When using the followin code to define a cck location:
$location = array(
'latitude' => "0.000000",
'longitude' => "0.000000",
'street' => "street is set",
'city' => "city is set",
'postal_code' => "post code set"
);
$newLocationID = location_save( $location );
All the information is created with the exception of the longitude and the latitude.
Can anyone tell me why and how I can solve this problem?
I had the same problem and this is how I solved it.
As the best documentation is a source code, I had a look into the location_save function and found out that location module tries to get the latitude and longitude by geocoding, using function _location_geo_logic.
This is default setting and when you have a look into the _location_geo_logic function you will notice, that this geocoding overwrites latitude and longitude keys in input array. However, this geocoding is only being done if the $inhibit_geocode variable is set to FALSE, so the only thing you have to do is add this key to the $location array:
$location['inhibit_geocode'] = TRUE;
For me it worked great, I hope so will for you.
Related
Been pulling my hair out over this for a day and exhausted my google foo. I have inherited a Silverstripe 3.4 site that we have upgraded to 4.4. But something odd has been going on with certain images after running MigrateFilesTask.
I think this is something to do with a file being attached to an unversioned objects that are accessed via ModelAdmin. But I have not been able to find a definitive solution.
Code for this object below. Problems experienced are under it.
<?php
use SilverStripe\Assets\Image;
use gorriecoe\Link\Models\Link;
use SilverStripe\Security\Member;
use SilverStripe\Control\Controller;
use SilverStripe\View\Parsers\URLSegmentFilter;
use SilverStripe\Forms\TextField;
use SilverStripe\Forms\FieldGroup;
use gorriecoe\LinkField\LinkField;
use SilverStripe\TagField\TagField;
use SilverStripe\ORM\DataObject;
use SilverStripe\SelectUpload\SelectUploadField;
class Person extends DataObject
{
private static $db = array(
'FirstName' => 'Varchar(128)',
'LastName' => 'Varchar(128)',
'Role' => 'Varchar(128)',
'DirectDialNumber' => 'Varchar(128)',
'Email' => 'Varchar(128)',
'CellphoneNumber' => 'Varchar(30)',
'DirectDial' => 'Varchar(30)',
'UrlSegment' => 'Varchar(255)',
'Blurb' => 'HTMLText',
'SortOrder' => 'Int'
);
private static $has_one = array(
'Image' => Image::class,
'Office' => 'Office',
'LinkedIn' => Link::class,
'Member' => Member::class
);
private static $many_many = array(
'Interests' => 'Section'
);
private static $belongs_many_many = array(
'ElementCollection' => 'ElementCollection'
);
static $sort_fields = array(
'FirstName' => 'First name',
'LastName' => 'Last name',
'Role' => 'Role'
);
private static $summary_fields = array(
'Name' => 'Name',
'Role' => 'Role',
'Office.Name' => 'Office'
);
private static $searchable_fields = array(
'FirstName',
'LastName',
'Role'
);
// For use with the ElementCollection
public static $templates = array(
'ElementPeople' => 'Default',
'ElementPeopleAlternative' => 'Alternative'
);
public function getCMSFields() {
$fields = parent::getCMSFields();
$fields->removeByName( ['SortOrder', 'ElementCollection', 'FirstName', 'LastName', 'Interests'] );
$firstname = TextField::create('FirstName', 'First name');
$lastname = TextField::create('LastName', 'Last name');
$fields->addFieldsToTab('Root.Main', FieldGroup::create($firstname, $lastname)->setTitle('Name')->setName('Name'), 'Role');
$image = UploadField::create('Image', 'Photo');
$image->setFolderName('Uploads/People');
$image->setCanSelectFolder(false);
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Main', $image);
$linkedin = LinkField::create('LinkedIn', 'LinkedIn', $this);
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Main', $linkedin);
$interests = TagField::create(
'Interests',
'Interests Tags',
Section::get(),
$this->Interests()
)->setShouldLazyLoad(true)
->setCanCreate(false);
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Main', $interests);
return $fields;
}
public function onBeforeWrite()
{
$count = 1;
$this->UrlSegment = $this->generateURLSegment();
while (!$this->validURLSegment()) {
$this->UrlSegment = preg_replace('/-[0-9]+$/', null, $this->UrlSegment) . '-' . $count;
$count++;
}
parent::onBeforeWrite();
}
}
Problem #1 is after running MigrateFileTask, ALL existing images attached to instances of this class get moved from /assets/Uploads/People to /assets/.protected/Uploads/People. The confusing part here is that there is one other class called Company that is structurally near identical, yet images for that remain in /assets/Uploads/Companies as expected.
