I am creating a brand new projet with Visual Studio 2013, I choose Asp.Net MVC and the framework 4.5.1 The project is created, then, I do nothing else than F5 to start the default web page. Unfortunately, it produces a redirect to the login page which is redirecting into the login page too. Here is a short version of the url I have in the browser:
http://localhost:5285/Account/Login?ReturnUrl=%2FAccount%2FLogin%3FReturnUrl%3D%252FAccount%252FLogin%253FReturnUrl%253D%25252FAccount%25252FLogin%25253FReturnUrl%25253D%2525252FAccount%2525252FLogin%2525253FReturnUrl%2525253D%252525252FAccount%252525252FLogin%252525253FReturnUrl%252525253D%25252525252FAccount%25252525252FLogin%25252525253FReturnUrl%25252525253D%2525252525252FAccount%2525252525252FLogin%2525252525253FReturnUrl%2525252525253D%252525252525
I do not have any error in the Event Viewer. But in the screen I see :
"HTTP Error 404.15 - Not Found The request filtering module is
configured to deny a request where the query string is too long."
The website is running with the default setting in IIS Express. How can I fix this problem? I am guessing something is wrong with my Visual Studio 2013?
Edit
It works if I create a brand new website and I host it in IIS. But if I create a new website (without modifying anything) and just hit play (which start IIS Express by default), it doesn't.
Edit 2
I have deleted every websites in the Documents\IISExpress\config\applicationhost.config. I have recompiled everything, and it created this entry :
<siteDefaults>
<logFile logFormat="W3C" directory="%IIS_USER_HOME%\Logs" />
<traceFailedRequestsLogging directory="%IIS_USER_HOME%\TraceLogFiles" enabled="true" maxLogFileSizeKB="1024" />
</siteDefaults>
<applicationDefaults applicationPool="Clr4IntegratedAppPool" />
<virtualDirectoryDefaults allowSubDirConfig="true" />
</sites>
I am still getting the error with IIS Express, not with IIS.
Highlight the project in Visual Studio
Open the 'Properties' panel on the right (or press F4)
Set 'Windows Authentication' to 'Disabled'
Set 'Anonymous Authentication' to 'Enabled'
You are missing [AllowAnonymous] attribute on login action.
[AllowAnonymous]
public ActionResult Login(string returnUrl)
{
// code....
}
2nd possibility, specific to IIS Express only: is that, if you created same default WebApplication1 project multiple times, playing with different authentication settings, IIS Express stored additional authentication settings in it's configuration file. Something like:
<location path="WebApplication1">
<system.webServer>
<security>
<authentication>
<windowsAuthentication enabled="true" />
<anonymousAuthentication enabled="false" />
</authentication>
</security>
</system.webServer>
</location>
</configuration>
Configurations are in user's Documents folder Documents\IISExpress\config\, and you should look for:
applicationhost.config
Then just delete xml node <location path="WebApplication1"> mentioned above.
Update for VS 2015+
If you're using Visual Studio 2015 or higher, check this path for the config file:
$(solutionDir)\.vs\config\applicationhost.config
Each solution will have its own config file.
This issue is because of the authentication mode selected(by default) by the MVC 5 Template, which triggers the ReturnUrl Style of redirection that might lead to an infinite loop if not configured correctly.
To disable OWIN startup discovery,add this key to your webconfig file.
<add key="owin:AutomaticAppStartup" value="false"/>
I had to remove (Source Link):
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
</authorization>
I know I may be late, and this is not directly for the OP's question. But if anyone in the future come here, one more check about AllowAnonymous and Authorize attribute is that, you have to check all child actions too.
For example, I had my Layout (which the Login page also use) that call 2 child actions for breadcrumbs and sidebar, and they did not have AllowAnonymous attribute (the Controller had Authorize attribute).
Hope this help.
In IIS, Select you website and check for Authentication, If you are using Forms Authentication then -
Set 'Windows Authentication' to 'Disabled' ,
Set 'Anonymous Authentication' to 'Enabled'
Set 'Forms Authentication' to 'Enabled'
ASP.Net MVC 5 template adds Microsoft.Owin and related libraries to the project. Since Owin infrastructure doesn't require Forms Authentication, the template also introduces the following key in web.config.
