I have 2 dataframes, Tg and Pf, each of 127 columns. All columns have at least one row and can have up to thousands of them. All the values are between 0 and 1 and there are some missing values (empty cells). Here is a little subset:
Tg
Tg1 Tg2 Tg3 ... Tg127
0.9 0.5 0.4 0
0.9 0.3 0.6 0
0.4 0.6 0.6 0.3
0.1 0.7 0.6 0.4
0.1 0.8
0.3 0.9
0.9
0.6
0.1
Pf
Pf1 Pf2 Pf3 ...Pf127
0.9 0.5 0.4 1
0.9 0.3 0.6 0.8
0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7
0.4 0.7 0.6 0.5
0.1 0.6 0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
Note that some cell are empty and the vector lengths for the same subset (i.e. 1 to 127) can be of very different length and are rarely the same exact length.
I want to generate 127 graph as follow for the 127 vectors (i.e. graph is for col 1 from each dataframe, graph 2 is for col 2 for each dataframe etc...):
Hope that makes sense. I'm looking forward to your assistance as I don't want to make those graphs one by one...
Thanks!
Here is an example to get you started (data at https://gist.github.com/1349300). For further tweaking, check out the excellent ggplot2 documentation that is all over the web.
library(ggplot2)
# Load data
Tg = read.table('Tg.txt', header=T, fill=T, sep=' ')
Pf = read.table('Pf.txt', header=T, fill=T, sep=' ')
# Format data
Tg$x = as.numeric(rownames(Tg))
Tg = melt(Tg, id.vars='x')
Tg$source = 'Tg'
Tg$variable = factor(as.numeric(gsub('Tg(.+)', '\\1', Tg$variable)))
Pf$x = as.numeric(rownames(Pf))
Pf = melt(Pf, id.vars='x')
Pf$source = 'Pf'
Pf$variable = factor(as.numeric(gsub('Pf(.+)', '\\1', Pf$variable)))
# Stack data
data = rbind(Tg, Pf)
# Plot
dev.new(width=5, height=4)
p = ggplot(data=data, aes(x=x)) + geom_line(aes(y=value, group=source, color=source)) + facet_wrap(~variable)
p
Highlighting the area between the lines
First, interpolate the data onto a finer grid. This way the ribbon will follow the actual envelope of the lines, rather than just where the original data points were located.
data = ddply(data, c('variable', 'source'), function(x) data.frame(approx(x$x, x$value, xout=seq(min(x$x), max(x$x), length.out=100))))
names(data)[4] = 'value'
Next, calculate the data needed for geom_ribbon - namely ymax and ymin.
ribbon.data = ddply(data, c('variable', 'x'), summarize, ymin=min(value), ymax=max(value))
Now it is time to plot. Notice how we've added a new ribbon layer, for which we've substituted our new ribbon.data frame.
dev.new(width=5, height=4)
p + geom_ribbon(aes(ymin=ymin, ymax=ymax), alpha=0.3, data=ribbon.data)
Dynamic coloring between the lines
The trickiest variation is if you want the coloring to vary based on the data. For that, you currently must create a new grouping variable to identify the different segments. Here, for example, we might use a function that indicates when the "Tg" group is on top:
GetSegs <- function(x) {
segs = x[x$source=='Tg', ]$value > x[x$source=='Pf', ]$value
segs.rle = rle(segs)
on.top = ifelse(segs, 'Tg', 'Pf')
on.top[is.na(on.top)] = 'Tg'
group = rep.int(1:length(segs.rle$lengths), times=segs.rle$lengths)
group[is.na(segs)] = NA
data.frame(x=unique(x$x), group, on.top)
}
Now we apply it and merge the results back with our original ribbon data.
groups = ddply(data, 'variable', GetSegs)
ribbon.data = join(ribbon.data, groups)
For the plot, the key is that we now specify a grouping aesthetic to the ribbon geom.
dev.new(width=5, height=4)
p + geom_ribbon(aes(ymin=ymin, ymax=ymax, group=group, fill=on.top), alpha=0.3, data=ribbon.data)
Code is available together at: https://gist.github.com/1349300
Here is a three-liner to do the same :-). We first reshape from base to convert the data into long form. Then, it is melted to suit ggplot2. Finally, we generate the plot!
