I'm trying to make a background following this example, but I need to nest 2 containers.
My code look something like:
XHTML:
<body>
<div id="background_shadow">
<div id="container">
<!--content-->
</div>
</div>
</body>
css:
#background_shadow{
margin:0 auto; /* center, not in IE5 */
height:100%;
height:auto !important; /* real browsers */
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
width: 876px;
padding: 0px 72px;
background: url("../images/background_shadow.png") repeat-y center;
}
#container{
width: 100%;
margin: auto;
background-image: url("../images/background.jpg") repeat-y;
height: 100%;
}
The problem is that the #container element isn't stretching with #background_shadow. Am I missing something? I would like to use nested container with 2 background image because one of them is transparent and if I use png instead of jpeg on the second image the filesize is too big (around 1Mo)
Here is what I'm getting
And what I would like
I guess that if there arn't any solution I will need to use a big png.
Thank you
For height: 100%; to work on an element, all parent elements need it, too (even html and body). So because of height: auto !important;, it doesn't work anymore in the #container child.
You can either remove the height: auto; or add #container { min-height: 100%; }. I just tested it in Opera 11 and apparently min-height works just as fine. Don't know about IE, though.
By the example you provided, your #background_shadow should have position: relative. That's going to allow it and it's children out of the restrictions of straight document flow.
Use Firebug to delete the footer from your example link - you'll see the div above it expand to fill the page even though it's content does not require the additional height.
Related
I am using a series of a div elements to display a set of client logos. The reason for using background images was to allow the images to be vertically and horizontally centered within the div, instead of a more hack-y solution using img elements.
The issue: I am using a fluid, responsive grid, so when the browser is below the max width (1000px), the div elements begin to shrink. This causes some of the client logos (the background images) to clip at the edges. This is a given. I would like to have these images begin to scale down when the hit the edges of the parent element.
background-size: contain partially solves this. The only drawback is that it also scales the background image's size above 100%, which is an issue. It stretches the logo which is not a good solution for me.
I could also just not use background-size, and have the client logos have a max-width set. This, however, causes the client list to go to extra rows for responsive layouts. I would like to avoid this, but to me this is the only working solution.
That being said, is there anyway to utilize the background-size without having it scale up? Or is there another way to approach this that would keep the images centered within their box?
Here's quick look at the code:
HTML
<div class="client"><div class="client1"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client2"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client3"></div></div>
CSS
.clientlist .client { width: 20%; height: 90px; float: left; } /* Five clients a row */
.clientlist .client div {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat; } /* Vertically centers background images */
.clientlist .client .bcs { background-image: url(../images/client-bcs.jpg); } /* bunch more like this to define image */
It doesn't look like this is possible yet.
Based on the syntax examples on https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/background-size#Syntax, you would think you could do something along the lines of "background-size: auto, auto, contain;" but it didn't play out that way in my initial testing on Chrome, FF and IE. They all seem to do fine with SVGs. Chrome and IE fail with PNGs. All of them fail with GIFs.
To me, it seems like this behavior we are looking for is spelled out pretty clearly on http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-background-size:
If both values are ‘auto’ then the intrinsic width and/or height of the image should be used, if any, the missing dimension (if any) behaving as ‘auto’ as described above. If the image has neither an intrinsic width nor an intrinsic height, its size is determined as for ‘contain’.
However, it doesn't play out that way so maybe I'm missing something.
I think that this is what your a re asking for
demo
The HTML is
<div class="clientlist">
<div class="client"><div class="client1"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client2"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client3"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client4"></div></div>
<div class="client"><div class="client5"></div></div>
<div class="push"></div>
</div>
And The CSS is
body, html {
height: 100%;
}
.clientlist {
text-align: justify;
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
}
.clientlist .client {
width: 18%;
height: 90px;
max-width: 200px;
display: inline-block;
}
.clientlist .client div {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-position: center center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
}
.push {
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 0px;
}
.client1 { background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/200/300); }
.client2 { background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/200/200); }
.client3 { background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/200/180); }
.client4 { background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/220/200); }
.client5 { background-image: url(http://placekitten.com/180/200); }
I am setting the max-width on the div, and not really in the background size; but I think that the result is the intended one.
