one column will display. On a wide screen they might have 4 or 5 columns. If the browser window is resized, the number of columns will adjust up or down to allow portlets to stay approx 300-400 pixels wide.
I think I can do this with a bit of jQuery and some server side support (PHP), but would prefer to do it all in CSS if possible (no / minimal javascript).

Use a combination of media queries and text alignment to achieve this:
In its natural state, ‘text-align: justify’ will not work unless the contents of the line are long enough to cause a line-break. Otherwise, the text remains left aligned. We can solve this problem by giving 100% width to an invisible inline element at the end of the line.
Because ‘text-align: justify’ is designed to work on individual inline words, it works on any inline element—and more importantly any inline-block element.
To account for any and all possible numbers of elements on the last row, the number of “placeholder” elements you will need to add is equal to the maximum number of elements per row, minus 2. These elements should be inserted at the end of your grid (before the “break” element if you are not using a pseudo-element to break the row) and then left alone. Since they do not occupy any vertical space, the “placeholder” elements won’t affect the layout if the last row is full or if your site is responsive and the number of elements per row changes. As long as you have enough placeholders for the widest view, you’ll be fine.
Obviously, this has some semantic implications—as there is no way to create any of these placeholders using pseudo-elements. On a grid where the last row will always have the maximum number of elements, we don’t need to use placeholders at all (just a break), but in most CMS situations they are necessary, and should be hard-coded into your HTML.
By simply applying ‘text-align: justify’ to the container, and giving the child elements ‘display: inline-block’ and a percentage width, you’ll never have to deal with horizontal margins ever again! (Oh and did I mention, when using this trick, you’ll also never need to use float on your elements ever again, so you can wave goodbye to those ignominious clearfixes and clear divs too!)
We should be aware that when using ‘display: inline-block’, our elements will be at the mercy of various typographic CSS properties, including font-size, line-height, vertical-align and word-spacing. These properties will have a visible affect on your layout’s whitespace, but can be easily adjusted or removed as needed. In 99% of cases, setting ‘font-size: 0.1px;’ to the container and ‘vertical-align: top’ to the child elements should do the trick.
References
Using text-align: justify for Layout
Swipe Me Responsive Slideshow
Text-align Justify and Responsive Web Design
Zoom for fixed and responsive sites | AlastairC

Related

CSS Columns and equal content

I want to utilize CSS3 Columns around my site as it on wide pages provides a better UX for the users. However if I use CSS3 Columns, sometimes the left column is full (lets say 20 lines of text) and the right side only have2 lines of text. Can I with pure css3 (maybe Flexbox) make it have equal amount of content? Or do I need JS to fix this?
Beaware I'm not talking about equal height, but equal amount of content :)
You'll need to specify a height property.
From the Mozilla docs:
The CSS3 Column specification requires that the column heights must be
balanced: that is, the browser automatically sets the maximum column
height so that the heights of the content in each column are
approximately equal.
However, in some situations it is also useful to set the maximum
height of the columns explicitly, and then lay out content starting at
the first column and creating as many columns as necessary, possibly
overflowing to the right. Therefore, if the height is constrained, by
setting the CSS height or max-height properties on a multi-column
block, each column is allowed to grow to that height and no further
before adding new column. This mode is also much more efficient for
layout.
Sorry it was a padding-bottom which messed it up. When I remove that it spreads out nicely. Strange!

CSS Resizing based on key variables

I've built a dynamically sized grid layout that can adapt to reasonably in any sized resolution (phone, tablet, desktop) and handle resizing, all while being near pixel-perfect (sorry, I'm OCD -- and I say "near" because my math is broken right now and you can't fit two evenly sized elements inside of an odd sized container without padding being 1px off on one side).
Anyway, below is a link to what I've hacked together with JavaScript. It's an example of what I'm trying to pull off. Resize the width of the bottom pane a bit to see what I'm going for.
http://jsfiddle.net/langdonx/uFW2C/2/
It has some ugly manual JavaScript that's since been ported to Angular, but still the ugly JavaScript that calculates all the styles remains.
So my question... can I pull this off with strictly CSS? Or a lot more CSS and a lot less JavaScript? And by this I mean dynamically sized cells based on the width of the screen?
Here are the business rules:
Max cell width: 320px
Minimum # cells per row: 2
this might be impossible with CSS, so I'd be fine with settling on Min Cell Width: 178 for Chrome on my Galaxy Nexus(whose portait mode is 360px wide)
Cell border: 5px with a 2px outline
Visible margin between cells: 3px (margin is actually 5px, but outline bleeds out)
In this example, I'm redrawing the cells on resize every time, but in my Angular version, I believe that just the styles get updated. That said, I could probably get away with redrawing a table on resize, but I'd only have to calculate the cell width based on the document width, and well... I wouldn't be thrilled to use a table. =[
-end mad rant
Media queries
CSS media queries might get you pretty close to a CSS-only solution.
The key concept here is using different layout grids based on the width of the browser, to vary the number of columns.
Media queries are the natural CSS way to change the layout based on the browser width. And they require no JavaScript. If you use a set of media queries -- each one targetting a different range of browser widths -- to control which layout grid is used, then all each grid has to do is be responsive -- percentage widths for each column, and let the content stretch to fill the column width.
Responsive Design
The question then becomes: Is it possible to automatically stretch each piece of content to fill the column using CSS alone? That depends on the type of content, how it's expected to behave when it stretches, and if there's any room for compromise with the graphic design.
Typically, the graphic design for a responsive website has to be tailored to suit the limitations of Responsive Design (with the graphic designers having a rough idea of what's feasible and what isn't). But... whatever can't be done automatically, can be done using JavaScript.
Relevant search terms for attempting to stretch the content: Responsive Design, Adaptive Content, Fluid Grid
Note: "Columns" in this case may simply mean the percentage width used for the floated containers for each piece of content. It doesn't have to mean "physical" columns, in the traditional sense.

