I recently start to learn CSS and table less design.
After reviewing some tutorials now I am involved with converting PSD Mockup to XHTML and CSS.
Most often my problem is to positioning elements and containers.
for example this below design:
I am converting this to CSS and HTML.
I have no problem with styling Input elements.
about main layout it seems two columns layout , right ?
How do I style containers ?
I wrote this code It displays better here.
I divided my page to two containers and valued (float:left) to left container.
As specified in jsFiddle link elements on the left side container had come out of the box (I think its because of float).
I can't set containers position to absolute.
Now please help me to refactor and change my code. And please explain to me how to position elements right ?
i think a
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
before the </div> of the container will work.
edit:
http://jsfiddle.net/xNwAc/5/
Try and have a wrapping element to contain your two columns. with W3C code, you'll want to use floated elements. The elements don't have any padding, you can work on them yourself, but it's a very basic structure to follow:
The CSS:
#wrapper { width: 960px; margin: 0 auto; background: blue; } /* positions it center of page */
#left { float: left; width: 50%; background: red;}
#right { float: right; width: 50%; background: green;}
The HTML:
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="left"> Left content </div>
<div id="right"> Right content </div>
</div>
You have to set a new formating context on the container, with overflow:auto; eg.
I sugger you to read the specification which is very clear and useful.
As the exclamation point is not a part of the content you can place it as a background image.
Related
For a webpage grid-layout I decided to use Flexbox. Now I wanted to implement some "auto-functionality", so that grid-boxes can later be inserted without the need to add classes or styles in the HTML. One of this features is to make a box allways be 75% as tall as it is wide - even if the box is resized by, for example, browserwindow resize. Off course, if the boxes content extends the 75%-height, it should (and only then should) increase its height to fit the content. I searched for hours to find a suitable solution, but I finally got it working. So I thought at least, until I added content to the box.
The auto aspect-ratio works fine, as long as the box is empty. If I add content, the 75% of the width is allways added to the height it has through extension by its content. I made a jsfiddle to clearly visualize the problem:
JSFiddle wd5s9vq0, visualizing the following Code:
HTML-Code:
<div class="container">
<div class="content-cell"></div>
<div class="content-cell"></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="content-cell">
This cell has an inreased height because of
it's content. The empty space below the
content is the 75% of the cells width.
</div>
<div class="content-cell"></div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: flex;
width: 400px;
}
.content-cell {
flex: 1 1 0;
margin: 10px;
background-color: #ccc;
}
.content-cell::after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-top: 75%;
}
If I didn't knew it better, it looks like a floating-problem - but I think the ::before / ::after selector should add the block-element before the element it is used on and not inside it.
Does anyone has an idea on how to fix this problem?
This seems to be a very widespread problem on the internet, and most solutions you find are either about wrapping the content, absolute-positioning the content or a mixture of both. This has numerous and case-dependent downsides. After hours of playing around with the code, I finally found a combination of CSS proporties that work without the need to add any DOM or make the content absolute-positioned. This looks quit basic, and I am wondering why it took me so long and why you can't find it out there on the web.
The HTML:
<div class="mybox aspect-full">
This is text, that would normally extend the box downwards.
It is long, but not so long that it extends the intended aspect-ratio.
</div>
The CSS:
.mybox {
width: 200px;
}
.aspect-full::before {
content: '';
display: block;
padding-top: 100%;
float: left;
}
The only downside I could find is that the content of your cell must float. If you use clear on one of your child objects, it is positioned below the expander-block and you are back to the original problem. If you need to clear the floating of divs inside of these aspect-ratio-cells, you might consider to wrap them and keep the wrapper floatable.
I'm in the process of taking out tables from an entire site, and switching them to CSS Div's.
Here's the link of the first one I'm trying:
http://www.torelloengineers.com/legal_investigations.html
The problem is the content to the right is being put below the picture to the left, rather than being right next to it.
I created this in my CSS file: a container, row, and left, right, and middle for the table cells. I couldn't paste it exactly here because the text box wasn't allowing formatted code.