mydf <- reshape(cbind(Tg, Pf), varying = 1:8, direction = 'long', sep = "")
mydf_m <- melt(mydf, id.var = c(1, 4), variable = 'source')
qplot(id, value, colour = source, data = mydf_m, geom = 'line') +
facet_wrap(~ time, ncol = 2)
NOTE. The reshape function in base R is extremely powerful, albeit very confusing to use. It is used to transform data between long and wide formats.
Kudos for automating something you used to do in Excel using R! That's exactly how I got started with R and a common path to R enlightenment :)
All you really need is a little looping. Here's an example, most of which is creating example data that represents your data structure:
## create some example data
Tg <- data.frame(Tg1 = rnorm(10))
for (i in 2:10) {
vec <- rep(NA, 8)
vec <- c(rnorm(sample(5:10,1)), vec)
Tg[paste("Tg", i, sep="")] <- vec[1:10]
}
Pf <- data.frame(Pf1 = rnorm(10))
for (i in 2:10) {
vec <- rep(NA, 8)
vec <- c(rnorm(sample(5:10,1)), vec)
Pf[paste("Pf", i, sep="")] <- vec[1:10]
}
## ok, sample data created
## now lets loop through all the columns
## if you didn't know how many columns there are you could
## use ncol(Tg) to figure out
for (i in 1:10) {
plot(1:10, Tg[,i], type = "l", col="blue", lwd=5, ylim=c(-3,3),
xlim=c(1, max(length(na.omit(Tg[,i])), length(na.omit(Pf[,i])))))
lines(1:10, Pf[,i], type = "l", col="red", lwd=5, ylim=c(-3,3))
dev.copy(png, paste('rplot', i, '.png', sep=""))
dev.off()
}
This will result in 10 graphs in your working directory that look like the following:
Related
I'm working on a one species, two resources phytoplankton competition model based on Tilman's work in the 70s and 80s. I have a dataframe set up for the analytical solution but am really struggling with the syntax to plot the graphs I need. Here is my code so far:
library(dplyr)
r <- 0.1
g1 <- 0.001
g2 <- 0.01
v1 <- 0.1
v2 <- 1
k1 <- 0.01
k2 <- 0.1
d <- 0.15
s1_star = (r*g1*k1*d)-((v1*(r-d))-r*g1*d)
s2_star = (r*g2*k2*d)-((v2*(r-d))-r*g2*d)
s01 = s1_star+((s02-s2_star)*(g1/g2))
params <- list(r = 0.1,
g1 = 0.001,
g2 = 0.01,
d = 0.5,
v1 = 0.1,
v2 = 1,
k1 = 0.01,
k2 = 0.1)
df <- data.frame(s02 = seq(10, 1, -1)) |>
mutate(
s1_star = (r*g1*k1*d)-((v1*(r-d))-r*g1*d),
s2_star = (r*g2*k2*d)-((v2*(r-d))-r*g2*d),
s01 = s1_star+((s02-s2_star)*(g1/g2)), ## Tilman eq 17, supply concentration of resource 1
## in the reservoir that would result in co-limitation given some concentration of
## resource 2 (s20) in the reservoir
s1_limiting_ratio = s02/s01 ## ratio of supply points that result in co-limitation
)
cbind(params, df) |> as.data.frame() -> limiting_ratio
library(ggplot2)
limiting_ratio |> ggplot(aes(x = s1_star, y = s2_star)) + geom_line()
I want to plot s1_star and s2_star as the axes (which I did), but I'm trying to add the s1_limiting_ratio as a line on the graph (it's a ratio of s02/s01, which represents when resource 1 (S1) and resource 2 (S2) are co-limited. Then, I want to plot various values of s01 and s02 on the graph to see where they fall (to determine which resource is limiting to know which resource equation to use, either S1 or S2, in the analytical solution.
