I have a build process that records some information about the build and then checks that information back into TFS. This check back in is causing another build to be triggered.
When my build was using CruiseControl, I could filter out changes that a user made. My question is how can I filter changes made from the build agent?
If it's firing a new build because you have a CI build setup, you can set the check-in comment to include the text ***NO_CI*** which will suppress any CI builds.
There are different build trigger types that can be triggered by a checkin: CI, Rolling, or Gated Checkin.
If you're dealing with a CI or Rolling build definition, what Dylan said about ***NO_CI*** would work. If you're dealing with a Gated Checkin build definition, set the right workspace parameters and grant permission to bypass gated checkin for the build service account as described here.
The most important thing is, if these files that you check in TFS again during your build don't need to be built, you should cloak the build definition's folder mappings for these files so you would not need to do any extra thing to suppress triggering a build.
Related
I have 3 stages (dev / staging / production). I've successfully set up publishing for each, so that the code will be deployed, using msbuild, to the correct location, with the correct web configs transformed - all within Jenkins.
The problem I'm having is that I don't know to deploy the code to staging from what was built on dev (and staging to production). I'm currently using SVN as the source control, so I think I would need to somehow save the latest revision number dev has built and somehow tell Jenkins to build/deploy staging based on that number?
Is there a way to do this, or a better alternative?
Any help would be appreciated.
Edit: Decided to use the save the revision number method, which parses a file containing the revision number to the next job -- to do this, I followed this answer:
How to promote a specific build number from another job in Jenkins?
It explains how to copy an artifact from one job to another using the promotion plugin. For the artifact itself, I added a "Execute Windows batch command" build step after the main build with:
echo DEV_ENVIRONMENT_CORE_REVISION:%SVN_REVISION%>env.properties
Then in the staging job, using that above guide, copied that file, and then using a plugin EnvInject, to read from that file and set an environment variable, which can then be used as a parameter to the SVN Repository URL.
You should be able to identify the changeset number that was built in DEV and manually pass that changeset to the Jenkins build to pull that same changeset from SVN. Obviously that makes your deployment more manual. Maybe you can setup Jenkins to publish the changeset number to a file and then have the later env build to read that file for the changeset number.
We used to use this model as well and it was always complex. Eventually we moved to a build once and deploy many times model using WebDeploy. This has made the process much more simple. Check it out - http://www.dotnetcatch.com/2016/04/16/msbuild-once-msdeploy-many-times/
Currently I package my changes using the publish wizard in Visual Studio and take those files to the server and run the deploy batch file in command line.
What is the best strategy to use if I have issues in the deployment and I want to revert back my website/service to the last working state?
Since your deployment is a manual process, it would probably be best to create a backup zip or copy of the webroot - this could be added as a command in your batch file before the other commands.
Alternatively, you could create a label in your source control system each time you deploy which would give you the ability to re-deploy a previous version. I would only advise this approach though if you have some sort of CI process in place to guarantee that the label is done prior to each deployment/release, otherwise your process is dependent on the person deploying remembering to create that label - if they forget, then you can't restore that previous version.
In the project I'm working for we're having a continuous deployment setup. The goal is to always install the latest working build to production, unless someone manually overrides this functionality.
In order to make this working we
Run static code analysis
Run unit tests
Run integration tests
Run automatic UI tests, to the extent this is feasible
If any of the above steps fail, the build process is halted, and the build marked as failed. If the installation package is created it is then in steps installed to
CI --> staging --> production
At each step we run a integration and UI tests for the environment, to make sure we didn't introduce some new things which fail on on the subsequent environments. If none of the tests fail, and N minutes pass without anyone pressing the panic button, the build gets promoted to the next env. If the tests fail, we want to delete the package, and discard it completely. The installation packages are, however, delivered to other servers, so we need to run a bunch of remote (shell) scripts to make this step happen.
The problem is, that there are a big set of failure cases which we cannot reliably test in the normal automated cycle, e.g. page layout, or some integrations fail only production and so on.
So the actual question: How shall I demote/delete builds, once they've been promoted? Is it possible to either run a remote script when doing delete build or use any of the promotion plugins to achieve this functionality? Is there some think-outside-the-box solution for this that I might not have thought about?
Instead of deleting builds manually, you may write a Jenkins job that accepts the build number as a parameter, deletes it, and then does the rest of the housekeeping. You can configure Jenkins access privileges so that people do not delete builds manually by accident.
This might be a very particular case, but we decided against creating a separate job for removing the builds, for the very simple reason of keeping all the logging related to a specific build number in one single place. The setup was the following:
Promotion here means make the installation package (RPM) available to the given server, where auto-update handles the actual upgrade of the package.
We have one main build, that builds every time a new commit is available. We had some fine-tuning related to quiet times etc. but basically every new pushed set of commits resulted in a new build. The build contains all the relevant and available testing, which is far from being complete, and probably never will be.
Every hour a separate promotion step handles promotion from staging to production. This build kicks off a separate promotion which takes the latest accepted build from CI to staging. There is a 30min delay before builds were promoted CI-->staging, to prevent accidental promotions for last second commits. Delays were achieved with some bash find scripting. The order of promotions is this, to make sure a build is available in staging for (at least) one hour before going to promotion.
The actual answer:
The promotion steps were done as separate builds. In order to do a real promotion, rather than a separate build with a separate log, the build kicks off an actual promotion in the main build, using curl and calling the remote HTTP API. This leaves a relevan promotions star in the main build log. Using different colors, the promotions are visible with one look.
To demote builds I decided to create a separate "demote build" promotion step. This would then issue a purple star as a sign of the build being defective, and thus removed. The demotion is done by accessing the correct build in the UI, and pressing the "Remove build" button. No automation has been added to this step, but by creating a separate test step, it would be fairly easy to automate the demotion as well. We, however, have not gotten quite this far yet.