Problem #2 is if I create a new Person object and attach an image, that image is in Draft, sitting in /assets/.protected/Uploads/People with no method of actually publishing it. Meanwhile, if I do the same with a Company object, the image is still in Draft, but I can see it in the CMS.
Can someone offer some guidance on the above? At this point I'd be happy to just be able for images to be published when the DO is and I'll manually go through every single Person record and hit save myself just to get this upgrade over the line.
You should be able to fix this issue by adding the image to your DataObejct's owns property. Basically add this:
private static $owns = [
'Image'
];
Basically owns tells a DataObject which objects to publish when it is saved:
More info in the docs: https://docs.silverstripe.org/en/4/developer_guides/model/versioning/#defining-ownership-between-related-versioned-dataobjects
The cause of issue #1 was found. Leaving this here in case it helps someone in future:
The database table File has a row for every File and Folder in the system. This table has a column called "CanViewType". It exists in both Silverstripe 3 and 4.
For the particular Folder that was causing trouble during the Migration process, I found it was the only one with that column set to "OnlyTheseUsers". The rest were set to "Inherit". This was the state of the table before the upgrade.
I'm unsure how or by what mechanism that row is ever changed, but the solution to problem #1 was to manually change that field to "Inherit" before running FileMigrationTask.
Issue #2 persists, but it looks like there are two very different issues here.
OK. So sorted problem #2 finally (see other answer for solution to #1), but it's put a massive dent in our confidence in Silverstripe and sparked a meeting here.
Code for future readers:
In your unversioned DataObject, add this. In this case, my file object is called "Image". If you had more than one file to publish on save, you would have to add one of these IF blocks for each.
public function onAfterWrite()
{
if ($this->Image()->exists() && !$this->Image()->isPublished()) {
$this->Image()->doPublish();
}
parent::onAfterWrite();
}
SIDENOTE:
This Object/File relationship really is a strange design choice. Are there actually any situations where you would want to attach a file or image to a data object and NOT publish that file at the same time as you save/publish the object/page? Developers even need to explicitly define that on Versioned objects using $owns - which I'm happy to bet that most developers have to add more times than NOT. Which should really tell a us something is around wrong way.
Adding an image to a CMS system shouldn't be hard. It should take reading basic docs at the most. Not Googling, deep API doc dives (which don't answer much) or posting on StackOverlfow (where no one really knows the answer) over three days. It's an image. A core function of the product.
I've been working with SS since v2.4 and seen all the hard lessons learned to get to v4. But this appears to be a textbook case of the simple being over-engineered.
I'm trying to setup a bbpress with extended user capabilities.
The problem
My goal is that users need to have different capabilities in each forum, i.e:
UserA can't access ForumW
UserA can only read topics and replies in ForumX
UserA can create topics and write replies in ForumY
UserA can moderate ForumZ
Plugins
These are the plugins I tried so far, but without success:
Ultimate Member, official 1.7 and the new 2.0 version
https://ultimatemember.com/
They claim that they're working on a groups extension for UltimateMember v2, which somehow looks promising, but as of now there's no release date and I still don't know if this extension is going to solve my problem.
itthinx Groups plugin
http://docs.itthinx.com/document/groups/
Allows me to assign multiple groups to users and forums, but there's still a catch.
First attempt
Since itthinx Groups plugin allows me to assign multiple groups to UserA, which is great, it's still not solving my issue.
So, I tried something like this:
ForumX has the following groups assigned: ForumX_readers, ForumX_writers, ForumX_moderators
UserA has the following groups assigned: ForumX_readers, ForumY_writers, ForumZ_moderators
But the problem is, since UserA belongs to groups that have publish_replies and moderate capabilities, he has full access to ForumX.