I've tried googling ggplot help, and struggling to apply it to the graph I need. I'm still fairly new to R and definitely pretty new to ggplot, so I really appreciate any help and advice!
I am trying to plot a boxplot in R, where the input file has multiple columns and each column has different number of rows. With the help given on help on the following link:
boxplot of vectors with different length
I am trying:
x <- read.csv( 'filename.csv', header = T )
plot(
1, 1,
xlim=c(1,ncol(x)), ylim=range(x[-1,], na.rm=TRUE),
xaxt='n', xlab='', ylab=''
)
axis(1, labels=colnames(x), at=1:ncol(x))
for(i in 1:ncol(x)) {
p <- x[,i]
boxplot(p, add=T, at=i)
}
I am trying to plot the values in log scale. But defining log ="y", I am getting the following error:
Error in xypolygon(xx, yy, lty = "blank", col = boxfill[i]) :
plot.new has not been called yet
Following is the sample of my input csv data:
A B C D
2345.42 932.19 40.8 26.19
138.48 1074.1 4405.62 4077.16
849.35 0.0 1451.66 1637.39
451.38 146.22 4579.6 5133.14
5749.01 7250.08 12.23 0.09
4125.48 129.46 49.51
440.38 6405.02
Your data as a reproducible example
Note I had to remove an extra element
library(data.table)
df <- fread("A,B,C,D
2345.42,932.19,40.8,26.19
138.48,1074.1,4405.62,4077.16
849.35,0.0,1451.66,1637.39
451.38,146.22,4579.6,5133.14
5749.01,7250.08,12.23,0.09
4125.48,129.46,49.51,440.38", sep=",", header=T)
dplyr and tidyr solution
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
df1 <- df %>%
replace(.==0,NA) %>% # make 0 into NA
gather(var,values,A:D) %>% # convert from wide (4-col) to long (2-col) format
mutate(values = log10(values)) # log10 transform
If you want log2, simply replace log10 with log2
Output
boxplot(values ~ var, df1)
A little extra
For log10 scale, I like to add 1 to my values to eliminate negative values since log10(0 < x < 1) = -value. This sets the minimum value on your plot as 0 since 0 + 1 = 1 and log10(1) = 0
Using the following code:
library("ggplot2")
require(zoo)
args <- commandArgs(TRUE)
input <- read.csv(args[1], header=F, col.names=c("POS","ATT"))
id <- args[2]
prot_len <- nrow(input)
manual <- prot_len/100 # 4.3
att_name <- "Entropy"
att_zoo <- zoo(input$ATT)
att_avg <- rollapply(att_zoo, width = manual, by = manual, FUN = mean, align = "left")
autoplot(att_avg, col="att1") + labs(x = "Positions", y = att_name, title="")
With data:
> str(input)
'data.frame': 431 obs. of 2 variables:
$ POS: int 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
$ ATT: num 0.652 0.733 0.815 1.079 0.885 ...
I do:
I would like to upload input2 which has different lenght (therefore, different x-axis) and overlap the 2 curves in the same plot (I mean overlap because I want the two curves in the same plot size, so I will "ignore" the overlapped axis labels and tittles), I would like to compare the shape, regardles the lenght of input.
First I've tried by generating toy input2 changing manual value, so that I have att_avg2 in which manual equals e.g. 7. In between original autoplot and new autoplot-2 I add par(new=TRUE), but this is not my expected output. Any hint on how doing this? Maybe it's better to save att_avg from zoo series to data.frame and not use autoplot? Thanks
UPDATE, response to G. Grothendieck:
If I do:
[...]
att_zoo <- zoo(input$ATT)
att_avg <- rollapply(att_zoo, width = manual, by = manual, FUN = mean, align = "left") #manual=4.3
att_avg2 <- rollapply(att_zoo, width = 7, by = 7, FUN = mean, align = "left")
autoplot(cbind(att_avg, att_avg2), facet=NULL) +
labs(x = "Positions", y = att_name, title="")
I get
and a warning message:
Removed 1 rows containing missing values (geom_path).
par is used with classic graphics, not for ggplot2. If you have two zoo series just cbind or merge the series together and autoplot them using facet=NULL:
library(zoo)
library(ggplot2)
z1 <- zoo(1:3) # length 3
z2 <- zoo(5:1) # length 5
autoplot(cbind(z1, z2), facet = NULL)
Note: The question omitted input2 so there could be some additional considerations from aspects not shown.