The benefits of this approach include
A build is deleted by accessing the failed build, not by providing parameters. Makes it much easier to document, and get right under pressure
Having a "panic button" like this available for anyone to press, builds trust and ownership for the process not only amongst the developers but also managers and DevOps.
It's dead simple to spot dead builds, as the log is available besides the other promotion logs
Having all the relevant promotion calls in the same build makes further scripting easier
Acute things we still have to improve include automating the testing on the later stages of the build pipeline, and also a suitable way of downgrading builds after demotion. E.g. in production a defective build and a demotion must always lead to installing the last good build, which has turned out to be fairly hard to achieve. Production data centers are rarely allowed to be accessible to this level from the development DC where the CI system sits. Also stopping and starting the build pipeline must be automated, as else there is the chance of slipping back to the manual state.
Naturally, in the spirit of continuous improvement, there are always things to improve. The whole setup is something of a bash/perl scripting mess, but since it's scripted and repeatable, there is always the option of improving one small piece at a time. The most important thing is the automation, as it allows for incremental steps, which any manual steps more or less prevent.
For anyone looking for an easy way to delete a build with custom steps:
Create a 'defective' promotion.
Make it manually triggered.
Force it run on the master.
Add a choice parameter DELETE with choices NO and YES.
Add action Execute Shell.
_
if [ "${DELETE}" == "YES" ]; then
# TODO: my custom steps
curl -X POST ${PROMOTED_URL}/doDelete"
fi
To delete a build now, just go to promotions, flip the choice to YES and click approve.
Is there any way in ASP.NET website project, that allow to publish it from command prompt and I can continue working on project, or if it is not easy to use , at least speed up my publish task?
I know about the auto publishing tools like TFS or CruiseControl, so please don't tell me these ways.
I am thinking to create a .bat file , that I'll run everytime I have to publish. but it should not take changes made by me during its running process.
asp.net single file publish
I really like the Answer given by Ludwo, providing more information on that would be very helpful.
You can use MsBuild to publish your websites in parallel. Start with this article. It is about publishing one website using MsBuild. Define your projects inside ItemGroup and use MSBuild task this way:
<MSBuild Projects="#(YourProjectsToBuildInParallel)" BuildInParallel="true" ...
The final step is to enable parallel processing for MSBuild task.
Open another Visual Studio to continue :P. Publishing mechanism can detect updated and can send only changes. So dont upload full site everytime, if its really disturbs you.
Use source control and a build server mechanism. The build server should be able to pull from source control when you commit a change, build the project, do any unit tests you may/should have, and then deploy to a test site.
Depending on which build server platform you use you may or may have to do varying amounts of work. In the past I have used Bamboo by Atlassian. Fantastic product but you have to configure the deployment using MSBuild - it's fine but it can take some time to get it perfect. I am sure there are some good examples out there for it.
How it will work for you:
When you are finished working on a file/issue you can commit your changes. The build server will then detect these changes and wait a varying amount of time (waiting for you to commit more) e.g. 3 minutes, check out your changes, and deploy. You can set up notifications when the deployment is done to goto your testing team - with a link in the email saying where the site is, and what the change that occurred (based on your SVN commit log).
So your net effort is to check a file in with a correct comment - and you are finished.
How can I automate the web-application build process, that includes following steps:
Change connection string.
Recreate database by scripts.
Deploy web-site by ftp.
Copy some files to server in addition to application.
And may be perform some initialize operations.
Should I write any script/programm, use Visual Studio or any another program?
Personally I use a Continuous Integration tool to do this kind of work.
The one I mainly use is Team City by JetBrains.
This kind of software can look at your Source Control repo for new checking, perform builds, publish builds to servers as well as running pre/post build events.
You've to start learning MSBuild. It is VERY simple and straightforward, so just start and you'll see ;)
In adddition to built in features it has Community Pack with many tasty things so you will be able to:
Replace connection string in config file using regex or replace whole config with predefined connection string (FileUpdate or Copy task)
Execute database scripts (MSBuild.Community.Tasks.SqlServer.ExecuteDDL)
Deploy site using Copy task
And many other...
You can run pre and post events in Visual Studio. To do this, simply right click on the project and in the project properties navigate to the 'Build Events' options. Here you can specify the pre and post build events (you can also specify when the event runs - on successful build or otherwise).
Once the project has been successfully built, the post build event can be set up to perform the tasks specified. You can detail the steps either in a separate file or in Visual Studio project's build events itself.
More information
Pre/Post Build event command line arguments
How to: Specify Build Events (C#)
Much along the continuous integration concept Jamie mentions, we use BuildMaster internally for all of our applications since we develop it :)
Now that we have a version offered for free, I'll share some thoughts on each of your bullet points:
Change connection string
This is something that is handled uniquely by the tool. Each environment would get its own "instance" of a configuration file and in a deployment plan you can use the "deploy configuration files" action to put them in any environment. This means there are no transforms to worry about since the config file is stored and versioned within the tool.
Recreate database by scripts
This is another major feature we have. Object code (stored procs, views, etc.) can be run every time with a DROP/CREATE combo, but adding indexes, dropping columns, can only be done once (you can't bring a column's data back without a restore!)
BuildMaster handles these types of change scripts differently - they can only be run at most once against an environment's instance of your database. This makes it super easy to bring any new or existing initialized database schema up-to-date.
Deploy web-site by FTP
Just add an action to your deployment plan, and you click Create Build or Promote Build, it will do that.
Copy some files to server in addition to application
If the process is repeatable you can do this easily, if need be by using a manual action that will remind you to do it.
And may be perform some initialize operations
This sounds like a "change control" to me, a one-time change when you release. We support these as well but not in the free version unfortunately.