I've got three div elements within one class, which in html document it looks like that:
<div class="content">
<div id="content_head">
<!--CONTENT HEAD CODE-->
</div>
<div id="between_ads">
<!-- ADS HERE -->
</div>
<div id="content_middle">
<!--CONTENT MIDDLE CODE-->
</div>
</div>
And css code for these:
.content
{
position: relative;
width: 75%;
float: left;
left: -52px;
margin: 5px 0 10px 0;
border-right: 1px solid #D9D9D9;
}
.content #content_head
{
/*position: relative;*/
width: 100%;
float: left;
border-bottom: 1px solid #D9D9D9;
}
.content #content_middle
{
/*position: relative;*/
width: 100%;
float: left;
margin: 5px 0 0 0;
border-top: 1px solid #D9D9D9;
border-bottom: 1px solid #D9D9D9;
}
/*BETWEEN ADVERTS*/
.content #between_ads
{
position: static;
width: 100%;/*737px;*/
height: 10px;
/*margin: 302px 0 0 -17px;*/
margin: auto;
padding: 0;
background: #000;
}
/*BETWEEN ADVERTS*/
The problem is, that resulted code for BETWEEN ADVERTS looks like this:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/ZU2FD.png - black bar over window "Polecane" that's highlighted in blue - but this div element should be placed here:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/ww0Ko.png - where is the yellow highlight.
Setting .content to position: absolute and rest to relative brakes totally the layout of .content class.
I'm quite new to html and css and still not everything understand.
Cheers
Try taking out the position and float of all your divs. Divs naturally like to be sitting one on top of another so adding positioning css disrupts it I would think.
Related
I'm currently stuck on an design issue that has had me scratching my head for a bit too long.
I have a two-column layout with one column for content (left) and a side bar that lists some sports venues (right) and this column's content exceeds that of the content column.
Basically what I'm looking to achieve is to make the content column match the left hand column.
Much like the one I quickly did up over on Codepen http://codepen.io/anon/pen/iLJAe
Any advice on how to do this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanking you in advance
Stu :)
Here what I have in my style.css for the two columns.
style.css
.content {
border: 1px solid #e8e8e8;
float: left;
margin: 5em 0 0;
padding: 1em;
height: 100%;
}
.sidebar {
border: 1px solid #e8e8e8;
float: left;
margin: 5em -0.1em 0;
padding: 1em;
height: 100%;
}
You can use css display: table; property.
First put the two divs in a wrapper (act as a parent div for both)
Like:
<div id="#wrapper">
<div class="content"></div>
<div class="sidebar"></div>
</div>
Then in your css, use display: table to the wrapper div and display:table-cell; to the column divs (this will make the both divs behave like <td> in a table) to get them to same height.
Like:
.wrapper{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: table;
float:left;
}
.content {
border: 1px solid #e8e8e8;
margin: 5em 0 0;
padding: 1em;
height: 100%;
background: red; /* for test */
display: table-cell;
}
.sidebar {
border: 1px solid #e8e8e8;
margin: 5em -0.1em 0;
padding: 1em;
height: 100%;
background: blue; /* for test */
display: table-cell;
}
WORKING SAMPLE
When my app-container div expands, it will overflow my footer. My footer should move down away from the app-container (or the entire wrapper respectively), but it does not, and I don't manage to find what's wrong.
HTML Code:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="wrapperbackground">
<div class="app-container">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<footer>
<div class="footerwrapper">
</div>
</footer>
CSS code:
.wrapper { text-align:center; min-height: 900px; }
.wrapperbackground { background-color: #C63D0F; height:375px; padding: 25px 0px; }
.app-container {
border: 1px dotted;
padding: 30px;
margin: 0 auto;
min-height:300px;
width:775px;
background-color:#FDF3E7;
overflow:hidden;
}
footer {
height:100%;
border-top: 1px dashed #FDF3E7;
background-color:#250800;
text-align:left;
}
.footerwrapper { border-bottom: 1px dotted #3B3738;padding:50px;min-height:200px; background-color:#220a03; margin: 0 auto; }
Would be nice if someone could help me. I agree that the CSS code is a little bit messy, and that's perhaps the problem.
You needed to move .wrapperbackground to be before .app-container so it is no longer wrapping it. Then on '.wrapperbackground' apply:
position: absolute; top: 0; right: 0; left: 0; height: 200px;
Then on .wrapper apply position: relative; for good measure and more portability.
See this updated fiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/p57rK/1/
Container #666 has margin: 20px; overflow: hidden;.