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<remove name="FormsAuthentication" />
</modules>
</system.webServer>
Presence of this key could be a reason for undesirable looping back to Login page. Commenting it may help fix the problem for some people.
I faced the same problem because my MVC project was configured for .Net 4.5 but I was using .Net 4.0 as my application pool in IIS. Switched it to .Net 4.5 application pool and the problem was fixed. I hope this helps some one else!
TL:DR? Do not call a protected web API (any web API which requires Authorization) from an authorization page such as ~/Account/Login (which, by itself, does NOT do this.). If you do you will enter into an infinite redirect loop on the server-side.
Cause
I found that the culprit was, indirectly, AccountController::Authorize and the fact that AccountController is decorated with [Authorize].
The root cause was Sammy() being called from HomeViewModel() (Line 6 of home.viewmodel.js), which was accessing a "protected web API". This was being done for /Account/Login, which resulted in /Account/Login redirecting to itself.
Confirmation
You can confirm this is the cause of your problem through several methods:
Decorate AccountController::Authorize with [AllowAnonymous]
Comment out the Sammy() calls made during viewmodel construction.
Solution
The solution was to only emit the app bundle (a.k.a "~/bundles/app") for views which already required authorization. To my knowledge /Account/ views are classic MVC-based views, and are not part of the app datamodel/viewmodel, but I had mistakenly moved the bundle Scripts.Render(#"~/bundles/app") call into _Layout.cshtml (causing protected web API calls to be made for all MVC views, including /Account/.)
in my case: in my _layout.cshtml, i use Html.Action to call Action from Authorize Controller: ex: Html.Action("Count", "Product") -> loop error
fix: decorate by [AllowAnonymous] attribute in that Action (or remove these Html helper from _layout)
I just dealt with this issue for hours on end.
For me, it was in the Startup.Auth.cs file.
This code, when commented out, stopped the redirect loop.
app.UseCookieAuthentication(new CookieAuthenticationOptions
{
AuthenticationType = DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ApplicationCookie,
LoginPath = new PathString("/Account/Login")
});
Please be aware that this is potentially harmful advice, it's rarely a good idea to modify an applicationhost config file directly, there are usually tools that will do this for you, safely (for example, from within Visual Studio.) Before proceeding, be sure to create a backup copy of this file in the event your IIS Express becomes trashed.
To fix this problem, I took the default IIS configuration file located here :
C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\config\applicationHost.config
To my document
%userprofile%\documents\iisexpress\config\applicationhost.config
And it worked.
This was because I had some Windows Authentification set and not the anonymous account.
Make sure you have no actions in pipeline that have authorize attribute.
In my case, my layout had navigation menu controller which was missing allowAnonymous attribute.
I solved the same problem thanks to this accepted answer: ASP.NET Login Redirect Loop when user not in role.
It is possible that the controller containing Login action is decorated with an AuthorizeAttribute (even a custom one) while the login action is not decorated with AllowAnonymous attribute. Removing AuthorizeAttribute from the controller and adding AllowAnonymous to login action may be a possible solution.
These answers are more or less pieces of the same puzzle; I'll try to put everything in one place.
Problem that OP described hit my application the moment I implemented the OWIN pipeline and AspNET Identity.
So let's see how to fix it...
OWIN Startup
I guess you need it, because if you don't, then you don't need authentication, and I guess you do.
Except it you're using some old-style authentication, and I guess you don't.
So, don't remove either the OWIN startup attribute...
[assembly: OwinStartupAttribute(typeof(YourApp.Probably_App_Start.SomethingLikeAuthConfig))]
...or the configuration line...
<add key="owin:AppStartup" value="YourApp.Probably_App_Start.SomethingLikeAuthConfig" />
Access restriction on controllers
Now we cleared this up, you need the authentication. This means either each of your controller needs the [Authorize] attribute, or you can do the same to all controllers in one place by registering the thing globally (e.g. in RegisterGlobalFilters(), add line filter.Add(new AuthorizeAttribute())).
In the former case (when securing each controller separately) skip this part, just go to the next one.
In the latter case all of your controllers will be secured against unauthorized acces, so you need an entry point for that authorization - unprotected Login() action.