To make the div space evenly, I use a trick using text-align: justify. For this to work; I need an extra element in the HTML that is the "push" class.
Say that i want to have a couple of divs on my page with images in the background (like this: http://www.ubudhanginggardens.com/). I know how to set the size of my divs, but the problem is that the background image stays the same if I make the web browser smaller... I want the background image to scale up/down with the web browser.
CSS
body, html {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
margin: 0px;
}
#container1 {
float: left;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
background-image: url(../img/1.png);
}
#container2 {
float: left;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;
background-image: url(../img/2.png);
}
This can be done with pure CSS and does not even require media queries.
To make the images flexible, simply add max-width:100% and height:auto. Image max-width:100% and height:auto works in IE7, but not in IE8 (yes, another weird IE bug). To fix this, you need to add width:auto\9 for IE8.
Source
CSS:
img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: auto\9; /* ie8 */
}
And if you want to enforce a fixed max width of the image, just place it inside a container, for example:
<div style="max-width:500px;">
<img src="..." />
</div>
jsFiddle example here. No javascript required. Works in latest versions of Chrome, Firefox and IE (which is all I've tested).
If you would like to have your image scale with your browser, set the width to a percent instead of defining it as a number of pixels.
So if you wanted the image to always cover half of a div:
<div class="my_div">
<img src="http://example.com"></img>
</div>
<style>
.my_div .image {
width:50%;
}
</style>
As you change your browser window size, the size of the image will change. You might want to take a look at Responsive CSS Frameworks, such as Twitter's Bootstrap, which can help you achieve exactly this behavior.
I created a <div> first thing in the <body> to draw a top line at the top of the page:
<body>
<div class="bordertop"></div>
.....
</body>
and the style:
body {
font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
-webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;
margin:0;
}
.bordertop {
background-image: url(../images/top_border.png);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
}
However, the top_border image doesn't appear unless I write some text inside the <div> but I don't want to. How could I fix this?
Since the div is empty, there's no content to push it "open" leaving the div to be 0px tall. Set explicit dimensions on the div and you should see the background image.
.bordertop
{
background-image: url(../images/top_border.png);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
height: 100px;
width: 100%; /* may not be necessary */
}
You might need to set the css width and height of your <div> element to whatever size you want
.bordertop {
background-image: url(../images/top_border.png);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
Give the div a height:1px. That should work. Otherwise your div is 0px high, meaning you won't see anything.
You could also give it padding-top:1px
Another thing you could do is to set the background-image of the line on the body in your CSS. This is assuming the line is the entire width of the body.
See demo
As the answers above me suggest ^^' it's because it has virtually no size, you need either to put content inside to resize it or to set width/height or padding in css bordertop class, or you can put another empty inside it with set size. I was going to skip this answer since there are already answers but I just wanted to add that width/height is not your only option.
On a side note, oh man, people here posting so fast I sometimes wonder if its a race and what is the prize, there must be some, I guess helping other is itself great prize. :) When I was starting to type this there was no answer yet.
The best way I have found is:
for landscape:
width:100%;
height:0;
padding-top:[ratio]%;
for portrait:
width:[ratio]%;
height:0;
padding-top:100%;
You need to determine which side is longer and accept this dimension as 100%
then calculate [ratio] - percentage of shorter dimension in relation to 100% longer dimension. Then use the one of solutions above.
I had the same problem for quite some time, my solution was giving the style lines of: min-height. This opens the div to the height given if there is no elements inside. The height can get bigger with the more elements inside, but not smaller.
Example code:
.fixed-bg {
/* The background image */
background-image: url("img_tree.gif");
/* Set a specified height, or the minimum height for the background image */
min-height: 500px;
/* Set background image to fixed (don't scroll along with the page) */
background-attachment: fixed;
/* Center the background image */
background-position: center;
/* Set the background image to no repeat */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
/* Scale the background image to be as large as possible */
background-size: cover;
}
code gotten from https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_background-attachment.asp
If it is the only div element in the body use the following style to to make it occupy the full-width.