So what I need is an intersection of the forum-groups and the user-groups - which in this example is ForumX_readers.
The promising part, but...
I digged into the code of the plugin and found the line that handles the capabilities of the user based on his assigned groups and quickly tried to get the current forum groups, to implement the intersection.
Unfortunatelly I was not able to access the global $post, the $_GLOBALS['post'] nor the $_REQUEST[] variables in this part of code. Neither directly nor with an apply_filters() function, that I implemented into the part of the code myself.
UPDATE:
I was able to get the ID with get_posts() and the slug of the current forum/topic.
So, my question
Is there any solution to my first attempt, which I may have overseen?
If not, is there maybe any other plugin that can solve my problem that I'm not aware of?
Or is something like that even impossible in bbpress?
After some further research and trial & error, I finally figured it out.
First step to do is to set up the capabilities, which in my case look something like this.
In the plugins directory, there is the file core/class-groups-user.php. The init_cache() function retrieves the assigned groups to the user, and sets the according capabilities.
To not mess around to much with the core-plugin, I applied a filter to the $group_ids variable which can be found in line: 415.
foreach( $user_groups as $user_group ) {
$group_ids[] = Groups_Utility::id( $user_group->group_id );
}
// added this line
$group_ids = apply_filters('filter_user_group_ids', $group_ids);`
I then created a new plugin, which hooks into this filter.
add_filter('filter_user_group_ids', 'dnmc_filter_groups', 10, 1);
function dnmc_filter_groups($user_group_ids) {
$forum_id = dnmc_get_forum_id();
if(!$forum_id) return $user_group_ids;
$forum_group_ids = Groups_Post_Access::get_read_group_ids( $forum_id);
$user_restricted_forum_group_ids = array_intersect($user_group_ids, $forum_group_ids);
return $user_restricted_forum_group_ids;
}
function dnmc_get_forum_id() {
$args_topic = array(
'name' => basename( untrailingslashit( rtrim($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'], '/') ) ),
'post_type' => 'topic',
'post_status' => 'publish',
'numberposts' => 1
);
if($topic = get_posts($args_topic)) {
return $topic[0]->post_parent;
}
$args_forum = array(
'name' => basename( untrailingslashit( rtrim($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'], '/') ) ),
'post_type' => 'forum',
'post_status' => 'publish',
'numberposts' => 1
);
if($forum = get_posts($args_forum)) {
return $forum[0]->ID;
}
return false;
}
I’m using the woocommerce api for my application, i’ve created the keys and apis and it did work fine , it authenticate and return the data via the api .
It’s been two days that it doesn’t connect any more , I’ve made a new api key but the same result.
I get this message when I run the url :
{"errors":[{"code":"woocommerce_api_authentication_error","message":"\u06a9\u0644\u06cc\u062f \u06cc\u06a9 \u0645\u0646\u0638\u0648\u0631\u0647 \u0646\u0627\u0645\u0639\u062a\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u062a. \u06a9\u0644\u06cc\u062f \u0642\u0628\u0644\u0627 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0641\u0627\u062f\u0647 \u0634\u062f\u0647 \u0627\u0633\u062a."}]}
it says woocommerce_api_authentication_error , but I've created new keys and I'm sure the keys are correct .
can you help me . this is a sample code of mine :
$options = array(
‘debug’ => true,
‘return_as_array’ => false,
‘validate_url’ => false,
‘timeout’ => 30,
‘ssl_verify’ => false,
);
$client = new WC_API_Client(‘http://nodasht.com’,
“ck_4c25b06d7a9e507fbdeb06e338e20a2db1f7cc43”,
“cs_b89c9152510beb3cd915942cc4f33b91b720d62e”, $options);
$res = $client->products->get($row->ID);
$product = $res->product;
If you google bits of your message like this part \u06a9 you will be able to find out what the message is , thus know what the actual problem is.
I have the following code.
Login user and validation works, returns true.
The problem is seePageIs, it returns an error. But after posting the respons has to go to company lister page. So if i change the ->seePageIs('admin/company') to ->seePageIs('admin/company/create') it works.
What's wrong?