Nodes #333 have margin: 20px 0 0 20px; float: left;.
Example, http://jsbin.com/owejal/3/edit or picture:
However, the intended result is:
container with 20px margin,
children with 20px margin in-between, but not with the container.
This could be achieved using negative padding (i.e. if container had padding: -20px 0 0 -20px), though such thing does not exist.
The desired result can be achieved using additional element (http://jsbin.com/owejal/4/), though I am keen to learn whether there is CSS only solution.
If you only care about the spacing between the elements, you can discard the pseudo element. It's only there for the background.
http://codepen.io/cimmanon/pen/mucDv
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="group">
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
</div>
<div class="foo"></div>
The CSS:
.group {
overflow: hidden;
margin: -10px 0 -10px 10px;
padding-right: 10px;
position: relative;
}
.group:before {
display: block;
content: '';
position: absolute;
z-index: -1;
top: 10px;
right: 20px; /* 20px instead of 10px due to padding */
bottom: 10px;
left: 10px;
background: #666;
}
.node {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
float: left;
background: #333;
margin: 10px;
}
.foo {
height: 20px;
background: #00f;
margin: 20px;
}
This is a little hacky, but how about just hiding the top and left margin areas with some strategically placed pseudo-elements?
http://jsfiddle.net/SUJtd/
.foo {height:20px; background:#00f; margin:20px 20px 0;}
.group {overflow:hidden; margin:0 20px 20px 0; background:#666; position:relative;}
.group:before{content:""; position:absolute; top:0; left:0; right:0; height:20px; background:#fff;}
.group:after{content:""; position:absolute; top:0; bottom:0; left:0; width:20px; background:#fff;}
.node {width:100px; height:100px; float:left; background:#333; margin:20px 0 0 20px;}
No extra HTML tag - but a class change & No Pseudo elements
A simple trick which probably should work for you :
http://jsbin.com/owejal/65/edit
Screenshot:
Will work with all possible number of nodes :)
<div class="foo"></div>
<div class="group">
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
<div class="node"></div>
</div>
<div class="foo2"></div>
CSS:
.group { overflow: hidden; margin: 20px; margin-bottom:0px; /* margin is required */ background: #666; }
.node { width: 100px; height: 100px; float: left; background: #333; margin: 0px 20px 20px 0px; /* there must 20px gap between every node, but not the container */ }
.foo { height: 20px; background: #00f; margin: 20px;}
.foo2{
height:20px;
background:#00f;
border-top:20px solid white;
margin:20px;
margin-top:-20px;
}
Since you didn't mention resizability as requirement, you could simple use a nth child declaration like in here:
http://jsbin.com/owejal/51/
However, this solution is optimized for fixed widths of parent container, so there should always be 4 elements in a row for example. Nevertheless, its css only.
Change the margin of the node to:
.node { margin: 0 20px 20px 0; }
See http://jsbin.com/owejal/52/edit. Note that this will still give you extra padding at the bottom, but this is a common issue that isn't easily solved. See http://css-tricks.com/spacing-the-bottom-of-modules/ for various ways to solve this (though in the case you presented, none of these solutions work).
The following CSS will get you the desired result, actually you will still have 2 limitations:
If you change the background of body, you need to update the border color for element .foo
The inner nodes still have right margin, this is also the case your desired result screen shot (.group can have 5 nodes, but in this solution it will only have 4).
.group {
overflow: hidden;
margin: 20px; /* margin is required */
background: #666;
}
.node {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
float: left;
background: #333;
margin: 0px 20px 20px 0px;
}
.foo {
height: 20px;
background: #00f;
margin: 20px;
}
.group + .foo {
height: 20px;
background: #00f;
margin: 20px;
position: relative;
top:-40px;
border-top: 20px solid #fff;
}
You can still find the solution here
I have a facebook app and I am working on the front-end now. I am just getting started with css and html, so this might be a silly question- sorry for that.
What I am trying to do is to divide the page in two sections. I've created two divs for that, but the problem is the way they are positioned. My code is the following:
<style>
.choose_div{
width: 20%;
height: auto;
padding: 1px;
left: 0px;
border: 2px;
}
.frame_div{
right:0px;
height: auto;
width: 80%;
border: 2px 2px 2px 2px;
position: relative;
}
</style>
<div id="choose_div">
<ul>
<li class="li_choose">
<div class="li_div">
<p>Save</p>
<img src="arrow.jpg" id="arrow_save" style="width:10%;height:10%">
<hr>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="frame_div">
<iframe id="frame_opened">
</div>
I thought that right:0px; for one and left:0px;for the other would position them properly, but they are just one at the bottom of the other.