Just add...
[AllowAnonymous]
...and you should be good.
OWIN cookie configuration
When your user logs in, his browser stores encrypted (hopefully!) cookie in order to simplify things for the system. So, you need cookie - don't delete the line that says UseCookieAuthentication.
What you really have to do is turn off the IIS integrated authentication mechanism for your web application. This means switching off Windows Authentication (Disabled) and enable letting any user in, at least as long as IIS Express is now concerned, by setting Anonymous Authentication (Enabled).
When you start your web site, this will in turn copy these settings into IIS Express configuration (applicationhost.config), and there you should see these two lines:
<windowsAuthentication enabled="false" />
<anonymousAuthentication enabled="true" />
You might have the authorization config in your web.config that says deny users="?". It means the authorization subsystem is instructed to prevent anonymous users from entering.
With OWIN, this still works as designed. You either have to remove this, or make your anonymous user able to access the Login page by using something like...
<location path="Account/Login">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
HTH
I had similar issues where it was in an infinite loop when calling back to the website locally. It turns out that when debugging locally it was redirecting the ports. I updated port numbers in the project properties screen but left the Azure definition the same in the cloud project and everything started to work as expected.
I had the same issue with my Asp.Net MVC 4 project. I resolved it by going to Startup.cs and commenting out the line for ConfigureAuth(app)
public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)
{
//ConfigureAuth(app);
}
I also made sure that I had Windows Authentication enabled in IIS for my project, and all other authentication options disabled.
For me, this turned out to be caused by my LoginViewModel containing references to translation resources files, apparently being protected by authentication. I removed those references, and the problem was solved.
For me, removing the following block fixed it:
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
Assume
<authentication mode="None" />
in my case it was a very wired problem , i decorated the home controller by non existent role. so it causes a redirection loop.
Go to to your applicationhost.config file and set anonymousauthentication = "true"
<authentication>
<anonymousAuthentication enabled="true" userName="" />
<windowsAuthentication enabled="true">
<providers>
<add value="Negotiate" />
<add value="NTLM" />
</providers>
</windowsAuthentication>
</authentication>
I have published an ASP.NET MVC3 site. It runs great. However, looking back at my web.config file, I was not sure if some of the values I used are correct for publishing versus for developing. These configurations are in the <system.web> section.
...
<system.web>
<httpRuntime requestValidationMode="2.0" executionTimeout="200" maxRequestLength="20000000"/>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0">
...
I read here ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e1f13641.aspx ) that using debug=true in compilation will disregard the executionTimeout of 200, and use a default value of 110. This seems to be the case, and the site is setup to allow very large amounts of files to be uploaded all at once. However, with only 110 seconds, not much can be uploaded.
My question is this: Is the correct setting to publish a live site for debug "false"? In addition, is requestValidationMode="2.0" still safe to use considering asp.net is now on version 4 (soon to be 4.5)?
Validationmode 2.0 is not the framework version and can stay like that.
Put debug=false and you are fine.
requestValidationMode... As far as I'm aware, this has to be set to 2.0 if you want to allow special characters (<, >, % etc.) in request data to pass ASP.NET's request validation at all. requestValidationMode="2.0" means "only enforce validation on pages (i.e. .aspx), rather than on every request (as was introduced in 4.0). That allows ASP.NET MVC to take over the validation - and hence also lets you turn it off for specific requests.
Is it safe? It is, if you've made sure that any actions or controllers that have [ValidateInput(false)] applied or models with [AllowHtml] have been properly secured against attacks. Imran Baloch has a full explanation here.
And yes, debug should be "false" for several reasons, including performance and memory usage. Also, debug="true" changes the default cache policy for static files to never cache the files in the browser, meaning tons of redundant requests for scripts, CSS etc.
As for the image upload, other than the suggestions given, check in Event Viewer that it's not really the application pool recycling for one reason or other, rather than an execution timeout.
I added the following lines to Application_Start method in global.asax:
var provider = new TestVirtualPathProvider();
HostingEnvironment.RegisterVirtualPathProvider(provider);
Yet the 'TestVirtualPathProvider' is never used when deploying this application in IIS6 (it does in the ASP.NET Development Server).
