Alright, I understand that the purpose of a DIV is to contain its inner elements - I didn't want to upset anyone by saying otherwise. However, please consider the following scenario:
My web page (which only takes up a width of 70% of the entire page) is surrounded by a container (a div). However, under my navigation bar which is at the top of the page, I would like to create w banner that takes up 100% of the width of the entire page (which means it will have to extend outside the bounds of its container as the container is only taking up 70% of the page's width).
This is the basic idea that I am trying to accomplish: http://www.petersonassociates.biz/
Does anyone have any suggestions for how I could accomplish this? I'd appreciate any help.
Evan
If you just want the background of the element to extend across the whole page this can also be achieved with negative margins.
In a nutshell (correction from comment):
.bleed {
padding-left: 3000px;
margin-left: -3000px;
padding-right: 3000px;
margin-right: -3000px;
}
That gives you horizontal scroll bars which you remove with:
body {overflow-x: hidden; }
There is a guide at http://www.sitepoint.com/css-extend-full-width-bars/.
It might be more semantic to do this with psuedo elements: http://css-tricks.com/full-browser-width-bars/
EDIT (2019):
There is a new trick to get a full bleed using this CSS utility:
width: 100vw;
margin-left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
I guess all solutions are kind of outdated.
The easiest way to escape the bounds of an element is by adding:
margin-left: calc(~"-50vw + 50%");
margin-right: calc(~"-50vw + 50%");
discussion can be found here and here. There is also a nice solution for the upcoming grid-layouts.
If I understood correctly,
style="width: 100%; position:absolute;"
should achieve what you're going for.
There are a couple of ways you could do this.
Absolute Positioning
Like others have suggested, if you give the element that you want to stretch across the page CSS properties of 100% width and absolute position, it will span the entire width of the page.
However, it will also be situated at the top of the page, probably obscuring your other content, which won't make room for your now 100% content. Absolute positioning removes the element from the document flow, so it will act as though your newly positioned content doesn't exist. Unless you're prepared to calculate exactly where your new element should be and make room for it, this is probably not the best way.
Images: you can also use a collection of images to get at what you want, but good luck updating it or making changes to the height of any part of your page, etc. Again, not great for maintainability.
Nested DIVs
This is how I would suggest you do it. Before we worry about any of the 100% width stuff, I'll first show you how to set up the 70% centered look.
<div class="header">
<div class="center">
// Header content
</div>
</div>
<div class="mainContent">
<div class="center">
// Main content
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
<div class="center">
// Footer content
</div>
</div>
With CSS like this:
.center {
width: 70%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
Now you have what appears to be a container around your centered content, when in reality each row of content moving down the page is made up of a containing div, with a semantic and descriptive class (like header, mainContent, etc.), with a "center" class inside of it.
With that set up, making the header appear to "break out of the container div" is as easy as:
.header {
background-color: navy;
}
And the color reaches to the edges of the page. If for some reason you want the content itself to stretch across the page, you could do:
.header .center {
width: auto;
}
And that style would override the .center style, and make the header's content extend to the edges of the page.
Good luck!
The more semantically correct way of doing this is to put your header outside of your main container, avoiding the position:absolute.
Example:
<html>
<head>
<title>A title</title>
<style type="text/css">
.main-content {
width: 70%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<header><!-- Some header stuff --></header>
<section class="main-content"><!-- Content you already have that takes up 70% --></section>
<body>
</html>
The other method (keeping it in <section class="main-content">) is as you said, incorrect, as a div (or section) is supposed to contain elements, not have them extend out of bounds of their parent div/section. You'll also face problems in IE (I believe anything 7 or below, this might just be IE6 or less though) if your child div extends outside the parent div.
Related
For a webpage grid-layout I decided to use Flexbox. Now I wanted to implement some "auto-functionality", so that grid-boxes can later be inserted without the need to add classes or styles in the HTML. One of this features is to make a box allways be 75% as tall as it is wide - even if the box is resized by, for example, browserwindow resize. Off course, if the boxes content extends the 75%-height, it should (and only then should) increase its height to fit the content. I searched for hours to find a suitable solution, but I finally got it working. So I thought at least, until I added content to the box.
The auto aspect-ratio works fine, as long as the box is empty. If I add content, the 75% of the width is allways added to the height it has through extension by its content. I made a jsfiddle to clearly visualize the problem:
JSFiddle wd5s9vq0, visualizing the following Code:
HTML-Code:
<div class="container">
<div class="content-cell"></div>
<div class="content-cell"></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="content-cell">
This cell has an inreased height because of
it's content. The empty space below the
content is the 75% of the cells width.