<div id="row">
<div id="left">
<h4><img src="picts/torello-safety-design.jpg" width="400" height="301"></h4>
</div>
<div id="right">
<h4>Lacking Good Safety Design - Missing Guardrail. Plainville, CT</h4>
<p>While returning to her parked vehicle after using an ATM.... </p>
</div>
</div>
I "dived" the content I wanted as left and right on the main page to where I wanted it, but the right content won't line up with the left.
I didn't see a CSS file that had the IDs #left and #right in it. Are the ids #left and #right floated left and/or right?
#left {
float: left;
}
#right {
float: right;
}
You might want to change those to classes too, just to make it easier to reuse them. :)
Try position:absolute or position:relative
<div id="right"> is formatted as a table cell. Check the vertical alignment for the text - vertical-align:baseline. Personally I would remove the table cell formatting and use a regular div.
Do this:
#left {width: 50%; display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;}
#right {width: 50%; display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;}
Adjust widths to your liking. Floats allow content to wrap around them, so they're an option as well.
While you're in there, change
"Here's a few examples of past work we have done for attorney's:"
to
"Here're a few examples of past work we have done for attorneys:"
I'm trying to convert my site from using tables to just using css and divs but I'm running into a lot of problems with trying to figure how to exactly do it, I've been looking for tutorials on centering a site with css and how to put divs side by side but I can't really find one that does both and I keep getting confused by how to exactly achieve this, I asked around a bit and I got told to use absolute positioning but still I can't really wrap my head around this.
So basically how would I arrange the 2 central div side by side while keeping the whole thing centered in the browser? The following image is the layout I'm trying to achieve:
the blue boxes are eventual other stuff I might want to put in them, such as a blog requiring again the use of side by side divs.
right now I have the following layout:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="banner"> banner </div>
<div id="navbar"> navigation links </div>
<div id="body"> stuff </div>
<div id="footer"> stuff </div>
</div>
General idea: http://jsfiddle.net/JjbJE/
A little specific but provide you a great adventure to learn HTML | CSS : http://jsfiddle.net/JjbJE/3/
float:left|right this property does the side by side trick
clear:both this property clear away the float property
Other things are pretty easy to learn, just head to W3Schools
First you need a main container to center everything. Then two separate divs. See the HTML below:
<div id="main">
<div class="box">Left Box</div>
<div class="box">Right Box</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
Here is the CSS you will need:
#main{
width:960px;
margin:0 auto;
}
.box{
width:450px;
float:left;
border:solid 1px #000000;
}
.clear{
clear:both;
}
Hope that helps.
Here's my general overview on converting to a CSS based layout - if you have a table based layout, this is a good plan - in the end you can do more, Google will like you more, and it's much cooler.
My strategy is to look at all the groups of things on your page. Whatever needs to go into a group together, put inside a div. Assign this div a class and/or id to style it. If the divs are grouped, put them together in a div too.
In your case, you have two chunks of content to group inside of divs. Style them to be the size and shape you like, background, border, whatever is needed. Then group them together in an additional div, and center it. This and the rest of the page content can go inside a container div, which will determine the width of the page, how it's aligned, etc.
One possibility is to have a centered wrapper class and contain the divisons inside of that:
<div class="wrapper">
<header></header>
<div id="middle">
<div class="main-article clearfix"></div>
<aside></aside>
</div>
<footer></footer>
</div>
Then to style, center the wrapper, float the aside and main-article:
.wrapper { width: 1024px; margin: 0 auto; /* the auto centers it */ }
header, footer, aside, { display: block; }
.main-article { width: 50%; float: right; }
aside { width: 50%; float: left; }
.clearfix:before, .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; }
.clearfix:after { clear: both; }
.clearfix { *zoom: 1; }
Note: This is untested, and uses the clearfix from the HTML5 Boilerplate.
Update 01.22.2014: This "Holy Grail Layout" has ben solved by Flexbox. Check out Solved By Flexbox for more information on recreating this layout (and many more).
I having a hard time with my CSS min-height, I have two divs and they are side by said, if one of them expands, I would like the other to expand http://www.willruppelglass.com/
As you can see the leftSideBar stops expanding at its min-height and the content div is expanded past its min-height.
