I have a series of images (about a 100 or so) that have been resized so that they fit in a background box that is 130x130. The images are either 130 wide or 130 high. How do I style the image so that they appear in the middle of the 130px box.
This is the effect I want to achieve: http://i.imgur.com/LY1Ag.png
Here's another method that has two main differences: avoids the use of background images (the use of which is semantically weird as Nightfirecat mentioned) and puts the images within an unordered list. The latter isn't necessary but is arguably follows CSS best practices.
I haven't tested extensively but on recent Firefox, Chrome and IE for PC. I had to add a hack for IE7 based on this page's suggestions. That's the reason for the empty <span> for each list item.
CSS:
<style type="text/css">
#boxes {
list-style: none outside none;
margin: 0;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0;
}
#boxes li {
float: left;
border: 1px solid #333;
margin: 30px;
}
#boxes li div {
position: relative;
width: 130px;
height: 130px;
text-align: center;
display: block
}
#boxes li div img {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin: auto
}
</style>
<!--[if IE 7]>
<style type="text/css">
#boxes li div * {
vertical-align: middle;
}
#boxes li div img {
position: relative;
}
#boxes li div span {
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
}
</style>
<![endif]-->
HTML:
<ul id="boxes">
<li><div><span></span><img src="wide1.jpg"></div></li>
<li><div><span></span><img src="wide2.jpg"></div></li>
<li><div><span></span><img src="wide3.jpg"></div></li>
<li><div><span></span><img src="tall1.jpg"></div></li>
<li><div><span></span><img src="wide4.jpg"></div></li>
<li><div><span></span><img src="tall2.jpg"></div></li>
</ul>
Done quickly, so it's entirely possible that there are some bugs.
If you use them as backgrounds for a div, you're all set:
CSS:
div.box-images div {
float: left; /* has them left-align */
height: 130px;
width: 130px;
margin: 12px; /* gives them gutters in between */
background-position: 50% 50%; /* ensures they're centered */
background-repeat: no-repeat;
border: 2px solid #ccc;
}
HTML:
<div class='box-images'>
<div style='background-image: url(images/sample1.png);'></div>
<div style='background-image: url(images/sample2.png);'></div>
[etc.]
<br style='clear: both;' />
</div>
I personally wouldn't use background images.
I would, if possible, apply a class to each box that holds these image. the box would have set height and width as you mentioned.
Then, with jQuery or javascript, add a class depending on the images height or width. so if the width is 130px, add the class of top and bottom padding. If the image is 130 high, add the left and right padding class.
Hope this makes sense and helps you. Let me know if you need me to elaborate.
Although I only tested in fx, chrome and IE9 but you can use vertical-align: middle + line-height: 130px on the image like this:
css:
div.box {
width: 130px;
height: 130px;
text-align: center;
line-height: 130px;
}
div.box img {
vertical-align:middle;
}
html
<div class="box">
<img src="image1.jpg">
</div>
<div class="box">
<img src="image2.jpg">
</div>
I'm getting a little bit of a push though, when the image is the same height as the box. Anyone else know why? You can see it here: http://jsfiddle.net/9bu5Z/1/
Related
Basically I have a nested <div> as a footer and the parent div is centered 1000px wide.
I was wondering if it was possible to extend the width of footer div so that it goes out of the parent to fit the browsers width but still keeps its place in the parent?
My solution assumes that .parent element has stretched height. even if it is not the case, then it seems you want the .footer element stick to the bottom of the page. If it is so, then using position:absolute you can bring the child block out of the parent block and then pin it to bottom using bottom: 0px and then to stretch its width use left:0px and right: 0px.
Working Fiddle
UPDATED:
Use this Doctype declaration:
<!DOCTYPE html>
Also, in .footer element mention top:auto css property. Something like this:
.footer{
padding: 0px 15px;
height: 50px;
background-color: #1A1A1A;
position:absolute;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
right: 0px;
top: auto; /* added (IE FIX) */
}
Something that would work for you:
.parent{
width: 300px; /* your parent width */
}
.footer{
height: 50px; /* your footer height */
position:absolute;
left: 0px;
right: 0px;
}
Demo
You could set the footer position to relative and set the left property to -100px and width to 1200px for example.
Better still don't have it in the parent div, have it as it's own div with it's own values set.
Do like this
html
<div id="parent" class="wrap"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
css
.wrap{width: 1000px;}
#footer{width: 100%;}
Try this CSS.
#footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
width:100%;
}
Try this css this will definitely work as you want
html,body{
height: 100%;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
}
.parent{
width: 400px;/*put your width here*/
height: 100%;
background-color: #ccc;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.footer{
padding: 15px 0px;
height: 30px;
background-color: #000;
position:absolute;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
width:100%
}
If you really want to bypass the parent element, you could look into display:contents
https://css-tricks.com/get-ready-for-display-contents/
It really is a game changer if you need a div to wrap elements for some logic reason, but want the styling of all seperate elements.
