To explain my problem, I'm trying to make a div wide enough to accommodate a dynamically generated title without wrapping it, but the div also has other content, which I want to wrap.
In other words:
CSS:
.box {
min-width:170px;
}
.box span.title {
font-size:24px;
white-space: nowrap;
}
.box span.text{
font-size:10px;
white-space: normal;
}
HTML:
<div class="box">
<span class="title">Title on one line</span><br />
<span class="text">This is the main body of text which I want to wrap as
required and have no effect on the width of the div.</span>
</div>
However, this is causing the div to expand to be wide enough to contain the main body of text on one line, which I want to wrap. I've tried various arrangements for CSS and the putting them all inside container divs and the like but I can't seem to get the box to be exactly wide enough to contain only the title without wrapping (but not less than the min width)
Is there any way to do this just in CSS? Note I don't want to set a max width as this just causes it to become a static size again, as the main body of text is always going to be enough to hit the max width. I also can't line break the body manually as it's dynamically generated.
Is this (jsFiddle) what you're trying to accomplish?
I just added display: table; to .box's CSS. This expands the main div to the width of the title span but wraps the text span.
Note: You can also set a constant width to prevent the div from expanding to the width of the window. This way it will still expand to the width of the title if it is larger than your constant width, but will not grow if the user drags out the window. In my example I added width: 100px; to demonstrate.
A working jQuery example:
http://jsfiddle.net/8AFcv/
$(function() {
$(".box").width($(".title").width());
})
For headlines you should use the <hN> tags (<h1>, <h2> etc).
For no text wrap:
white-space: nowrap;
On the element who's text you don't want to wrap.
Working Example on jsFiddle
If i understand your correctly you can easily set the same width for yours text as for yours title using JS or jQuery, for ex:
$('.text').width($('.title').width())
and run it at jQuery(document).ready or by event if you add it dynamically
Block elements such as divs extend as far as content pushes them, unless specified by explicit widths or heights.
A pure CSS solution for this is unlikely without setting a max-width on the div.
A pointer on CSS:
Don't include the tags in your selectors (i.e. tag.class) as you are then forced to use that tag with that class. Simply using .class will make it easier to change your markup (should you need to) as well as make your class extend its use to more than a single tag.
Related
Let's say I have a block element, such as an h2:
<h2>Title</h2>
And I give it a background color. The background will span the entire width of the wrapper (as it should).
If I float it, or position: absolute, it will 'shrink wrap' the words. However, both of these methods take the element out of the 'flow' and prevent it from pushing the rest of the content down the page.
I'd like to avoid having to add a clear underneath the title every time. Is there a better solution? I thought the overflow property could do it, but I'm not figuring it out.
fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/QxRRh/
Here's one (very simple) way ...
h2 {
display: table;
}
Fiddle
Wrap the header text in a <span> and apply the background color to that span.
HTML:
<h2><span class="blue">Title</span></h2>
CSS:
.blue{
background-color:blue;
}
There are my codes. (jsfiddle)
Why this part of my codes isn't running?
header{background-color: #2bd5ec;}
I want to add background color to header tag. What i need to do?
The issue here is that since the elements inside your header are floated, they're considered in a different flow than your header, and thus it doesn't resize to fit them.
One way to fix this is to append <div style = "clear: both;"></div> to your header; little demo: little link.
You can also just add overflow: hidden; to your header: another little link, or float it as well: yet another little link.
you can set Height for Header.
for example :
header{background-color: red; height:100px;}
and you can use "clear" like this :
<header>
<div id="info">
<h1>Oyunn.in</h1>
</div>
<div id="categories">
<p>Barbie - Benten - Senten</p>
</div>
<br clear="all"/>
</header>
and css:
header{background-color: #2bd5ec;}
#info{float: left;}
#info h1{font-size: 100%;margin: 0;}
#categories{float: right;}
#categories p{margin:0;}
use overflow:hidden
header{background-color: #2bd5ec; overflow:hidden;}
The overflow CSS property specifies whether to clip content, render scroll bars or display overflow content of a block-level element.
Using the overflow property with a value different than visible, its default, will create a new block formatting context. This is technically necessary as if a float would intersect with the scrolling element it would force to rewrap the content of the scrollable element around intruding floats. The rewrap would happen after each scroll step and would be lead to a far too slow scrolling experience. Note that, by programmatically setting scrollTop to the relevant HTML element, even when overflow has the hidden value an element may need to scroll.
The overflow declaration tells the browser what to do with content that doesn't fit in a box. This assumes the box has a height: if it doesn't, it becomes as high as necessary to contain its contents, and the overflow declaration is useless.