CSS
.leftSideBar{
background:url(../images/leftSide.jpg) repeat-y;
float:left;
margin-top: -49px;
min-height: 591px;
}
.contentWrapper{
background-color:#ebebeb;
width:1411px;
margin:0 auto;
position:relative;
}
.content{
background:#FFF;
width: 1100px;
margin:0 auto;
position:relative;
min-height: 591px;
}
HTML
<div class="contentWrapper">
<div class="content">
<div class="leftSideBar">
<img src="images/leftSideTop.jpg" width="170" height="78" border="0" />
</div><!--leftSideBar-->
</div><!--content-->
</div><!--contentWrapper-->
The reason this is happening is because the content in the content div is pushing past the minimum height but the left nav not actually having content has no reason to get bigger.
My suggestion, even though it is not strictly CSS, I would use a simple piece of jQuery (because I noticed you are already using it) that will dynamically adjust the CSS property of the left div to match the right div. The jQuery version is here:
var div_height = $("#content").height();
$(".leftsidebar").css("height":div_height);
Please note that I have used an ID on the content that doesn't exist in your existing code so you will need to assign an ID to that div to work.
I hope this helps.
You have the first area floating left. Whenever you use float it can act different in various browsers, so I avoid that sort of stuff at all costs for main elements.
If you want your divs to be independent of each other, don't nest them. Better yet, control the positioning yourself using css properties such as "display" and "position". Once you get your divs separated from interacting with each other you'll find you have much more control over them individually.
This question already has answers here:
How can I reorder my divs using only CSS?
(27 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
Given that the HTML
<div>
<div id="content1"> content 1</div>
<div id="content2"> content 2</div>
<div id="content3"> content 3</div>
</div>
render as
content 1
content 2
content 3
My question:
Is there a way to render it as below by using CSS only without changing the HTML part.
content 1
content 3
content 2
This can be done in browsers that support the CSS3 flexbox concept, particularly the property flexbox-order.
See here
However, support for this is only in current versions of most browsers still.
Edit Time moves on and the flexbox support improves..
This works for me:
http://tanalin.com/en/articles/css-block-order/
Example from this page:
HTML
<div id="example">
<div id="block-1">First</div>
<div id="block-2">Second</div>
<div id="block-3">Third</div>
</div>
CSS
#example {display: table; width: 100%; }
#block-1 {display: table-footer-group; } /* Will be displayed at the bottom of the pseudo-table */
#block-2 {display: table-row-group; } /* Will be displayed in the middle */
#block-3 {display: table-header-group; } /* Will be displayed at the top */
As stated there, this should work in most browsers. Check link for more info.
It might not exactly match what you're after, but take a look at this question:
CSS positioning div above another div when not in that order in the HTML
Basically, you'd have to use Javascript for it to be reliable in any way.
This is one of the classic use-cases for absolute positioning--to change rendering from source order. You need to know the dimensions of the divs to be able to do this reliably however, and if you don't javascript is your only recourse.
I was messing around in Firefox 3 with Firebug, and came up with the following:
<div>
<div id="content_1" style="height: 40px; width: 40px; background-color: rgb(255, 0, 0); margin-bottom: 40px;">1</div>
<div id="content_2" style="width: 40px; height: 40px; background-color: rgb(0, 255, 0); float: left;">2</div>
<div id="content_3" style="width: 40px; height: 40px; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 255); margin-top: -40px;">3</div>
</div>
It's not perfect, since you need to know the heights of each container, and apply that height value to the negative top margin of the last element, and the bottom margin of the first element.
Hope it helps, nd
I got it to work by doing this:
#content2 { position:relative;top:15px; }
#content3 { position:relative; top:-17px; }
but keep in mind that this will not work for you as soon as you have dynamic content. The reason I posted this example is that without knowing more specific things about your content I cannot give a better answer. However this approach ought to point you in the right direction as to using relative positioning.
One word answer: nope. Look into XSLT (XML Stylesheet Language Transforms), which is a language specifically geared towards manipulating XML.
If you know the height of each element then it is a simple case of vertical relative positioning to swap around the orders. If you don't know the heights then you either have to give them heights and allow the divs to get scroll bars if there is any overflow or calculate it all with JavaScript and add the relative positioning on-the-fly.
with jquery you can simply do:
$('#content2').insertAfter($('#content3'));
I don't think there's a way to do it with CSS, except to force fixed positioning of each of the divs and stack them that way.