.bordertop {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
background-image:
url('../images/top_border.png');
}
I couldn't get my background showing in the div even with the width set up. Turns out i had to put "../" in the url section then it showed the picture i was struggling for quite a while.
left {
width: 800px;
height: auto;
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
background-image: url("../img/loginpic.jpg");
background-size: cover;
border-top-left-radius: 4px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 4px;
background-color: crimson;
}
Otherwise, you can just open a <p></p> and in styles, remove the default margin length, that's margin: 0; and add height: 0.1px which doesn't consume much space, so it'll work.
Note: it'll work properly until it's not zoomed out more than 50%, so make sure of the use case before you apply it to the body.
I am looking to implement the opposite behaviour to the following question: CSS Push Div to bottom of page. I.e., when content overflows to the scrollbars, I would like the footer to be at the bottom of the page, like Stack Overflow.
I have a div with id="footer" and the following CSS:
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 30px;
width: 100%;
}
This moves the div to the bottom of the viewport - but the element stays there even when you scroll the page down, so it is no longer at the bottom.
How can I make sure the div stays at the bottom of the page's contents even when the content overflows? I'm not looking for fixed positioning, only for the element to be at the bottom of all content.
Image:
This is precisely what position: fixed was designed for:
#footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
Here's the fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/uw8f9/
Unfortunately you can't do this with out adding a little extra HTML and having one piece of CSS rely on another.
HTML
First you need to wrap your header,footer and #body into a #holder div:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
CSS
Then set height: 100% to html and body (actual body, not your #body div) to ensure you can set minimum height as a percentage on child elements.
Now set min-height: 100% on the #holder div so it fills the content of the screen and use position: absolute to sit the footer at the bottom of the #holder div.
Unfortunately, you have to apply padding-bottom to the #body div that is the same height as the footer to ensure that the footer does not sit above any content:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
Working example, short body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/
Working example, long body: http://jsfiddle.net/ELUGc/1/
Just worked out for another solution as above example have bug( somewhere error ) for me. Variation from the selected answer.
html,body {
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter {
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
/* Firefox */
min-height: -moz-calc(100% - 30px);
/* WebKit */
min-height: -webkit-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Opera */
min-height: -o-calc(100% - 30px);
/* Standard */
min-height: calc(100% - 30px);
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
position: relative;
}
for html layout
<body>
<div id="nonFooter">header,middle,left,right,etc</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</body>
Well this way don't support old browser however its acceptable for old browser to scrolldown 30px to view the footer
plunker
I realise it says not to use this for 'responding to other answers' but unfortunately I don't have enough rep to add a comment onto the appropriate answer (!) but ...
If you are having problems in asp.net with the answer from 'My Head Hurts' - you need to add 'height : 100%' to the main generated FORM tag as well as HTML and BODY tags in order for this to work.
You didn't close your ; after position: absolute.
Otherwise your above code would have worked perfectly!
#footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:30px;
width:100%;
}
I would comment if i could , but i have no permissions yet, so i will post a hint as an answer, for unexpected behavior on some android devices:
Position: Fixed only works in Android 2.1 thru 2.3 by using the following meta tag:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, user-scalable=no">.
see http://caniuse.com/#search=position
This is an intuitive solution using the viewport command that just sets the minimum height to the viewport height minus the footer height.
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#nonFooter{
min-height: calc(100vh - 30px)
}
#footer {
height:30px;
margin: 0;
clear: both;
width:100%;
}
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
(if needs element in whole display and left align)
left:0;
width: 100%;
I've solved a similar issue by putting all of my main content within an extra div tag (id="outer"). I've then moved the div tag with id="footer" outside of this last "outer" div tag.
I've used CSS to specify the height of "outer" and specified the width and height of "footer". I've also used CSS to specify the margin-left and margin-right of "footer" as auto. The result is that the footer sits firmly at the bottom of my page and scrolls with the page too (although, it's still appears inside the "outer" div, but happily outside of the main "content" div. which seems strange, but it's where I want it).
I just want to add - most of the other answers worked fine for me; however, it took a long time to get them working!
This is because setting height: 100% only picks up parent div's height!
So if your entire html (inside of the body) looks like the following:
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
Then the following will be fine:
html,body{
height: 100%
}
#holder{
min-height: 100%;
position:relative;
}
#body{
padding-bottom: 100px; /* height of footer */
}
footer{
height: 100px;
width:100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
...as "holder" will pick up it's height directly from "body".