</div>
<div class="content-cell"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 400px;
}
.content-cell {
flex: 1 1 0;
margin: 10px;
background-color: #ccc;
}
.content-cell::after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-top: 75%;
}
If I didn't knew it better, it looks like a floating-problem - but I think the ::before / ::after selector should add the block-element before the element it is used on and not inside it.
Does anyone has an idea on how to fix this problem?
This seems to be a very widespread problem on the internet, and most solutions you find are either about wrapping the content, absolute-positioning the content or a mixture of both. This has numerous and case-dependent downsides. After hours of playing around with the code, I finally found a combination of CSS proporties that work without the need to add any DOM or make the content absolute-positioned. This looks quit basic, and I am wondering why it took me so long and why you can't find it out there on the web.
The HTML:
<div class="mybox aspect-full">
This is text, that would normally extend the box downwards.
It is long, but not so long that it extends the intended aspect-ratio.
</div>
The CSS:
.mybox {
width: 200px;
}
.aspect-full::before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
float: left;
}
The only downside I could find is that the content of your cell must float. If you use clear on one of your child objects, it is positioned below the expander-block and you are back to the original problem. If you need to clear the floating of divs inside of these aspect-ratio-cells, you might consider to wrap them and keep the wrapper floatable.
Let´s say I have following mark up and CSS:
HTML:
<div id="Container">
<div id="Content">
[* some text *]
</div>
</div>
CSS:
#Container {
height: 400px;
overflow: scroll;
}
#Content {
height: 800px;
}
Obviously this set up invokes a scrollbar to possibly scroll down 400px. I created a jsFiddle for a better understanding.
Is there a way to jump to the second paragraph by CSS only?
I added a javascript command to demonstrate what I want to achieve. Just uncomment and run it.
There are two things that I have tried so far, but in both cases I was not able to scroll up anymore:
Setting the margin-top attribute of the inner div container to -180px
Setting the inner div container to position: absolute and top: -180px
Note: I do not care for the paragraph or any content. This is just an example. I want to jump to an arbitrary position.
Edit:
Anchor tags are not an option. I do not want to flood my mark up with unnecessary tags.
How about the humble 'a' tag?
jump to one
jump to two
<a name="one">this is one</a>
<a name="two">this is two</a>
Not with CSS, but with standard HTML/anchors.
http://jsfiddle.net/r6vn7/3/
paragraph 2
Give your paragraph an ID and use the URL hash to say where to go to. I used an anchor as an example how to make it jump to the second paragraph.
I having a hard time with my CSS min-height, I have two divs and they are side by said, if one of them expands, I would like the other to expand http://www.willruppelglass.com/
As you can see the leftSideBar stops expanding at its min-height and the content div is expanded past its min-height.
CSS
.leftSideBar{
background:url(../images/leftSide.jpg) repeat-y;
float:left;
margin-top: -49px;
min-height: 591px;
}
.contentWrapper{
background-color:#ebebeb;
width:1411px;
margin:0 auto;
position:relative;
}
.content{
background:#FFF;
width: 1100px;
margin:0 auto;
position:relative;
min-height: 591px;
}
HTML
<div class="contentWrapper">
<div class="content">
<div class="leftSideBar">
<img src="images/leftSideTop.jpg" width="170" height="78" border="0" />
</div><!--leftSideBar-->
</div><!--content-->
</div><!--contentWrapper-->
The reason this is happening is because the content in the content div is pushing past the minimum height but the left nav not actually having content has no reason to get bigger.
My suggestion, even though it is not strictly CSS, I would use a simple piece of jQuery (because I noticed you are already using it) that will dynamically adjust the CSS property of the left div to match the right div. The jQuery version is here:
var div_height = $("#content").height();
$(".leftsidebar").css("height":div_height);
Please note that I have used an ID on the content that doesn't exist in your existing code so you will need to assign an ID to that div to work.
I hope this helps.
You have the first area floating left. Whenever you use float it can act different in various browsers, so I avoid that sort of stuff at all costs for main elements.
If you want your divs to be independent of each other, don't nest them. Better yet, control the positioning yourself using css properties such as "display" and "position". Once you get your divs separated from interacting with each other you'll find you have much more control over them individually.
I'm creating a full screen (html, body {height: 100%}) web application and have a screen which has a form in the top (approximately) half, and some other information with two buttons in the bottom (approximately) half.
What I'm wanting to do (being a touch screen in an industrial environment) is to make these buttons as big as possible. So they have height: 50% inside the bottom container.
