I Have the following in my ccnet.config file
....
<publishers>
<xmllogger />
</publishers>
<tasks>
<artifactcleanup cleanUpMethod="KeepLastXBuilds" cleanUpValue="5" />
....
However the build logs never get removed? Am I misunderstanding this? I would expect never seening more then 5 log files in there.
According to documentation you must put the artifact cleanup publisher in the publishers section for it to work:
<publishers>
<xmllogger />
<artifactcleanup cleanUpMethod="KeepLastXBuilds" cleanUpValue="5" />
</publishers>
Related
I am modifying some existing projects that uses QT (version 5.10). I am updating them to use better, more concise msbuild syntax (Target Visual Studio 2015) on windows.
One project has about 170 header files, of which about 135 header files need to be run through MOC.exe.
Therefore I wrote a custom target to send 135 files to moc.exe. But the msbuild syntax to tell Moc which files to process is quite long.
i.e.
<QtMocs Include="A.h;
B.h;
C.h;
D.h;
etc...
I tried sending ALL of the header files through to moc.exe. But if a header file doesn't have Q_OBJECT, then moc.exe emits a warning about not needing to moc the header file. And to add insult to injury it still emits a cpp file, even though nothing needed to be moc'd.
So I'd like to write a nice short (one line?) concise way to tell QT to moc only the headers that are needed.
Is this possible?
So after two days with no response, I decided to write my own solution, which works really well. I wrote a custom task for MSBuild. It takes an array of ProjectItem's that is supposed to point to all the header files in your project. Then for each file in the array, it opens the files, searches for Q_OBJECT and if found saves off the Item into an output array. That output array is then queried later on and sent to moc.exe.
<!-- Task to automatically discover header files that need to be run through QT's MOC.exe compiler.
It does this by examing each file and checking if 'Q_OBJECT' is in the file. -->
<UsingTask TaskName="FindFilesForQtMoc" TaskFactory="CodeTaskFactory" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildToolsPath)\Microsoft.Build.Tasks.v4.0.dll" >
<ParameterGroup>
<Files ParameterType="Microsoft.Build.Framework.ITaskItem[]" Required="true" />
<MocFiles ParameterType="Microsoft.Build.Framework.ITaskItem[]" Output="true" />
</ParameterGroup>
<Task>
<Using Namespace="System" />
<Using Namespace="System.IO" />
<Using Namespace="System.Diagnostics" />
<Code Type="Fragment" Language="cs">
<![CDATA[
var result = new List<Microsoft.Build.Framework.ITaskItem>();
foreach(var item in Files)
{
String filePath = item.GetMetadata("FullPath");
var content = File.ReadAllText(filePath);
if (content.Contains("Q_OBJECT"))
{
result.Add(item);
}
}
MocFiles = result.ToArray();
]]>
</Code>
</Task>
</UsingTask>
I call the task like this:
<FindFilesForQtMoc Files="#(ClInclude)" >
<Output ItemName="FileForMoc" TaskParameter="MocFiles" />
</FindFilesForQtMoc>
<Message Text="Moc: %(FileForMoc.Identity)" />
Therefore I only have to declare all my header files in my .vcxproj like this:
<ClInclude Include="*.h" />
Which is way better than explicitly declaring each and every file that needs moc.exe.
I am trying to add a new view in our application. For time being adding this view as the first page in the app. Created necessary OSLC resources in maximo and also verified that I am able to view the data by hitting the URL (ip,userid,pw removed intentionally).
http://{ipaddress}:7001/maximo/oslc/os/ABS_VERI_POINTS?_lid={maximoadminuser}&_lpwd={maximoadminpw}&oslc.select=*
I have also added the view and the resources in app.xml file but when I am logging in to the application it gives me the following message
"WorkList Record Could Not be Downloaded. If Problem persists, Contact your administrator"
After than it landed up into the view with No data. Upon inspecting the UI in browser I noticed I am getting the following error
Procedure invocation error. Runtime: Failed to parse JSON string
Error 404--Not Found
....
....
Resource Data in app.xml is as follows
<resource describedBy="http://jazz.net/ns/ism/asset/smarter_physical_infrastructure#ABS_VERI_POINTS" id="resabsVP" name="resabsVP" providedBy="/oslc/sp/SmarterPhysicalInfrastructure">
<attributes id="absVPAttrs">
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:parent" id="vpparent" name="parent"/>
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:location" id="vplocation" name="location"/>
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:assetnum" id="vpassetnum" name="assetnum"/>
<!-- attribute describedByProperty="spi:abs_verification_pointsid" id="vpabsvpid" name="absvppointsid" -->
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:taskid" id="vptaskid" name="taskid"/>
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:description" id="vpdescription" name="description"/>
<attribute describedByProperty="spi:wonum" id="vpwonum" name="wonum"/>
</attributes>
<queryBases id="absvpqry">
<queryBase id="absvpqry1" name="getabsvp" queryUri="oslc/os/ABS_VERI_POINTS" />
</queryBases>
</resource>
View in app.xml as follows
<view id="absVPview" label="ABS Verification Points">
<requiredResources id="absVPAttrs11">
<requiredResource name="resabsVP" id="resabsVP11">
<requiredAttribute id="vpdescription1" name="description"/>
<requiredAttribute id="vpwonum1" name="wonum"/>
<requiredAttribute id="vpparent1" name="parent"/>
</requiredResource>
</requiredResources>
<list id="VP.abs_veri_points_list" resource="resabsVP" >
<listItemTemplate id="VP.abs_veri_points_list_listItemTemplate" layout="InspectionListItem">
<listtext id="VP.abs_veri_points_list_vpid" resourceAttribute="description" layoutInsertAt="item1"/>
<listtext id="VP.abs_veri_points_list_wonum" resourceAttribute="wonum" layoutInsertAt="item2"/>
<listtext id="VP.abs_veri_points_list_parenttext" resourceAttribute="parent" layoutInsertAt="item3"/>
</listItemTemplate>
</list>
</view>
Can you please give any clue whats going wrong here
Can you open a PMR on this with our support? This may be a bug where we're not correctly handling underscores in our OSLC request url to retrieve data. Also, check the URL that is failing in your javascript console, just to make sure that it's really this resource throwing the 404 exception. You might check the network tab of the debugger to see that.