Kudos to My Head Hurts, whose answer was the one I ended up getting to work!
However. If your html is more nested (because it's only an element of the full page, or it's within a certain column, etc) then you need to make sure every containing element also has height: 100% set on the div. Otherwise, the information on height will be lost between "body" and "holder".
E.g. the following, where I've added the "full height" class to every div to make sure the height gets all the way down to our header/body/footer elements:
<div class="full-height">
<div class="container full-height">
<div id="holder">
<header>.....</header>
<div id="body">....</div>
<footer>....</footer>
</div>
</div>
</div>
And remember to set height on full-height class in the css:
#full-height{
height: 100%;
}
That fixed my issues!
if you have a fixed height footer (for example 712px) you can do this with js like so:
var bgTop = 0;
window.addEventListener("resize",theResize);
function theResize(){
bgTop = winHeight - 712;
document.getElementById("bg").style.marginTop = bgTop+"px";
}
I hit my footer with a margin-top: auto and it did the trick! Im commenting this here just in case it could help any future visitors.
With HTML/CSS, how can I make an element that has a width and/or height that is 100% of it's parent element and still has proper padding or margins?
By "proper" I mean that if my parent element is 200px tall and I specify height = 100% with padding = 5px I would expect that I should get a 190px high element with border = 5px on all sides, nicely centered in the parent element.
Now, I know that that's not how the standard box model specifies it should work (although I'd like to know why, exactly...), so the obvious answer doesn't work:
#myDiv {
width: 100%
height: 100%;
padding: 5px;
}
But it would seem to me that there must be SOME way of reliably producing this effect for a parent of arbitrary size. Does anyone know of a way of accomplishing this (seemingly simple) task?
Oh, and for the record I'm not terribly interested in IE compatibility so that should (hopefully) make things a bit easier.
EDIT: Since an example was asked for, here's the simplest one I can think of:
<html style="height: 100%">
<body style="height: 100%">
<div style="background-color: black; height: 100%; padding: 25px"></div>
</body>
</html>
The challenge is then to get the black box to show up with a 25 pixel padding on all edges without the page growing big enough to require scrollbars.
I learned how to do these sort of things reading "PRO HTML and CSS Design Patterns". The display:block is the default display value for the div, but I like to make it explicit. The container has to be the right type; position attribute is fixed, relative, or absolute.
.stretchedToMargin {
display: block;
position:absolute;
height:auto;
bottom:0;
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
margin-top:20px;
margin-bottom:20px;
margin-right:80px;
margin-left:80px;
background-color: green;
}
<div class="stretchedToMargin">
Hello, world
</div>
Fiddle by Nooshu's comment
There is a new property in CSS3 that you can use to change the way the box model calculates width/height, it's called box-sizing.
By setting this property with the value "border-box" it makes whichever element you apply it to not stretch when you add a padding or border. If you define something with 100px width, and 10px padding, it will still be 100px wide.
box-sizing: border-box;
See here for browser support. It does not work for IE7 and lower, however, I believe that Dean Edward's IE7.js adds support for it. Enjoy :)
The solution is to NOT use height and width at all! Attach the inner box using top, left, right, bottom and then add margin.
.box {margin:8px; position:absolute; top:0; left:0; right:0; bottom:0}
<div class="box" style="background:black">
<div class="box" style="background:green">
<div class="box" style="background:lightblue">
This will show three nested boxes. Try resizing browser to see they remain nested properly.
</div>
</div>
</div>
The better way is with the calc() property. So, your case would look like:
#myDiv {
width: calc(100% - 10px);
height: calc(100% - 10px);
padding: 5px;
}
Simple, clean, no workarounds. Just make sure you don't forget the space between the values and the operator (eg (100%-5px) that will break the syntax. Enjoy!
According the w3c spec height refers to the height of the viewable area e.g. on a 1280x1024 pixel resolution monitor 100% height = 1024 pixels.
min-height refers to the total height of the page including content so on a page where the content is bigger than 1024px min-height:100% will stretch to include all of the content.