Can anyone please help with this?
This is the normal way to do what you ask, using float:left;. There were a few other issues with your styles though:
You were targetting .choose_div the class (.), not the id (#)
You need to use box-sizing:border-box when you're doing this otherwise the padding and border is added on top of width:20% making the width larger than 20%.
jsFiddle
#choose_div {
width: 20%;
height: auto;
padding: 1px;
border: 2px;
float:left;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
#frame_div {
height: auto;
width: 80%;
border: 2px 2px 2px 2px;
float:left;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
As for left and right, they can be used to align to a particular side of the screen if using position:absolute. position:relative simply shifts the element a particular amount, for example left:2px would shift the element 2 pixels to the left.
position:absolute positions the element on its closest ancestor that has a position of non-static. Then left/right/top/bottom can be used to indicate the sides of the ancestor.
for the div which to be shown write:
float:left
And for the right one:
float:right
<style>
#choose_div{
width: 20%;
height: auto;
padding: 1px;
left: 0px;
border: 2px;
float:left;
}
#frame_div{
float:right;
right:0px;
height: auto;
width: 80%;
border: 2px 2px 2px 2px;
position: relative;
}
</style>
If you add borders you must shrink your divs' witdh. Or they overflows the parent section and seen top-bottom.
<style>
html,body{margin:0;}
#choose_div{
display:block;
float:left;
width: auto;
height: 100%;
padding: 1px;
}
#frame_div{
float:right;
height: auto;
width: 80%;
height: 100%;
border: 2px 2px 2px 2px;
border-left:solid 2px #000000;
padding:10px;
overflow:hidden;
}
</style>
<body>
<div id="choose_div">
<ul>
<li class="li_choose">
<div class="li_div">
<p>Save</p>
<img src="arrow.jpg" id="arrow_save" style="width:10%;height:10%">
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="frame_div">
<iframe id="frame_opened">
</div>
Continuing my last question on this thread (Play button centred with different image/video sizes), I will open this one regarding to #Marc Audet request.
Basically I had this code:
.playBT{
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
z-index: 999;
top: 25%;
left: 25%;
margin-left: -25px;
margin-top: -25px;
}
However I can't use the example given by Marc on the last thread, because the play button doesn't work as expected when the video size changes...
Here is the code
You need to tweak your HTML a bit, here is one way of doing it:
<div id="video-panel">
<div id="video-container" class="video-js-box">
<div id="play" class="playBT"><img class="imgBT" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RnPjQOr3PSw/Teflrf1dTaI/AAAAAAAAAbc/zQbRMLQmUAY/s1600/player_play.png" /></div>
<video id="video1">
<source src="http://video-js.zencoder.com/oceans-clip.mp4"/>
</video>
</div>
<div id="video-controls">
<div id="footerplay"><img src="http://www.cssaddons.com/uploads/goruntulenme/jQueryPausePlay/images/play.png" /></div>
<div id="footerpause"><img src="http://www.cssaddons.com/uploads/goruntulenme/jQueryPausePlay/images/pause.png" /></div>
<div id="progressbar">
<div id="chart"></div>
<div id="seeker"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and the CSS is as follows:
#video-panel {
border: 4px solid blue;
padding: 4px 50px;
}
.video-js-box {
width: auto;
height: auto;
outline: 1px dotted blue;
position: relative;
display: block;
}
video {
outline: 1px dotted blue;
margin: 0 auto;
display: block;
}
#play {
position:absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
outline: 1px dotted red;
}
.imgBT{
width:50px;
height:50px;
vertical-align: bottom;
margin-left: -25px;
margin-top: -25px;
}
#video-controls {
outline: 1px solid red;
overflow: auto;
}
#footerplay {
float: left;
margin-left: 27px;
}
#footerpause {
float: left;
margin-left: 27px;
}
#progressbar {
float: left;
outline: 1px dotted black;
display: inline-block;
width: 200px;
height: 27px;
margin-left: 27px;
}
#footerplay img, #footerpause img{
height:27px;
}
Fiddle Reference: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/EnDHw/
Explanation & Details
User a wrapper div to keep everything tidy, video-panel, and use a separate div for the video video-container and for the controls video-controls.
The play button and the <video> element are positioned with respect to the video-container and note the negative margin trick to position the arrow button image.
The control elements can be positioned in their own div video-controls. I simply floated them to the left with a 27px left margin.
This should help you get started. The outlines and borders are for illustration only and are optional.
Good luck!