Edit: the default path provider has always done its job correctly and served (non-embedded) views correctly. The problem is simply that I want to use my own path provider to provide embedded views. So, initially, I already had the following wildcard mapping configured:
Any possible reasons why this does not work in IIS6?
Are there any other factors (handlers for example) wich might influence the used VirtualPathProvider?
UPDATE: the fact that you want to handle extension-less URL's is an important point that's not mentioned in the question. Please see this page for help in setting up MVC with IIS 6: http://haacked.com/archive/2008/11/26/asp.net-mvc-on-iis-6-walkthrough.aspx. This should cover your scenario as well.
Most likely the same issue that I answered in this thread: http://forums.asp.net/t/995633.aspx
Basically, add this in your web.config:
<httpHandlers>
<add path="*" verb="GET,HEAD,POST" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" validate="true" />
</httpHandlers>
That other thread has some details that explain why this is necessary.
For the combination Custom VPP + IIS6 + Precompiled site, we need to add the VPP from AppInitailize();
public static class AppStart
{
public static void AppInitialize()
{
// code to be executed automatically by the framework
}
}
See also:
http://sunali.com/2008/01/09/virtualpathprovider-in-precompiled-web-sites/
I believe that you need to use an ISAPI filter in IIS6 to intercept URLs without extensions. Problem is that ISAPI will need to be done in c/c++.
IIS6 is configured to allow only certain extensions to be processed by the ASP.net pipeline.
To findout how you can redirct requests check out the post by DocV.
I am using freetextbox and have added to the web.config of my app but I still get the following error when submitting text with html:
A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client (ctl00_MainContent_FreeTextBox1="
I know this is not the preferred way to set up an app but why am I getting these errors even though I have turned off request validation in my app?
The short answer is you shouldn't be getting such an error if you turned off Request Validation.
Did you do one of these two things correctly?
Disable on the page by inserting this at the top of the ASPX
Add the below section to your web.config.
<configuration>
<system.web>
<pages validateRequest="false" />
</system.web>
</configuration>
If that doesn't work then check the machine.config and see if the pages validaterequest value is set to true in there as that would override the web.config.
I had the same problem, and it was actually my fault. Maybe you have done the same mistake: I placed <httpRuntime requestValidationMode="2.0"/> inside
<configuration><location><system.web> instead of <configuration><system.web>.
Ensure that you haven't enabled request validation for this page. I would keep validation running for your site - but turn it off on pages where you need this control.
Be sure to sanitize anything that gets posted and be prudent about security.
I would like to increase the httpRuntime executionTimeout for a subsection of an ASP.NET MVC application.
In a regular Web App, you could use:
<configuration>
<location path="UploadPage.aspx">
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="600"/>
</location>
</configuration>
However there really is not the idea of "Folders" in ASP.NET MVC, so how would I go about doing this?
Lets assume the ASP.NET MVC path is /Images/Upload with an ImagesController and Upload Action.
You can include the whole MVC path (controller and action) in the <location> tag's path attribute. Something like this should work:
<location path="Images/Upload">
<system.web>
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="600" />
</system.web>
</location>
Chris Hynes solution works! Just be sure to not include ~/ in your path.
This answer details another way - simply set the ScriptTimeout within your action code:
public ActionResult NoTimeout()
{
HttpContext.Server.ScriptTimeout = 60 * 10; // Ten minutes..
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000 * 60 * 5); // Five minutes..
return Content("NoTimeout complete", "text/plain"); // This will return..
}
If the action is in the default controller then home/upload does not work, you just put the action name.
I notice that you are specifically trying to increase the timeout on an upload page. I have had some success with a "chunking" uploader called plupload. A relatively simple MVC actions can be setup to receive the upload's chunks, appending each chunk as it is received. With the small chunks, you will not need to increase the timeout. Of course there might be some browser limitations, but n
http://plupload.com/
Take a look a AsyncController, if you use this, you will have the possibility to set a AsyncTimeout attribute on an action method, so you will be able to timeout a request.
Links that helped me:
http://forums.asp.net/p/1564303/3922462.aspx
http://dariosantarelli.wordpress.com/2010/10/16/asp-net-mvc-2-handling-timeouts-in-asynchronous-controllers/