The other problem then is that padding and border are added to the height and width in most modern browsers except ie6(ie6 is actually quite logical but does not conform to the spec). This is called the box model. So if you specify
min-height: 100%;
padding: 5px;
It will actually give you 100% + 5px + 5px for the height. To get around this you need a wrapper container.
<style>
.FullHeight {
height: auto !important; /* ie 6 will ignore this */
height: 100%; /* ie 6 will use this instead of min-height */
min-height: 100%; /* ie 6 will ignore this */
}
.Padded {
padding: 5px;
}
</style>
<div class="FullHeight">
<div class="Padded">
Hello i am padded.
</div
</div>
1. Full height with padding
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 50px;
box-sizing: border-box;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
2. Full height with margin
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: calc(100vh - 100px);
margin: 50px;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
3. Full height with border
body {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
min-height: 100vh;
border: 50px solid pink;
box-sizing: border-box;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">Hello world.</div>
This is one of the outright idiocies of CSS - I have yet to understand the reasoning (if someone knows, pls. explain).
100% means 100% of the container height - to which any margins, borders and padding are added. So it is effectively impossible to get a container which fills it's parent and which has a margin, border, or padding.
Note also, setting height is notoriously inconsistent between browsers, too.
Another thing I've learned since I posted this is that the percentage is relative the container's length, that is, it's width, making a percentage even more worthless for height.
Nowadays, the vh and vw viewport units are more useful, but still not especially useful for anything other than the top-level containers.
Another solution is to use display:table which has a different box model behaviour.
You can set a height and width to the parent and add padding without expanding it. The child has 100% height and width minus the paddings.
JSBIN
Another option would be to use box-sizing propperty. Only problem with both would be they dont work in IE7.
Another solution: You can use percentage units for margins as well as sizes. For example:
.fullWidthPlusMargin {
width: 98%;
margin: 1%;
}
The main issue here is that the margins will increase/decrease slightly with the size of the parent element. Presumably the functionality you would prefer is for the margins to stay constant and the child element to grow/shrink to fill changes in spacing. So, depending on how tight you need your display to be, that could be problematic. (I'd also go for a smaller margin, like 0.3%).
A solution with flexbox (working on IE11): (or view on jsfiddle)
<html>
<style>
html, body {
height: 100%; /* fix for IE11, not needed for chrome/ff */
margin: 0; /* CSS-reset for chrome */
}
</style>
<body style="display: flex;">
<div style="background-color: black; flex: 1; margin: 25px;"></div>
</body>
</html>
(The CSS-reset is not necessarily important for the actual problem.)
The important part is flex: 1 (In combination with display: flex at the parent). Funnily enough, the most plausible explanation I know for how the Flex property works comes from a react-native documentation, so I refer to it anyway:
(...) flex: 1, which tells a component to fill all available space, shared evenly amongst other components with the same parent
To add -webkit and -moz would be more appropriate
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
Frank's example confused me a bit - it didn't work in my case because I didn't understand positioning well enough yet. It's important to note that the parent container element needs to have a non-static position (he mentioned this but I overlooked it, and it wasn't in his example).
Here's an example where the child - given padding and a border - uses absolute positioning to fill the parent 100%. The parent uses relative positioning in order to provide a point of reference for the child's position while remaining in the normal flow - the next element "more-content" is not affected:
#box {
position: relative;
height: 300px;
width: 600px;
}
#box p {
position: absolute;
border-style: dashed;
padding: 1em;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
<div id="box">
<p>100% height and width!</p>
</div>
<div id="more-content">
</div>
A useful link for quickly learning CSS positioning
This is the default behavior of display: block The fastest way that you can fix it in 2020 is to set display: 'flex' of parent element and padding e.g. 20px then all its children will have 100% height relative to its height.
Border around div, rather than page body margin
Another solution - I just wanted a simple border around the edge of my page, and I wanted 100% height when the content was smaller than that.
Border-box didn't work, and the fixed positioning seemed wrong for such a simple need.
I ended up adding a border to my container, instead of relying on the margin of the body of the page - it looks like this :
body, html {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
border: 8px solid #564333;
}
<style type="text/css">
.stretchedToMargin {
position:absolute;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
</style>