Example without:
.main {
align-items: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
<div class="main">
<div class="title">
<h2>Foo</h2>
<span>Bar</span>
</div>
<button>shamefull_button</button>
</div>
Example with:
.main {
align-items: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
.title {
display: contents;
}
<div class="main">
<div class="title">
<h2>Foo</h2>
<span>Bar</span>
</div>
<button>shameless_button</button>
</div>
I'm trying to negative position a DIV element (in the example is #content), but my problem is the div's container (#wrapper2), gets too much height (actually is the height the #content is giving, but as I'm moving the content up, I would like to decrease the height of #wrapper2 accordingly).
Here I give you an example to show what I'm trying to achieve. If you try the sample, you'll see that footer stays at too many distance from container. I can make a dirty hack here and make footer top:-200px too but then the scroll bar of the window goes over the footer.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Relative positioning demo</title>
<style>
/* RESET STUFF */
html {
margin:0;
padding:0;
border:0;
}
body, div, p, h1 {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
}
/* END RESET */
h1 {
background-color: yellow;
}
p {
margin-bottom: 1em;
}
/* LAYOUT */
#wrapper1 {
text-align: center;
height: 250px;
background-color: lightgray;
}
#wrapper2 {
background-color: lightblue;
}
#content {
width: 950px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color: white;
padding: 5px;
height: 560px;
/* HERE's my problem */
position: relative;
top: -200px;
}
#footer {
background-color: black;
color: white;
height: 40px;
line-height: 40px;
text-align: center;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper1">
<h1>This is my heading</h1>
</div>
<div id="wrapper2">
<div id="content">
My content here
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
lorem ipsum
</div>
</body>
</html>
If you have any suggestions, keep in mind that I must see both, the lightgrey and lightblue background (they're images on my site), so margin-top: -200px is not an option (like someone suggested in related questions that I've searched for)
Thanks!
Change the top property to margin-top
Demo
position: relative;
top: -200px;
changed to
margin-top: -200px;
For future references, what I've finally done is to merge the images on the wrapper1 and wrapper 2 in the same image (they were background patterns), so I only have one wrapper now, and I don't need to relative position the content above the second one, it just goes following the page flow.
In the end I've understood that you can't delete the unwanted height without using some sort of Javascript.
In my html I have a div classed "footer". I want it to have a bg to #000 and occupy the full page width and left no white space after it.
I am currently using this CSS:
.footer {
color: #fff;
clear: both;
margin: 0em 0em 0em 0em;
padding: 0.75em 0.75em;
background: #000;
position: relative;
top: 490px;
border-top: 1px solid #000;
}
But the full page width isn't filled with this css code.
Any help? Thanks!
I use sticky footer: http://ryanfait.com/sticky-footer/
/*
Sticky Footer by Ryan Fait
http://ryanfait.com/
*/
* {
margin: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto -142px;
/* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
}
.footer,
.push {
height: 142px;
/* .push must be the same height as .footer */
}
<div class='wrapper'>
body goes here
<div class='push'></div>
</div>
<div class='footer'>Footer!</div>
Essentially, the wrapper is 100% height, with a negative margin the height of the footer ensuring the footer is always at the bottom without causing scroll.
This should accomplish your goal of having a 100% width footer and narrower body as well, because divs are block level elements, and their width is by default 100% of their parent. Keep in mind the footer here is not contained by the wrapper div.
you could make the footer div absolute to the page like this:
.footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:0px;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
background-color: #000;
height: 100px;/* or however high you would like */
}
I use a few DIV elements for each section of my webpages.
<div id="tplBody">
<div id="tplHeader">
...
</div>
<div id="tplContent">
...
</div>
<div id="tplFooter">
...
</div>
</div>
Each section is relatively positioned. Using wrapping DIVs, I can set the wrapper a specific width and the elements inside it can be 100% width.
I suggest you steer away from absolute positioning and floating, because they create compatibility issues so may not appear correctly on all browsers.
if you want that your footer be fixed on your page :
.footer{ position:fixed;}
but if you want your footer fixed end of page :
see that
I'm glad for the support you all provided, each one of these replies helped me somehow. I came to this code:
.footer {
height: 59px;
margin: 0 auto;
color: #fff;
clear: both;
padding: 2em 2em;
background: #000;
position: relative;
top: 508px;
}
Thanks!
This issue i have came cross when I started an web application using Bootstrap menu and fixed footer irrespective of browser resolution.
Use below styling for footer element
In-line style
External style sheet using class attribute in Div
<div class="footer"></div>
style.css
.footer
{
backgroud-color:black;
position:fixed;
bottom:0;
height:2%;
}
External style sheet using id attribute in Div
<div id="divfooter"></div>
style.css
#divfooter
{
backgroud-color:black;
position:fixed;
bottom:0;
height:2%;
}
You can use this styles in your CSS to achieve your goal
.footer{
background-color: #000;
min-width: 100%;
height: 100px;
bottom:0;
position: fixed;
}
If you are using bootstrap try with margin-left: -15px and margin-right:-15px but it will not be necessary in most cases when you have your own class.
html:
<div class="footer">
<p>
Some text comes here! © 2015 - 2017
</p>
</div>
css:
.footer {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
text-align: center;
background: rgb(59, 67, 79);
position: fixed;
bottom: 0%;
margin-top: 50%;
}
* {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
I was facing same issue and solved it with using jquery.