Error:
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
Expected :'http://localhost/admin/company'
Actual :'http://localhost/admin/company/create'
Test:
public function testExample()
{
$this->be(User::find(4));
$rules = array(
'companyname' => 'required',
'email' => 'required|email',
);
$data = [
'companyname' => 'aa',
'email' => 'aaaa#aa.nl']
;
$v = $this->app['validator']->make( $data, $rules);
$this->visit('admin/company/create')
->press('Create')
->assertTrue($v->passes())
->seePageIs('admin/company');
}
I'm not sure I understand your code very well and your question, but maybe it is this line:
$this->visit('admin/company/create')
->press('Create')
->assertTrue($v->passes())
->seePageIs('admin/company/create');
I just changed the line seePageIs() to add create at the end. Maybe that is the problem?
Try it.
If not, can you show your code for assertEquals(...)... Thanks!
EDIT #2
Hi there Bas; based on your comments and what I think you are trying to do:
If after creating the company, then you want to check it, then you probably need to do this instead:
$this->visit('admin/company')
->seePageIs('admin/company');
Which just goes to the company page an verifies that is the correct page.
I created the following token; however, when I try to use site:coupons as a data selector in a loop action
It does not appear in data selection browser. Note that it does appear as replacement pattern when i use for example "Show a message on the site" action.
I spent lot of time searching in the internet and rules' token' issue queue, i tried to read the source codes of core token , token and rules as well. I also found some information too like data selector are no tokens! or rules only works with entities!
So far i couldn't get this to work no matter hard i tried. My data is not entity. Is there anyway to integrate it with rules?
I couldn't find any official documentation on this so i created an issue with hope that some of the rule's experts can help me out.
Note : if i replace site with coupon-link in the following code, it won't even appear as replacement pattern in rules. but it works fine as token anywhere else but in rules
Thanks in advance
<?php
/**
* Implements hook_token_info().
*/
function coupon_link_token_info() {
$types['coupon-link'] = array(
'name' => t("Coupon link coupon info"),
'description' => t("Info about linked coupon via url."),
);
// Andy Pangus specific tokens.
$tokens['site']['coupon-code'] = array(
'name' => t("Coupon Link Coupon Code"),
'description' => t("The code of the coupon entered via url."),
);
$tokens['site']['coupon'] = array(
'name' => t("Coupon Link Coupon"),
'description' => t("The coupon entered via url."),
'type' => 'commerce_coupon'
);
$tokens['site']['coupons'] = array(
'name' => t("Coupon Link List Coupons"),
'description' => t("The coupons entered via url."),
'type' => 'array'
);
return array(
'types' => $types,
'tokens' => $tokens,
);
}
/**
* Implements hook_tokens().
*
* #ingroup token_example
*/
function coupon_link_tokens($type, $tokens, array $data = array(), array $options = array()) {
$replacements = array();
$sanitize = !empty($options['sanitize']);
// Text format tokens.
if ($type == 'site' && __coupon_link_get_coupon_code()) {
//$format = $data['format'];
foreach ($tokens as $name => $original) {
switch ($name) {
case 'coupon-code':
// Since {filter_format}.format is an integer and not user-entered
// text, it does not need to ever be sanitized.
$replacements[$original] = $sanitize ? filter_xss(__coupon_link_get_coupon_code()) : __coupon_link_get_coupon_code();
break;
case 'coupon':
// Since the format name is user-entered text, santize when requested.
$replacements[$original] = __coupon_link_get_coupon(__coupon_link_get_coupon_code());
break;
case 'coupons':
// Since the format name is user-entered text, santize when requested.
$replacements[$original] = array(__coupon_link_get_coupon(__coupon_link_get_coupon_code()));
break;
}
}
}
return $replacements;
}
?>
A few things.
Tokens are formatted as [type:token] as explained on the hook_token_info api page. For your example, it would be [coupon-link:coupon]. I'm not sure why you're appending your tokens to the site array, as your custom coupon token probably has nothing to do with sitewide tokens like *site_url* or *site_name*.
Because the types are machine names, you should change it to coupon_link as machine names with dashes are not Drupal standard.
If you truly get lost, I suggest also looking at the token example from the examples module.