SEE DEMO
Add
header{background-color: #2bd5ec;width:100%; height:30px;}
Background attribute usually needs div's dimensions
actually you didn't clear your child floats so whenever we are using float so we should clear the floats and we can give overflow: hidden; in our parent div to clearing the child floated div's.
header {
background-color: #2BD5EC;
overflow: hidden;
}
see the demo:- http://jsfiddle.net/vE8rd/17/
So the problem is when you have a block of text, and an image that is slightly too tall that you want to place in-line with the text. For example, a smiley. It will cause the line height of that line of the paragraph to grow, making the block of text look ugly.
I've actually already come up with a solution, but it's messy and I don't like it... If I wrap the smiley in a relatively-positioned div, and give it an absolute position I get the effect that I'm after:
.holder{display:inline-block;position:relative;width:16px}
.holder img{position:absolute;top:-16px}
<span class="holder"><img src="/smiley.gif" height="16" width="16"></span>
But it adds extra markup. Is there any way to achieve this without adding extra HTML elements - a pure CSS solution (no javascript!)
I wonder if I'm missing some application of overflow/vertical-align/float/display etc?
Many thanks!
Depending on the desired image position and whether you have a fixed line-height in pixels you could set a maximum height on your image that equals your line-height and set vertical-align: bottom on the image so it fits exactly into your line.
See this fiddle for an example.
p {
line-height: 18px;
}
p img {
max-height: 18px;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
<p>Some text <img src="/smiley.gif"> more text.</p>
Set the image as a background of a DIV and give the DIV fixed dimensions.
<div class="smiley"></div>
CSS:
.smiley {
float:right; <-- or inline-block if you want.
background-image:url(../smiley.gif);
height:20px;
width:20px;
}
I'm currently working on a new project. I've got a div which acts as a container "container" and inside this there are two span tags; "label" and "buttons". The buttons span tag has two links inside of it and my css changes the a tag and styles it like a button (this is okay). The buttons span tag is told to float to the left, and has a set width of 182px.
The label span tag is where the text description goes (and is has a set height, and a background colour). Essentially it should look like this:
Label : [button1 : button2]
All on a single line. The square brackets represent the fixed width of 182px.
The problem I'm having is that I can't figure out how to make "Label" take up the remaining space.
Label can't be a fixed width because I want the same element to be able to be used regardless of the size of the container (this varies between pages). But when I set it to 100% it takes up the full line and pushes the buttons onto a new line.
Ideally I'd like to be able to use some css like "100% - 182px", but I know css doesn't support this. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I could do to get this working?
<div id="container">
<span id="label"><p>song title</p></span>
<span id="buttons"><img src="resources/images/fill.gif" width="1" height="1">edit<img src="resources/images/fill.gif" width="1" height="1">delete</span>
</div>
This can be done easily with block elements.
The #label element would automatically fill the full width (no need for width:100%). If you leave a margin at the right of the element, and let #buttons floating to the right, this will do exactly what you want.
#label {
display: block;
margin-right: 100px;
}
#buttons {
width: 100px;
float: right;
}
Try this here: http://jsfiddle.net/nPBak/1/
(notice that you have to move #label after #buttons)
I want to have a setup like this:
<div id="block">
<div class="btn">2</div>
<div class="btn">1235e</div>
<div class="btn">really long one</div>
</div>
jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/cutcopypaste/3uu5Q/
Where the btns and block div get their width based on the content. Just like it appears in the fiddle, except that the width of the btns are based on their text rather than their container
I cannot use a table because I need to be able to apply styling to get vastly different appearance, so I need the html markup to stay basically the same. If it's absolutely necessary I could apply some js.
I tried a couple different ways of displaying, but not sure how to acheive this. I don't wish to hard-code any widths as the content will be changing, and I need it to work in older versions of IE (though I can use libraries like IE9.js).
Here's an example of how the #block will be sized to be as wide as its longest button:
#block {
float: left;
}
.btn {
float: left;
clear: both;
}
The floated elements will expand only to their content's width. It's assuming you want each button on its own line.
If you want the buttons to flow together, remove the clear:both from the .btn rule. However if you do want them all on one line you'll have to be aware of float drop. This will happen if the widths of all your buttons added together is greater than the available width. In this case, the rightmost button will drop down below the other buttons.
Update: based on OP's comment, here's the CSS for a table cell style where #block and all .btn elements expand to the widest button's width:
#block {
display: inline-block;
}
.btn {
display: block;
}
Along with an example.
Where the btns and block div get their width based on the content.
I'm not 100% sure whether I get you right, but using display:inline elements like spans instead of <div>s should solve your problem.
make them float or inline, that way they won't act like blocks (wont be 100% width).