<body>
<div id="header" style="background-color: green">This is header</div>
<div id="main-body" style="background-color: red">This is body</div>
<div id="footer" style="background-color: grey">This is footer</div>
</body>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
if(($(document).height() - $("body").height()) > 0){
var main_body_height = $(document).height() - $("#footer").height() - $("#header").height()
$('#main-body').css('min-height', main_body_height+'px');
}
</script>
What I'm doing here is based on the Screen size of the User.
I'm increasing the main-body section height after subtracting the height of header and footer from it.
If the complete html body height is less then the user screen size then it will increase the main-body section height and automatically footer will reach the bottom of page.
I have a quick question about to how setup my basic fluid layout. I have one 40px high, and 100% wide header bar at the top, this looks great.
Then i have a #left and #right div, each floated respectively. This looks cool. They both have height 100% which works great but the issue is the page then scrolls 40px down, because there is the 40px from the header bar... if i use a fluid layout for the header and then the content box's it would look awful on a tiny or very large resolution.
Any ideas?
Here is my CSS
body
{
background: #ebebeb;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
min-width: 750px;
max-width: 1500px;
}
#wrap
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#header
{
background: #414141;
height: 40px;
width: 100%;
}
#sidebar
{
width: 30%;
background: #ebebeb;
height: 100%;
float: left;
}
#rightcontent
{
width: 70%;
background: #fff;
height: 100%;
float: right;
}
#footer
{
width: 100%;
background: #414141;
height: 40px;
clear: both;
}
And here is my html page:
<body>
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">
head
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
side
</div>
<div id="rightcontent">
right
</div>
<div id="footer">
footer
</div>
</div>
</body>
Does that help :)
height: 100%; is a tricky thing for web pages, as you are no doubt keenly aware. Looking at your code in Firefox 3.5.7 the #sidebar and #rightcontent columns only have only the height of about an em — just enough to hold the text you put in them, not the full page length I think you were hoping for. The columns are trying to calculate percent height from the explicit height of their parent, but #wrap also has a %-based height, which causes this to fail (at least in my Firefox).
Now, as you've described it (the columns being the right height, except for an extra 40px scroll) what seems to be happening is that whatever browser you're using is passing the full height of #wrap as 100% of it's parent, which is <body>. So naturally, when your columns are sized to the height of <body>, which also encloses the height of your header and footer, the columns are too tall.
A trick I've used a couple of times to achieve the full page length appearance of columns that scales appropriately to whatever page dimension is to stick a position: fixed; bottom: 0px; <div> tag at the bottom of my page with just enough markup inside it to mimic the structure and relevant CSS of the columns.
Here's what I did to your page to get this effect:
<!--Add this to your HTML-->
<div id='columnfooter'>
<div id='sidecont'></div>
<div id='rightcont'></div>
</div>
/* And modify your CSS like this */
#sidebar, div#sidecont {
width: 30%;
background: #ebebeb;
float: left;
}
#rightcontent, div#rightcont {
width: 70%;
background: #fff;
float: right;
}
div#rightcont, div#sidecont {
height:100%;
}
#footer {
width: 100%;
background: #414141;
height: 40px;
position: relative;
bottom: 0px;
}
div#columnfooter {
position: fixed;
z-index: -25;
bottom: 40px;
height: 100%;
background: #ebebeb;
width: 100%;
}
Yes, using the HTML to form empty background columns this way does kind of mix semantic and stylistic markup — a technical no-no. But the CSS is clearly abstracted from the HTML, and with this code I have full page columns, #footer at the bottom (even when more than a page of content is added to either column above it), and it behaves the same in the latest versions of Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome and IE8 at any resolution (tested down to 800x600).
Hope this helps!
I want the top lines of two DIVs (<div></div>) to be aligned horizontally, how to do it?
Steven,
In addition to T. Stone's suggestion to float both divs, a simple way to align two divs is to make both have the display: inline-block; CSS rule and give the lower div the vertical-align: top; CSS rule.
Take a look at this simple jsFiddle example to see how this works.
div {
display: inline-block;
}
div#tall {
height: 4em;
}
div#short {
height: 2em;
vertical-align: top;
}
In response to "is there another way to do it", sure you could use display: inline but you have a bunch of hacks to remember to get it to work in IE6/7. This way is generally better (but it all comes down to the individual circumstances)
<style type="text/css">
.keeper {
overflow: hidden; /* expand to contain floated children */
}
.keeper div {
width: 200px;
height: 30px;
float: left;
border-top: 1px solid red; /* so you can see the 'tops' */
}
</style>
<div class="keeper">
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
Float them in a container.
.parent div { float: left; width: 50%; }
<div class="parent">
<div>1</div>
<div>2</div>
</div>
Note: The sum of the width of the child divs can not be greater than 100% of the parent div, including margin and padding.
Alternative
If maintaining flow with the page isn't a requirement, and all that really matters is aligning, them, the divs can always be positioned absolutely.
.abs { position: absolute; top: 100px; width: 50px; }
.left { left: 0px; }
.right { left: 50px; }
<div class="abs left">1</div>
<div class="abs right">2</div>