The question is: how do I get the top half to take the height it requires, and the bottom to take the rest? i.e. is it possible with CSS (2.1 preferably, but 3 is good too)?
There's no way to make an element in CSS 2.1 to take up the rest of the space vertically. Block elements, like Div tags, will automatically stretch out to fill a space horizontally, but won't do it height-wise. This means that you can't get something, like a content page or your buttons, to stretch out to fill rest of the empty space.
The best way to achieve something like this is with tricks, or knowing exactly how high each element will be. For instance, if you know the exact percentage that the other elements will be, you can hard-code a percentage into your stylesheet as described, here. Another trick would be by making the bottom element fill the entire window, and hiding the top half with the form.
Tables, however, are the only elements which will stretch to fill a vertical space. That might be the only solution available to you. An example of this is shown below:
<form ...>
<table id="container">
<tr><td id="top">Form elements go here</td></tr>
<tr><td>Buttons go here</td></tr>
</table>
</form>
And the CSS:
#container {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
#top {
height: 200px; /* Replace this with the appropriate height, or remove altogether. */
}
.buttons {
height: 100%; /* Used to stretch the buttons to fill the element. */
}
the HTML:
<div id="c">
<div id="topHalf"></div>
<div id="bottomHalf"></div>
</div>
the CSS:
#c {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
#topHalf, #bottomHalf {
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
background: #00f;
}
#bottomHalf {
background: #f00;
}
You can place your buttons inside the bottom half.
try something like this :-
<html style="height: 100%">
<head>
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body style="height: 100%">
<div id="top" style="background-color: #cccccc; height: 50%">form here</div>
<div id="bottom" style="background-color: #eeeeee; height:50%">buttons here</div>
</body>
essentially height:100% just tells the div to be as big as its parent, and this carries on up the chain of parent objects. you'll notice that if you remove the height:100% on the html tag that all the inner children will just collapse up.
hth
EDIT: I just realised this is appropriate if using tables. If using a div then it's a little harder... a JavaScript function to manipulate the height of the bottom element using the style property in the element. Have a look at this previous question that may help with the JavaScript
ORIGINAL ANSWER
Try putting in the CSS for the bottom half of the application
min-height:50%;
Then specify no height in the top half section.
This will mean the bottom half with the buttons will be at least 50% of the screen area being able to become bigger as required and the bottom half will take the remaining section.
Personally I make this a little smaller than what I expect to use, e.g. instead of 50% I may use 30%, this means I'm getting the most out of my screen real estate but it may not be appropriate in your app.
I hope this helps ;-)
I've used the last example on this page for equal height columns.
http://www.ejeliot.com/blog/61
The problem is, when you click an internal anchor link, the content is shifted up, and the overflow is making the top part of the page disappear.
For example, click this link
http://www.noosanativeplants.com.au/~new/articles/botany-words/
Then click a letter to jump to that section. You will notice what I am describing.
Is there a way to combat this, or is this a short coming of the technique? Do you recommend I use the background image technique for faux equal height columns? I'd rather not use this, as one page has a different background, and would require a bit of reworking to do the background for this page.
Thanks
I really recommend you to use the fail-safe faux columns method. If you are not a layout expert (no offence, seriously), stay away from the padding/margin/overflow magic and the one true layout technique. The latter is elegant but it can cause unwanted side-effects if you are to do heavy JS/DOM manipulations and all (see the problems listing).
As slink said you have two overflow: hidden rules in your css:
#main-container {
overflow:hidden;
}
And
#content {
overflow:hidden;
}
If you disable/remove these you will able to use your scrollbars again. Unfortunately the padding / negative margin "hack" will be visible. I recommend you to completely remove this solution and use faux columns. Faux columns background can be added to your #main-content or even the #content div (not just like the example in the ALA article that sets the background image to the body tag).
Good luck!
Update: Sorry, let me correct myself: to use faux columns in your case it is better to set the current background to the html element and the faux background to body element.
Assuming your equal height columns are the left menu and right content in that example, you could just use a margin-left property on the right-column and set the background colour of the container to the desired left-column colour. This would assume your right content always has a greater height than the left, but there are other ways round this.
#container {
width: 960px;
background-color: #000;
}
#menu {
float:left;
width: 240px;
}
#content {
float:right:
margin-left: 240px;
background-color: #fff;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="menu">
<ul>
<li>Home</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
stuff goes here
</div>
</div>
The problem is caused by two overflow: hidden; rules defined on elements #content and #main-contaniner.