I am wondering how I can plot a QQ plot with multiple p-value vectors for different studies in one plot.
I am using the following code to generate a QQ-plot:
install.packages("ggplot2")
library(ggplot2)
The code for qq can be found here: http://gettinggeneticsdone.blogspot.com/2009/11/qq-plots-of-p-values-in-r-using-ggplot2.html
qq(data$Pvals, title="My Quantile-Quantile Plot")
Now I have 4 studies, so 4 $Pval vectors. I am able to add in the first Pval1 as :
qq(data$Pval1, title="My Quantile-Quantile Plot")
How can I add labeled lines of observed p-values for the remaining studies? -> Pval2, Pval3, Pval4. Essentially I'd like to display the QQ-plot with 4 observed p-value lines representing the 4 studies in one graph.
Please help!
Thanks!
Can you share how your data looks? I think the answer you're looking for is defining the group variable in the aes string. For instance,
UPDATE TO TRANSPOSE DATA SET
# install.packages('ggplot2') # only needs to be installed first time
# install.packages('reshape2') # only needs to be installed first time
library(ggplot2)
library(reshape2)
# fakeData
# RowNum Pval1 Pval2 Pval3 Pval4
# 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
# 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
# 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
#
# melt(fakeData, id.vars = 'RowNum')
# RowNum variable value
# 1 Pval1 0.5
# 1 Pval2 0.5
# 1 Pval3 0.5
ORIGINAL CODE
df <- data.frame(Group = rep(c('A', 'B', 'C', 'D'), 50),
Number = sample(1:100, 200, replace = T))
ggplot(df, aes(sample = Number, group = Group, color = Group)) +
geom_point(stat = 'qq')
I have a data that looks like this:
> print(dat)
cutoff tp fp
1 0.6 414 45701
2 0.7 172 16820
3 0.8 51 4326
4 0.9 49 3727
5 1.0 0 0
I want to plot them in reverse-order from smallest dat$tp to largest.
However this code plot them in order like above (i.e. largest to smallest) instead.
> fp_max <- max(dat$fp);
> tp_max <- max(dat$tp);
> op <- par(xaxs = "i", yaxs = "i")
> plot(tp ~ fp, data = dat, xlim = c(0,fp_max),ylim = c(0,tp_max), type = "n")
> with(dat, lines(c(0, fp, fp_max), c(0, tp, tp_max), lty=1, type = "l", col = "black"))
> lines( par()$usr[1:2], par()$usr[3:4], col="red" )
How can I modify the code above to address the problem?
Of course, the x-axis & y-axis coordinates should be from smallest to largest value
The following shows the result of my current code.
Notice that the line started at 0,0 and it 'goes back' to 0 again.
we want to avoid it going back to 0.
Ahh, I understand.
It's because lines draws lines between the points in the order they are given.
There are a few ways you could get around this:
do type='l' in your plot command and then with(dat,lines(...)) is not necessary:
# can also do the col='black',lty=1 in here.
plot(tp ~ fp, data = dat, xlim = c(0,fp_max),ylim = c(0,tp_max), type = "l")
Note that by definition of your fp_max and tp_max, you will include the point (fp_max,tp_max) already. And as long as you have a row with (0,0) for tp and fp in dat, you'll also get the (0,0) point.
Sort dat$tp and use that to sort dat$fp too:
plot(tp ~ fp, ..., type='n')
# sort dat$tp
obj <- sort(dat$fp,index.return=T)
# use obj$x as tp and obj$ix to sort dat$fp prior to plotting
with(dat,
lines(c(0, obj$x, fp_max), c(0, tp[obj$ix], tp_max),
lty=1, type = "l", col = "black"))
#Get order of rows
idx <- order(dat$tp)
#Select data in sorted order
sorted <- dat[idx,]