CSS to make two divs appear parallel independent of the page's width?

If you try to resize the window while my page is open: http://antonpug.com/mainepark/
You will see that the images in both columns jump around, they are not always level, but because the height of the content is fluid (min-height:450; and max-height:900), and the text is not the same length, the sections end up being different sizes.
How can I ensure that the sections are either just always leveled, or perhaps all sections are of the size needed for the section with the largest amount of text?
Column A has no idea what's going on column B.
You can either set a standard height for a section (not desirable) or write some JavaScript that will tweak the heights automatically after the window resizes.
Alternately you can re-structure the HTML so that each section has two columns instead of the entire page.

Move left-most column in a responsive design

I'm working on making a redesign of my college newspaper's website and got the design to fit nicely on an iPad. I'm now trying to switch it to a one column layout (for smart-phones).
The problem is that, in a single-column layout, the the right column must go above the left column. I would know how to do this if the code for the right column was written before the left column, but unfortunately it isn't.
How can I move the left column under the right column? Do I need to use Javascript to switch the column orders in the HTML code? Thanks!
EDIT: I realize that I can have a DIV that is invisible when the width > someNumber. I'd prefer not to have to be redundant though...
The CSS only solution is to start with the smallest screen as your default design then enhance as the screen size increases using media queries. Starting with the smallest screen first puts your markup in the correct order - for the image above Banner, Primary Navigation, Main Content (right-hand column), Aside (left-hand column) and (presumably), Footer. As the media queries apply additional CSS you can then float Main Content right and Aside left - the elements are positioned correctly for smaller or larger screens.
The easiest way I can think to do this is with jQuery (a javascript library) to remove the right column content from one div to another in the DOM. This allows you to create and remove the div's on the fly so there is not redundancy in the end.
If this is too vague, comment and I'll add an example.
CSS can take elements out of the document flow and put them anywhere, in any manner you want. But it cannot create a new document flow (ie it can't reorder elements). You need to position one element relative to the other or position them both absolutely.
If you have access to Javascript and are not concerned about graceful degredation you could also swap the .innerHTML of the two divs.

How to slide the outer 2 columns under the centre column using HTML and CSS only?

First see http://jsfiddle.net/b2BpB/15/
3 columns, aligned to the top of a container which is centred on the page. When the browser window is wider than the container - the example above is good.
When you shrink the width of the browser window - the columns start to stack down the page.
Question: How can I make it so that the outer two columns have a z-index lower then the centre column, so that when the browser window is squeezed, width-wise, instead of the columns stacking down the page, the outer columns slide under (behind) the centre column?
Note: I need to keep the present behaviours. 3 divs align to top of container. 3 divs grow / shrink to fit their contents (can't use fixed width, hight divs for the columns)
--added 19 April 2010 am UK--
This one seems to be stumping everyone - I've added a couple of more tags to see if anyone else can figure it out.
It may help me & others even if you post your initial ideas and explain why they wont work in this instance - to help avoid dead ends.
One avenue I looked at is using iframes instead of divs - but auto resizing iframes in a cross-domain application requires some exotic javascript. I would like to avoid javascript, let alone this cross domain hack. - I think this is a dead end - unless you know otherwise.
Thanks in advance...
--added 19 April 2010 13:44 UK--
#RoToRa - here I get absolute top positioning, divs size to fit content & divs sliding under the main centre div with no stacking down the page as the window is squeezed:
http://jsfiddle.net/qr7WB/
I have used inline style - but this is easy to extract to the CSS file - if I ever get it to do what I want.
If I can just get the left & right divs to but up to the centre div - only sliding under when the browser window forces them to, then bingo!
In terms of the application: I want a 3 col web site. The centre col holds the main content and I want it to take precedent. The outside columns are for subordinate content and ads.
First off: This isn't an answer, however I have several points and it's more readable as an answer.
I don't think what you want is possible. Having elements slide under each other is normally something one want to avoid, so it's not a "standard behavior" of CSS.
You'd have to use absolute positioning to have elements overlap each other, but then you can't have the elements adjust width and height to their contents.
The best I can think of is JavaScript, which could be based on the existing layout (so that it would still be displayed without JavaScript), and just "kick in", when the elements need to overlap. However that wouldn't be a simple script to write, because calculating the correct width it needs to react too, isn't simple.
Another alternative could be CSS 3 Media Queries, which allow you define different CSS rules based on window size, however that would require you to know at exactly which width you want the change.
As I mentioned having elements overlap - especially when they contain text, which one would expect to be able to read - is something one usually tries to avoid. Maybe you should describe your exact scenario (which elements contain which kind of information, and why it's ok for them to overlap) instead of your perceived solution, then it may be possible to suggest alternatives.
BTW I can't see how iframes would have to do with problem at all.
Do You mean like this?
Example Fiddle : HERE
if that's it it will depend on what widths you can or can't set, but if that's the idea more specs would help
It's all floated or inline-block, no absolute positioning so flow should remain to allow for footers to follow.. let me know!
Updated fiddle per comments : HERE

Resources