#MDutta,
If the issue is in the object/attribute using underscore ("_"), you can fix this by updating the xsd validation file located at ..\Anywhere\lib\codegen\artifac-processor-7.5.2.jar.
Unzip this file and open the app.xsd located: ..\resource\xsd\app.xsd. Modify the validation
From:
<xs:simpleType name="string">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]+"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
To:
~dk
I have two test groups which are dependent on another group.
<dependencies>
<group name="search" depends-on="login" />
<group name="addnew" depends-on="login" />
</dependencies>
Which one out of the two groups (search, addnew) should ideally get executed first? For me, the group addnew is getting executed first all the time, which I don't want to happen. I want search to get executed and then addnew to get executed, once login is done. Also, I have set "preserve-order" for the test as true. Any suggestions?
If you want search to get executed first, then add new is also dependent on search group in that case. You can specify a list of groups in the depends-on list. Try with depends-on="login search" or you can let search depend on login and make add new depend on search to guarantee execution order.
Quote from documentation: "By default, TestNG will run your tests in the order they are found in the XML file. If you want the classes and methods listed in this file to be run in an unpredictible order, set the preserve-order attribute to false:"
<test name="Regression1" preserve-order="false">
<class name="test.Test1">
<methods>
<include name="m1" />
<include name="m2" />
</methods>
</class>
<class name="test.Test2" />
I'm responsible for allowing unit tests for one of ETL components.I want to acomplish this using testNG with generic java test class and number of test definitions in testng.xmlpassing various parameters to the class.Oracle and ETL guys should be able to add new tests without changing the java code, so we need to use xml suite file instead of annotations.
Question
Is there a way to group tests in testng.xml?(similarly to how it is done with annotations)
I mean something like
<group name="first_group">
<test>
<class ...>
<parameter ...>
</test>
</group>
<group name="second_group">
<test>
<class ...>
<parameter ...>
</test>
</group>
I've checked the testng.dtd as figured out that similar syntax is not allowed.But is therea workaround to allow grouping?
Thanks in advance
You can specify groups within testng.xml and then run testng using -groups
<test name="Regression1">
<groups>
<run>
<exclude name="brokenTests" />
<include name="checkinTests" />
</run>
</groups>
....
No, this is not possible at the moment.
As a rule of thumb, I don't like adding information in XML that points into Java code, because refactorings might silently break your entire build.
For example, if you rename a method or a class name, your tests might start mysteriously breaking until you remember you need to update your XML as well.
Feel free to bring this up on the testng-users mailing-list and we can see if there's interest for such a feature.
--
Cedric
I have been struggling trying to figure out how to conditionally include Flex libraries in an ant build based on a property that is set on the command line. I have tried a number of approaches with the <condition/> task, but so far have not gotten it to work. Here is where I am currently.
I have an init target that includes condition tasks like this:
<condition property="automation.libs" value="automation.qtp">
<equals arg1="${automation}" arg2="qtp" casesensitive="false" trim="true"/>
</condition>
The purpose of this task is to set a property that determines the name of the patternset to be used when declaring the implicit fileset on a mxmlc or compc task. The pattern set referenced above is defined as:
<patternset id="automation.qtp">
<include name="automation*.swc"/>
<include name="qtp.swc"/>
</patternset>
The named patternset is then referenced by the mxmlc or compc task like this:
<compc>
<compiler.include-libraries dir="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/libs" append="true">
<patternset refid="${automation.libs}"/>
</compiler.include-libraries>
</compc>
This doesn't appear to work. At least the SWC size does not indicate that the additional automation libraries have been compiled in. I want to be able to specify a command line property that determine which patternset to use for various types of builds.
Does anyone have any ideas about how to accomplish this? Thanks!
If you can't get <patternset> to work correctly, you might want to take a look at the <if> <then> and <else> tasks provided by ant-contrib. We ended up doing something like this:
<target name = "build">
<if>
<equals arg1="automation.qtp" arg2="true"/>
<then>
<!--
- Build with QTP support.
-->
</then>
<else>
<!--
- Build without QTP support.
-->
</else>
</if>
</target>
There is some duplication of build logic between the if and else branch, but you can factor some of that out if you wrap <mxmlc> with a macrodef.
The mxmlc task supports loading configuration files <load-config filename="path/to/flex-config.xml" />. So, generate the config xml on the fly, by combining the echoxml task and if-then-else.
<echoxml file="path/to/flex-config.xml">
<flex-config>
<compiler>
<library-path append="true">
<path-element>${lib.qtp}</path-element>
</library-path>
</compiler>
</flex-config>
</echoxml>
If your needs are more complicated, you could even generate several xml configs and <load-config ... /> them all.
Personally, I find any logic very terse and ugly to write using Ant's conditions or if-then-else, XML is not a pretty language to use for programming. Luckily, it's possible to use more flexible approach - write a script to produce the config xml, before calling mxmlc. E.g. use the script task with your favorite scripting language
<script language="javascript">
<![CDATA[
// Create your XML dynamically here.
// Write that XML to an external file.
// Later, feed that file to mxmlc using `<load-config ... />`.
]]>
</script>